PDA

View Full Version : Janet Rehnquist to Resign


subgenius
4th March 2003, 05:23 PM
Janet Rehnquist, the daughter of Chief Justice William Rehnquist (A Nixon appointee that Nixon once referred to as "Renchberg, or whatever that clown's name is-ed.), will resign as inspector general of the Health and Human Services Department after a controversial tenure, congressional sources said Tuesday.

Congress is investigating Rehnquist's work as internal watchdog of the agency, including her decision to delay an audit of Florida's pension fund at the request of Gov. Jeb Bush's office. Investigators also are looking at whether she forced out several top career staff members.

Her management also is under review by the Integrity Committee of the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency, a peer group of inspectors general. Rehnquist's job is to investigate fraud, waste and abuse at HHS, including Medicare fraud.

She reportedly said in her resignation letter that she wanted to spend more time with her family.

Rehnquist was appointed by President Bush in August 2001. The position is considered nonpartisan.

Investigators on the Senate Finance Committee have said they have heard about questionable practices from dozens of people who work for the HHS inspector general's office.

Specifically, congressional aides said they have heard from credible sources that Rehnquist had in her office an unloaded, service-issued 9 mm handgun, even though she is not licensed to carry it, as well as a poster of a target.
...

The issue (delaying the audit of Florida's pension fund-ed.) may have been politically perilous for Bush, the president's brother. The Florida Board of Administration, which runs the pension fund, has been under scrutiny because it invested and lost $300 million in the bankrupt energy company Enron. The federal audit focused on whether the state properly accounted for U.S. contributions to the pension program.

http://start.earthlink.net/newsarticle?cat=9&aid=D7PIJD6O0_story

Everyone please read the last paragraph carefully.
Investing other people's money in a corrupt orgaization that was the largest contributor to your brother's campaign.
I guess its not as bad as it sounds.
Guess there's really two topics here. Wacky Janet and Jivin Jeb.

corplinx
4th March 2003, 11:24 PM
Originally posted by subgenius
Investigators on the Senate Finance Committee have said they have heard about questionable practices from dozens of people who work for the HHS inspector general's office.

Specifically, congressional aides said they have heard from credible sources that Rehnquist had in her office an unloaded, service-issued 9 mm handgun, even though she is not licensed to carry it, as well as a poster of a target.


Unloaded? About as dangerous as a hammer. Of course, this is just hearsay for now. I think this shows the bias of the article writer. Including hearsay that makes her look like a wild out of control gun nut is a great way to load up the article.

As far as the allegation goes though, if she is dumb enough to let others see her firearm, she probably needs to be let go. Keep it hidden girl. A gun is the _only_ reasonable self defense an average woman has against the average rapist.

a_unique_person
5th March 2003, 03:26 AM
Originally posted by corplinx


Unloaded? About as dangerous as a hammer. Of course, this is just hearsay for now. I think this shows the bias of the article writer. Including hearsay that makes her look like a wild out of control gun nut is a great way to load up the article.

As far as the allegation goes though, if she is dumb enough to let others see her firearm, she probably needs to be let go. Keep it hidden girl. A gun is the _only_ reasonable self defense an average woman has against the average rapist.

average rapist? Considering most women are raped by someone they know, this person would also know they have a gun.

Smalso
5th March 2003, 04:23 AM
I think this shows the bias of the article writer.


Why do I get the idea that if the article had been about, oh, say, Janet Reno instead of Janet Rehnquist, it would be considered a painstakingly fair reporting of the facts?

subgenius
5th March 2003, 06:43 AM
because you've been following his postings

corplinx
5th March 2003, 11:19 AM
Originally posted by Smalso
I think this shows the bias of the article writer.


Why do I get the idea that if the article had been about, oh, say, Janet Reno instead of Janet Rehnquist, it would be considered a painstakingly fair reporting of the facts?

Bias is bias. I don't think you have ever read a post of mine where I took a worldnetdaily or newsmax article too seriously.