svero
11th March 2003, 12:13 PM
I've come across another one of these things where I hear two sides of the story and they're so opposed that one must simply be a lie, but I can't really verify it. The two statements are basically...
Sanctions have killed x million Iraqi children
and the defense one hears is...
Saddam has more money now than before the war thanks to the oil for food program but he squanders it all on weapons and palaces, therefor he's to blame for any deaths. (note : more money doesn't take into account though that the country is recovering from war... so more money may not necessarily mean enough money)
So I guess the first question is... Is it actually possible for Saddam to spend the oil for food money on palaces and other things or is that money in a controlled bank account? On the UN site it says 3/4 of that money is earmarked for humanitarian aid, and talks a little about how it's managed but doesn't really go into details about who manages it and so on.
Anyone have any info?
Sanctions have killed x million Iraqi children
and the defense one hears is...
Saddam has more money now than before the war thanks to the oil for food program but he squanders it all on weapons and palaces, therefor he's to blame for any deaths. (note : more money doesn't take into account though that the country is recovering from war... so more money may not necessarily mean enough money)
So I guess the first question is... Is it actually possible for Saddam to spend the oil for food money on palaces and other things or is that money in a controlled bank account? On the UN site it says 3/4 of that money is earmarked for humanitarian aid, and talks a little about how it's managed but doesn't really go into details about who manages it and so on.
Anyone have any info?