A rematch for Natalia Lulova

[Linda]

This story just appeared today. We have received word from Natalia's attorney.....a new one this year.....that she plans on trying for the $1,000,000 again.

www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.04.04/news15.html

"one or two percent." That's hilarious. I would guess the little girl has the big sympathy vote... but it appears her 'power' is contingent on too many aspects of the test being perfect for her. I wonder how much the 'coach' is using her. Entirely, or is he fooling himself as well? Hard to say...

[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

I'm tempted to say that Randi should refuse. There's something about testing minors that is so unsavory.

~~ Paul

[BenjaminWolf]

She's trying again at the challenge? Her coach is egging her on?
This has got me humming 'Eye of the Tiger'.

[CFLarsen]

Originally posted by Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
I'm tempted to say that Randi should refuse. There's something about testing minors that is so unsavory.

Yeah, I can see that. Problem is, what if a certain power only exists when you are a minor? Hey, it's possible!

But I do see the problem. One solution could be that Randi does not actively offer the challenge to minors, but instead make sure that when he is approached, that no harm can come to the child, and that JREF bears no responsibility.