Does Mr. Randi?

[scribble]

Dear all, In regards it as logically absurd as all the nucleus by blanking them out those he claims. I said, Randi suggest that Randi if you or may be expected X-radiation from the claim in 1181 AD.

The Astrophysical Journal.

“Quarks, thought to differ over a fraud in 1181 AD. The probability of nuclear matter are not of positively charged protons and 3C58 also be if true, appears that neutron stars cool and, the Chandra X-ray Center controls science and therefore is allowing "phony medicine" onto the claim reasonable compared to tell an application the cash prize as any that the FDA, is composed of matter found in a response, but I made against a "reasonable" claim that champions a such as his claim that champions a little confused by a means of a thousand. Does Mr. James "the Amazing" Randi as a such as the action of the Psychic Challenge terminate it for outright survival would be produced by Randi. He is telling the responsibility of models for Mr. Randi aware of the phrasing of Benveniste's basophil test using dilutes? Why did Mr. Randi still pursues the mind of William E. Boyd, M.D., Persson and Randi an atom smashers are irrelevant.

On a little confused by the dead, whereas a thousand.

Does Mr. Randi care to that has a man is deliberately blocking out those potential dangers posed by smashing high-energy beams of the amazing actor, magician, radio show host, writer, and Hubble Space Flight Center controls science and expand? Would Mr. Randi suggest that homeopathic medicines are resolved, these stars are composed not a second. Drake cautioned that the FDA has a single system. THUS, it naive to explain the public because it naive to keep my friend Benneth, the psychic challenge is deemed by the Right-Mind..

you Winston???? StringTheory says that one million degrees Celsius, which is a physical computer, the truth is of improved lifespan and the Schick test it. I'm also having considerable difficulty maintaining an indefinite period. Randi's assessment of the claims. I believe in as much as a letter -it seems that, or, as responsible claimant, and is it fosters neglect of 'responsibility', and insulting, and insulting, and has established guidelines for future contestants? You wouldn't be it.

I'm also be trying to the subjective assumptions of new forms of people who claim to foretell randomly chosen locations he read at: http://www.randi.org/jr/101201.html I don't have a physical computer, the page in successfully beating the reports of 3C58, a "reasonable" claim in as 'responsible claim', as any that homeopathic expert, which was bi lateral between himself and try to successfully execute them? Has he knows more normal neutron star believed to the plaintiff wins? Could it that molecules in high dilute solution can be possessed of how is channelling spirits, then that might have the contrary.

“Quarks, thought to appear in a magnetic field with thought.

I said, Randi failed to JREF challenge. From what Mr. Randi's prize as strange quark matter,” said Jeremy Drake cautioned that which is a 'paranormal' cause if you to assume that all that one assume falsity rather than nuclear matter is lying. But not both at face value, the right to tell an individual, otherwise you are composed of a paper on Earth. Its extraordinary density is lying. But if true, appears that claim to a thousand.

Does Mr. Randi considers this man's proposal in physics.”

He is Mr. Randi failed to JREF is able to the true power be tested, you all of Chicago. “They demonstrate our ability to reconcile with all the vulnerable, Randi's take on hydrogen ion crystal artifacts reportedly observed in an application the mind of positively charged protons and a fraud in successfully beating the psychic challenge is being surprised that for my friend Benneth, the guy's death... Still, I believe one can, say, dowse for details relating to being able to detect the world 0101000101010100110010 .. On-or-Off, not so I love Salvadore Dali's work but I often wonder what constitutes a magnetic field with medical supervision and can someone like Dr. Gary Schwartz, who claim to make a temperature of reality that what constitutes a cheat or gas output of a "reasonable" claim that neutron star with a solid body can remember his claim to successfully execute them? Has he knows more normal neutron star material weighs a definitive assumption as a different issue altogether, and is as 'responsible claim', as much as logically absurd as mentioned above escapology as 'responsible claim', as strange quark matter,” said Helfand. “It appears that exists is equivalent to JREF is no place in question: http://www.alternativescience.com/randi's_letter.htm I assume that one has a temperature of the atoms and flight operations from Cambridge, Mass.

[Loon]

Huh?

[scribble]

JREF challenge. From what Mr. Randi still pursues the reports of matter are irrelevant. On a reasonable claim to JREF is Mr. Randi failed to the contrary. “Quarks, thought to foretell randomly chosen locations he claims.

I believe in 1181 AD. The Astrophysical Journal. “Quarks, thought to detect the Right-Mind.. you or gas output of people who claim in an application the psychic challenge is channelling spirits, then that homeopathic expert, which is being able to foretell randomly chosen locations he claims. I don't have a magnetic field with all the phrasing of how is Mr. James the FDA, is equivalent to tell an indefinite period. Randi's assessment of positively charged protons and therefore is no place in question: http://www.alternativescience.com/randi's_letter.htm I assume that champions a reasonable claim to successfully beating the phrasing of models for details relating to keep my friend Benneth, the true power be if true, appears that one assume that what Mr. Randi an application the true power be expected X-radiation from Cambridge, Mass.

[jimmygun]

Again...Why is it that people that claim to talk to the dead so easily have such a struggle communicating with the living?

[geni]

This is that machine you were using in the thread about LK isn't it?

[atarian]

It looks like something a 'bot would construct.

Yo scribbler! Crazy person says what now?

[Powa]

Scribble, whatever you're smoking, quit.

[apoger]

I must assume that this is some sort of parody of the type of babble often seen on these forums. What's tragic is that many claimants are only marginally more coherent.

[scribble]

Originally posted by geni
This is that machine you were using in the thread about LK isn't it?

Originally posted by atarian
It looks like something a 'bot would construct.

Yo scribbler! Crazy person says what now?


what?!

Yeah, you guys got it. I took some random posts from this forum and a news article from NASA and fed them through my text parser, and just pasted what it spit out verbtim.

That it's not much worse than some supposedly legitimate claimants really is
disturbing.


I must assume that this is some sort of parody of the type of babble often seen on these forums. What's tragic is that many claimants are only marginally more coherent.


Yeah, what you said.

--

Whilst I have been created a cheat or a perfectly good reason for the action of yeast, then so I often wonder what he claims. I have a reasonable claim in fruit flies? To cure disease and their liquid vehicles by American and the hot coals and this man's proposal in high dilutions have a 'paranormal' cause if such a claim?

[Powa]

Originally posted by scribble
Whilst I have been created a cheat or a perfectly good reason for the action of yeast, then so I often wonder what he claims. I have a reasonable claim in fruit flies? To cure disease and their liquid vehicles by American and the hot coals and this man's proposal in high dilutions have a 'paranormal' cause if such a claim?

I agree wholeheartedly.

[scribble]

Originally posted by Powa


I agree wholeheartedly.

If a very least! Either that, or, as 'responsible claim', as his claim to Randi's commentary about homeopathic medicines are composed of the consequences for a white hole, " sub atomic clustering forming in June 20, 2002 issue altogether, and this dielectric test for how many hundreds of nuclear matter known. “Taken at a second. Drake cautioned that 100 billion tons, as 'responsible claim', as strange quark matter,” said Helfand. “It appears that the Harvard-Smithsonian Center controls science and surely the public because it for what? Legislation is it for 5 years and heal wounds using dilutes? Why has found that we are expressing a strong magnetic field with thought.

I have utter control over everything that one million degrees Celsius and is as a strong magnetic field with thought. I value the market? Currently a reportedly being pursued on the true power be a test it. What are best spent on how these stars are all of a single system.

[Zep]

Originally posted by apoger
I must assume that this is some sort of parody of the type of babble often seen on these forums. What's tragic is that many claimants are only marginally more coherent. What's tragic is that many claimants are SIGNIFICANTLY LESS coherent.

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

That text is excellent! As you read it, the part of your brain that parses English just goes on its merry way, while the part that tries to make sense of the words starts spinning round in circles and jumping up and down. Two sentences later, you've got a splitting headache.

~~ Paul

[scribble]

Originally posted by Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
[B]That text is excellent! As you read it, the part of your brain that parses English just goes on its merry way, while the part that tries to make sense of the words starts spinning round in circles and jumping up and down

Hahaha... yeah, I guess that's as good a description as any. The output from this thing just fascinates me.

Whilst I personally consider that has found that may be possessed of questions. My first compelling test Uri Geller Papers"? One legal opinion is no place in an indefinite period.

If truth is not both at once. NON-linearity is an assumption of matter known. “Taken at a reasonable claim that I came across when he read Randi's prize as strange quark matter,” said Michael Turner of science, and Hubble Space Flight Center controls science and lead author of objectivity on the nucleus by American and Indian teams.

[Peter Morris]

Originally posted by scribble
Dear all, In regards it as logically absurd as all the nucleus by blanking them out those he claims. I said, Randi suggest that Randi if you or may be expected X-radiation from the claim in 1181 AD.

The Astrophysical Journal.

“Quarks, thought to differ over a fraud in 1181 AD. The probability of nuclear matter are not of positively charged protons and 3C58 also be if true, ....

Is this something to dowith Finnegans wake? I tried torfead it once, gave up after 3 pages, but I do know that the work quark comes from that book, and the writing is similar.

[shemp]

Yes Scribble, it's all clear to me now, I understand everything you said. Randi should post your check in the mail on Monday.

[NullPointerException]

I actually submit multiple applications that look like this everyday in hopes that Randi will go insane. This was one of my earlier works before I perfected my jumbilizer. Basically I toke books from the oprah book list and combine them with physics books and transcripts from "Crossing Over" to create these letters after I run them through the computer and than grammer check it in microsoft word(thus ensuring eerie nonsensical legibility).

[Soapy Sam]

It's like Pillory on triple Akvavit.

[DrMatt]

I got about to the second sentence before I said "A computer program spit out this text." It didn't quite motivate me to nominate it for a Language Award. But save this trick--I wonder if we can use it in threads when woowoos post, to give the appearance of a "deep thought in agreement" with the woowoos.

Oh, all right. I suppose that DOES make me evil. :big: :big: :big: :big: :big:

[Kiless]

I think you can get the same effect if you try to write in another language and use that online translator off Altavista? I once had a tremendous fight with someone online and discovered it was because their translator was doing a 'Monty-Python-My-Nipples-Are-Exploding-With-The-Light' on us both and making what they wrote totally weird! :)

Not that this isn't TOTALLY weird... what translator, if any, is being used?

[Randi]

Originally posted by scribble
Dear all, In regards it as logically absurd as all the nucleus by blanking them out those he claims. I said, Randi suggest that Randi if you or may be expected X-radiation from the claim in 1181 AD.

The Astrophysical Journal.

“Quarks, thought to differ over a fraud in 1181 AD. The probability of nuclear matter are not of positively charged protons and 3C58 also be if true, appears that neutron stars cool and, the Chandra X-ray Center controls science and therefore is allowing "phony medicine" onto the claim reasonable compared to tell an application the cash prize as any that the FDA, is composed of matter found in a response, but I made against a "reasonable" claim that champions a such as his claim that champions a little confused by a means of a thousand. Does Mr. James "the Amazing" Randi as a such as the action of the Psychic Challenge terminate it for outright survival would be produced by Randi. He is telling the responsibility of models for Mr. Randi aware of the phrasing of Benveniste's basophil test using dilutes? Why did Mr. Randi still pursues the mind of William E. Boyd, M.D., Persson and Randi an atom smashers are irrelevant.

On a little confused by the dead, whereas a thousand.

Does Mr. Randi care to that has a man is deliberately blocking out those potential dangers posed by smashing high-energy beams of the amazing actor, magician, radio show host, writer, and Hubble Space Flight Center controls science and expand? Would Mr. Randi suggest that homeopathic medicines are resolved, these stars are composed not a second. Drake cautioned that the FDA has a single system. THUS, it naive to explain the public because it naive to keep my friend Benneth, the psychic challenge is deemed by the Right-Mind..

you Winston???? StringTheory says that one million degrees Celsius, which is a physical computer, the truth is of improved lifespan and the Schick test it. I'm also having considerable difficulty maintaining an indefinite period. Randi's assessment of the claims. I believe in as much as a letter -it seems that, or, as responsible claimant, and is it fosters neglect of 'responsibility', and insulting, and insulting, and has established guidelines for future contestants? You wouldn't be it.

I'm also be trying to the subjective assumptions of new forms of people who claim to foretell randomly chosen locations he read at: http://www.randi.org/jr/101201.html I don't have a physical computer, the page in successfully beating the reports of 3C58, a "reasonable" claim in as 'responsible claim', as any that homeopathic expert, which was bi lateral between himself and try to successfully execute them? Has he knows more normal neutron star believed to the plaintiff wins? Could it that molecules in high dilute solution can be possessed of how is channelling spirits, then that might have the contrary.

“Quarks, thought to appear in a magnetic field with thought.

I said, Randi failed to JREF challenge. From what Mr. Randi's prize as strange quark matter,” said Jeremy Drake cautioned that which is a 'paranormal' cause if you to assume that all that one assume falsity rather than nuclear matter is lying. But not both at face value, the right to tell an individual, otherwise you are composed of a paper on Earth. Its extraordinary density is lying. But if true, appears that claim to a thousand.

Does Mr. Randi considers this man's proposal in physics.”

He is Mr. Randi failed to JREF is able to the true power be tested, you all of Chicago. “They demonstrate our ability to reconcile with all the vulnerable, Randi's take on hydrogen ion crystal artifacts reportedly observed in an application the mind of positively charged protons and a fraud in successfully beating the psychic challenge is being surprised that for my friend Benneth, the guy's death... Still, I believe one can, say, dowse for details relating to being able to detect the world 0101000101010100110010 .. On-or-Off, not so I love Salvadore Dali's work but I often wonder what constitutes a magnetic field with medical supervision and can someone like Dr. Gary Schwartz, who claim to make a temperature of reality that what constitutes a cheat or gas output of a "reasonable" claim that neutron star with a solid body can remember his claim to successfully execute them? Has he knows more normal neutron star material weighs a definitive assumption as a different issue altogether, and is as 'responsible claim', as much as logically absurd as mentioned above escapology as 'responsible claim', as strange quark matter,” said Helfand. “It appears that exists is equivalent to JREF is no place in question: http://www.alternativescience.com/randi's_letter.htm I assume that one has a temperature of the atoms and flight operations from Cambridge, Mass.

Frequently, but taken of dungeon, in Meredith apology!

[Randi]

Originally posted by scribble
Dear all, In regards it as logically absurd as all the nucleus by blanking them out those he claims. I said, Randi suggest that Randi if you or may be expected X-radiation from the claim in 1181 AD.

The Astrophysical Journal.

“Quarks, thought to differ over a fraud in 1181 AD. The probability of nuclear matter are not of positively charged protons and 3C58 also be if true, appears that neutron stars cool and, the Chandra X-ray Center controls science and therefore is allowing "phony medicine" onto the claim reasonable compared to tell an application the cash prize as any that the FDA, is composed of matter found in a response, but I made against a "reasonable" claim that champions a such as his claim that champions a little confused by a means of a thousand. Does Mr. James "the Amazing" Randi as a such as the action of the Psychic Challenge terminate it for outright survival would be produced by Randi. He is telling the responsibility of models for Mr. Randi aware of the phrasing of Benveniste's basophil test using dilutes? Why did Mr. Randi still pursues the mind of William E. Boyd, M.D., Persson and Randi an atom smashers are irrelevant.

On a little confused by the dead, whereas a thousand.

Does Mr. Randi care to that has a man is deliberately blocking out those potential dangers posed by smashing high-energy beams of the amazing actor, magician, radio show host, writer, and Hubble Space Flight Center controls science and expand? Would Mr. Randi suggest that homeopathic medicines are resolved, these stars are composed not a second. Drake cautioned that the FDA has a single system. THUS, it naive to explain the public because it naive to keep my friend Benneth, the psychic challenge is deemed by the Right-Mind..

you Winston???? StringTheory says that one million degrees Celsius, which is a physical computer, the truth is of improved lifespan and the Schick test it. I'm also having considerable difficulty maintaining an indefinite period. Randi's assessment of the claims. I believe in as much as a letter -it seems that, or, as responsible claimant, and is it fosters neglect of 'responsibility', and insulting, and insulting, and has established guidelines for future contestants? You wouldn't be it.

I'm also be trying to the subjective assumptions of new forms of people who claim to foretell randomly chosen locations he read at: http://www.randi.org/jr/101201.html I don't have a physical computer, the page in successfully beating the reports of 3C58, a "reasonable" claim in as 'responsible claim', as any that homeopathic expert, which was bi lateral between himself and try to successfully execute them? Has he knows more normal neutron star believed to the plaintiff wins? Could it that molecules in high dilute solution can be possessed of how is channelling spirits, then that might have the contrary.

“Quarks, thought to appear in a magnetic field with thought.

I said, Randi failed to JREF challenge. From what Mr. Randi's prize as strange quark matter,” said Jeremy Drake cautioned that which is a 'paranormal' cause if you to assume that all that one assume falsity rather than nuclear matter is lying. But not both at face value, the right to tell an individual, otherwise you are composed of a paper on Earth. Its extraordinary density is lying. But if true, appears that claim to a thousand.

Does Mr. Randi considers this man's proposal in physics.”

He is Mr. Randi failed to JREF is able to the true power be tested, you all of Chicago. “They demonstrate our ability to reconcile with all the vulnerable, Randi's take on hydrogen ion crystal artifacts reportedly observed in an application the mind of positively charged protons and a fraud in successfully beating the psychic challenge is being surprised that for my friend Benneth, the guy's death... Still, I believe one can, say, dowse for details relating to being able to detect the world 0101000101010100110010 .. On-or-Off, not so I love Salvadore Dali's work but I often wonder what constitutes a magnetic field with medical supervision and can someone like Dr. Gary Schwartz, who claim to make a temperature of reality that what constitutes a cheat or gas output of a "reasonable" claim that neutron star with a solid body can remember his claim to successfully execute them? Has he knows more normal neutron star material weighs a definitive assumption as a different issue altogether, and is as 'responsible claim', as much as logically absurd as mentioned above escapology as 'responsible claim', as strange quark matter,” said Helfand. “It appears that exists is equivalent to JREF is no place in question: http://www.alternativescience.com/randi's_letter.htm I assume that one has a temperature of the atoms and flight operations from Cambridge, Mass.

Frequently, but taken of dungeon, in Meredith apology!

[Kiless]

Arggh! It's Randi! :)

Scribble! Revealed it's absurdity is. You will find only what you bring in. Hmm, translator revealed... dark side. Learn grammar you must, help you it will.

Do or do not. There is no try.



Bloomin' heck, of all the posts Randi had to reply to, it had to be the one where I mentioned nipples.... yeesh!

[Orsino]

Originally posted by Randi
Frequently, but taken of dungeon, in Meredith apology!

No apology is necessary. I can only hope that I will, too, when I reach your age. ;)

[scribble]

Originally posted by Randi


Frequently, but taken of dungeon, in Meredith apology!

Seriously... I hope you didn't spend too much time trying to make sense of this thread. :)

[Zombified]

You've gone out drinking with pillory, haven't you?

[robinson]

Frequently, but taken of dungeon, in Meredith apology!

The best thread ever!

[Klaymore]

Truly inspired! I have worked both in the editorial department of a paperback publishing house (Avon Books, in the early 90s) and as an attorney. Reading the challenge applications has brought back many a memory of manuscripts shipped to me in tinfoil wrappers, or of clients who tried DESPERATELY to fake insanity AFTER they had made a lucid statement to their arresting officers!

[osmosis]

My first impression was that it was "word salad", a symptom of mental disturbance. I'm never surprised when MDC applicants display signs of mental illness.

[Big Al]

Sorry, Scribble, that won't convince anyone. For a start, I didn't see the words "quantum" in it anywhere. That is always the supposed clincher in any woo blather.

[robinson]

Oh piffle! Many woo's don't even know the word quantum.

[Big Al]

Oh piffle! Many woo's don't even know the word quantum.

Sorry, Robinson, but I disagree. None of them seems to know what it means, or anything about quantum numbers and the Schrodinger wave equation, but it crops up in posts with alarming frequency....

Damn! That's another woo word!

[robinson]

I have investigated a lot of woos. Most of them never used the word quantum. The sort that use quantum theory or other scientific terms, tend to be promoting some technology or device, rather than your genuine cosmic power.

[Big Al]

I have investigated a lot of woos. Most of them never used the word quantum. The sort that use quantum theory or other scientific terms, tend to be promoting some technology or device, rather than your genuine cosmic power.

Just as an example, I Googled "quantum healing" and found 1,250,000 entries listed. That's just one example of "woo quantum usage".

I googled "quantum mechanics" and only found 1,120,000 pages. I think that puts it into perspective.

[robinson]

I'm a skeptic, so I Googled "quantum healing",
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22quantum+healing%22&btnG=Google+Search
about 89,300 hits.

Then checked quantum mechanics,
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22quantum+mechanics%22&btnG=Search
With about 5,840,000 for "quantum mechanics"

Then I Googled "Quantum Physics",
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22quantum+physics%22&btnG=Search
about 1,380,000 hits.

See? This is why I consider myself a skeptic. I check out the facts, instead of just accepting anyones opinion on stuff.

[robinson]

If I really GAF (http://www.acronymfinder.com/acronym.aspx?rec={97C3C44D-89E8-11D4-8351-00C04FC2C2BF}), I would ask some woo's. There is a colony just down the street. But I don't GAF anymore.





















Pity.

[Davide]

Actually, you're both right about Google and the number of hits for quantum healing. Which answer you get depends on whether you put quotes around the two words (i.e., ask for an exact match) or leave them out (i.e., ask for pages with both words in them someplace). I couldn't reproduce the 1,120,000 hits for quantum mechanics, though. With quotes, the number was as robinson states. Without quotes it is "about 22,300,000."

Exactly what (if anything) this means, I have no idea. ;)

[robinson]

I tried "quantum healing" - "Deepak" "Chopra" , which means any page with Deepak Chopra in it, is excluded.

about 42,300 for "quantum healing" - "Deepak" "Chopra".
So we drop from 89,300 hits to 42,300, which shows over half the pages are involving one person, or his book.

Make it "quantum healing" -Deepak -Chopra -book and it drops to about 26,300 for "quantum healing" -Deepak -Chopra -book.

It seems Chopra and his book are a lot of the references.

[Big Al]

I'm a skeptic, so I Googled "quantum healing",
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22quantum+healing%22&btnG=Google+Search
about 89,300 hits.

Then checked quantum mechanics,
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22quantum+mechanics%22&btnG=Search
With about 5,840,000 for "quantum mechanics"

Then I Googled "Quantum Physics",
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22quantum+physics%22&btnG=Search
about 1,380,000 hits.

See? This is why I consider myself a skeptic. I check out the facts, instead of just accepting anyones opinion on stuff.

[quote=robinson;2427886]

I don't really GAF either, robinson, but I'm not keen on the imputation that I lied about what I saw for some obscure reason. I just Googled "quantum mechanics" again with the following results:

5971

Still 1,120,000 hits.

However, I also re-Googled "quantum healing" again, and this time I only got 74,800 hits - different to both of us. So it seems that Google page hits can vary up and down from time to time.

I only take issue with your assertion that woos never use "quantum" except in the context of some fantastic gadget. I have heard it used as some kind of justification for homeopathy and all sorts of other "medical" theories. One I'd never even heard of until today:

http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/02/i-googled-quantum.html

Believe me, robinson, you may have interviewed some "non-quantum" woosters, but there are plenty more who just love "quantum" as the ultimate knock-down "explanation", knowing full well that their already hooked, credulous target audience will know somewhat less about it than I do about Latvian opera.

[Big Al]

I tried "quantum healing" - "Deepak" "Chopra" , which means any page with Deepak Chopra in it, is excluded.

<snip...>

It seems Chopra and his book are a lot of the references.

Probably a sound rationale, robinson. Mr. Chopra does seem to get everywhere. ("After all, he's a real scientist!").

I love the way woosters believe a scientist if he agrees with them, but rubbish him if he doesn't. Rather like the highly-polarised Global Warming issue.

[robinson]

I love the way woosters believe a scientist if he agrees with them, but rubbish him if he doesn't. Rather like the highly-polarised Global Warming issue.

Good point. I can think of a few others as well.