PDA

View Full Version : Another popular bit of hate mail.


evildave
13th March 2003, 08:02 PM
I received this in the email this morning.

I sent this back to all the original recipients.


My comments appear between dashes.

-----------------------------------


I believe in Santa Claus, but I'm not going to sue somebody for not singing a Ho-Ho-Ho song in December. I don't agree with Darwin but I didn't go out and hire a lawyer when my high school teacher taught his theory of evolution. Life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness will not be endangered because someone says a 30-second prayer before a football game. So what's the big deal? It's not like somebody is up there reading the entire book of Acts. They're just talking to a God they believe in and asking him to grant safety to the players on the field and the fans going home from the game.


-----------------------------------

OK, first little point: The Stadium and School Prayer

http://archive.aclu.org/clis/schoolprayer.html

http://archive.aclu.org/court/prayer.html

The ACLU is the one who carried these lawsuits forward. Not “atheists”. These kinds of lawsuits generally begin when the “wrong kind of” Christian offers a prayer, and other Christians take offense.

In the case of the stadium incident, people who did not participate in the prayer were OPENLY HARRASSED by their Christian peers.

The actual case story about what went on at the event that got the story started.

http://archive.aclu.org/court/santafe.html#statement
"
1. The Litigation. Plaintiffs are two mothers and their children who objected to persistent imposition of sectarian religious practices in the public schools of Santa Fe, Texas. The district court found a history of distinctively Christian prayer at graduation, prayer before every football and baseball game, school selection of the clergyman to conduct a subsidized baccalaureate service, and on-campus distribution of Bibles by the Gideons. The court further found that Santa Fe had encouraged and preferred religion clubs over other clubs and that multiple teachers had promoted their own religious views in the classroom. One teacher, after distributing flyers for a Baptist revival meeting to his class and discovering in the ensuing conversation that one of his students is Mormon, "launched into a diatribe about the non-Christian, cult-like nature of Mormonism, and its general evils." Pet. App. A4.(1)

The district court found that "these incidents occurred amidst the School District's repeated tolerance of similar activities and oftentimes with the awareness and explicit approval of the School District," and that "these incidents therefore reflect the actual policies of the School District at that time, irrespective of any applicable written policies which may have been in place." Pet. App. E2 n.2.(2)
"

So, what we have is a Baptist versus Mormon conflict that started the mess.

Furthermore, in school you are still free to pray on your own. The only thing the law says is you can't have the SCHOOL officially lead a prayer. If you want to talk to your hands over your food, it's fine with everyone. If you want to grab the microphone, stand behind a podium and tell everyone to drop everything and pray, that's not fine. The distinction isn't a very complex one, but some people don't seem to “get it”.

-----------------------------------


"But it's a Christian prayer," some will argue. Yes, and this is the United States of America, a country founded on Christian principles. And we are in the Bible Belt. According to our very own phone book, Christian churches outnumber all others better than 200-to-1.
So what would you expect -- somebody chanting Hare Krishna?
If I went to a football game in Jerusalem, I would expect to hear a Jewish prayer.
If I went to a soccer game in Baghdad, I would expect to hear a Muslim prayer.
If I went to a ping pong match in China, I would hear someone pray to Buddha.
And I wouldn't be offended. It wouldn't bother me one bit. When in Rome...
Appeal to Popularity.
"But what about the atheists?" is another argument. What about them? Nobody is asking them to be baptized. We're not going to pass the collection plate. Just humor us for 30 seconds. If that's asking too much, bring a Walkman or a pair of ear plugs. Go to the bathroom. Visit the concession stand. Call your lawyer. Unfortunately, one or two will make that call. One or two will tell thousands what they can and cannot do. I don't think a short prayer at a football game is going to shake the world's foundations.


-----------------------------------

Actually, as already demonstrated, it's about ANY other religious groups being persecuted at state-run events. And in the event that sparked the lawsuit, the non-Baptists were singled out and humiliated.

-----------------------------------


Christians are just sick and tired of turning the other cheek while our courts strip us of all our rights. Our parents and grandparents taught us to pray before eating, to pray before we go to sleep. Our Bible tells us just to pray without ceasing. Now a handful of people and their lawyers are telling us to cease praying. God, help us. And if that last sentence offends you, well..........just sue me. The silent majority has been silent too long... it's time we let that one or two who scream loud enough to be heard, that the vast majority don't care what they want... ...it is time the majority rules!! It's time we tell them, you don't have to pray..you don't have to say the pledge of allegiance, you don't have to believe in God or attend services that honor Him. That is your right, and we will honor your right....but by golly you are no longer going to take our rights away...we are fighting back... and we WILL WIN! After all, the God you have the right to denounce, is on our side!!

God bless us one and all, especially those who denounce Him...

God bless America, despite all her faults.. still the greatest nation of all.....

God bless our service men who are fighting to protect our right to pray and worship God...

May 2003 be the year the silent majority is heard and we put God back as the foundation of our families and institutions.

Keep looking up......In God WE Trust


-----------------------------------

So, as far as the writer is concerned, EVERY atheist is incapable of tolerating even seconds of Christian exposure, while Christians are the model of tolerance and understanding? And all things wrong in the country are because of the unreligious?

Well, you know what? I'm sick and tired of this endless ad-hominem being cast at the unreligious. Maybe I'll take this advice and not be silent.

I don't believe in any gods. I can't help it. I can't start honestly believing in them any more than many of you can stop believing in them. If you consider yourself monotheistic, then I only dismiss one god more than you. I've lived my life generally avoiding the topic of religion for the simple reason that many people appear to believe that not being Christian is a “Bad Thing”, and that not having any religion at all is even worse. What this means is every time the Jehova's Witnesses, the Mormons, or any of the many fruity flavors of born-again fundies corner me in some public place, I know from experience it will be that much worse when I tell them that I don't consider any “Testament” to be an authoritative source of “truth”, and don't believe in their Christ, their God or their book. I also know that they approach other Christians in this manner. Usually, I grin and bear it. I'm even nice and polite to the Jehova's Witnesses (and others) who come to my door. How many of you can say that? When people get that “look” on their face and say something like “I'll pray for you!” and walk quickly away like they expect lightning to come down from the sky, I know I've just been socially chastised. Typically for nothing more than mentioning I don't attend church.

Most Christians I know are good people. I conclude this because most people I know are good people, and most people I am exposed to regularly are Christians. I am polite enough not to bring religion arbitrarily into a discussion. I will bow in silence at the dinner table, or sit quietly for moments of silence, or politely do whatever my hosts do as their regular rituals require when visiting. I just don't happen to believe in any of it as coming from “almighty” sources.

But maybe I shouldn't bend over and “take it” when someone is arbitrarily stirring up hatred that is eventually focused towards me.

Take that original letter and replace “atheist” with “Jew”, or “Hindu”, or “Muslim” or even "Mormon". Then ask yourself again why the ACLU takes these cases.

Oh, and go ahead and send this rebuttal to all the folks you know, if you like. Just to be "fair".

fishbob
13th March 2003, 09:55 PM
They're just talking to a God they believe in That is the lie. Look back to the thread about Roger Ebert's column on horizontal prayer. A stadium-wide prayer before a football game is about as horizontal as you can get.

Don't be silent, evildave.

UnrepentantSinner
13th March 2003, 10:30 PM
- If I went to a football game in Jerusalem, I would expect to hear a Jewish prayer.

No, because Israel is way to secular and sophisticated to something do something rediculous like that.

- If I went to a soccer game in Baghdad, I would expect to hear a Muslim prayer.

Only if the game were started at dawn, midmorning, noon, evening or sunset, but I'm sure the sports authorities would have more sense than to do that.

- If I went to a ping pong match in China, I would hear someone pray to Buddha.

No, because Buddhists don't pray to Buddha and China is an officially atheist country so there wouldn't be any prayers regardless.

Note to evildave's correspondant: If you're going to use analogous examples, please don't use any that make you look like you ignorant and fail to support your position.

Checkmite
13th March 2003, 10:44 PM
I was under the impression that China was officially Catholic, and that all non-Catholic, non-licensed churches were illegal. In fact, I remember reading a news story about China cracking down on "underground" unlicensed churches.

UnrepentantSinner
13th March 2003, 10:59 PM
Originally posted by Joshua Korosi
I was under the impression that China was officially Catholic, and that all non-Catholic, non-licensed churches were illegal. In fact, I remember reading a news story about China cracking down on "underground" unlicensed churches.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html
Religions: Daoist (Taoist), Buddhist, Muslim 1%-2%, Christian 3%-4%
note: officially atheist (2002 est.)

What you're referring to are the Christian chuches officially allowed by the state.
http://www.gospelcom.net/od/content/truth_china.html
...17 million worship in the two officially organized churches of China -- the Protestant Three Self Patriotic Movement (12 million members) and the Catholic Patriotic Association (5 million members).

Tom Head
13th March 2003, 11:49 PM
evildave, I think your post nailed it. Very well done!


Cheers,

Checkmite
14th March 2003, 05:22 AM
Originally posted by UnrepentantSinner


http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html
Religions: Daoist (Taoist), Buddhist, Muslim 1%-2%, Christian 3%-4%
note: officially atheist (2002 est.)

What you're referring to are the Christian chuches officially allowed by the state.
http://www.gospelcom.net/od/content/truth_china.html
...17 million worship in the two officially organized churches of China -- the Protestant Three Self Patriotic Movement (12 million members) and the Catholic Patriotic Association (5 million members).

Thank you...I love this place. :D

I mean the forum, not China...I don't believe any state should have an "official" religious stance, or own churches.

Ladewig
14th March 2003, 05:49 AM
Christians are just sick and tired of turning the other cheek while our courts strip us of all our rights.

When I read that a see: "We Christians are just sick and tired of following Jesus's explicit instructions in Mat 5:39." But I suppose that if you are going to ignore Jesus's admonition NOT to pray in public (Mat 6:5-6) then it's just a matter of in for a penny, in for a pound.

BillyTK
14th March 2003, 06:04 AM
Originally posted by Joshua Korosi
I was under the impression that China was officially Catholic, and that all non-Catholic, non-licensed churches were illegal. In fact, I remember reading a news story about China cracking down on "underground" unlicensed churches.

Apologies for the flippancy, but the phrase '"underground" unlicensed churches' has given me imagining hundreds of people packed into a cramped warehouse, off their heads on bad drugs and dancing to dodgy house music...

BillyTK
14th March 2003, 06:06 AM
So anyway, I'm all for religious tolerance ("love the person, condemn the behaviour "springs to mind ;) ), but isn't there something in the constitution about protecting minority rights, what with the reason why the founders left England in the first place?

Thanz
14th March 2003, 06:21 AM
evildave -

I have to say that I am impressed.

I will admit that, based on most of the comments I have seen you make on this board, I thought that you were a jerk. One of the "hardcore athiests" who get their kicks mocking those who are religious.

The response you gave to this email, however, was much more reasonable than I would expect. You made your points in a polite and persuasive manner. I am now forced to re-evaluate my opinion of you. I still think that many of your postings are "jerky", but I can see that you are not always a "jerk".

As a Christian, I have never prayed at public functions that do not have at least some religious overtones. I did go to Catholic schools, so school prayer was pretty much a given, so I can't really comment on that issue. But I agree that many fights over religion, prayer, etc. is between people of differing religions rather than athiest v. theist. The bickering and outright hostility between different Christian denominations sickens me.

So, to sum up, good points, good email, and I am glad that you decided not to insult the person to whom you were responding to. Not only is it much more persuasive, it shows you are a better person.

UnrepentantSinner
14th March 2003, 07:44 AM
Originally posted by BillyTK
So anyway, I'm all for religious tolerance ("love the person, condemn the behaviour "springs to mind ;) ), but isn't there something in the constitution about protecting minority rights, what with the reason why the founders left England in the first place?

Yes Billy. Thankfully the concept of separation of church and state has matured over time to the fruit Jefferson and Madison initially desired it to be. Part of the biggest problem with the evangelicals that want school "sanctioned" (gee, sounds a lot like sanctified doesn't it) prayers is that they fail to consider that the schools are government organizations and that the establishment clause applies to them as much as it does the federal government.

The "why don't you plug your ears and hum atheist singalongs" response to this fact hardly warrents consideration. :rolleyes:

But! On the other hand... perhaps a stagnant state church is exactly what this country needed to break us from our addition to religion. Alternate history is not my forte however. :)

UnrepentantSinner
14th March 2003, 07:55 AM
Originally posted by Thanz
evildave -

I will admit that, based on most of the comments I have seen you make on this board, I thought that you were a jerk. One of the "hardcore athiests" who get their kicks mocking those who are religious.

As a Christian...

Thanz, first off I would hope that as a Christian "representin'" as they say on the block, for his religion in cyberspace you would realize that not everyone who tweaks the nose or or questions the theology of religion (and especially in our American culture Christianity) was a God-Hater out to ballbreak only the Christians in the house. From my R&P lurking I would hardly call evildave a ballbuster.

I count among my friends the most devout of Christians, a Muslim and a Wiccan though I have disdain for aspects of each of those religions. I still wish my Christian friends a Merry Christmas each year, send Eid Mubarak e-cards to my Muslim friend and e-bid on a Book of Shadows for my Wiccan friend. To paraphrase the old chicken nugget commercial, "friends are friends."

Not to toot my own or other's horns, but I don't think that asking someone to use their brain as well as their Bible is being a jerk. It's just asking them to be a rational human and use a gift either evolution or God has given us.

Thanz
14th March 2003, 08:37 AM
Originally posted by UnrepentantSinner


Thanz, first off I would hope that as a Christian "representin'" as they say on the block, for his religion in cyberspace you would realize that not everyone who tweaks the nose or or questions the theology of religion (and especially in our American culture Christianity) was a God-Hater out to ballbreak only the Christians in the house. From my R&P lurking I would hardly call evildave a ballbuster.

Well, the point of my post was that I had this impression of evildave, and now I see that my impression was wrong. I don't claim to have done a study of his posts or anything, nor do I even think I have read most of his posts. I was just saying that I had an impression. I fully expect other people's opinions to vary.

I do realize that not everyone who tweaks a nose is out to be a ballbreaker. I ws just relaying my impression of the tone of evildave's posts (my selective memory impression of posts I can remember, which is of course, highly unscientific). And then I admitted that my judgment was wrong. Not sure what else I could do here.

Next, I am not here "representin" for my religion in cyberspace. I think that the original post makes it clear that there are too many people claiming to be "representin" for their religion, so that all others are wrong. I am only "representin" my own beliefs here - I do not presume to speak for others. I mention my religion as I think it may be relevant for others to know my potential biases when it comes to discussing religious matters.

Checkmite
14th March 2003, 10:01 AM
Originally posted by BillyTK


Apologies for the flippancy, but the phrase '"underground" unlicensed churches' has given me imagining hundreds of people packed into a cramped warehouse, off their heads on bad drugs and dancing to dodgy house music...

:D :D :D

Yahzi
14th March 2003, 01:17 PM
Did your email cause the recipient's computers to blow up, killing them, their familys, their neighbors, and destroying the European economy? No? Then you were WAY TOO NICE.

Come on, Evil, get with the program. We don't want people mistaking us atheists for human beings, who might be just as sincere and caring as any other human beings with slightly different views.

Thanz
14th March 2003, 02:16 PM
Originally posted by Yahzi
Did your email cause the recipient's computers to blow up, killing them, their familys, their neighbors, and destroying the European economy? No? Then you were WAY TOO NICE.

Come on, Evil, get with the program. We don't want people mistaking us atheists for human beings, who might be just as sincere and caring as any other human beings with slightly different views.

Yahzi - I am sure that you can pick up the slack... :p

Doctor X
14th March 2003, 02:34 PM
It seemed a very reasoned response to an unreasonable diatribe.

I will also note that it is nice to see people reevaluate their opinions.

It is funny, people like the writer have no problem exposing others to their religion but have every problem with others doing the same. I am certain he will march for the right of a predominantly Muslim community to halt businesses, traffic, et cetera to "call for prayer."

It is disengenuo . . . disingen . . . false to claim that a purpose does not exist behind such public uses of religion. It is a premeditated attempt to give the impression that the view is "correct" and "universally accepted."

This is wrong.

This would be wrong if someone led a "Why God Sucks" discussion prior to the kickoff.

--J.D.

evildave
15th March 2003, 01:10 AM
It should be pointed out that I spent a little more time on the response than I do my common UBB forum post.

According to my mood, I suppose I can seem a bit of an ogre at times.

UnrepentantSinner
15th March 2003, 04:08 AM
Originally posted by Thanz
Next, I am not here "representin" for my religion in cyberspace. I think that the original post makes it clear that there are too many people claiming to be "representin" for their religion, so that all others are wrong. I am only "representin" my own beliefs here - I do not presume to speak for others. I mention my religion as I think it may be relevant for others to know my potential biases when it comes to discussing religious matters.

Message received. I'll try not to post replies when I'm drunk in the future.

Tricky
24th March 2004, 05:20 AM
Originally posted by evildave
According to my mood, I suppose I can seem a bit of an ogre at times.
I think we all have forum personas which are different, or at least more exaggerated than our real lives. At least I would hope that is the case with some of our more... um... stentorian posters.

Good orig post, Evil D, and well spoken, Thanz.

sackett
24th March 2004, 06:30 AM
I voted "too mean," because you, a big well-grown kid, beat up on a Special Education second-grader. Have you no shame, sir?

Love it!

ebola
24th March 2004, 07:10 AM
Dave,

Well measured, and well said.

Eric

evildave
24th March 2004, 09:58 AM
Eek! The thread returned from the dead!

Back, Zombie thread! Back!