Poll: Accuracy of Test Interpretation

[Wrath of the Swarm]

Already asked and given. Read the thread, yersinia - you should really do so at least once before demanding sources.

[scribble]

Originally posted by Wrath of the Swarm
Already asked and given. Read the thread, yersinia - you should really do so at least once before demanding sources.


Dude, there's THIRTEEN PAGES OF CRAP HERE.

(Edited because what happed to the autocensor?)

[exarch]

Originally posted by Wrath of the Swarm
Already asked and given. Read the thread, yersinia - you should really do so at least once before demanding sources.Scribble's right, there's thirteen pages of cr*p here, BUT, not one of them has a link to a study showing that doctors aren't very good at understanding how test results work. You just keep saying that, and people have agreed that doctors aren't statisticians, but not once in all these 13 pages have you provided a link that actually proved what it was you were asserting. In fact, it's becoming quite clear you don't even bother to read the pages you link to (or merely superficially), perhaps hoping we don't either.

[Wrath of the Swarm]

Except all those sites that pointed out that doctors routinely fail questions about the most basic aspects of test interpretation.

Other than those, I haven't presented a thing.