View Full Version : Martha Stewart Gets Five Months
Chad Noles
16th July 2004, 08:09 AM
Choking back tears,Martha pleaded for leaniency,and got it.Her sentence,five months in jail,two years of supervised release,home confinement,and a fine of $30,000.Seems like another slap on the wrist for the wealthy.The message,make plenty of money before you commit your crime!Hey,this is America after all.
patnray
16th July 2004, 08:13 AM
Will the judge be reported to Ashcroft for imposing a sentence below the federal guidelines, one wonders?
Chad Noles
16th July 2004, 08:15 AM
No way,Martha is a good Republican,not a lousy Dem......Demo.....Democr........aw,I can't even say it!
Larspeart
16th July 2004, 08:29 AM
she'll serve 2 months.
She'll have her own cell.
She'll be kept out of general population whenever possible (if not always).
aerocontrols
16th July 2004, 08:38 AM
Originally posted by Chad Noles
No way,Martha is a good Republican,not a lousy Dem......Demo.....Democr........aw,I can't even say it!
Republican? (http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?NumOfThou=0&txtName=Stewart%2C+Martha&txtState=%28all+states%29&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt2004=Y&txt2002=Y&txt2000=Y&Order=N)
I think her conviction was pretty bogus (http://www.reason.com/0310/fe.mm.st.shtml), though.
Phrost
16th July 2004, 08:44 AM
I agree. The media is all wrapped up with the stuffy homemaker while nobody's paying attention to Ken Lay and the real criminals of the corporate world.
The Central Scrutinizer
16th July 2004, 08:54 AM
It is important to note that the judge issued a stay of execution.
Chad Noles
16th July 2004, 09:47 AM
Since Martha got off with the lowest possible sentence,doesn't she risk a higher sentence by her appeal?Maybe she gets more time with a harsher judge?
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.