PDA

View Full Version : Protest Video

Tony
6th April 2003, 06:12 PM
http://www.protestwarrior.com/

Click where is says "The Video is Here".
6th April 2003, 06:46 PM
You realize you are a fascist just for posting that link. ;)

Maybe you should sign up for one of those Marxist classes in the video.
bva
6th April 2003, 07:00 PM
Im buying shirts right now. I love it. These PEACE ACTIVISTS sure are angry :) and very self-righteous..
corplinx
6th April 2003, 08:14 PM
The brain-terminal.com videos were better done.
Khalid01
6th April 2003, 09:57 PM
I could imagine a plethora of comments from you, Tony, but I don't want to put words in your mouth. Please share you opinion.
Tony
6th April 2003, 10:06 PM
Originally posted by Khalid01
I could imagine a plethora of comments from you, Tony, but I don't want to put words in your mouth. Please share you opinion.

I thought it was funny, especially the people saying that they(protest warriors) weren't welcome at the protest, while AT THE SAME TIME calling them fascists. I wish I could be there with the protest-warriors. I would be armed of course. http://www.forum.scullyspost.com/images/smilies/smilies2.9.03/doublepis.gif :D
Khalid01
6th April 2003, 10:18 PM
Originally posted by Tony


I thought it was funny, especially the people saying that they(protest warriors) weren't welcome at the protest, while AT THE SAME TIME calling them fascists. I wish I could be there with the protest-warriors. I would be armed of course. http://www.forum.scullyspost.com/images/smilies/smilies2.9.03/doublepis.gif :D

Very well, but consider that the anti-war demonstrators in New York several months back were cordoned off to the "free-speech" section, do you think it would have been too much to have asked the pro-war supporters to do likewise in this demonstration? Should the pro-war supporters been there while they hadn't signed up for the demonstration? Or would Matriarchial Totalitarianism prevent that?

I don't condone the hostilities of the protestors, of course, I just hope that the situations are "fair and balanced".
Tony
6th April 2003, 10:27 PM
Originally posted by Khalid01


Very well, but consider that the anti-war demonstrators in New York several months back were cordoned off to the "free-speech" section


My understanding is that those situations were arranged by the city to separate the anti and pro demostrators, lest violence ensue.

do you think it would have been too much to have asked the pro-war supporters to do likewise in this demonstration?

No, but just because they are asked doesnt mean they should required to comply.
Barkhorn1x
7th April 2003, 08:22 AM
Originally posted by bva
These PEACE ACTIVISTS sure are angry :) and very self-righteous..

The video was borderline parody - angry peace guys denying free speech to those who don't agree w/ them. :rolleyes:

The Protest Warrior signes were very funny.

Regards,
Barkhorn.
7th April 2003, 11:02 AM
Originally posted by Khalid01


Very well, but consider that the anti-war demonstrators in New York several months back were cordoned off to the "free-speech" section, do you think it would have been too much to have asked the pro-war supporters to do likewise in this demonstration? Should the pro-war supporters been there while they hadn't signed up for the demonstration? Or would Matriarchial Totalitarianism prevent that?

I don't condone the hostilities of the protestors, of course, I just hope that the situations are "fair and balanced".

I would say cordoning off the protestors was a wise decision, seeing as how their aim was to shut down the city.