Is This A Medical Condition

[BillyJoe]

http://img105.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eyes3gf.jpg

Or is it a product of photoshop?

[EdipisReks]

photoshop. not even a particularly good one, the forehead was clearly clone stamped into the eye sockets, for one. the "eye cheeks" also don't work, and have evidence of cut and pasted edges.

[EdipisReks]

the eyes also appear to be reversed, with the left eye in the right cheek and the right eye in the left cheek, probably because the shapes worked better that way.

[RandFan]

I concur with EdipisReks. A good effect overall but the editing is visible to the naked eye which does make it a poor edit but I suspect no one was really trying to pass it off as real.

When you magnify the picture the editing becomes far more obvious. In addition to the cloned forehead there is serious lack of detail in the area surrounding the cloned area in the eye sockets. The eyes appear upside down also.

[EdipisReks]

Originally posted by RandFan
The eyes appear upside down also.

are you sure? they just appear to be switched, to me.

[RandFan]

Originally posted by EdipisReks
are you sure? they just appear to be switched, to me. On closer inspection I agree. It appeared to me that the lashes on the lower lid were longer than the lashes on the upper however I think it is just that the lashes on the lower are simply more exposed. When I turn the eyes upside down in photo shop they do not at all look correct. FWIW I'm not at all an expert in such matters though I did use Photoshop for 8 years as a graphic production artist.

[BillyJoe]

Thanks. Photoshop picture. Good. I didn't think it was possible to stretch the optic nerve that far without rupturing it and going blind.

[Rolfe]

I don't know about Photoshop, but that's impossible!

Rolfe.

[BillyJoe]

Originally posted by Rolfe
I don't know about Photoshop, but that's impossible! Well, there are conditions where, joints and skin are excessively mobile. But the optic nerve? No, I don't think so either.