View Full Version : "God" is an extraterrestrial
nixwj
14th February 2005, 08:58 PM
Hi everyone!
To know what and who "god" really is please go to this URL address:
<a href>"http://www.freewebs.com/nixwj/extraterrestrials.html"</a></br>
This is not a joke.
Please don't post the same thread into different forum sections. If you post a thread in the wrong forum section you can PM a member of the Mod Team or use the "Report" button and it will be moved to the correct section.
geni
14th February 2005, 09:03 PM
On balance I think von darken was better even if only because he at least was being original.
nixwj
14th February 2005, 10:35 PM
Originally posted by geni
On balance I think von darken was better even if only because he at least was being original.
Both von Daniken and Zechariah Sitchin did not describe their "gods" in their books. Von Daniken was mostly busy discussing about the relation of ancient artifacts and structures to what he called "gods". He was insinuating that these "gods" were the ones we find in UFO's, that's all. Mr. Sitchin gave a relation of his "gods" to the Caucasian peoples of this planet as their ancestors however he just stopped there without describing what and who these "gods" were. I was the one who completed the jigsaw puzzle about these "gods" by giving them personification and I discussed further their activities on this planet since prehistoric times, these facts can't be found anywhere.
arance
bigred
15th February 2005, 10:01 AM
er shouldn't this be in the Religion area....
nixwj
24th February 2005, 06:36 PM
Hi everyone!
To know what and who "god" is please go to this URL address:
http://www.freewebs.com/nixwj/extraterrestrials.html
This is not a joke.
nixwj
kedo1981
24th February 2005, 06:43 PM
No really! It's a joke right?
nixwj
24th February 2005, 06:46 PM
Originally posted by kedo1981
No really! It's a joke right?
No it's not.
nixwj
SixSixSix
24th February 2005, 06:58 PM
I'm not really sure what it even means to say that one fictional character is actually another kind of fictional character.
TragicMonkey
24th February 2005, 07:02 PM
Originally posted by SixSixSix
I'm not really sure what it even means to say that one fictional character is actually another kind of fictional character.
You mean, God is a hobbit?!?
Lisa Simpson
24th February 2005, 07:06 PM
Originally posted by TragicMonkey
You mean, God is a hobbit?!?
I'm disappointed, TM. When I saw you had posted to this thread, I was hoping you had come up with a brilliant post on how god is not an alien, but a monkey. :(
SixSixSix
24th February 2005, 07:06 PM
No, silly. Hobbits are clearly terrestrial (if not homo sapiens); they live on middle EARTH.
Clearly, God is a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.
Possibly with 2 heads.
Bikewer
24th February 2005, 07:43 PM
I found the narrative so compelling that I wished it would go on and on.... Oh, it sorta did.
TragicMonkey
24th February 2005, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by Lisa Simpson
I'm disappointed, TM. When I saw you had posted to this thread, I was hoping you had come up with a brilliant post on how god is not an alien, but a monkey. :(
What? God? That humorless sack of crap? He's not cool enough to be monkey.
If God were monkey, this universe would be really kickin'. Free love, free money, and all the snack foods you can stuff in your mouth between orgies.
neutrino_cannon
24th February 2005, 10:19 PM
Most astute oh great red one, your acute observation is almost prophetic (http://randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=53175).
Z
24th February 2005, 11:15 PM
What, is nixwj 12? 13 at most?
This is ridiculous spew - photos from that ridiculous 'extraterrestrial autopsy' program (that was so fully proven to be a hoax), commentary about books written by or about aliens... etc. etc.
I've seen better attempts by grade-schoolers than this.
neutrino_cannon
25th February 2005, 01:07 AM
[Lingua Latina]
Quoniam non insapientes sunt, nemo conabantur redarguere tales tricas. Redarguere has est adesse tempus. Ergo, est sole dementissimis vesanisisque ridere tales fabulas in lingua Latina! Ergo, habemus me. Hic argumentum (si non oppederem omnium argumenti ubi denomino hunc ita) excordior stercore Kumaris, et extollo haudquaquam.
From my researches from books and the Internet, I have discovered that there are only two kinds of "gods", the Caucasian electronic extraterrestrials and the Mongoloid electronic ones.
Tales origines indicii! Timebam ne caput meus combustus esset ubi hunc legebam!
[/Lingua Latina]
(Feel free to point out any errors; I’m still trying to figure out when it’s appropriate to use the subjunctive mood)
Praytell, what does it mean by “electronic”? Does it mean animatronic, ergo latex, ergo laughable? Do they need to be plugged into their spaceships? And just how did they come to be described with adjectives referring to terrestrial regions? LSD or opiates?
Of course, like any such fruitcake, the really sticky and half-baked stuff is in the center.
Both of these entities come from other planets. The Caucasian extraterrestrials' height is about 3.5 feet and they are the ancestors of the Caucasian peoples of this planet. These Caucasian electronic extraterrestrials have genetically manufactured the Caucasian race by creating a hybrid of themselves and the semi-human entities of Earth in order that the resulting hybrid Caucasian will have a biological clock that matches that of Earth's and the size of Earth's semi-human creatures. The images of these extraterrestrials can be found on Easter Island that are the monolith stone statues there.
Once again, I’d have to smoke at least three joints laced with something harsh to consider that anything more than the most meaningless drivel I’ve been so foolish to read since I went to this little toy (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/) this morning. For what is supposed to be a knockout revelation I find the supporting evidence somewhat… nonexistent. Wild, hackneyed details are in abundance of course, with the belief that Caucasians came from some other source than other races being of particular interest. Polygenesis has a pretty good pedigree of supporters, including Voltaire, though that hardly makes it anything other than fatuity in the twenty-first century.
Of course the very mention of “semi-human entities” makes me immediately think of polygenesis’ less savor backers. It also makes me think (Yessir Goodwin, here it comes) of those goofy fellows who liked to play at taking over the world and wear brown out of season. Can’t imagine why though, I can’t imagine that the author of this piece is coherent enough to type “untermensch”. I’m not sure what the rest of it means, and I strongly suspect that a search for meaning amongst the words would be like pheasant hunting in a brothel, and probably just as amusing.
The Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrials have performed the same on this planet as a result of their agreement with the Caucasian extraterrestrials. However the Mongoloid peoples are smaller in size because they are a hybrid of a semi-human entity of a smaller size. These Mongoloid extraterrestrials are what the media wants us to believe that they are the only extraterrestrials in the Universe. These electronic extraterrestrials are about the same height as the Caucasian ones. You can find their images by using the search feature of your Internet browser and typing in the acronym "UFO". The Caucasian hybrid peoples and the Mongoloid hybrid peoples were created or manufactured about 11,500 years ago, just before the third and final flooding of this planet by both extraterrestrials in order in order that they could destroy the creative devices of Earth. The evidence of earlier creations of the Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrials, who found Earth about 27,000 years ago, are now found on the sea floor of this planet under several miles of ocean. The Caucasian electronic extraterrestrials arrived on this planet at about earlier than 11,500 years ago. The water that was used in flooding Earth came from both polar regions (the North and South Poles) by massive heating of the ice at those polar regions.
As a hybrid of Mongoloid and Caucasian Alien hybrids I find it amusing that such disparate stock could interbreed. It’s almost as good as Star Trek, the way that you can have sex with just about any other species in this universe of ours. Funny though, you can’t boff any other species that lives around this planet and get viable offspring.
Oh, silly me, I had of course forgotten that the untermensch are a different species entirely, and that those sneaky electronic aliens can use their spooky quantum genetic recombination techniques to achieve any hybrid they want! I suppose I ought to be thanking those greys for having the foresight to make hapa (in the loose, colloquial and technically incorrect sense of the word) folks like me possible!
Excuse me, I have an appointment to receive a concussion from yonder wall.
I suppose the evidence of prior civilizations was detected via remote viewing?
Naturally, the bit about shorter mongoloid people cracks me up. (http://www.aabcdallas.org/webimages/vol_3-yao-1.jpg)
It is sensible to believe that there is no god and that if there is an existence of an entity(ies) that is technologically more advanced than humans this will only be an extraterrestrial(s) from other planets.
Because, you know, if they’re smarter than us, they must come from another planet. Very diplomatic, declaring god unreasonable without so much as a scuffle or grammatically correct sentence. I’m sure theists of all calibers are all ears at this point.
From reading Erich von Daniken's book "Chariot of the Gods" and another book titled "Our Ancestors Came From Outer Space", and by researching the natural history of Earth from the Internet, I have arrived at the conclusion that the creatures that we call "god(s)" is an extraterrestrial.
Because the internet is such a wonderful place for porn.
Even in the Christian bible, like any other bible, has a chapter that discusses the experiences of Ezekiel.
You heard it first here folks, all Bibles, even the Christian one, has a chapter on Ezekiel. Interestingly, _all Statues of Liberty_, even those which were made in France, hold torches. I swear, if this were any more brilliant I’d be blinded.
In an autodeocularization kind of way, but blinded nonetheless.
It states that Ezekiel has seen his "god" ride on a "chariot" several times and he describes this "chariot" in a way that we now describe it as a mechanical vehicle (a rocket) that could travel in space. Another experience by Ezekiel is recorded in the bible wherein he states that his "god" rode on a "chariot" that moved using a "wheel within a wheel". This vehicle is interpreted nowadays as a mechanical land machine on caterpillar treads. There are many more chapters in the bible that explain the fact that "god" is just another creature from another planet. Like, for example in a chapter where Moses was instructed by "god" to build an Ark of the Covenant wherein he could keep the Ten Commandments that were written in stone. This Ark was actually a large electrical capacitor that was designed to electrocute anybody who would try to steal its contents. Also, in ancient times, the ancient peoples worshipped many gods, not just one. Even at the present time there are other peoples who still worship many gods. So this fact should convince anybody that god(s) are also creatures who came from other planets. I know that this fact ("God" is an extraterrestrial) will bounce off everybody's head because we have been brainwashed for many centuries of other things except the fact that the gods are only extraterrestrials and this fact is what the "gods" do not want to be made known to anybody except themselves. Since I was a younger person I put the pieces of this unstarted jigsaw puzzle together to obtain the real picture of what it or they really are.
Because caterpillar treads are a heck of a lot like “a wheel within a wheel”.
Oh yeah, and Ezekiel 1:16 never mentions a chariot, and the wheel in a wheel bit is, AFAIK, unrelated to the sudden manifestation of God. It’s really quite interesting reading.
It’s too bad I’m brainwashed. If I wasn’t brainwashed, I’m sure I could accept the egregious run on sentence.
The Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrials come from a planetary system which they call the Zeta Reticuli. I believe other peoples' description of their skin color as green is correct. These entities are hermaphrodites.
Note that the alien pictured is not green.
The Caucasian electronic extraterrestrials come from a planet which Zecharia Sithin's book claims that it comes near Earth only once in 3,600 years. This book, "The 12th Planet" also discusses that we only know of 9 planets in our Solar System. However there are actually 12 and this information the Caucasian extraterrestrials informed the ancient peoples. The Caucasian electronic extraterrestrials come from a planet called "Marduk" in Hebrew. From my own work I have arrived at the conclusion that their skin color is yellow.
Why are all the cool nonexistent planets named after black metal groups?
arthwollipot
25th February 2005, 01:19 AM
Time Cube (http://www.timecube.com/), anyone?
SixSixSix
25th February 2005, 01:47 AM
Originally posted by arthwollipot
Time Cube (http://www.timecube.com/), anyone?
ARGH! My eyes! These googles do nothing!
nixwj
25th February 2005, 04:31 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
What, is nixwj 12? 13 at most?
This is ridiculous spew - photos from that ridiculous 'extraterrestrial autopsy' program (that was so fully proven to be a hoax), commentary about books written by or about aliens... etc. etc.
I've seen better attempts by grade-schoolers than this.
I don't believe that my photos about that Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial are from your "ridiculous extraterrestrial autopsy program". Like I said, these facts will go over or bounce off everybody's head at first. But I believe everything that I wrote in here by heart. You just "can't believe them" because your head is highly strung, like neutrino_cannon below who is a dopehead.
nixwj
nixwj
25th February 2005, 04:53 PM
Originally posted by neutrino_cannon
[Lingua Latina]
Quoniam non insapientes sunt, nemo conabantur redarguere tales tricas. Redarguere has est adesse tempus. Ergo, est sole dementissimis vesanisisque ridere tales fabulas in lingua Latina! Ergo, habemus me. Hic argumentum (si non oppederem omnium argumenti ubi denomino hunc ita) excordior stercore Kumaris, et extollo haudquaquam.
Tales origines indicii! Timebam ne caput meus combustus esset ubi hunc legebam!
[/Lingua Latina]
(Feel free to point out any errors; I’m still trying to figure out when it’s appropriate to use the subjunctive mood)
Praytell, what does it mean by “electronic”? Does it mean animatronic, ergo latex, ergo laughable? Do they need to be plugged into their spaceships? And just how did they come to be described with adjectives referring to terrestrial regions? LSD or opiates?
Of course, like any such fruitcake, the really sticky and half-baked stuff is in the center.
Once again, I’d have to smoke at least three joints laced with something harsh to consider that anything more than the most meaningless drivel I’ve been so foolish to read since I went to this little toy (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/) this morning. For what is supposed to be a knockout revelation I find the supporting evidence somewhat… nonexistent. Wild, hackneyed details are in abundance of course, with the belief that Caucasians came from some other source than other races being of particular interest. Polygenesis has a pretty good pedigree of supporters, including Voltaire, though that hardly makes it anything other than fatuity in the twenty-first century.
Of course the very mention of “semi-human entities” makes me immediately think of polygenesis’ less savor backers. It also makes me think (Yessir Goodwin, here it comes) of those goofy fellows who liked to play at taking over the world and wear brown out of season. Can’t imagine why though, I can’t imagine that the author of this piece is coherent enough to type “untermensch”. I’m not sure what the rest of it means, and I strongly suspect that a search for meaning amongst the words would be like pheasant hunting in a brothel, and probably just as amusing.
As a hybrid of Mongoloid and Caucasian Alien hybrids I find it amusing that such disparate stock could interbreed. It’s almost as good as Star Trek, the way that you can have sex with just about any other species in this universe of ours. Funny though, you can’t boff any other species that lives around this planet and get viable offspring.
Oh, silly me, I had of course forgotten that the untermensch are a different species entirely, and that those sneaky electronic aliens can use their spooky quantum genetic recombination techniques to achieve any hybrid they want! I suppose I ought to be thanking those greys for having the foresight to make hapa (in the loose, colloquial and technically incorrect sense of the word) folks like me possible!
Excuse me, I have an appointment to receive a concussion from yonder wall.
I suppose the evidence of prior civilizations was detected via remote viewing?
Naturally, the bit about shorter mongoloid people cracks me up. (http://www.aabcdallas.org/webimages/vol_3-yao-1.jpg)
Because, you know, if they’re smarter than us, they must come from another planet. Very diplomatic, declaring god unreasonable without so much as a scuffle or grammatically correct sentence. I’m sure theists of all calibers are all ears at this point.
Because the internet is such a wonderful place for porn.
You heard it first here folks, all Bibles, even the Christian one, has a chapter on Ezekiel. Interestingly, _all Statues of Liberty_, even those which were made in France, hold torches. I swear, if this were any more brilliant I’d be blinded.
In an autodeocularization kind of way, but blinded nonetheless.
Because caterpillar treads are a heck of a lot like “a wheel within a wheel”.
Oh yeah, and Ezekiel 1:16 never mentions a chariot, and the wheel in a wheel bit is, AFAIK, unrelated to the sudden manifestation of God. It’s really quite interesting reading.
It’s too bad I’m brainwashed. If I wasn’t brainwashed, I’m sure I could accept the egregious run on sentence.
Note that the alien pictured is not green.
Why are all the cool nonexistent planets named after black metal groups?
Well, if you can't believe the facts in my thesis I can't go on typing in here until my face turns blue in arguing with you about them. However there are other readers of this thread who will say I'm right. And still there will be others who will ask themselves "who's going to believe this guy?" (You) You're not only brainwashed, you're also in limbo. And the Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial you're saying is not green is most likely the result of lighting conditions when the photo was taken. (Color-blindedness may also be the cause. I know this because the green-colored traffic signal light looks white to me).
c4ts
25th February 2005, 05:28 PM
Ugh... I don't know where to begin here... I'll start small...
Did you just claim white people and asians do not share a common ancestor?
Z
25th February 2005, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
I don't believe that my photos about that Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial are from your "ridiculous extraterrestrial autopsy program". Like I said, these facts will go over or bounce off everybody's head at first. But I believe everything that I wrote in here by heart. You just "can't believe them" because your head is highly strung, like neutrino_cannon below who is a dopehead.
nixwj
YOu can 'believe by heart' anything you like - that don't make it right.
Where's your evidence? Where's your proof? Documentation?
Your in-depth refutation of the common ancestry of caucausoid and mongoloid species?
And, no, those photos are clearly not of a green alien, but are overexposed photos of a greenish rubber mask. Maybe latex. Anyway, I've seen 'em before...
Let's face it - you're just a troll with a rich fantasy life. Cute, kid, cute.
nixwj
25th February 2005, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by c4ts
Ugh... I don't know where to begin here... I'll start small...
Did you just claim white people and asians do not share a common ancestor?
According to my research that is correct. And your question should have been correctly written as "Did you just claim that Caucasian peoples and Asian peoples do not share a common ancestor?"
nixwj
Z
25th February 2005, 05:48 PM
And here, we see the source of his 'alien autopsy' photos is none other than...
PENTHOUSE MAGAZINE! (http://www.trudang.com/autopsy/autrecra.html)
Just click the link and scroll down - you'll see the Roswell autopsy as well as nixwj's here - both the same doll, btw - as well as the same fakir.
Sorry, nix - the proof is right there. Your 'alien' is another lie.
Z
25th February 2005, 05:50 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
According to my research that is correct. And your question should have been correctly written as "Did you just claim that Caucasian peoples and Asian peoples do not share a common ancestor?"
nixwj
Um... what are your sources? The Internet? A couple of UFOlogy books? Apparently, Penthouse Magazine was another big source...
If you REALLY used these as 'resources' to come up with this mind-numbingly stupid concept, you're clearly on the JREF Top 5 most Gullible Village Idiots list.
nixwj
25th February 2005, 05:54 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
YOu can 'believe by heart' anything you like - that don't make it right.
Where's your evidence? Where's your proof? Documentation?
Your in-depth refutation of the common ancestry of caucausoid and mongoloid species?
And, no, those photos are clearly not of a green alien, but are overexposed photos of a greenish rubber mask. Maybe latex. Anyway, I've seen 'em before...
Let's face it - you're just a troll with a rich fantasy life. Cute, kid, cute.
What do you mean by "troll"? And this is not a fantasy like you dopeheads always think. You're drilling me again of things like troll, evidence, proof, and documentation? For your information these are all mentioned in my thesis that you just read at the URL that I've indicated. In the pictures that I've posted in my website, can't you see the resemblance between a Mongoloid person and that Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial? Can't you also see the resemblance between a Caucasian person and that Caucasian electronic extraterrestrial?
nixwj
c4ts
25th February 2005, 06:01 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
According to my research that is correct. And your question should have been correctly written as "Did you just claim that Caucasian peoples and Asian peoples do not share a common ancestor?"
nixwj
You do realize you are contradicting everything we know about biology and human physiology, but go on. How do you explain the other races?
Odin
25th February 2005, 06:13 PM
A troll:
http://www.patriotresource.com/lotr/pics/characters/cavetroll.jpg
:D
What research did you do? What evidence do you have?
nixwj
25th February 2005, 06:14 PM
Originally posted by c4ts
You do realize you are contradicting everything we know about biology and human physiology, but go on. How do you explain the other races?
The other races of people to my belief were created utilizing semi-humans of various skin and hair colors, like the apes are of different skin and hair colors. And just a food for thought, on the subject of DNA, even plant DNA will look like that of animal and human DNA's. Now what will be the biblical reason why people are of different races despite the saying (was this also in the bible?) that "men were created equal"?
nixwj
Z
25th February 2005, 06:14 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
What do you mean by "troll"? And this is not a fantasy like you dopeheads always think. You're drilling me again of things like troll, evidence, proof, and documentation? For your information these are all mentioned in my thesis that you just read at the URL that I've indicated. In the pictures that I've posted in my website, can't you see the resemblance between a Mongoloid person and that Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial? Can't you also see the resemblance between a Caucasian person and that Caucasian electronic extraterrestrial?
nixwj
Yep - a troll. Probably a child, too, come to think of it.
1 - Let's see - claims ignorance of the common forum term, 'troll'.
This is either an ingenuine attempt at seeming stupider than he is, or he is not a regular poster on internet fora.
2 - Insults everyone as being 'dopeheads'. Clearly childish - probably barely a teen-ager.
3 - Lumps 'troll, proof, evidence, documentation' into the same category, then indicates that all has been explained in his text.
Very well, let's check his text for source materials:
He first mentions typing UFO into internet search engines. Yeah, and if you type in 'alien' you can see the horrible black-skinned predatory aliens that have attacked people all over Earth, too.
More in-depth searching reveals that these alien photos - specifically the ones he has used on his web site - are images of a mail-order Alien Autopsy kit by one Steve Johnson, who also did an 'alien autopsy' special on at least three shows... all of which were fake.
OK, what else?
Ah, he mentions 'Chariot of the Gods' - which, I believe, was thoroughly laughed out of scholarly circles some time ago. Most of the material in that book is used today to demonstrate the how NOT to present evidence.
I'm not familiar with this other book - "Our Ancestors Came From Outer Space" - I see it's French, written by one Maurice Chatelain - who was exposed as a liar and fraud after making wild claims concerning NASA. He also tries to sell bogus nonsense concerning numerology, Atlantis, and the Mayan calendar.
Generally considered another con-man.
Anything else? Oh, yes - Zecharia Sitchen (you have misspelled his name, btw). Well, he claims to be able to 'remote view', gives wild claims about a 12th planet (which, so far, has remained unconfirmed by astronomical observations), and has a host of other wild beliefs, from Elohim to a 2000-year-old Jewish calendar - where Abraham lived about 3-6 A.D...
Oh, and the Bible.
Clue for ya, kid - never trust the Bible as a resource.
Anyway - your resources are bunk. Best get your nose out of the 'UFO' section of your local bookstore and actually go out there and get some REAL research under your belt.
c4ts
25th February 2005, 06:20 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
The other races of people to my belief were created utilizing semi-humans of various skin and hair colors, like the apes are of different skin and hair colors. And just a food for thought, on the subject of DNA, even plant DNA will look like that of animal and human DNA's. Now what will be the biblical reason why people are of different races despite the saying (was this also in the bible?) that "men were created equal"?
nixwj
No, the real question is why are you calling one alien race "Caucasian" and the other "Mongoloid" if they are both responsible for all the human races?
nixwj
25th February 2005, 06:24 PM
Originally posted by Odin
A troll:
http://www.patriotresource.com/lotr/pics/characters/cavetroll.jpg
:D
What research did you do? What evidence do you have?
You'll have to read Erich von Daniken's "Chariots of the Gods" and Zechariah Sitchin's "The 12th Planet" and parts of the bible quoted by "The 12th Planet" in order that you will be guided to the correct thinking and belief. There is also a book by Maurice Chatelain titled "Our Ancestors Came From Outer Space". My thesis that I've posted at the URL that I have indicated earlier in this Forum can also provide you with enough proof, evidence, etc., etc. about this fact ("God" is an extraterrestrial).
nixwj
c4ts
25th February 2005, 06:29 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
You'll have to read Erich von Daniken's "Chariots of the Gods" and Zechariah Sitchin's "The 12th Planet" and parts of the bible quoted by "The 12th Planet" in order that you will be guided to the correct thinking and belief. There is also a book by Maurice Chatelain titled "Our Ancestors Came From Outer Space". My thesis that I've posted at the URL that I have indicated earlier in this Forum can also provide you with enough proof, evidence, etc., etc. about this fact ("God" is an extraterrestrial).
nixwj
No, I don't have to read it. If you make the claim, it's your job to explain it.
nixwj
25th February 2005, 06:33 PM
Originally posted by c4ts
No, I don't have to read it. If you make the claim, it's your job to explain it.
The problem with you is that you are very spoiled. And you want to be spoonfed. The evidence is staring at you, can't you see it?
nixwj
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 06:36 PM
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof
Or something like that. You are the one that has to prove your claim. Not anyone else.
c4ts
25th February 2005, 06:43 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
The problem with you is that you are very spoiled. And you want to be spoonfed. The evidence is staring at you, can't you see it?
nixwj
If this really is obvious to you, then you should have no trouble answering my last question at all, so do it. I am under no obligation to do your research for you. However, I will take this refusal to mean "you don't know what you're talking about."
nixwj
25th February 2005, 06:43 PM
Originally posted by Lisa Simpson
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof
Or something like that. You are the one that has to prove your claim. Not anyone else.
I can do nothing more. If you're playing the skeptic game, like I said, I can type here until my face turns blue and keep on splitting hairs but these won't change a thing in here. I have submitted in this Forum and in my thesis at my URL enough convincing proof that "God" is an extraterrestrial. And don't try to put words in my mouth.
nixwj
c4ts
25th February 2005, 06:44 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
I can do nothing more. If you're playing the skeptic game, like I said, I can type here until my face turns blue and keep on splitting hairs but these won't change a thing in here. I have submitted in this Forum and in my thesis at my URL enough convincing proof that "God" is an extraterrestrial. And don't try to put words in my mouth.
nixwj
There is a whole lot more you can do. You can start by answering my last question.
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 06:45 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
I can do nothing more. If you're playing the skeptic game, like I said, I can type here until my face turns blue and keep on splitting hairs but these won't change a thing in here. I have submitted in this Forum and in my thesis at my URL enough convincing proof that "God" is an extraterrestrial. And don't try to put words in my mouth.
nixwj
Where did I put words in your mouth?
You posted your thesis, now you have to defend it. That's the way it works.
Bikewer
25th February 2005, 06:46 PM
"God is good, God is great, God's a big invertebrate.."
Boiled in Lead, "The microrganism".
Z
25th February 2005, 06:50 PM
Besides, it's not 'convincing proof'. It's some Easter Island photos, some swiped pics from Penthouse, and references to some UFOlogy books - two of which by completely disreputable authors, and the third by a highly contraversial writer who believes in 'remote viewing' and 12 planets.
All in all - no proof.
Oh, yes, and the Bible. Well, we all know how good of a source the Bible is, don't we?
Nix - you brought it on, now you have to either defend it, or crawl back into your hole with your tail tucked between your legs. That's the way it works - that's why only the weak-minded and gullible will find your tripe interesting. However, as long as we are who we are - we will be sure to expose the con, the lies, the fallacies, to all who read these threads.
(By 'we' I simply refer to whosoever takes an interest in debunking the 'woo' claim of the week. I'm waiting for my own 'woo' claim to be debunked.)
nixwj
25th February 2005, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by Lisa Simpson
Where did I put words in your mouth?
You posted your thesis, now you have to defend it. That's the way it works.
Nope. You figure it out in the way that I did. It's easy. You just don't like this subject ("God" is an extraterrestrial) because it goes against your religion, sect, beliefs, cult, organization, party, racial orientation, etc., etc. Therefore it is impossible to convince you and you're giving me a runaround.
nixwj
neutrino_cannon
25th February 2005, 07:00 PM
Now taking bets on how long it takes before I get this booted off to flame wars.
I don't believe that my photos about that Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial are from your "ridiculous extraterrestrial autopsy program".
Yes, of course you wouldn’t believe that your precious alien photos come from Penthouse, even though it’s just been demonstrated. Funny you know, when most people talk about attachment to latex dolls in the context of penthouse magazine, they usually mean something entirely different. Don’t despair though; I hear the realdoll folks make all their products on a custom basis.
Like I said, these facts will go over or bounce off everybody's head at first. But I believe everything that I wrote in here by heart. You just "can't believe them" because your head is highly strung,
I’m very sorry that you believe with a circulatory organ. I’d suggest you use your brain, but such exertion on your part might cause considerable pain, and you’d never be able to use a chair again.
Very nice job switching an adverb to modify a participle, “high-strung” is technically incorrect. Alas, you also just killed the idiom, which doesn’t matter because you were using it incorrectly anyway.
like neutrino_cannon below who is a dopehead.
Oh! The pain, my hubris has brought about my downfall at this master of wordsmiths! Shakespeare himself would cry at such a fatally leveled retort, drawn from the Mecca of eloquence that is the third grade playground. No epithet, not even “poop-head”, “smelly-face” or “army-butt” could compare with the singeing blow to pride that this insult delivers! I will now hang my head in shame at the righteous verbal thrashing I have received.
Or perhaps you meant that I read the straight dope religiously. I can’t be sure because I’m highly strung and brainwashed.
Well, if you can't believe the facts in my thesis I can't go on typing in here until my face turns blue in arguing with you about them.
You’re missing a clause; it should read “if you can’t believe that there are facts in my thesis”. I’m also sorry to hear that you type with your face.
However there are other readers of this thread who will say I'm right.
Si Observo, credo.
And still there will be others who will ask themselves "who's going to believe this guy?" (You)
How kind of you to use the royal plural when describing me. You wouldn’t believe the number of people that screw that up.
You're not only brainwashed, you're also in limbo.
The funny thing is, it’s inside the gates which read “abandon all hope ye who enter here”, and it ain’t that bad. There’s this irritating sound of buzzing wasps and screaming opportunists outside, and there are all these freaking unbaptized infants in here, but other than that I haven’t got any complaints. I get to chill with Saladin and Ovid for all the rest of eternity and we don’t have to put up with any truck from that “God/Xenu” fellow.
And the Mongoloid electronic extraterrestrial you're saying is not green is most likely the result of lighting conditions when the photo was taken. (Color-blindedness may also be the cause. I know this because the green-colored traffic signal light looks white to me).
Curse those bright lights that make green object look pink! Lessee, if we shine white light and red light on a green object… It looks green! If we shine red light on a green object… it looks black! If we shine blue light on a green object… it looks black! In fact, there’s no freaking way you can make a green object look pink with normal lighting.
Of course, if you’re color blind, that’s different. Out of curiosity, what color do the detector arrays in my avatar appear to be?
Z
25th February 2005, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
Nope. You figure it out in the way that I did. It's easy. You just don't like this subject ("God" is an extraterrestrial) because it goes against your religion, sect, beliefs, cult, organization, party, etc., etc. Therefore it is impossible to convince you and you're giving me a runaround.
nixwj
Actually, that's not how presenting a thesis works, my friend. You do the research, you present the thesis, you prepare to defend it. You will face much criticism, and you must defend your sources, your process, your conclusions - everything. It's all on YOU, nix.
The fact is, I've done the research you mentioned - in fact, I just finished reading a summary of three of Sitchen's works... which leads me to believe that he is a kook and a con artist.
Well, you're using disreputable source material - so your thesis is also disreputable. There isn't much more to say.
c4ts
25th February 2005, 07:08 PM
He doesn't know what he is talking about, so he's going to dodge questions until one of us gives up.
Complicated terminology doesn't make things true. Especially when that terminology has no rational foundation.
Calling something obvious doesn't make it true. (In fact, sometimes the obvious isn't true, such as how the Earth is obviously flat and the stars obviously revolve around it.)
Question dodging certainly doesn't make it true.
And a claim like this requires more evidence than a few books, websites, and some dissimilar photographs. This would require an extraordiary amount of fossil and archeological evidence, none of which he seems to have access to, although he pretends to hold a great deal.
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 07:11 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
Nope. You figure it out in the way that I did. It's easy. You just don't like this subject ("God" is an extraterrestrial) because it goes against your religion, sect, beliefs, cult, organization, party, racial orientation, etc., etc. Therefore it is impossible to convince you and you're giving me a runaround.
nixwj
I'm not the one giving the runaround. That would be you.
You have a point. God is an extraterrestrial.
Now prove it.
Sounds like another case of argument by blatant assertion to me.
neutrino_cannon
25th February 2005, 07:19 PM
Fine! Put up a smokescreen of logic and reason you egalitarian, lucid, monogenesis-endorsing commie! Just don't come crying to me when the Illuminati take over the world because I couldn't convince anyone that I was right!
nixwj
25th February 2005, 07:24 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
Actually, that's not how presenting a thesis works, my friend. You do the research, you present the thesis, you prepare to defend it. You will face much criticism, and you must defend your sources, your process, your conclusions - everything. It's all on YOU, nix.
The fact is, I've done the research you mentioned - in fact, I just finished reading a summary of three of Sitchen's works... which leads me to believe that he is a kook and a con artist.
Well, you're using disreputable source material - so your thesis is also disreputable. There isn't much more to say.
I don't believe every word you say. In fact I believe that you are the kook and the con artist. Like I said, there is NOTHING that I can do if you go on playing skeptic forever because of the reason that people like you refuse to agree to this subject and to the author of it and the fact that you even hate its presence in this Forum.
nixwj
neutrino_cannon
25th February 2005, 07:31 PM
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/grail/large/HolyGrail049.jpg
What's all this about Me being an extraterrestrial? Well it's about Me-damned time somebody figured that out!
noun: a form of life assumed to exist outside the Earth or its atmosphere
Ecclesiastes 5:2
Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty to utter any thing before God: for God is in heaven, and thou upon earth: therefore let thy words be few.
(Italics Mine)
Duh!
c4ts
25th February 2005, 07:34 PM
God needs a shave.
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 07:36 PM
Originally posted by c4ts
God needs a shave.
I kinda like the ZZ Top beard. 'Cause every girl's crazy 'bout a sharp dressed man.
Z
25th February 2005, 07:37 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
I don't believe every word you say. In fact I believe that you are the kook and the con artist. Like I said, there is NOTHING that I can do if you go on playing skeptic forever because of the reason that people like you refuse to agree to this subject and to the author of it and the fact that you even hate its presence in this Forum.
nixwj
Yep - he's a kid.
I certainly don't expect you to 'believe every word' I say. However, I do speak the truth... believe it or not, that is the way it is.
Name-calling doesn't change the fact that you are trying to convince people that God comes from Zeta Reticuli and has green skin, based on some poorly-written works by lunatics and some Penthouse photos.
I'm afraid most of the rest of this is incomprehensible. "Playing Skeptic"? You mean, being analytical of evidence, and critical of wild claims? Those who will not 'play skeptic' must instead 'play the fool'.
I don't hate your post being on the fora - I simply looked at what you call 'evidence', and checked it against other resources, and determined there to be a considerable difference between your so-called 'facts' and the actual facts. The one who seems to 'hate' is the one who is getting his precious pet idea trashed.
Why do woo's post ideas on a SKEPTIC'S forum, then get upset when the skeptic does what the skeptic always does? Did you honestly think that your pet theory would stand up to scrutiny?
Who do you think you're kidding?
neutrino_cannon
25th February 2005, 07:42 PM
As much fun as this is, I think we're all ignoring the bigger issue:
Increasingly poor quality of JREF forum trolls. It used to be that real class acts like Franko/Wraith, Carlos, jedi knight and muscleman came in here and sweated for what they believed in. Since then we've got what, a thousand incarnations of GP and hellcat (boring), 1inChrist (quickly became boring), and some other random trash not even worth further mention.
We've got to get us some better trolls.
nixwj
25th February 2005, 08:05 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
Yep - he's a kid.
I certainly don't expect you to 'believe every word' I say. However, I do speak the truth... believe it or not, that is the way it is.
Name-calling doesn't change the fact that you are trying to convince people that God comes from Zeta Reticuli and has green skin, based on some poorly-written works by lunatics and some Penthouse photos.
I'm afraid most of the rest of this is incomprehensible. "Playing Skeptic"? You mean, being analytical of evidence, and critical of wild claims? Those who will not 'play skeptic' must instead 'play the fool'.
I don't hate your post being on the fora - I simply looked at what you call 'evidence', and checked it against other resources, and determined there to be a considerable difference between your so-called 'facts' and the actual facts. The one who seems to 'hate' is the one who is getting his precious pet idea trashed.
Why do woo's post ideas on a SKEPTIC'S forum, then get upset when the skeptic does what the skeptic always does? Did you honestly think that your pet theory would stand up to scrutiny?
Who do you think you're kidding?
I don't expect you or your kind to believe this thesis of mine. Who do you think you are that I must waste my time on? Like I said, there are many others reading my thesis and will conclude that I'm right. And just like you said, this is a pet thesis. And this pet thesis of mine will continue to present in the minds of the majority of this planet the myths about any "god(s)" that they have been worshipping. All of you are using "philosophy" on a thesis such as this? "Philosophy" which is a "subject" that professes you cannot believe that you exist? Hah! And when I say that you're a dopehead that word is a demerit to your integrity because I know you're a dopehead. And for your information, I can be old enough to be your father. Therefore you're the kid. And also for your information, it is easier to poke holes in other people's defense, theory, etc. regardless of how solid they are. All the "skeptic" will do is to continue to split hairs until that hated thesis or subject is reduced to a drivel.
nixwj
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 08:11 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
I don't expect you or your kind to believe this thesis of mine.
So why did you post it here?
Who do you think you are that I must waste my time on?
We are skeptics. Therefore, we are skeptical of things. It's logic. Try it.
Like I said, there are many others reading my thesis and will conclude that I'm right. And just like you said, this is a pet thesis. And this pet thesis of mine will continue to present in the minds of the majority of this planet the myths about any "god(s)" that they have been worshipping. All of you are using "philosophy" on a thesis such as this? "Philosophy" which is a "subject" that professes you cannot believe that you exist? Hah!
Then they aren't critically thinking either.
And when I say that you're a dopehead that word is a demerit to your integrity because I know you're a dopehead. And for your information, I can be old enough to be your father. Therefore you're the kid. And also for your information, it is easier to poke holes in other people's defense, theory, etc. regardless of how solid they are. All the "skeptic" will do is to continue to split hairs until that hated thesis or subject is reduced to a drivel.
nixwj
You forgot to add "neener, neener, neener"
nixwj
25th February 2005, 08:17 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
Besides, it's not 'convincing proof'. It's some Easter Island photos, some swiped pics from Penthouse, and references to some UFOlogy books - two of which by completely disreputable authors, and the third by a highly contraversial writer who believes in 'remote viewing' and 12 planets.
All in all - no proof.
Oh, yes, and the Bible. Well, we all know how good of a source the Bible is, don't we?
Nix - you brought it on, now you have to either defend it, or crawl back into your hole with your tail tucked between your legs. That's the way it works - that's why only the weak-minded and gullible will find your tripe interesting. However, as long as we are who we are - we will be sure to expose the con, the lies, the fallacies, to all who read these threads.
(By 'we' I simply refer to whosoever takes an interest in debunking the 'woo' claim of the week. I'm waiting for my own 'woo' claim to be debunked.)
What's the matter, your "philosophy" tells you not to believe in your own bible anymore?
nixwj
nixwj
25th February 2005, 08:20 PM
Originally posted by Lisa Simpson
So why did you post it here?
We are skeptics. Therefore, we are skeptical of things. It's logic. Try it.
Then they aren't critically thinking either.
You forgot to add "neener, neener, neener"
I'm not idiots like you.
nixwj
Z
25th February 2005, 08:22 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
I don't expect you or your kind to believe this thesis of mine.
One does wonder, then, why you would post it here?
And what, exactly, are 'my kind'?
Ah, must be intelligent critical thinkers with excessive egos.
Anyway...
Who do you think you are that I must waste my time on?
Only you can answer your question, since you chose to waste your time on us.
Like I said, there are many others reading my thesis and will conclude that I'm right.
On an off-handed guess, I'd say less than a third of those that conclude that you are a nut job.
And just like you said, this is a pet thesis. And this pet thesis of mine will continue to present in the minds of the majority of this planet the myths about any "god(s)" that they have been worshipping.
It took me a time or two to understand that last sentence. To reduce: "And this thesis will present the myths about any "gods"."
So you admit, then, that all you are doing is presenting a nice myth?
All of you are using "philosophy" on a thesis such as this?
No one is using 'philosophy' - we're using Analytical Thinking - Logic - Reason. Three things you would, apparently, know nothing about.
"Philosophy" which is a "subject" that professes you cannot believe that you exist? Hah!
Apparently, you know about as much about philosophy as you do about who and what we are.
And when I say that you're a dopehead that word is a demerit to your integrity because I know you're a dopehead.
The word 'dopehead' is a demerit to OUR integrity because you have a false belief?
FYI - never done 'dope' in my life. Never even seen it up close. My drugs of choice are pipe tobacco and an occasional European lager.
And for your information, I can be old enough to be your father.
You can be? What a strange thing to say.
The fact is, your writing style, general intelligence level, and use of retort demonstrate that you are clearly no more than 15, mentally.
Therefore you're the kid.
Yes, yes I am.
:D
And also for your information, it is easier to poke holes in other people's defense, theory, etc. regardless of how solid they are.
The usual use of this construction is to say it is easier than something else. It is easier than what?
And in your case - you have no defense - and your theory came pre-equipped with an inane number of holes.
All the "skeptic" will do is to continue to split hairs until that hated thesis or subject is reduced to a drivel.
IN this case, all we had to do was let you post it - it was drivel to start with.
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 08:22 PM
Try answering questions instead of name calling and people might take you slightly more seriously little boy.
Z
25th February 2005, 08:24 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
What's the matter, your "philosophy" tells you not to believe in your own bible anymore?
nixwj
"Your own Bible"
Know thine enemy. I'm a Pagan minister, my son. Not a Christian. I take no text of myth as truth - I know that sounds somehow wrong, that a Pagan priest doesn't just accept myths as if they are real. But it's not my Bible, idiot.
You're scoring a big, fat ZERO today, son.
Go to bed - your mommy will be mad if you stay up too late.
nixwj
25th February 2005, 08:42 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
"Your own Bible"
Know thine enemy. I'm a Pagan minister, my son. Not a Christian. I take no text of myth as truth - I know that sounds somehow wrong, that a Pagan priest doesn't just accept myths as if they are real. But it's not my Bible, idiot.
You're scoring a big, fat ZERO today, son.
Go to bed - your mommy will be mad if you stay up too late.
A "pagan minister"? What? This could only come from insane idiots like you. I posted my thesis in this Forum because I know that a lot of people who are not only of your kind are reading the postings in it. I have heard all lies today. I think your credibilities are being tested today. And very seriously. So you're tired of going around the bush which is what all of you have been trying to do to me. So you instead must go to your bed of hay and lick your wounds, parasites, so that Mother Maggot won't be mad at you. Oh, and think about those "precious" credibilities that you have to defend against me.
nixwj
Lisa Simpson
25th February 2005, 08:45 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
A "pagan minister"? What? This could only come from insane idiots like you.
nixwj
One more time.
Less name calling.
More evidence of your claim.
Z
25th February 2005, 10:40 PM
Originally posted by nixwj
A "pagan minister"? What? This could only come from insane idiots like you. I posted my thesis in this Forum because I know that a lot of people who are not only of your kind are reading the postings in it. I have heard all lies today. I think your credibilities are being tested today. And very seriously. So you're tired of going around the bush which is what all of you have been trying to do to me. So you instead must go to your bed of hay and lick your wounds, parasites, so that Mother Maggot won't be mad at you. Oh, and think about those "precious" credibilities that you have to defend against me.
nixwj
Hmmm... Weirdo. Apparently so hate-filled, he has to not only invent a God, but an alien one at that. And feels he must personally attack people based on beliefs.
So he is not only a child, but a bigot. AND an idiot.
Well, when you grow up and have something positive to contribute, please feel free to do so. In the meantime, I'll stick around just to point out to passers-by how silly and loony your notion sounds - how it's founded on the weakest of material, poorly researched, etc.
For goodness' sake, you have a couple of photographs of a rubber alien doll on your website! And you think OUR credibility is threatened?
Silly fool - stay in school.
Z
25th February 2005, 10:47 PM
btw Nix - what rank are ya now?
Semper Fi - almost as smart as a child...
neutrino_cannon
25th February 2005, 11:04 PM
The assertions of familiarity between the latex Penthouse blow up doll (i.e. the supposed "Mongoloid") alien and Mongoloid peoples fascinates me. I was unaware that Mongoloid peoples lack hair, have green skin, and possess extremely reduced noses. Similaraly, I'm curious as to why nix asserts that Caucasians look like Easter Island statues.
I don't know if this is more fun than taunting 1inChrist, but it sure is close.
H'ethetheth
26th February 2005, 05:46 AM
First, good thing you wrote it isn't a joke. Some people might have assumed otherwise.
Here come the questions:
- What on earth does "electronic" mean in connection with extraterrestrials and what then are we, humans? Cyborg?
- What evidence of early 'electromongoloid' alien architecture can be found on the sea floor? Who claims this beside you (I assume you didn't go down there yourself in your scuba-gear)?
- How did you come to know the true nature of the Ark of the covenant, a thing that nobody has seen, at least not since the (re?)invention of electricity.
- If the aliens know a certain star system as "Zeta Reticuli", they must have spoken greek and latin roughly 25,000 years before these languages came into existence. Also this means that they know the constellations by their latin names, based on their likeness from the viewpoint of earth, and use greek characters to indicate certain stars in them, just like we have in the past centuries. How do you explain this?
(neutrino_cannon: Your first reply made me want to remember my latin. Unfortunately I didn't)
- How do you know we've been brainwashed? By whom? Why?
-Could all this "evidence" not convince you or anyone that God, like aliens, is a figment of human imagination?
regards and welcome to the forum,
H'ethetheth
Odin
26th February 2005, 07:34 AM
-Are there any websites that you used as sources?
H'ethetheth
26th February 2005, 02:57 PM
- Are there going to be answers?
Z
27th February 2005, 04:46 AM
I think the Colonel is too busy to reply...
wink wink nudge nudge
Probably seeing if he can find alien photos that AREN'T already debunked.
Vortex
27th February 2005, 09:35 AM
Maybe he's busy gathering up some real hard evidence to lend credence to his ranting screed of utter lunacy. That, or his mom ordered him to take down the silly site.
neutrino_cannon
27th February 2005, 02:41 PM
He needs to work out some better catch-phrases, cause nothing presents itself with what he's got.
Ala 1inC: Dopeheads!
Ala Franko: D-opeheads!
Ala muscleman: I DON'T NEED TO LISTEN TO YOUR HAIR-SPLITTING BECAUSE SOMEONE WILL LISTEN TO ME AND READ THEIR BIBLE AND PUT TOGETHER THE PIECES LIKE I HAVE IT SAYS "CHARIOT" AND WHEEL INSIDE OF WHEELYOU MORON DOPEHEADS I CAN BENCH PRESS AN UFO...
H'ethetheth
27th February 2005, 03:00 PM
I think it might be a while.
neutrino_cannon
27th February 2005, 11:44 PM
Originally posted by zaayrdragon
I think the Colonel is too busy to reply...
wink wink nudge nudge
Probably seeing if he can find alien photos that AREN'T already debunked.
From Penthouse we may assume?
H'ethetheth has made a safe bet.
LotusMegami
3rd March 2005, 03:45 AM
I must agree that this is very poor quality trolling. Trite, overused woo psychobabble.
mayday is much higher quality. Personally, I find Janice to be very amusing. Her talk about angels and fairies led to my late-night invention of a tarot deck based on professional wrestlers.
2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.