PDA

View Full Version : Obama seeks to violate Constitution via Executive Order


randman
19th April 2011, 03:08 PM
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/leaked-obama-executive-order-intends-to-implement-portions-of-disclose-act/

They lost in court and in Congress and now seek to violate the Court's ruling by Executive fiat, all the while leaving their union buddies free not to disclose anything.

leftysergeant
19th April 2011, 03:15 PM
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/leaked-obama-executive-order-intends-to-implement-portions-of-disclose-act/

They lost in court and in Congress and now seek to violate the Court's ruling by Executive fiat, all the while leaving their union buddies free not to disclose anything.There is no constitutional basis for what the five drongos on the Supreme Court pulled, either. Big whoop.

Unabogie
19th April 2011, 03:18 PM
Why shouldn't the Executive branch be allowed to set requirements for contractors as it sees fit? After all, John Galt can simply not bid on the project, Magical Free Market hand and all that.

MG1962
19th April 2011, 03:36 PM
Ya gotta love any new item that starts with An impeccable source has provided me with a copy of a draft of an executive order.

Then discover the media outllet is called pajamas media :confused:

Upchurch
19th April 2011, 04:30 PM
Ya gotta love any new item that starts with An impeccable source has provided me with a copy of a draft of an executive order.

Then discover the media outllet is called pajamas media :confused:

And the PDF in the article is so simple and easily faked, it has to be real!

Tricky
19th April 2011, 05:04 PM
I have a pdf of his Kenyan birth certificate...

Upchurch
19th April 2011, 06:16 PM
I have a pdf of his Kenyan birth certificate...

Did you get it from an impeccable anonymous source?

Joey McGee
19th April 2011, 06:22 PM
randman you are the boy that cried wolf! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_-UZ4ADjmY)

WildCat
19th April 2011, 06:23 PM
There is no constitutional basis for what the five drongos on the Supreme Court pulled, either. Big whoop.
Damn that infernal 1st Amendment, eh comrade?

WildCat
19th April 2011, 06:27 PM
At any rate, I don't see what this alleged memo has to do with the Citizens United ruling.