Roboramma
6th April 2005, 12:51 AM
This yahoo news article (http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050405/sc_afp/vaticanpopeastronomy_050405184305) is probably just bad wording, but is anyone really expected to buy this?
Here's a quote:
Those who say eclipses herald history-shaping events will find support for their superstition when, on Friday, the Sun will be briefly plunged into darkness on the day of Pope John Paul II's funeral.
As though the Pope's death actually caused the eclipse. And:
Astronomers, though, say the eclipse, while of a rare and intriguing type, was calculated long ago and is simply part of a ballet in celestial physics between the Sun, Earth and Moon.
Great to put that in there, but doesn't it paint these as just two contrasting viewpoints?
Here's a quote:
Those who say eclipses herald history-shaping events will find support for their superstition when, on Friday, the Sun will be briefly plunged into darkness on the day of Pope John Paul II's funeral.
As though the Pope's death actually caused the eclipse. And:
Astronomers, though, say the eclipse, while of a rare and intriguing type, was calculated long ago and is simply part of a ballet in celestial physics between the Sun, Earth and Moon.
Great to put that in there, but doesn't it paint these as just two contrasting viewpoints?