Trying not to derail the Date Rape Thread

[The Don]

We're spending a lot of time on one thread dealing with Rouser2's derailing tactics. I'm unwilling to let Rouser2's comments go unchallenged but I feel that they do tend to clog up the thread with a lot of "he said, she said" bullsh!t. Maybe this thread could be the one with no actual useful content but where these kinds of comments coulb be challenged

>>In view of this, the questions I would like to ask (and let us please ignore Rouser2 when he squeals that it's an infringement on natural or common law):


An "infringement on natural of common law"???? Your nitwittery has no bounds. I've never made any such nonsensical statement.


-- Rouser
I'm sorry, I misconstrued the statement.....

Not exactly. I Rouser2, a clear thinking sovereign citizen, endowed with all the rights secured by our Constitution, and by our Creator as well as the Common law, including the right to preserve one's conscience in a jury deliberation, cannot "make" law by a jury vote, but certainly can and should nullify bad or unconstitutional law by simply refusing to convict.

....in the context of a discussion of your avowed unwillingness to convict for date rape as an indication that you thought that prosecution for date rape was an infringement of natural or common law

I will amend my statment to be....

In view of this, the questions I would like to ask (and let us please ignore Rouser2 when he squeals that it's a bad or unconstitutional law)

I'd still like you to be ignored in this regard

[Some Friggin Guy]

Don, just so I have a bit of background, can you link the original thread?

Scratch that. I got it. Thanks, anyway.

[The Don]

Sorry, for those without the requisite tenacity

http://host.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=35793&perpage=40&pagenumber=1

Rouser2's comment is on page 5

[Some Friggin Guy]

I didn't even get to that comment, Don.

For this little gem:

As they down their 3rd string place-kicker's banana cake, perhaps they learn that a women's proper place is in the home and the kitchen, not the gridiron.

Rouser will always have a special place in my ignore list.

[Iconoclast]

Originally posted by The Don
Rouser2's comment is on page 5
Page 5! Geez, the rationality of a thread usually goes out the window by Page 3, I think you're holding the standards too high Don.

[The Don]

Just trying to take the arguments about nitwittery off that particular thread.

I'm just glad it didn't turn into an Israel/Palestine thread - of course there is still time

[Dancing David]

The Don
Maybe this thread could be the one with no actual useful content but where these kinds of comments could be challenged


Well, thats really funny Don, almost all of Rouser's comments would be in this thread!

[Rouser2]

Originally posted by The Don [/i]


>>....in the context of a discussion of your avowed unwillingness to convict for date rape as an indication that you thought that prosecution for date rape was an infringement of natural or common law

Nitwittery squared, cubed, unbounded. Prosecution of so-called "date rape" has nothing to do with common law nor of natrual law. You can prosecute till the cows come home. But in a jury trial, it is only juries who can convict or not convict. Get it??? Nah!


-- Rouser

[The Don]

So I take it as a yes then, you would not convinct on date rape on the grounds that you think the law is bad or unconstitutional.

After all that IS what you said