November Stundie Nominations [Archive]

ApolloGnomon

1st November 2011, 08:14 PM

From our newest treasure trove of wisdom, Nuke Lies:

Apollognomon, here's a photo from NASA's 'Apollo 14 image library'. Image AS14-64-9189. It's here:--
http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/images14.html#Mag64

Now, the earth and the moon are virtually identical distances from Venus. Venus from earth looks like a bright dot - few if any people can discern the pahases. This photo, supposedly from the moon, shows a hugely enlarged Venus - and yet the supposed moon equipment next to it is unenlarged, natural size photo as from normal (not long-focus) lens. It's clearly a fake photo.

The photo:
http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9189.jpg

Yep. He thinks the Earth is Venus.

http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=198&start=36

Horatius

1st November 2011, 08:26 PM

From our newest treasure trove of wisdom, Nuke Lies:

The photo:
http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9189.jpg

Yep. He thinks the Earth is Venus.

http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=198&start=36

Come on, the Earth is huge, everybody knows that! Look out your window, the Earth literally spans the horizon! You expect us to believe that little old thing is the Earth? Pshaw! [/Idiot]

:D

Reactor drone

1st November 2011, 10:09 PM

From our newest treasure trove of wisdom, Nuke Lies:

The photo:
http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9189.jpg

Yep. He thinks the Earth is Venus.

http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=198&start=36

Venus is in the photo, it just isn't the thing he thinks it is,
http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/a14Venus.html

Maybe they should have put labels on the earth too :D

ApolloGnomon

1st November 2011, 10:48 PM

Yes, fancy that, more information on the very site he got the image from in the first place explaining everything.

The very image you link was my response.

Macgyver1968

2nd November 2011, 10:40 AM

From that same thread:
I have doubts that NASA can get heavy payloads into a vacuum. It appears to me, from watching Apollo rocket launches, that a rocket engine works just like a propeller on an airplane; by moving lots of air. When they get into a vacuum, they fizzle. So they might move a light payload. But no landing four ton crafts on the moon, and no rover on Mars.

Dave Rogers

2nd November 2011, 10:45 AM

From that same thread:

To be fair:

That Professor Goddard with his "chair" in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action and reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react—to say that would be absurd. Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.

...he's not the first to make that mistake.

Dave

Spindrift

2nd November 2011, 10:56 AM

From that same thread:

I've been wrong all these years. I thought they used rocket propellants, but know I find out it's rocket propellers.

Robrob

2nd November 2011, 11:35 AM

I've been wrong all these years. I thought they used rocket propellants, but know I find out it's rocket propellers.

http://wwwcdn.net/ev/assets/images/vectors/afbig/propeller-hat-clip-art.jpg

sts60

2nd November 2011, 12:41 PM

I've been wrong all these years. I thought they used rocket propellants, but know I find out it's rocket propellers.

Don't laugh. One company (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotary_Rocket) made a serious run at it.

And, for more Earthbound flights, you might soon be able to fly your own (http://www.peroxidepropulsion.com/news/the-dragonfly-tip-rocket-helicopter-is-flying), which I also hereby nominate for "Best Impression of a Steam Locomotive by a Light Helicopter".

sylvan8798

2nd November 2011, 01:02 PM

To be fair:

...he's not the first to make that mistake.

Dave

And we thought the problems with the education system were of recent origin. :)

jargon buster

2nd November 2011, 03:08 PM

I actually burst out laughing when I discovered this gem, in fact I still laugh every time I read it.
In a hundred years time, people will be reading Rob Menard as we do Lysander Spooner today.
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=11455

Mr.Herbert

2nd November 2011, 03:09 PM

Controlling Hurricanes, video fakery... it works and it sucks!

From one of the goons at ATS:

They faked the 9/11 video in advance and had to ensure that the day turned out bright and sunny, as seen in the faked videos. They engineered hurricane
erin for this purpose and directed it close to NY city to suck away any possibility
of a rainy or overcast morning. They also needed to coordinate the actual wind direction
to match up with the fake video.
(No clouds was the safest way to go for faked video,
like the no stars in the moon landing hoaxed shots - little chance of contradiction
between different faked video perspectives).

And G.O.D. Yes, they have the technology.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread771115/pg1#pid12713408

LordXenu

2nd November 2011, 06:06 PM

Keoni Galt says that feeding babies formula causes allergies, asthma, and diarrhea because he suffers from those problems:
http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/my-problem-with-christian-movements/#comment-35943

I was a soy formula baby. By 2 years old I developed allergies, asthma and had constant diarrhea. My mother said she tried to breast feed me, but I wouldn’t latch. To this day, I have problems with both – although i’ve discovered that my diet has dramatically reduced their severity, I don’t I’ll ever be “cured” of them.

My other siblings were all breast fed exclusively.

None of them developed allergies or asthma.

I don’t think that’s a coincedence.

Penemue

2nd November 2011, 06:45 PM

Controlling Hurricanes, video fakery... it works and it sucks!

From one of the goons at ATS:

[B]
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread771115/pg1#pid12713408

This one gets my vote.
Controlling hurricanes, indeed.

Elizabeth I

2nd November 2011, 07:25 PM

In a hundred years time, people will be reading Rob Menard as we do Lysander Spooner today.
Well, if everybody follows my example, that would be "not at all."

Redtail

2nd November 2011, 07:25 PM

Keoni Galt says that feeding babies formula causes allergies, asthma, and diarrhea because he suffers from those problems:
http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/my-problem-with-christian-movements/#comment-35943

Odd... I was adopted thus given simulac from day 1. Only illnesses I can recall are chicken pox, penumonia, the flu once, & the occasional cold.

triforcharity

2nd November 2011, 07:37 PM

Odd... I was adopted thus given simulac from day 1. Only illnesses I can recall are chicken pox, penumonia, the flu once, & the occasional cold.

That's because you're adopted. :duck:

Travis

2nd November 2011, 08:21 PM

and g.o.d. Yes, they have the technology.

g.o.d.

?????

sylvan8798

2nd November 2011, 09:04 PM

g.o.d.

?????
Hey! GoodOlDave! He's one of us, I knew him back on AOL message boards. Stalwart. If he's on JREF it must be under some other name.

Mel Odious

2nd November 2011, 10:09 PM

I don't think we've had a "correct physics is for shills!" nom in a while. So without further ado:

Where are the concrete floors ? They were destroyed in the collapse. When the buildings were constructed, a **** load of energy was used to hoist all the components into place. That energy used in construction remains as potential energy in the structure and it's constant battle with gravity is sustained in equilibrium until something happens to release that energy.

So the potential energy, that layed dormant within the structure was somehow responsible for it being pulverised. And I don't understand physics?

You don't realise it, but you just put the nail in your coffin. This is so FN ridiculous.

I want everyone here to get it. Staninsiderod believes that potential energy stored within the concrete floors when they were made was "waiting to be released" like a time-bomb and that the collapse was the trigger for this reaction.

So he's answer for where the "extra energy" came from, is not from demolition materials, but that each concrete floor PULVERISED ITSELF, like a time-bomb.

Note to staninsiderod...YOU'RE FINISHED, it will be almost impossible for you to turn this into a plausible solution or for you to redeem yourself now.

TAG-TEAM, where is the next one.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060333212&postcount=153

ETA: The bolding is like in the original post.

Travis

2nd November 2011, 11:46 PM

I have to wonder what he thinks potential energy is?

Tomtomkent

3rd November 2011, 01:19 AM

Its easy to prove if he understands potential energy or not. I will hold a 4kg hammer 100mm above his hand and let go. If he moves his hand he has an idea how much energy the hammer will have.

Dave Rogers

3rd November 2011, 02:23 AM

This one gets my vote.
Controlling hurricanes, indeed.

Not just controlling hurricanes; they want a clear, warm, cloudless day over New York, so to achieve this they create a hurricane nearby. It's loony conspiracist thinking at its most bass-ackward.

Dave

Dave Rogers

3rd November 2011, 02:26 AM

In a hundred years time, people will be reading Rob Menard as we do Lysander Spooner today.

Is he the one who proposed a toast to the queer old dean?

Dave

Supermac

3rd November 2011, 04:44 AM

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=188922

Chemtrails, NWO, subliminal programming, and the evil BBC all in one post:

"on saturday night i was flicking through the channels and went to bbc one and strictly come dancing was on and within 5 seconds i noticed graphics on the floor of planes flying through with trails behind them all the way to the other side of the studio!! i was thinking its subliminal programming by the bbc as the they are basically the leaders of the nwo in the uk with all there love of the eu which is the new world order"

IMO anyone who watches Strictly Come Dancing is beyond the reach of 'subliminal programming'.

Horatius

3rd November 2011, 04:46 AM

Odd... I was adopted thus given simulac from day 1. Only illnesses I can recall are chicken pox, pneumonia, the flu once, & the occasional cold.

So this stuff causes allergies, asthma, diarrhea, chicken pox, pneumonia, the flu, and colds?!?!? And you give this to babies?!?!?

:D

jargon buster

3rd November 2011, 05:20 AM

IMO anyone who watches Strictly Come Dancing is beyond the reach of 'subliminal programming'.

I hear one of the contestants had a brief wardrobe malfunction last week resulting in millons of men having an uncontrollable urge to look at womens breasts.

The subliminal plants are working thats for sure.

Supermac

3rd November 2011, 05:44 AM

I hear one of the contestants had a brief wardrobe malfunction last week resulting in millons of men having an uncontrollable urge to look at womens breasts.

The subliminal plants are working thats for sure.

Bother, I missed that. I'm subliminally programmed not to watch it.

Travis

3rd November 2011, 06:10 AM

Captain_Swoop

3rd November 2011, 06:16 AM

I am overtly programmed not to watch it.

uk_dave

3rd November 2011, 06:28 AM

How in the world do planes on the floor condition people to accept the NWO?

I suspect it goes like this:

1. 'Truther' watches tv and sees aircraft projected on to floor during a dance show. :)

2. 'Truther' suddenly realises that he's stopped thinking about 9/11 and feels guilty. :mad:

3. 'Truther' decides that it's not his fault that he'd stopped thinking about 9/11, it's because there are subliminal signs everywhere making the sight of aircraft so normal that 'truthers' will stop thinking about 9/11. :cool:

4. 'Truther' feels a bit better and not quite so guilty about enjoying Chelsey's wardrobe malfunction. :blush:

5. 'Truther' forgets about 9/11 :)

Travis

3rd November 2011, 06:37 AM

So.....a massive campaign designed just for Truthers?

That seems like a waste of resources.

uk_dave

3rd November 2011, 06:40 AM

So.....a massive campaign designed just for Truthers?

That seems like a waste of resources.

You mean 'truthers' don't have delusions of grandeur?

Border Reiver

3rd November 2011, 06:41 AM

So this stuff causes allergies, asthma, diarrhea, chicken pox, pneumonia, the flu, and colds?!?!? And you give this to babies?!?!?

:D

Gotta toughen the little ones up. Get 'em ready for the real world, where they ain't gonna be spoon-fed everything.

Cuddles

3rd November 2011, 06:43 AM

My mother said she tried to breast feed me, but I wouldn’t latch. To this day, I have problems with both

Wait.. he still has trouble latching to both his mother's breasts?:eye-poppi

TjW

3rd November 2011, 06:44 AM

You mean 'truthers' don't have delusions of grandeur?
No. Truthers have delusions of adequacy.

Horatius

3rd November 2011, 07:54 AM

Gotta toughen the little ones up. Get 'em ready for the real world, where they ain't gonna be spoon-fed everything.

But - don't you do that by spoon-feeding them?!?!?

I'm on to you, man! :boxedin:

Border Reiver

3rd November 2011, 07:57 AM

Curses - foiled again!

Twirls mustache, and exits stage right.

TSR

3rd November 2011, 08:38 AM

Wait.. he still has trouble latching to both his mother's breasts?:eye-poppi
,
Funny, *I* never have that trouble with his mother...
,

TSR

3rd November 2011, 08:40 AM

So this stuff causes allergies, asthma, diarrhea, chicken pox, pneumonia, the flu, and colds?!?!? And you give this to babies?!?!?

:D
,
To be honest, just the ones we don't like.

What ?!?!?!? Those twins are little monsters...
,

Cl1mh4224rd

3rd November 2011, 10:23 AM

I have to wonder what he thinks potential energy is?

A fantasy, probably.

sts60

3rd November 2011, 10:48 AM

And now for a little quote-mining.

Wait.. he still has trouble latching to both his mother's breasts?

Funny, *I* never have that trouble with his mother...

What ?!?!?!? Those twins are little monsters...

(Drops scissors and paste, walks away whistling innocently)

jaydeehess

3rd November 2011, 03:42 PM

Its easy to prove if he understands potential energy or not. I will hold a 4kg hammer 100mm above his hand and let go. If he moves his hand he has an idea how much energy the hammer will have.

You are nastier than I am. I usually tell them to place a 1/4 nut on their head and note the pressure it applies. Then have someone take that same 1/4 nut and increase the amount of potential energy it has avalable by raising it 1 meter above their head and then allow that energy to convert to kinetic energy as it drops onto their head and again note the pressure it applies to their skull.

jadebox

3rd November 2011, 04:08 PM

From our newest treasure trove of wisdom, Nuke Lies:

The photo:

http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a14/AS14-64-9189.jpg

Yep. He thinks the Earth is Venus.

That is a stunning, awe-inspiring photo.

I read these threads to get a laugh from reading the funny things some people have said. But, I have to feel sad for people who look at a photo like that and dismiss it because of their silly beliefs. Reality is so much more interesting ....

-- Roger

Travis

3rd November 2011, 07:17 PM

A fantasy, probably.

I'm guessing he thinks potential energy is like a bomb. That something only has potential energy if it will explode if someone drops it.

Dave Rogers

4th November 2011, 07:30 AM

It's vitally important that a properly researched and well-founded conspiracy theory is based entirely on facts. When this becomes a problem, one option is to put more effort into researching the facts and building a credible case. However, Patrick1000 has come up with an alternative option: simply re-define the word "fact".

Say one asked Kennedy or Nixon, LBJ, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bushes 1 and 2, Obama, what they thought about the American Indian Tragedy. You would get an answer from all of these US presidents pretty much as I have laid it out. They would say tragedy yes, but God wants us to be here so it is OK. In this sense, my contentions are indeed facts, and very very very important ones.

Yes, in Patrick1000 world, speculations on what a group of presidents would hypothetically say if you asked them a question are now "indeed facts".

Dave

Oystein

4th November 2011, 07:43 AM

Uhh, i think its rude behaviour, to not listen to the other, and just ignore everything.

That kind of people i always put on ignore

Need I comment?

Dave Rogers

4th November 2011, 07:43 AM

And, from Marokkaan, we have this post, which raises the question...

Uhh, i think its rude behaviour, to not listen to the other, and just ignore everything.

That kind of people i always put on ignore

...is 9/11 truth incompatible with any vestige of self-awareness?

Dave

ETA: Damned German ninjas. Curse you, Oystein!

twinstead

4th November 2011, 07:47 AM

I'm not a fan of the ignore function anyway, but putting people on ignore for doing exactly what he himself does doesn't further Marokkaan's position much.

Cl1mh4224rd

4th November 2011, 04:07 PM

Wow... November's off to a good start.

LordXenu

4th November 2011, 05:05 PM

I had these lye burns when I was 18 months old, and they turned me superhuman:
http://vault-co.blogspot.com/2011/11/scienmajistical-types-take-thirty-five.html?showComment=1320371158836#c2498846194527 967741

When I was 18 months old, I was burned so badly with sodium lye internally I was expected to die. A priest gave me the last rites and it was predicted I would never see the sun rise. Not only did I not die, but in the coming years my waist vanished, my hair went curly and all of a sudden I seemed to have committed the entire contents of the Library of Congress to memory almost overnight before the age of seven. The doctor winced when he told me to squeeze his hand as hard as I could and told my father we shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth. Something had clearly happened to me. My body had obviously repaired the genetic damage (lye is a saponifier, it breaks down organic material) it seems it just picked the wrong set of genes to do the repairs with.

Erock

4th November 2011, 05:58 PM

matt.tansy

4th November 2011, 06:17 PM

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060300812&postcount=20

"yes you do. eyeballing is how us realmen determine an EXACT ballpark figure...while you queenies
need some fancy intruments to calculate the measurement we realmen have already agree upon.

i say the moon is looking bigger!!! and that's that."

The Moon is bigger, and that is an exact ballpark figure estimate thingy - I can tell with my eyes no less.

And yet reports of worldwide coastal flooding from the increased tides are conspicuously absent. That can only mean one thing... all of the nutters on the DIF somehow missed the elementary school lecture about the tides and the Moon. What are the odds???

LordXenu

5th November 2011, 08:03 PM

Keoni Galt on the plan by bankers to steal houses:
Step 1: Make loans with fiat currency
Step 2: ?????
Step 3: Profit

http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/11/04/matt-taibbi-bitchslaps-conservatives-and-liebertarians/#comment-77511

Why did all the banks rush out to make loans to unqualified people? Not because the government made them.

Because they had the opportunity to convert fiat currency (made out of thin air) into real, physical assets – the foreclosed properties.

And yes, anyone who tries to defend the status quo of our Bankster Plutocracy as some sort of representative of the “free market” really is nothing more than a CONservative or LIEbertarian.

For real libertarianism, READ ROTHBARD.

We haven’t had a free market in the US since 1913.

solzhenitsyn

5th November 2011, 08:41 PM

tsig

6th November 2011, 03:53 AM

I had these lye burns when I was 18 months old, and they turned me superhuman:
http://vault-co.blogspot.com/2011/11/scienmajistical-types-take-thirty-five.html?showComment=1320371158836#c2498846194527 967741

Bet you never knew this:

For the same reasons that vampires often change their names and move to new towns where nobody remembers them, I am not going to answer your post in any detail.

Good thing Tex is on the case!

Captain_Swoop

6th November 2011, 04:21 AM

NoahFence

6th November 2011, 06:36 AM

Miragememories
Choke the fire and unless it is receiving a steady stream of falling nanothermitic dust, it will be extinguished.

Apparently the responders had to tread lightly so as not disturb the dust, causing it to fall into the fire and keep it going for 3 months.

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=7734166&postcount=1468

uk_dave

6th November 2011, 06:59 AM

Oh **** me gently with a chainsaw. Miragememories still posts on 9/11 crap? wow

GlennB

6th November 2011, 10:06 AM

More from Miragememories ...

Yet, with WTC7, not even a single brick was observed to drop until the start of global collapse.

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9872/set3sccompositeua1.png

In which his set of stills shows the onset of collapse with the East Mechanical Penthouse entirely missing.

Too funny ;)

Supermac

6th November 2011, 11:00 AM

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=12128&page=319

Bad news. Over at the DI forum another evil plot is revealed.

"In this country government kills its own people. Our politician are completly corrupted and doesn't have any right to represent people, they lye to us every day. Our elections is joke and complete falcification. Our prime minister is a criminal who is involved in henocide of its own people. Our royal family is involved in hidden conspiracy of dumping deadly and toxic chemicals from the aircraft to UK population. Our bankers and business elite is financing this henocide operation."

And I thought it was only Colonel Sanders who was involved.

Captain_Swoop

6th November 2011, 11:40 AM

'henocide'? Killing lots of chickens? second only to Sheepocide

Nick Terry

6th November 2011, 11:50 AM

'henocide'? Killing lots of chickens? second only to Sheepocide

genocide pronounced by a Ukrainian?

Nick Terry

6th November 2011, 11:53 AM

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060300812&postcount=20

"yes you do. eyeballing is how us realmen determine an EXACT ballpark figure...while you queenies
need some fancy intruments to calculate the measurement we realmen have already agree upon.

i say the moon is looking bigger!!! and that's that."

The Moon is bigger, and that is an exact ballpark figure estimate thingy - I can tell with my eyes no less.

Wow, that is the Stundie of the Year. Or the best Poe since Edgar Allen....

EventHorizon

6th November 2011, 02:55 PM

'Exact ballpark figure' ranks right up there with last month's winner: 'verbatim just written differently'.

Erock

6th November 2011, 03:01 PM

http://www.politicalforum.com/4650769-post1.html

"Common sense would say if we want to have a stable foundation for the Spacestation, we should anchor it to the Moon? right?

wrong. they lied so much about the Moon Landing, that they had to re-route their lies into building a Spacestation suspended in outerspace instead.

You'd think if we went to the Moon once, we could go back anytime we felt the need to. and a Trillion dollar Spacestation is a need to in anybody's book.

The Space station needs boosters to stay in formation or it would float away into deep outerspace wouldn't it?

Again, why not anchor the Spacestation TO THE MOON?"

:jaw-dropp

IIIClovisIII

6th November 2011, 04:58 PM

I don't know if this is Stundie material (probably not), but I'll just post it for fun:

That's not evalution, that's varience...their still bacteria, there still pathogens...

A basset hound is still a dog, like a wolf...and can only mate with a dog...

Your dismantled....next....

from Topix.

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/christian/TU5PFVIS4NP2AC135

Notice the two attempts at "they're"
:dl:

And then after a few exchanges

I dismantled you...your not suppose to be talking anymore...

NoahFence

6th November 2011, 04:58 PM

Wow, that is the Stundie of the Year. Or the best Poe since Edgar Allen....

Dammit!!!

You know when you try to get one in, but another just comes up that's unbeatable? Man. And we have a whole month left to battle for 2nd place....

NoahFence

6th November 2011, 05:02 PM

bynmdsue originally posted this, but it's not him I want to stundie, it's the link

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=7737014&postcount=1

I don't mean to steal it from bynmdsue, but I felt it needed to be seen to be believed!

Macgyver1968

6th November 2011, 05:33 PM

bynmdsue originally posted this, but it's not him I want to stundie, it's the link

I don't mean to steal it from bynmdsue, but I felt it needed to be seen to be believed!

Ahh...the truthers....they're always:
zZefX8bgEEE

sts60

6th November 2011, 09:31 PM

http://www.politicalforum.com/4650769-post1.html
"Common sense would say if we want to have a stable foundation for the Spacestation, we should anchor it to the Moon? right?

wrong. they lied so much about the Moon Landing, that they had to re-route their lies into building a Spacestation suspended in outerspace instead.

You'd think if we went to the Moon once, we could go back anytime we felt the need to. and a Trillion dollar Spacestation is a need to in anybody's book.

The Space station needs boosters to stay in formation or it would float away into deep outerspace wouldn't it?

Again, why not anchor the Spacestation TO THE MOON?"

:jaw-dropp

I enjoyed reading this contribution from the comfort* of my own space station, which I keep firmly anchored to the Earth - a very stable lithosynchronous orbit indeed.

* When I say it has all the comforts of home, I really mean it.

Mel Odious

6th November 2011, 10:39 PM

Can we nominate sigs for stundie awards? 'Cause this is a good one:

Remember: The complete lack of evidence is the surest sign that the conspiracy is working. :)

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060342247&postcount=10

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence CONSPIRACY.

Carl Sagan must be spinning in his grave.

ApolloGnomon

6th November 2011, 11:04 PM

Wow... November's off to a good start.

"good" being a very relative thing..... some of these are simply horrific and threaten my normally invincible faith in humanity.

... and it's only the first week! :covereyes

LordXenu

6th November 2011, 11:38 PM

If God isn't speaking to you directly giving you "warnings" and "premonitions" then you aren't a true Christian:
http://vault-co.blogspot.com/2011/11/vault-co-got-it-right-everybody-else.html?showComment=1320560221708#c5301792878969 296948

Except that real Christians know that there are no "innocents." You can bet that the day before Sodom was destroyed, people were cursing Lot for going around telling them they were doomed and to repent. "Repent for what?" they probably asked. "I'm a decent guy. I donate money to the pedophile orphanage league and regularly help out at the man-goo smoothie soup kitchens. I'm just a guy trying to get by. What, are innocent people like me also a target of God's wrath?"

It's easy to tell if you're a child of God. Has God been giving you warnings and premonitions? If he hasn't,maybe it is because you are not on his CC list. Right? Think about it. Maybe, he doesn't give a damn about you. If this possibility bothers you, there may be hope for you yet.

On the other hand, if you're a Sodomite who is completely puzzled about why God's wrath might fall on you, is it possible that God doesn't bother to speak to you at all?

Travis

7th November 2011, 01:36 AM

cocana

7th November 2011, 01:55 AM

Nobody can write that badly by accident. At least that is what I want to believe because the implications, if it is true, is that someone somehow learned to write without ever reading anything.

Damn that Heathrow Airport and its flight paths.

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&sugexp=kjrmc&cp=9&gs_id=4&xhr=t&q=aylesbury&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&biw=1280&bih=871&wrapid=tljp132065928328200&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x487657882dadcdbd:0xd81b10fa587ffbb3,Aylesb ury,+Buckinghamshire&gl=uk&ei=VKm3To7TOMqLswbcu6y8Aw&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CDAQ8gEwAA
http://www.heathrowairport.com/portal/page/Heathrow+noise%5EGeneral%5ENoise+explained%5ENoise +from+specific+operations%5EDepartures/7d0eff6b59b53210VgnVCM10000036821c0a____/448c6a4c7f1b0010VgnVCM200000357e120a____/

PS - for those unfamiliar with the location of Heathrow Airport, it's near Hounslow on the Google Map. Note where Aylesbury is and then compare with the westerly direction flightpaths on the PDF from the Heathrow link.

Someone needs to put this on the Ickey thread.

EDIT - maybe not. It'll just provoke discussion to the effect that practically every airline in the world is in on a conspiracy to lay chemtrails over Aylesbury.

Erock

7th November 2011, 05:09 AM

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060342659&postcount=359

"Aluminium does not reflect heat in the way you are hoping.
It might reflect light and that means different parts of the spectrum including UV and IR but that is not the same as reflecting radiant heat."

That old stelios at DIF strikes again:boggled:

Spindrift

7th November 2011, 06:27 AM

Klimax

7th November 2011, 06:36 AM

Nobody can write that badly by accident. At least that is what I want to believe because the implications, if it is true, is that someone somehow learned to write without ever reading anything.

I am sorry...

http://ohinternet.com/My_Immortal

http://web.archive.org/web/20100125072310/http://myimmortalrehost.webs.com/index.htm

BNRT

7th November 2011, 01:11 PM

I am sorry...

http://ohinternet.com/My_Immortal

http://web.archive.org/web/20100125072310/http://myimmortalrehost.webs.com/index.htm

I refuse to believe that is real. It's just too much.

LSSBB

7th November 2011, 01:47 PM

I refuse to believe that is real. It's just too much.

"“NO.” he muttered loudly."

Molinaro

7th November 2011, 02:34 PM

"“NO.” he muttered loudly."

My new favorite thing to do.. mutter loudly. :)

Travis

7th November 2011, 08:18 PM

I am sorry...

http://ohinternet.com/My_Immortal

http://web.archive.org/web/20100125072310/http://myimmortalrehost.webs.com/index.htm

My girlfriend turned me onto that a few months ago. Absolutely hilarious.

But still not written as badly as that nomination.

Klimax

7th November 2011, 09:56 PM

My girlfriend turned me onto that a few months ago. Absolutely hilarious.

But still not written as badly as that nomination.

Am I missing something? (MI could have affected my perception already...) I don't see such level of brokeness in that quote.

MetalPig

9th November 2011, 02:43 AM

"Vampire and I began 2 make out, moshing to the muzik."
That's a good trick right there, making out while moshing.

"if ur a homophone den **** of!"
Don't worry, I'm not. I just sound like one.

Make sure your quotes don't try to get around the autocensor either.

MetalPig

9th November 2011, 07:43 AM

Oops.

Supermac

9th November 2011, 11:23 AM

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=188551

An absolute gem from the DI forum. Someone has discovered something suspicious on their pc.

"I found something called Panther on my computer, after researching this is what I found about it..."

Like all good CTers he's done some 'research'.

The Rothschilds are attempting to clone him - on his own pc. Just in time someone comes along and solves the mystery. The op disappears without trace.

Captain_Swoop

9th November 2011, 11:37 AM

easy mistake to make, those Cloners get everywhere. I hear they even clone car registrations.

cocana

10th November 2011, 03:38 AM

I think last month's winner could be on target for another!

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060344719&postcount=846

THANKS!!
But I must respectfully decline the offer.
On the other hand....
I elect you to stand in my stead and accept it on my behalf :eye-poppi

Even better that he should make such a dumb remark in relation to the stundie award!

jargon buster

10th November 2011, 03:45 AM

Even better that he should make such a dumb remark in relation to the stundie award!
If I didn't know jackieg the half wit better, I would say he's doing it on purpose.

Rolfe

10th November 2011, 05:07 AM

I nominate Robert Prey, for this post from the politics section. This was after being told that correct logic itself was no barrier to a false conclusion, if it was based on false premises.

My assumptions are correct and being common knowledge, are immune from attack.

Rolfe.

RoboTimbo

10th November 2011, 06:00 AM

Robert is just made of Stundie.
I see a shot from the front blowing out his head producing a predictable jet effect spray of blood, brain and tissue. You see only what you want to see. I also see Jackie turning around to the trunk to try to retrieve a chunk of the JFK's brain blown away from the back of his head. But it's all subject to interpretation, which is why my proof of a second shooter lies in the un-assailable statements of the Parkland Personnel, not the Z film.

EventHorizon

10th November 2011, 07:11 AM

I nominate Robert Prey, for this post from the politics section. This was after being told that correct logic itself was no barrier to a false conclusion, if it was based on false premises.

That has to be the November winner.

Robert is just made of Stundie.

This one I love because he says 'you see only what you want to see' and then describes something that only he sees.

Spindrift

10th November 2011, 07:25 AM

I nominate Robert Prey, for this post from the politics section. This was after being told that correct logic itself was no barrier to a false conclusion, if it was based on false premises.

Rolfe.

Beat me to it. That one is just remarkable.

Robert is approaching Anders on Stundies to post ratio.

Dave Rogers

10th November 2011, 09:45 AM

Robert Prey demonstrates that the special pleading fallacy, for some reason, doesn't apply to him:

You see what you want to see. That's why I rely on the un-impeachable observations of the Parkland Witnesses.

Dave

slowsmile

10th November 2011, 10:04 AM

From the Icke Forums, 7forever re-invents stupid.

"A column is a horizontal component ..
A beam is a vertical component .. vertical meaning in the side to side direction."

forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060327644&postcount=469 (sorry I haven't made enough postings yet to show the full link).

Alferd_Packer

10th November 2011, 10:12 AM

Herman Cain diring last night's debate:

"For every person that comes forward with a false accusation, there are thousands that would say none of (those) activities ever came from Herman Cain."

From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20111109/...#ixzz1dJuhO2K6

He would make a good truther, don't you think?

EventHorizon

10th November 2011, 10:18 AM

Just one more to add to the Robert Prey pile:

The Z film is a rorschach test. It can mean whatever you want it to mean. Perhaps it's a vagina.

Sure the Zapruder film is a blurry by today's standards but equating it with an inkblot is ridiculous.

Cl1mh4224rd

10th November 2011, 10:41 AM

I don't frequent the Politics section, but what little I've seen of Robert Prey's posts scream classic trolling to me...

uk_dave

10th November 2011, 10:56 AM

I don't frequent the Politics section, but what little I've seen of Robert Prey's posts scream classic trolling to me...

Sadly you don't have to visit politics as he is posting within this very manor.

Walter Ego

10th November 2011, 01:21 PM

I don't frequent the Politics section, but what little I've seen of Robert Prey's posts scream classic trolling to me...

I would say petulant adolescent... or I hope he's still an adolescent. Most of his current posts are on the JFK thread (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=222556) I started on this forum.

Here are two more from USA Politics.

Originally Posted by Robert Prey

Just out of curiosity, how are the Republicans "anti-science." Why would anyone think that? Perhaps because some reject the fable of Man made global warming?

Originally Posted by Robert Prey

Do you realize that killing the unborn for not having a functioning brain is a principle that endangers many of the already born?

I think he was talking about himself in that last one. ;)

RoboTimbo

10th November 2011, 01:29 PM

He can't decide which forum to fail the most miserably in. This is another one from CT:

Shot from the Grassy Knoll-- Proved. Again

I know this is useless to those who refuse to accept the plain truth, even when it's so obvious, but I'm going to point out one more time with specific examples of how the frontal impact of that fatal bullet to the right temple had to create a jet effect of blood and tissue. This is what must happen as you can see in the following slow-motion video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfDoQwIAaXg

The video shows exactly the opposite. He may as well have posted a video of shooting himself in the foot.

Redtail

10th November 2011, 09:19 PM

Rolfe

11th November 2011, 01:10 AM

I'm not sure that's a Stundie, really. It's just plain ignorance of the definitions of words - at least as it's presented there.

Rolfe.

EHocking

11th November 2011, 06:12 AM

I'm not a fan of the ignore function anyway, but putting people on ignore for doing exactly what he himself does doesn't further Marokkaan's position much.If I didn't have you on ignore, I'd fully agree with this post.

Walter Ego

11th November 2011, 06:53 AM

Another one from Robert though I agree the first one from Rolfe is the best.

Nonsense. The independent corroboration of 20 people is overwhelming evidence. The only other "evidence' would be the un-tampered original autopsy photos which are both tampered and classified.

carlitos

11th November 2011, 09:38 AM

Dilbert is reality.
In a long post about waking up the sheeple, here's a mini-stundie to cleanse your palate.

Cl1mh4224rd

11th November 2011, 09:40 AM

Another one from Robert though I agree the first one from Rolfe is the best.

Sounds like he'd be a fan of CIT.

Horatius

11th November 2011, 10:56 AM

I'm not sure that's a Stundie, really. It's just plain ignorance of the definitions of words - at least as it's presented there.

Rolfe.

See, I can understand someone not knowing the technical differences between the terms "column" and "beam", as used by engineers.

Problem is, he does know the difference:

"A column is a horizontal component ..
A beam is a vertical component .. vertical meaning in the side to side direction."

...it's the words "vertical" and "horizontal" he doesn't know. That's just plain English! I expect technical terms to trip people up occasionally (in my work, it happens to me all the time!), but when you've got the definitions of the terms right there in front of you, and you get them completely ass-backwards because you completely screwed up the normal English words, well, that's Stundilicious!

Robrob

11th November 2011, 11:45 AM

vertical meaning in the side to side direction
:D

LSSBB

11th November 2011, 11:55 AM

Wow...

He's correct you know, if you are lying on your side. Reference frames...

LordXenu

11th November 2011, 06:12 PM

Nuclear wars happen over and over again:
http://vault-co.blogspot.com/2011/11/who-built-pyramids.html

As we've told you a hundred times, this isn't the first atomic war approaching and it won't be the last. I have a sneaking suspicion that nuclear wars are an extremely common event on this planet and that there have been so many of them you could not number them on your fingers and toes.

sylvan8798

11th November 2011, 07:04 PM

He's correct you know, if you are lying on your side. Reference frames...
That's what happens when you're a couch potato....:rolleyes:

NWO Sentryman

12th November 2011, 07:28 AM

Anything by Masonicon in this thread. particularly this:

http://forums.spacebattles.com/showthread.php?p=6692640#post6692640

more from trope that I dislike: Everything that exists and happens in Real Life is restricted to what's proven by Mainstream Media and Mainstream Scientific establishments(what's the proper title for this trope?) and I can't believe this because the universe named Real life is bigger than Most(if not all) of all Fictional universes combined together

Walter Ego

12th November 2011, 08:11 PM

Some people may not know that Stundie is a real person. He tells his story on this thread (http://s10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/ar/t16278.htm) on the Loose Change forum. Some excerpts:

A poster came on the SLC to tell how he had been banned from the Loose Change forum, so I told him about how I got banned from the JREF forum. I didn’t have a clue as to why! Someone called Orphia Nay emailed me to tell me why I had been banned. The admin thought I was a sock of "Pdoherty" (Again, I had no clue who he was at the time!) and had banned me. How they came to this conclusion??...I subsequently found out that I apparently had a similar IP address? (This was utter ********!) This was definitely a face saving exercise for the moderators in order to protect their beloved Gravy. :eye-poppi

------

Then the Stundie were started because of a spelling mistake I made, this was again in response to the fact that none of the JREFers at SLC could handle me and my arguments. (They really do struggle without the trolls at the JREF forum to support their ideology!) Admittedly, I’m human and make mistakes, sometimes spelling mistakes and even mistakes in my claims, but I’ve always apologised for them.

I complained directly to James Randi, as setting up the Stundie Awards was in direct confliction [sic] within their own rules. However, seeing as I’m not a member, they manage to carry it on as I’m still banned. Too be honest about it, I’m actually honoured they have the Stundie Awards at the JREF forum as all it does is confirm that they are clutching at straws to discredit me. :eye-poppi

LordXenu

12th November 2011, 08:21 PM

Dan Maes, the 2010 Republican candidate for the governor of Colorado, said that bike sharing programs are part of a United Nations takeover:
http://www.denverpost.com/election2010/ci_15673894

Republican gubernatorial candidate Dan Maes is warning voters that Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper's policies, particularly his efforts to boost bike riding, are "converting Denver into a United Nations community."

"This is all very well-disguised, but it will be exposed," Maes told about 50 supporters who showed up at a campaign rally last week in Centennial.

Maes said in a later interview that he once thought the mayor's efforts to promote cycling and other environmental initiatives were harmless and well-meaning. Now he realizes "that's exactly the attitude they want you to have."

"This is bigger than it looks like on the surface, and it could threaten our personal freedoms," Maes said.

He added: "These aren't just warm, fuzzy ideas from the mayor. These are very specific strategies that are dictated to us by this United Nations program that mayors have signed on to."

Hickenlooper won the gubernatorial election and Maes only got 11% of the vote.

Robrob

12th November 2011, 11:38 PM

Hickenlooper won the gubernatorial election and Maes only got 11% of the vote.
My faith in the people of Denver has been reaffirmed.

Sledge

12th November 2011, 11:41 PM

In a long post about waking up the sheeple, here's a mini-stundie to cleanse your palate.

I take it you've never worked in an office? :p

jaydeehess

13th November 2011, 01:21 PM

Indeed, Dilbert is funny because its often true.
,,,, I work for a telecommunications company not too far removed from Dilbert's line of work.

jaydeehess

13th November 2011, 01:22 PM

My faith in the people of Denver has been reaffirmed.

ditto!

I was despairing as I read the post only to see it through to its happy ending.

LordXenu

13th November 2011, 03:01 PM

My faith in the people of Denver has been reaffirmed.

It's not just Denver. It's the whole state of Colorado. Granted Tom Tancredo was running as a third party candidate, but even with Tancredo as a spoiler this guy could only get 11% of the vote. That was probably everyone who just voted straight Republican without thinking.

CompusMentus

13th November 2011, 03:02 PM

Some people may not know that Stundie is a real person.....

You can put even more flesh on the bones over at Unexplained-Mysteries (http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com) fora. Stundie makes frequent incursions into the 9/11 related threads over there.

Good hunting.

Compus

Elizabeth I

13th November 2011, 07:47 PM

I take it you've never worked in an office? :p

Indeed, Dilbert is funny because its often true.
,,,, I work for a telecommunications company not too far removed from Dilbert's line of work.

As a matter of fact, I've heard of something called the "Dilbert factor" that consultants use to identify dysfunctional work teams - the more Dilbert cartoons tacked up around the office, the more likely the team is badly managed and poor-performing.

jaydeehess

13th November 2011, 09:23 PM

As a matter of fact, I've heard of something called the "Dilbert factor" that consultants use to identify dysfunctional work teams - the more Dilbert cartoons tacked up around the office, the more likely the team is badly managed and poor-performing.

Non-union, we don't dare do that. Its just "did you see Dilbert yesterday?" with upraised eyebrows and knowing glances.:D

In our case its not bad local management but sometimes the decisions from on high in the head office, 1000 miles away, are too Dilbertian for comfort.

ApolloGnomon

13th November 2011, 09:35 PM

So you work in the Elbonian extension office then?

Travis

14th November 2011, 01:34 AM

more from trope that I dislike: Everything that exists and happens in Real Life is restricted to what's proven by Mainstream Media and Mainstream Scientific establishments(what's the proper title for this trope?) and I can't believe this because the universe named Real life is bigger than Most(if not all) of all Fictional universes combined together

That damned Reality Trope always ruining things.

Dave Rogers

14th November 2011, 01:37 AM

New not-a-conspiracy-theorist-honestly member madfoot disputes whether John Farmer's book says what it actually says, and posts a blurb off Amazon to try to prove it says something else instead. When Hokulele points this out:

If pointing out the fact that you are deliberately ignoring John Farmer's own words in favor of advertising copy for a book you haven't read isn't helpful ... well ...
You think I'm here to advertise his book? ^_^

Nominated for sheer non sequitur value, and total lack of any vestige of reading comprehension.

Dave

LSSBB

14th November 2011, 09:48 AM

You know it when you see it because you see it when you know it:

It's not ALL common sense uke2se........, you simply have to use common sense to see when common sense applies.

Erock

14th November 2011, 11:03 AM

Correcting other people, correcting his mistakes, we have.....

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362021&postcount=14018

''I was here.'' thats good. ''I were here'' thats bad ''We were here'' and ''We was here'' both ok.

Were is past tense contraction of we're which is a contraction of we are.

Rocks and sand are not we, they are mineral. There for they ''was'' contaminated is correct english.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362380&postcount=14026

"You we are at work today" reads like its missing a comma and your getting someone's attention and telling them you are both (or more, plural) at work today

Past tense, dummy "You were at work today" indecation that person saying it was also there.

"You was at work today" indecation that person saying it was not there.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362505&postcount=14029

Simple test, remember, plural person = Were, Singular person = Was Nouns = was

Was - Were - Past Tense of the verb "To Be"

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362564&postcount=14034

Try the test paddy you will find were only goes with plural person

Was - Were - Past Tense of the verb "To Be"

http://esl.about.com/library/beginner/blwas.htm

The alleged mooon samples WAS water contaminated and chemically altered, apollogists know this, but its difficult to apologise without me giving them words to twist.

As a non plural person, all I can say is educashun, it wasn't all what it were cracked up to be:jaw-dropp

Stacko

14th November 2011, 11:41 AM

You know it when you see it because you see it when you know it:

So it's porn then. Who'd have thought that would be the way to reason everything out after all.

RoboTimbo

14th November 2011, 03:18 PM

Never a dull moment with our Robert when talking about the Kennedy assassination and what we see in the Zapruder film.

Why does the zupruder film show the blow out being on the front of the head?

Because you have a biased imagination. It shows a jet effect blur of blood and tissue of an entrance wound caused by a bullet shot from the front.

jaydeehess

14th November 2011, 03:24 PM

So you work in the Elbonian extension office then?

Its a darned good thing I had not taken a sip of my soda as I was reading that.

No, but I can see Elbonia from my house......:D

carlitos

14th November 2011, 03:28 PM

As a non plural person, all I can say is educashun, it wasn't all what it were cracked up to be:jaw-dropp
Those were breathtaking. Thanks.

jaydeehess

14th November 2011, 03:31 PM

You know it when you see it because you see it when you know it:

to paraphrase Mr.Gump "Common sense is as common sense does".

jaydeehess

14th November 2011, 03:35 PM

Correcting other people, correcting his mistakes, we have.....

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362021&postcount=14018

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362380&postcount=14026

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362505&postcount=14029

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060362564&postcount=14034

http://esl.about.com/library/beginner/blwas.htm

As a non plural person, all I can say is educashun, it wasn't all what it were cracked up to be:jaw-dropp

Has anyone told him that he can purchase a dictionary for a few bucks on Amazon?

grmcdorman

14th November 2011, 04:28 PM

Has anyone told him that he can purchase a dictionary for a few bucks on Amazon?
Hell, there are free online dictionaries, most notably at... dictionary.com. But what do I know, that's probably controlled by the NWO, being a .com and all.

PhantomWolf

14th November 2011, 05:22 PM

So apparently nothing gets colder if it's in a vaccum. Who would have thought?

after the exhaust leaves the rocket, the temperature can't change in a vacuum.

LSSBB

14th November 2011, 06:37 PM

So apparently nothing gets colder if it's in a vaccum. Who would have thought?
Originally Posted by playdor
after the exhaust leaves the rocket, the temperature can't change in a vacuum.

Almost made me spit my dinner out my nose with that one. That hurts!

Alferd_Packer

14th November 2011, 06:53 PM

I take it you've never worked in an office? :p

with engineers.

Travis

15th November 2011, 12:09 AM

Damnit, and I've been saying "you were wrong" my entire life! I guess these guys (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/were) be wrong too.

Tomtomkent

15th November 2011, 12:17 AM

Damnit, and I've been saying "you were wrong" my entire life! I guess these guys (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/were) be wrong too.

You am wrong in da past?

Supermac

15th November 2011, 12:25 AM

Something important is going to happen on 21st Dec 2012 - apparently. Someone on the DI forum explains,

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=190487

Warning - this will hurt your brain.

garethdjb

15th November 2011, 02:40 AM

Travis

15th November 2011, 02:52 AM

You am wrong in da past?
Unpossible. I be wrong never. We are you smoking something?

Travis

15th November 2011, 03:01 AM

Something important is going to happen on 21st Dec 2012 - apparently. Someone on the DI forum explains,

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=190487

Warning - this will hurt your brain.

Oh boy.....

The greater quantum of the planetary Metatronic Time-Harness will override the smaller quantum of the existing Encryption Lattice

I think the entire post was created by picking out random words that sound cool.

Horatius

15th November 2011, 05:17 AM

Amazing. You're talking about a government that has officially lied to the public countless times and, as far as I know, never officially acknowledged any wrong doing.

You're talking about an elected government that has officially dismantled America into 21st century feudalism.

Hey, I was wondering why we could start jousting again! (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=223268)

sts60

15th November 2011, 09:55 AM

So apparently nothing gets colder if it's in a vaccum. Who would have thought?

playdor has done better than that.

In response to Patrick1000/fattydash/<and many more sock-puppets>'s marvel of crisp thinking, in which he asserts in the same thread that Apollo astronauts were told not to talk about stars, and then claims as evidence Al Worden's postflight discussion of seeing too many stars to readily pick out some specific ones, I offer this rebuttal by playdor (http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=gotopost&board=theories&thread=3248&post=94877):

The sky is black in space because there is little or no scattering of light. You can't see stars with your own eyes in space because they are too far away. The angular diameter of the biggest star in the sky, Betelgeuse, is 50 milli- arc secondes and the angular resolution of an human eye in 60 arc secondes. Therefore, the angular diameter of the largest star in the sky is about 1000 smaller than the resolution of a human eye! Then You can't see star when you are in space. It is comparable to trying to look at a 1 dollar coin (2 centimer diameter) located 200 km away from you - you can't simply resolve it!

Never mind P1k/fd's contradictory claims that the Apollo astronauts didn't see enough stars and saw too many stars. They didn't see any stars, and neither do Shuttle or Station crews. You can't see stars in space!

Debaser

15th November 2011, 12:55 PM

with engineers.

Steady......

JamesB

15th November 2011, 07:00 PM

This wouldn't be so funny, except the writer describes himself as Jeffrey G. Strahl "retired engineer/math instructor". I just want to know what kind of crane they use to lift these beams:

http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684DVPF7H2D/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx219ILD382OH2M&cdPage=1&asin=1566568684&newContentNum=197&store=books&cdSort=newest&cdThread=Tx17ZLVKHFAQE0B&newContentID=Mx1N4JB0AGVL56D#Mx1EYG714FMYNNR

Steel beams weigh thousands of tons, will not float in the air, unlike flour particles, which are extremely light, which can be moved every which way by even lightly blowing air on them . It would take a huge force to move them sideways at all, let alone eject them at high speeds, a force far bigger than their weight, which acts vertically.

Alferd_Packer

15th November 2011, 07:45 PM

OK, this one is just for goofs and giggles since it's not really something someone has said, but what they did.

It seems that the football coaches on the sidelines at Ol' Miss have figured out the perfect way to signal the play to the players in the huddle.

They hold up a large sign with the initials of the player the quarterback is to give the ball to.

http://www.redcuprebellion.com/2011/11/14/2560943/our-offensive-signals-not-smarter-than-a-fifth-grader

Border Reiver

16th November 2011, 04:49 AM

slowsmile

16th November 2011, 05:33 AM

Lemme see if I understand this:

You owe a tax debt and don't want to pay;
You do the FMOTL magic ritual;
Da gubbmint seizes your stuff to pay your debt;
You posit that its not the FMOTL woo thats flawed, it's the government that refuses to recognize that the woo is correct.

Someone, somewhere will no doubt chalk this up as another FMOTL "success" - after all the freeman did everything right, the government just cheated -again :D

jargon buster

16th November 2011, 05:52 AM

Someone, somewhere will no doubt chalk this up as another FMOTL "success
bit like this one
http://www.news-journalonline.com/news/local/east-volusia/2011/11/09/judge-in-daytona-targeted-by-man-in-foreclosure-case.html

Judge Rouse found Sanchez committed contempt of court by filing the liens. Rouse gave him 179 days in jail -- significantly less than the one-year maximum allowed.

No doubt with a nod and a wink from the judge to acknowledge the freemans "inonitness" *
* is that a new word I just invented?

Tomtomkent

16th November 2011, 06:03 AM

Gotta nominate this one from one of our fav sources of stundie:

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060367385&postcount=54

Lemme see if I understand this:

You owe a tax debt and don't want to pay;
You do the FMOTL magic ritual;
Da gubbmint seizes your stuff to pay your debt;
You posit that its not the FMOTL woo thats flawed, it's the government that refuses to recognize that the woo is correct.

I love that he puts "court order" in inverted commas.

I imagine something like this being said;
"So you think the judicial arm of legistrative powers can just order me to pay the taxes I owe? With some kind of order? From the courts? What is this?"

Im a liberal socialist, but FMOTL makes me long for Pay-On-Demand system for civil services. You dont want to pay taxes? Just make sure you never need any civil,fedral or council service, as they all demand payment when you do...

Border Reiver

16th November 2011, 06:15 AM

Someone, somewhere will no doubt chalk this up as another FMOTL "success" - after all the freeman did everything right, the government just cheated -again :D

We do that, you know by following the published rules of court, the published laws passed by the elected officials, not relying on "secret words and phrases", etc.

carlitos

16th November 2011, 11:52 AM

7forever explains perspective to us laymen.

No there isnt, There are different camera locations that you, as an ignorant child, cannot resolve.

No there isnt, The camera angles cannot change where the fake images were in the relation to the towers. The fake west plane is west and does not change because of camera angle...sorry.

JayUtah

16th November 2011, 02:17 PM

Well I can't prove it in a rigorous sense frenat......, but I can do a dang good job approximating rigor.

And given enough voltage, a corpse can do a dang good job of approximating vitality.

matt.tansy

16th November 2011, 08:07 PM

Evidently, if you know which way you are facing, you cannot know which way you are facing.

This one example demonstrates with great clarity that we are expected to believe attitude checks/platform alignments could be carried out by the very same system that is to be checked and corrected for.

abaddon

17th November 2011, 08:03 AM

And yet another believer that sunlight is trapped gravity, or atmosphere, or something.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060369369&postcount=14102
Incident sunlight is trapped by the atmosphere, and we DO have an atmosphere.
Are you sure its not you who is talking bollocks ?

jaydeehess

17th November 2011, 03:49 PM

You posit that its not the FMOTL woo thats flawed, it's the government that refuses to recognize that the woo is correct.

unfortunately your sarcastic statement seems to be exactly what they would claim. (albeit they might use a different term than 'woo'):D

LordXenu

17th November 2011, 10:25 PM

Keoni Galt, the Hawaiian Libertarian, says there's a conspiracy to lower testosterone by tricking us into not eating meat:
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-diet-nutrition-and-masculinity.html

See, on a basic, physiological level, what is the primary difference in male and female biology? When you get right down to it, it's testosterone.

And the standard low-fat, no-red meat, low cholesterol, plant-based diet that we are all supposedly should be eating to have good health? It's a diet that is primarily instrumental in reducing the bodies production of testosterone.

Saturated fat, and cholesterol are primary building blocks for the bodies production of testosterone.

To put it simply, a low-fat diet, is a low-T diet.

Speaking for myself, It's been 4 years now since I've adopted a high-protein, high-fat diet - I like to call it a Nutrient Dense, Real Food diet, after nearly a decade of low-fat, non-fat, semi-vegetarian, whole grain diet, all through my 20's and early 30's. That diet saw me increasingly getting fatter (at my worst, I was 40 lbs. overweight), and in hindsight, I now realize I had a gradually decreasing libido.

Eating too many plant foods and not enough animal foods was turning me into an Herb.

After a few years of eating paleo, I've discovered that I now have a constant, raging libido of a caveman ready to club the nearest fertile female and drag her away for some carnal savagery. I haven't felt like this since I was 15 years old and first starting dating, and could think of nothing else but sex, drugs, sex, rock-n-roll, and sex. One thing about being older though, while my libido has been rejuvenated by my diet, you don't get the bothersome, can't-control effects like involuntary erections, like you do when you first pass through puberty.

Yes, he said that eating meat increased his libido.

I have to ask. Is the paleo diet a conspiracy theory? The only people I know of who follow the paleo diet are all conspiracy theorists.

Supermac

18th November 2011, 01:01 AM

Supermac

18th November 2011, 01:05 AM

Keoni Galt, the Hawaiian Libertarian, says there's a conspiracy to lower testosterone by tricking us into not eating meat:
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-diet-nutrition-and-masculinity.html

Yes, he said that eating meat increased his libido.

I have to ask. Is the paleo diet a conspiracy theory? The only people I know of who follow the paleo diet are all conspiracy theorists.

I've always wondered. Where do they get the dinosaur steaks from?

---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.065517,-1.504711

Elizabeth I

18th November 2011, 03:33 AM

Keoni Galt, the Hawaiian Libertarian, says there's a conspiracy to lower testosterone by tricking us into not eating meat:
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-diet-nutrition-and-masculinity.html

Yes, he said that eating meat increased his libido.

I have to ask. Is the paleo diet a conspiracy theory? The only people I know of who follow the paleo diet are all conspiracy theorists.

With all the talk about how much female hormone is injected into meat animals, it seems like it would be better for his libido to go vegan.

frenat

18th November 2011, 05:03 AM

Haven't won the lottery? It's a conspiracy.

"what I have had the feeling for years is that their machines are fixed, when I say that their chosen selected numbers are already chosen before the event on live TV, these balls have somekind of magnet inside of them which the machine on live TV picks, they are drawn out by deception right in front of everyones eyes giving the delusion that they were randomly selected but rigged before the event!."

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=190702

---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.065552,-1.505010

It isn't even original. The exact same thing was done on an episode of Monk a few years ago.

Alferd_Packer

18th November 2011, 05:29 AM

It isn't even original. The exact same thing was done on an episode of Monk a few years ago.

Actually, about 25 years ago, they caught someone trying to rig the game by injecting sand into the balls.

frenat

18th November 2011, 05:39 AM

Actually, about 25 years ago, they caught someone trying to rig the game by injecting sand into the balls.

The specific example of magnets was used on Monk. Still no evidence beyond "he hasn't won yet".

Travis

18th November 2011, 05:56 AM

And on Monk it wasn't to prevent anyone from winning (which seems to what the Icke member was alleging) but to have a specific set of numbers win so that the conspirators friend would win.

Horatius

18th November 2011, 07:10 AM

And on Monk it wasn't to prevent anyone from winning (which seems to what the Icke member was alleging) but to have a specific set of numbers win so that the conspirators friend would win.

Which is really the only sensible way to rig a lottery. "I don't care if I win, I just want to make sure YOU don't!" is pretty silly.

jadebox

18th November 2011, 09:43 AM

Actually, about 25 years ago, they caught someone trying to rig the game by injecting sand into the balls.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Pennsylvania_Lottery_scandal

-- Roger

Tomtomkent

18th November 2011, 11:09 AM

I humbly submit post 1163 in the JFK Conspiracy (It never ends) thread, by Robert Prey:
Her is your video evidence.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/12174504/bulletwoundtemple.jpg
Because it proves that his final post that would "reveal all" turned out not to be quite so final, and also porves he is unaware that "video" and "pictorial" are different words.

carlitos

18th November 2011, 12:17 PM

I humbly submit post 1163 in the JFK Conspiracy (It never ends) thread, by Robert Prey:

Because it proves that his final post that would "reveal all" turned out not to be quite so final, and also porves he is unaware that "video" and "pictorial" are different words.

That's because it's a still photo of his computer video monitor.

PS - please NSFW these kinds of photos or links.

Alareth

18th November 2011, 04:44 PM

That's because it's a still photo of his computer video monitor.

I remember there was someone in the 9/11 forums a few years back that would print screenshots from his computer on paper, than use a digital camera to photograph the printed screenshot and then upload that to the forums.

JayUtah

18th November 2011, 04:59 PM

There was an Moon landing hoax theorist, so notorious we still don't mention his name, who would "enhance" Apollo photos by looking at his monitor through a mangifying glass.

RoboTimbo

18th November 2011, 05:16 PM

I remember there was someone in the 9/11 forums a few years back that would print screenshots from his computer on paper, than use a digital camera to photograph the printed screenshot and then upload that to the forums.

7forever used to do it in another JFK assassination thread. He would use his cell phone to zoom in on three pixels on his 1982 13" tv while it was playing a well-used VCR tape of the Zapruder film to prove that the limo driver shot Kennedy.

Redtail

18th November 2011, 05:23 PM

Haven't won the lottery? It's a conspiracy.

"what I have had the feeling for years is that their machines are fixed, when I say that their chosen selected numbers are already chosen before the event on live TV, these balls have somekind of magnet inside of them which the machine on live TV picks, they are drawn out by deception right in front of everyones eyes giving the delusion that they were randomly selected but rigged before the event!."

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=190702

---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.065552,-1.505010

Hah! A buddy of mine won the lottery when I was in the army.

(Great story, his wife got preggers by another guy, married him for the benefits til real dad finished school. She divorced him, told him the kid wasn't his, publicly humiliated him. I mean she really twisted the knife.

Just a short while after the papers were finalized, he won $34mil.)

LordXenu

18th November 2011, 09:15 PM

With all the talk about how much female hormone is injected into meat animals, it seems like it would be better for his libido to go vegan.

I would suspect that he would tell you that beef with hormones is a "feed product" while he eats "food". I know from other posts on his blog that he was doing something with his own chickens and a few other things so he's paranoid enough to grow his own food. If you're wondering how he has the time for it, it's because he hasn't held steady employment for a few years.

LordXenu

18th November 2011, 09:17 PM

Conspiracy theorists often claim that various government agencies like the IRS and the Federal Reserve are really private corporations. This has to be the first time that any conspiracy theorist has claimed the opposite:
http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/11/14/the-occupywallstreet-kids-could-be-working-on-farms-instead-of-hispanics/#comment-79253

You guys never heard of the Council on foreign relations?
(CFR?)

It is a govt agency that uses taxpayer dollars to pay corporations to move outside the US and to no longer pay US taxes.
This is treason, yet it has been going on for decades.
Republicrats as well as Democons.

Ron Paul!
Every year he wins the debates, every year the media shuts him out.

Of course, his rant wasn't complete without a Ron Paul shout out.

Robrob

18th November 2011, 09:47 PM

PhantomWolf

19th November 2011, 12:00 AM

If we all followed this advice from W.A.T.C.H. then anyone with kids would be in trouble, or perhaps just in the dark...

W.A.T.C.H. OUT! This oven uses standard 120-volt house current and shrinks a “shrinky dink” in a “heating chamber” with a 60-watt light bulb. A parent or caregiver needs no further indication that this oven could be dangerous than the litany of warnings and cautions on the toy itself and the packaging, including:

“CAUTION-ELECTRIC TOY: As with all electric products, precautions
shall be observed…to prevent electric shock.”
“WARNING: SHOCK HAZARD. Pull plug before changing light bulb.”
“DANGER – To prevent electric shock, do not immerse in water….”
“CAUTION – SUPERVISION REQUIRED - ELECTRIC TOY- UNPLUG WHEN NOT IN USE.”

A product with so many inherent hazards does not lend itself to use in a home environment with children.

Time to give up those hair-dryers, toasters, TVs, DVD's, oh, and your computer, iPad, and anything else you plug into the wall.

slowsmile

19th November 2011, 04:43 AM

Haven't won the lottery? It's a conspiracy.

"what I have had the feeling for years is that their machines are fixed, when I say that their chosen selected numbers are already chosen before the event on live TV, these balls have somekind of magnet inside of them which the machine on live TV picks, they are drawn out by deception right in front of everyones eyes giving the delusion that they were randomly selected but rigged before the event!."

Obviously the fact that the odds of winning the lottery are over 14 million to one doesn't enter into it.

I've met people like that - they often have a lucky charm that prevents them from being struck by lightning / eaten by bears / abducted by aliens and similar everyday occurrences.

EventHorizon

19th November 2011, 09:15 AM

One more from Robert Prey:

So now you duck the question 3 times. Frame 362 shows the object, briefly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdgRADuzdo0&feature=player_detailpage#t=0s

It probably doesn't qualify as a Stundie because it's useless without the context but this needs to be seen to be believed. Robert has been ducking questions for over 1200 posts (and this post is a direct reply to 8 of those questions) yet he has the audacity to accuse someone else of the same behavior. He follows that up by saying he can see something clearly in a film that he has claimed over and over again is too blurry to see anything clearly.

Tomtomkent

19th November 2011, 10:33 AM

One more from Robert Prey:

It probably doesn't qualify as a Stundie because it's useless without the context but this needs to be seen to be believed. Robert has been ducking questions for over 1200 posts (and this post is a direct reply to 8 of those questions) yet he has the audacity to accuse someone else of the same behavior. He follows that up by saying he can see something clearly in a film that he has claimed over and over again is too blurry to see anything clearly.

And I would like to point out I am not, and will not accuse one of his sources of telling lies or being mistaken in their expert opinion. I will however continue to suggest they may not be recalling their experiences accurately based on material evidence. More than that I will continue to ask why these eye witnesses should be considered any more or less accurate than those whose accounts they conflict with.

By suggesting I was accussing anybody of anything Robert is shoving words into my mouth. He appears unwilling to concede a difference between "I have no evidence to support this view and no reason to assume it is true" and "uh oh you are telling porkies."

Klimax

20th November 2011, 02:14 AM

Just reminder that not only CTers are less then efficent with images...
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Web_0_0x2e_1.aspx

Or was it same person? :D

slowsmile

20th November 2011, 07:41 AM

Communist guerillas in Borneo must have had very thick skulls - or heads as devoid of grey matter as conspiracy theorists.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060376938&postcount=4116

"Was discussing this with a friend of mine, he related an incident in Borneo where a communist geurilla was hit in the head at about 15 metres' range by 3 bullets from a sten gun. He turned and ran, then was killed by a grenade. They found that the bullets had penetrated 2 inches into his skull, without going through to the brain."

Nursedan

20th November 2011, 01:45 PM

"You may think this is off topic, but IMO it is a testament to the type of scum involved in the 911 mega ritual. Occultists use children in rituals, how do you know that Sandusky was not a man involved in 911. After all, both John & Mike Cappelletti went to Penn State & played football there. I have learned of at least 2 other men at Penn State who were involved in the occult beside the Cappellettis."

From a thread on the Icke forums about no-plane theory (did you expect anything less:))

So it was the Jews, then it was Bush, now it's Jerry Sandusky from Penn State.

jaydeehess

20th November 2011, 04:14 PM

There was an Moon landing hoax theorist, so notorious we still don't mention his name, who would "enhance" Apollo photos by looking at his monitor through a mangifying glass.

I believe that it was AE911T that had a video of a broadcast from Sept11/01 in which they pointed out various items supposedly showing suspicious things. At the beginning we see Al Roker doing his on the street walk about. The video is so compressed and re-compressed that Mr. Roker's face was an amorphorous tan coloured area and yet supposedly we could see great detail when the cameras were on the towers.

000063

20th November 2011, 04:22 PM

Indeed, Dilbert is funny because its often true.
,,,, I work for a telecommunications company not too far removed from Dilbert's line of work.Actually, Scott Adams started drawing the strip while working for Pacific Bell.

LordXenu

20th November 2011, 08:50 PM

Robrob

20th November 2011, 11:09 PM

When unable to convince anyone it was OK for a six year old to engage in a sex act with an adult (http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=7773071&postcount=329):
Okay, I'm outta here. You're clearly not interested in the science, but merely confirming your own preconceived notions. You'll fit in well on the JREF forum.

;)

sts60

21st November 2011, 06:37 AM

It really shouldn't count because Patrick1000/fattydash/DoctorTea/etc./etc. is a troll, but it's still funny: After matt.tansy, from his personal experience as a chief electronics technician on ballistic missile submarines, carefully explains how the inertial guidance system from which the missiles are updated doesn't itself need to be updated every femtosecond, the pretend doctor/mathematician/writer/scientist/engineer trots out his own expertise. Bolding mine.

...At the tale end of a Popular Science, May 1958 article, QUICK TRIGGER MISSILE, the author claims the missile's guidance system must know EXACTLY where it is for the launch to be successful in terms of providing the requisite accuracy...

After all, who are you going to listen to, a half-century old Popular Science article or (*snort*) just some guy who's actually operated the guidance systems?

vtbub

21st November 2011, 08:03 AM

Oswald claimed to be a Marxist, but actually was a loyal patriotic American who loved his country, loved his president, was a former US Marine, worked for Naval Intelligence, as well as an operative for CIA and FBI, was sent to USSR after having been sheep dipped as a disloyal American, but never revoked his citizenship, was apparently sent to language school so that he could speak fluent Russian, then sent to USSR so that he could spy for the US. While he made a big splash with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, he was also working with anti-Castro groups at the same time. Someday, when the full truth is accepted, he should be posthumously awarded the Medal of Freedom.

I'm..uhhh...wow...really?

Walter Ego

21st November 2011, 08:18 AM

I'm..uhhh...wow...really?

Drat, beat me to it. :mad:

Is there a Stundie Emeritus Award we can give to Robert Prey?

Dave Rogers

21st November 2011, 08:23 AM

Is there a Stundie Emeritus Award we can give to Robert Prey?

Doesn't he have to have retired first? As far as I know his promised final post, in which he conclusively proves everyone else but him to have been wrong all along, has yet to materialise, but we can always hope.

Dave

Tomtomkent

21st November 2011, 08:24 AM

Doesn't he have to have retired first? As far as I know his promised final post, in which he conclusively proves everyone else but him to have been wrong all along, has yet to materialise, but we can always hope.

Dave

Oh the FINAL NAIL did appear, but was not so final as once promised.

Walter Ego

21st November 2011, 08:28 AM

Doesn't he have to have retired first?

Maybe if we throw in a cash prize and a gold watch he will retire. I'm willing to pass the hat. ;)

sts60

21st November 2011, 09:44 AM

In the ineligible-because-it's-not-actually-a-CT category, surely Justinian2 deserves honors for getting frustrated and demandingYou want your opinions to be considered because???????
You think your opinions should be considered because???????

In a thread he started and titled "What do you think of Scientology?"

Really. The nerve of people giving him their opinions.

Safe-Keeper

21st November 2011, 10:02 AM

Every single post by the OP of the nuke lies thread.

Macgyver1968

21st November 2011, 10:38 AM

Including this stundie gold:

But it worth noting that the sun does not explode, despite being powered supposedly by fusion.

Tomtomkent

21st November 2011, 11:01 AM

Horatius

21st November 2011, 11:02 AM

Including this stundie gold:

But it worth noting that the sun does not explode, despite being powered supposedly by fusion.

Which of course means any astronomer who has ever discussed supernovae is also In On It(tm)

abaddon

21st November 2011, 01:26 PM

tsig

21st November 2011, 05:56 PM

Rerevisionist:

For most of the time human beings existed, nobody knew why they had to eat;
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=7778423&postcount=141

Hunger and starvation were a total mystery!

Johny2x4

21st November 2011, 06:20 PM

I nominate this gem:

http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transformers-toy-discussion/352201-lets-see-some-cool-stuff-2011-tf-edition-new-rules-first-post-read-them-703.html#post6890763

Illuminati symbols on his chest, even worse with Skullgrin who has a goat/Baphomet head, plus the symbols. If you don't know what that means, here it is in one word: EVIL.

A toy is evil!!!!

IIIClovisIII

21st November 2011, 10:40 PM

Although this might seem a little cliche, I decided to nominate the nut anyway:

I do not need science when something is common sense. OKay you can believe that a 47 story building fell completely straight down in 6 seconds(middle first) because debris caused a fire on the top floors. lol The firefighters on the scene knew it was going to be coming down that alone proves that their was advanced knowledge and thus was not a surprise attack.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2216939499390&set=o.2208880197&type=1&theater

Travis

22nd November 2011, 12:39 AM

Which of course means any astronomer who has ever discussed supernovae is also In On It(tm)

Reminds me of the winner from June

For all the Atheists out there, try to deny this! If there is no God, how does the sun stay burning when there's no oxygen in space?

Although this might seem a little cliche, I decided to nominate the nut anyway:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2216939499390&set=o.2208880197&type=1&theater

It continues to amaze me how they think a firefighter looking at a burning building and thinking it might collapse is evidence for their side.

Debaser

22nd November 2011, 05:42 AM

Yes anybody would have thought that the sun was made out of explosions... Whuh? It is? Hydrogen to helium you say? A constant furnace fire of reactions held together by gravity? But surely nuclear explosions trump gravity?

I think you'll find, according to one Stundie nomination, that a nuclear explosion in the basement of the WTC couldn't even bring down the twin towers on its own :eye-poppi . (It needed the extra oomph you only get from conventional high explosives, apparently :jaw-dropp ).

Safe-Keeper

22nd November 2011, 06:48 AM

Including this stundie gold:
But it worth noting that the sun does not explode, despite being powered supposedly by fusion. Somewhere on the nukelies site they wonder if nuclear power could somehow be used to help run evil facilities.

The plot thickens. They'll uncover the truth about electricity and its implications any second now:eye-poppi.

Horatius

22nd November 2011, 07:20 AM

Wow, Rere is really workign it this week:

My opinion is that all the guys on those kinds of skeptic forums are mostly just sayanim jews (with maybe a little bit of Freemasons), put there to bury the truth under a flood of crappy comments.

I was a skeptic myself when I was younger and discovered the work of Henri Broch. But, when I discovered the first skeptic forum (near 2000), I was very disappointed. Except for paranormal stuff, they didn't stop to criticize interesting dissident theories (like the one about aids), exactly as perfect conformists. At the beginning, I thought that followers of an intelligent man (Broch) are most of the time stupid people who are nonconformist only on his views but are stupid sheep on every other matters.

But I soon understood that jews controlled most of the well known forums. Then, I understood that those skeptic forums were just other controlled forums.

Which is absolutely clear now when you see that they sustain all official theories, even the most debunked ones (like aids, 9/11, the holocaust, etc...).

And Randi (real name Randall Swinge) is a jew himself. So, it leaves no doubt to the idea that his forum is driven by sayanims operatives.

Yes, maybe Randi's lot are just vain, rather than hired types. Who knows. But some of them have a few tens of thousands of postings, which must take time, even if the say nothing much.

It says very much in my opinion. You can't have ordinary people having 20.000 messages in only 3 or 4 years. This would mean that they would be on the forum nearly permanently during their free time. People like that are obviously paid to write on forums.

Voerioc ----
But I soon understood that jews controlled most of the well known forums. Then, I understood that those skeptic forums were just other controlled forums.

Which is absolutely clear now when you see that they sustain all official theories, even the most debunked ones (like aids, 9/11, the holocaust, etc...).

And Randi (real name Randall Swinge) is a jew himself. So, it leaves no doubt to the idea that his forum is driven by sayanims operatives.

I did a bit of googling: my "real name" is James Randi. I was born Randall Zwinge, but that was legally discarded long ago, and no such person now exists! You're quite right on the attribution of the quotation, however.

In view of what you say about AIDs, 9/11, the 'holocaust' etc, and the fact Christianity is routinely lambasted by the 'Educational Foundation', whereas nothing honest is ever said about Judaism, I'd say the case is closed.

Looks like the case is closed.

You heard it here first folks, "Case closed", we're all just shills in thrall to Randi the Jew

sylvan8798

22nd November 2011, 08:16 AM

because debris caused a fire on the top floors.
Hmm...

LSSBB

22nd November 2011, 08:27 AM

Wow, Rere is really workign it this week:

You heard it here first folks, "Case closed", we're all just shills in thrall to Randi the Jew

And we do it for free too!

Macgyver1968

22nd November 2011, 08:31 AM

Wait..wait..wait just a gosh darn second....if we're all Jews...that doesn't mean I have to the little...uh...you know..."snip snip" down south does it? Because that **** ain't happening.

:)

catsmate1

22nd November 2011, 08:50 AM

Wait..wait..wait just a gosh darn second....if we're all Jews...that doesn't mean I have to the little...uh...you know..."snip snip" down south does it? Because that **** ain't happening.

:)
We've a thread dedicated to that subject (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=220326).:)

Dave Rogers

22nd November 2011, 08:53 AM

We've a thread dedicated to that subject (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=220326).:)

In which the consensus tends to be anti. Strange, if we're all Jewish.

Dave

Metullus

22nd November 2011, 09:00 AM

In which the consensus tends to be anti. Strange, if we're all Jewish.The perfect cover...

Safe-Keeper

22nd November 2011, 09:07 AM

Rerevisionist makes a distinction between people who are Jewish and people who only think they are Jewish. I suppose we're among the wannabes.

Travis

22nd November 2011, 09:35 AM

Wouldn't a rerevisionist just be a visionist?

ApolloGnomon

22nd November 2011, 10:03 AM

The perfect cover...

. . . so to speak . . .

Cl1mh4224rd

22nd November 2011, 10:12 AM

Somewhere on the nukelies site they wonder if nuclear power could somehow be used to help run evil facilities.

Err... Wouldn't that kind of destroy the entire premise of the site?

twinstead

22nd November 2011, 10:45 AM

Rerevisionist makes a distinction between people who are Jewish and people who only think they are Jewish. I suppose we're among the wannabes.

Does that make us rerejewish?

matt.tansy

22nd November 2011, 12:12 PM

Does that make us rerejewish?

No, it makes us rereregentiles.

Elizabeth I

22nd November 2011, 02:32 PM

Wouldn't a rerevisionist just be a visionist?
No, I think that would be a derevisionist. :p

jaydeehess

22nd November 2011, 02:32 PM

Although this might seem a little cliche, I decided to nominate the nut anyway:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2216939499390&set=o.2208880197&type=1&theater

Well, given that he seems to be conflating the collapse of the towers and of WTC 7 as well as displaying great ignorance in other aspects of 9/11, I would say it counts as Stundiable.

jaydeehess

22nd November 2011, 02:40 PM

It continues to amaze me how they think a firefighter looking at a burning building and thinking it might collapse is evidence for their side.

To be fair here's MM (http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=7781003&postcount=1585) stating the exact opposite as evidence for his side:
When the unexpected occurs, not once, not twice, but, three times, at the same 16 acre site, on the same day, and all in the span of 7.5 hours, it is particularly reasonable to seek an explanation that would make the occurrences a logical expectation......
quotes an article about a meeting at 9:20 am in which "none of the Chiefs" expressed concern about a total collapse. Said article does state that one cheif worried that the upper floors could begin collapsing in a few hours and that FFs should probably not venture above the 60th floor.......
.........And the collapses were unexpected for good reason.

The WTC Twin Towers were designed to withstand aircraft collision and subsequent fire.

Yes I know there has been much debate on this issue, but no one has disproved the engineering white paper which claimed such design.

Unquestionably, the impacted floors were seriously damaged, and it is even possible that an area of partial collapse might have been a reasonable expectation.

But a total, high speed collapse, from aircraft impact and subsequent fires alone, for two of the three largest towers at the WTC site?

A big NO.

.

jaydeehess

22nd November 2011, 02:48 PM

Wait..wait..wait just a gosh darn second....if we're all Jews...that doesn't mean I have to the little...uh...you know..."snip snip" down south does it? Because that **** ain't happening.

:)

No Jewish in my family yet that little-off-the-top clip job was done. Reportedly made me howl.:eek: I'm much better now.:D

Halcyon Dayz

23rd November 2011, 04:08 AM

slowsmile

23rd November 2011, 08:11 AM

I nominate Anders Lindman for his attempt to explain fractional reserve banking:

:rolleyes:

How strange - that appears to be just the sort of thing put forward by the "Lawful Bank" - fronted by the World Freeman Society and the bankrupt Roger Hayes of the British Constitution Group.

http://lawfulbank.com/

"A positive credit system – for every £1 of cash deposited, each member creates £10 credit in their account. This credit (created by the system) on the back of the cash deposited is the property of the member and thus not a debt to the member. This will provided streams of credit to the system – and not debt."

matt.tansy

23rd November 2011, 09:13 AM

When stupid people argue with stupider people it's guaranteed lulz in every paragraph.

They cite and quote yet somehow in the midst of all that the OP misses the fact that nowhere is it written that the half-life of a substance is related to it's concentration.

From our new favorite source of Stundies: http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=55#p230

Another inconsistency we can notice is why the nuclear material inside the bomb isn't slowly (but quite fast in fact) consumed ? In a nuclear plant, they say the nuclear material is consumed in less than three years and then needs to be replaced by a new one. But, for atomic bombs, it seems that the same laws don't apply. You can keep it during thirty year without any problem of material depletion.

In fact, the nuclear material inside atomic bombs should be depleted way faster than the one from nuclear plants, since it is supposed to be more concentrated (I speak of the state of the bomb before the explosion of course). It should be consumed in less than two or one year.

I can't wait to see Travis' title for this one.

Travis

23rd November 2011, 09:21 AM

I'm so happy we found nukelies.

Myron Proudfoot

23rd November 2011, 12:20 PM

The perfect cover...

Ok, I see what you did there...

jadebox

23rd November 2011, 12:28 PM

I nominate Anders Lindman for his attempt to explain fractional reserve banking:

As I wrote before, $1 in reserves means that the bank can create $9 out of thin air and lend out $10. That's 10% fractional reserve requirement.

Several times I've had a conversation with someone about what "reserves" means, and each time the other person thought that it means the bank can loan out more than the total of the bank's customer's deposits. So, I suspect that's almost a universal misconception.

-- Roger

Mr.D

23rd November 2011, 07:01 PM

Several times I've had a conversation with someone about what "reserves" means, and each time the other person thought that it means the bank can loan out more than the total of the bank's customer's deposits. So, I suspect that's almost a universal misconception.

It's all right here in his own words.

Imagine that you yourself had $100 and created a loan by adding $900 out of thin air and lent that money to your neighbor and charged 5% interest on the loan. Pretty good scam..... eh excuse me, deal for you, eh? And if your neighbor can't pay you can take his/her car. Either way you win, big time. That's the ordinary banking scheme in a nutshell.

Seriously. In Anders-land, you can loan your neighbor $1000 even if you only have $100 to your name. All you have to do is pull $900 out of thin air and give him the cash.

sylvan8798

23rd November 2011, 08:02 PM

It's all right here in his own words.

Seriously. In Anders-land, you can loan your neighbor $1000 even if you only have $100 to your name. All you have to do is pull $900 out of thin air and give him the cash.
Somehow I don't think that's where he pulled that idea from...:rolleyes:

JayUtah

23rd November 2011, 08:17 PM

So, I suspect that's almost a universal misconception.

Yes, I think so too. Almost everyone I've talked to as well thinks fractional reserve banking means creating money out of nothing -- reserves on hand being wrongly thought of as a fraction of the overall debt obligation rather than a fraction of the total deposits.

Stacko

24th November 2011, 05:20 AM

I'm so happy we found nukelies.

Ahh! Don't say something we'll later regret. How do you knock on wood on the internet! :scared:

Horatius

24th November 2011, 06:46 AM

Ahh! Don't say something we'll later regret. How do you knock on wood on the internet! :scared:

Dude, it's the Internet. If you haven't found a site you can "knock wood" to, you haven't been here very long...

Myron Proudfoot

24th November 2011, 07:03 AM

Yes, I think so too. Almost everyone I've talked to as well thinks fractional reserve banking means creating money out of nothing -- reserves on hand being wrongly thought of as a fraction of the overall debt obligation rather than a fraction of the total deposits.

I confess I am fuzzy on it. Could someone explain it in layman's terms please. :)

Border Reiver

24th November 2011, 07:33 AM

The bank has $X in deposits/other assets.

The bank must hold onto at least $0.1X of said deposits/assets.

The bank may lend/invest not more than $0.9X of said deposits/assets.

jaydeehess

24th November 2011, 10:41 AM

The bank has $X in deposits/other assets.

The bank must hold onto at least $0.1X of said deposits/assets as cash or cash equivalent (non-fixed term bonds mostly I believe).

The bank may lend/invest not more than $0.9X of said deposits/assets.

FTFY as per my understanding.

Now if you lend out or invest that other 90% and it not only fails to increase in value (ie. the lendee defaults or investements go bankrupt) then you lose money. Your depositors get wind of this and demand their full deposits back. You don't have it (cue Jimmy Stewart in "Its a Goof Life") and you soon are out of business yourself.

Robrob

24th November 2011, 12:18 PM

From a discussion about the paparazzi stalking of author J.K. Rowling's children; apparently fictional characters deserve their privacy too?

"A child, no matter who their parents are, deserves privacy. ... It's a fairly black-and-white issue,"

Except for the fictional Harry Potter, whose life is exposed in pain staking detail. Hmm, I'm getting conflicting messages.

catsmate1

24th November 2011, 01:25 PM

Wouldn't a rerevisionist just be a visionist?
Given this post (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=7786299#post7786299) I'd say that that vision is pharmacologically aided.:rolleyes:

Robrob

24th November 2011, 03:29 PM

Governments are just fooling themselves... (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=7787214#post7787214)

The governments that deploy nukes don't know they're fake?

The governments believe the nukes are real I guess.

matt.tansy

25th November 2011, 06:33 AM

Yet again the Greatest Apollo Historian The World Has Ever Known displays his amazing ignorance of the most simple facts about spacecraft, namely, that spacecraft have small thrusters for attitude and translation control.

According to Patrick you have one and only one attempt at docking and docking all depends on how accurately you know your position before liftoff because you can't maneuver your spacecraft after the engine shuts down, and if you miss you can't maneuver to try again.

If they were out of plane 50 feet, it is infinitely too far. If off by 10 feet, it is a miss of infinite inaccuracy. If the docking attempt is a 10 foot miss, that is as bad as a 10,000 foot miss. A miss is a miss and I have caught them in a big fat lie confirming a miss.

carlitos

25th November 2011, 10:36 AM

Ineligible, as it's not tied to a conspiracy theory, but here you go.
That's an argument from incredulity.

And that's an argument from fallacy.

Tomtomkent

25th November 2011, 11:35 AM

Yet again the Greatest Apollo Historian The World Has Ever Known displays his amazing ignorance of the most simple facts about spacecraft, namely, that spacecraft have small thrusters for attitude and translation control.

If only PEOPLE had thrusters for attitude and translation. A thrusted fist is tempted but ineffective.

Robrob

25th November 2011, 05:54 PM

So your really believe this ridiculously, needlessly, convoluted plan conspiracy theorists have concoted is actually plausible? That they would set up a patsy in one location and shoot Kennedy from a completely different one thus requiring endless readaction and editing of evidence and creating a massive potential failure point?

All any plotter has to do to cover their tracks is make sure the fatal bullet is fired at least roughly from the same trajectory as Oswald would have shot from but no, in CT land they instead concoct a plan out of the worst hack thriller where everyhting depends on luck and chance to make it all work, a plan that depends on which car Kennedy decides to travel in for goodness sake!

It was for the very reason of anticipating luck and chance unfavorable to the intended outcome that they had to have back-up plans, back-up shooters, back-up Patsies, and back-up locations for the Big Event. It was all very professional and the proof is in its ultimate "success."

Yep, just creating the most convoluted assassination plot ever wasn't enough - they created an equally convoluted back-up plot as well!

RoboTimbo

25th November 2011, 06:04 PM

Yep, just creating the most convoluted assassination plot ever wasn't enough - they created an equally convoluted back-up plot as well!

Makes you wonder how anyone figured it all out without any evidence for it whatsoever.

IIIClovisIII

25th November 2011, 06:37 PM

Ineligible, as it's not tied to a conspiracy theory, but here you go.

*sigh*.....C'mon man I was obviously trolling. :wackyspinny:

Tomtomkent

26th November 2011, 02:14 AM

Robert Prey not understanding Irony...

So you duck the question? Was it a mistake by all at Parkland or a deliberate lie?
And how to you account for all of the Parkland witnesses seeing a large blow-out in the back of the head? Were they all lying, or simply mistaken?????
Would it be fair to say that if there was not large blow-out in the back of the head, then the Parkland witnesses were either mistaken or lying?
I believe you mean the Physicians not the Physicists. But that assertion was made a long time ago. Of course I do not believe the doctors, nurses and attendants at Parkland are lying, nor mistaken....
So were the Parkland witnesses lying or just simply mistaken???

(Crickets still chirping)
So your best guess is????, they are mistaken? Or lying? It's a simple question and does not require a PhD in Logic.
Let's go over this again one by one. Are you saying that all these witnesses from both Parkland and Bethesda are either lying or mistaken?????
So when somebody makes a joke this happens...
Robert, are you lying or mistaken about the things Clint Hill said?
Ah, ah, ah... That's the old

False dilemma (false dichotomy, fallacy of bifurcation, black-or-white fallacy): two alternative statements are held to be the only possible options, when in reality there are more.[

Your admission and apology, please.
Yes. I wonder if Robert will also make an admission and an appology? Or if he just expects it of others?