PDA

View Full Version : The Subgenius Report

corplinx
11th March 2003, 04:38 PM
I decided to create a thread for Subgenius to post his latest bushisms, red herrings, and haliburton conspiracy theories. I figure instead of reading the saem haliburton story in 8 different threads or about helen thomas in 4 different threads, he can just post the stories once here.

Okay Sub, threads' all yours! Let er rip!
aerocontrols
11th March 2003, 04:41 PM
I came this close ->||<- to ignoring him after those 10 replies to Nie Trink Wasser's thread.

Subgenius: you aren't conversing with us. You're spamming the board.

MattJ
corplinx
11th March 2003, 04:43 PM
Sub is a great guy, he just gets carried away. :D
subgenius
11th March 2003, 04:50 PM
"I may be right
and I may be wrong,
You're sure gonna miss me
when I'm gone."
--Taj Mahal
subgenius
11th March 2003, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by aerocontrols
I came this close ->||<- to ignoring him after those 10 replies to Nie Trink Wasser's thread.

Subgenius: you aren't conversing with us. You're spamming the board.

MattJ
Did you read any of the posts?
Have any rebuttal other than to complain about the quantity of evidence?
subgenius
11th March 2003, 04:58 PM
I'm going out now to party like its 1999.

Talk amongst yourselves, I'll give you a topic: Bill Clinton, everything is still his fault. :D
OdderMensch
11th March 2003, 05:21 PM
I heard a report on NPR once, it was semi-satirical(i think) about how ill Clinton was the best Libertarion President ever!

I mean, think about it twice with him in power the government basicly shut down, and the vast majority of the population felt no real impact. Goes a long way towards showing people how massivly redundant much of our government is.
aerocontrols
11th March 2003, 05:35 PM
Originally posted by subgenius

Did you read any of the posts?
Have any rebuttal other than to complain about the quantity of evidence?

I had already read most of that stuff, although I admit that likely many here have not. My point, I believe, is that of your ten posts, many were only peripherally related to Nie Trink's post, and almost none of them responded directly to his post. Limiting yourself to the one or two articles that were on-topic would have been far more appropriate than spamming his thread with 10 replies, don't you think?

To answer your question, I have replied.

MattJ