View Full Version : help with qigong debunking
Deadlytoque
19th July 2005, 04:19 PM
Hello, all. I have a problem.
A friend of mine, who is a neuroscience student at a decent Canadian university, and who is usually a very rational and skeptical person, has one major weakness: he believes utterly in qigong and similar "magic". No amount of rational examination has dissuaded him from this belief, and I fear that he's starting to slip into belief of other quackery (therapeutic touch, for example) as an extension of this belief.
His birthday is coming up at the beginning of September, and I'd like to get him a book that deals with (disproves?) qigong in a rational and skeptical manner, preferably something that's fairly approachable and not too dense (when Fall semester starts he's going to have enough reading to do).
If no good suggestions come up, I'll probably get him a copy of Sagan's "The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark", which doesn't deal with qigong directly, that I remember, but was a damn good read and helped bolster my own skepticism.
Cheers,
The Deadly Toque
crimresearch
19th July 2005, 04:29 PM
What specifically does your friend believe?
Does he believe that if he stands still and breathes very slowly while visualizing energy circling his body, that he will gain some mild benefits in stronger legs, and better posture?
I doubt if there is any written material to debunk that.
Or does he believe that if he wiggles around a certain way in a room full of other devotees, that the Living Buddha will implant a Falun wheel in his tantien, which will cure cncer, etc?
Deadlytoque
19th July 2005, 04:32 PM
He believes that all things, whether living or non-living are surrounded by an as-yet-unmeasured energy field, which a trained practicioner (or talented amateur) can manipulate for various purposes, including healing, promotion of growth, and better health.
Ashles
19th July 2005, 04:39 PM
Well first of all you want to check out the forums here - there are many discussions on the subject.
Then you really have to have a look at Bullshido.com (http://www.bullshido.net/) a frankly superb resource that discusses all the nonsense that gets tied up with martial arts.
Phrost is the website administrator of Bullshido.com and if you have any specific questions then you couls ask him or thaiboxerken, both of whom are regular posters and pretty darned knowledgeable about the whols area.
Or, the simplest solution: ask your friend what he claims qigong is capable of and type it up here.
Bottom line is - I bet he has recently started a martial arts course and is all excited about what he has heard is possible with qigong or chi or qi etc.
It isn't.
Here is a recent example of someone who was confused about what is possible with martial arts (and they weren't even going into the wackier mystical aspects).
The Ultimate Unstoppable Chi Warrior (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=58683)
Bottom line is, he probably won't appreciate what you tell him (as you can see from that thread), so maybe you could invite him to join this forum or bullshido.com to discuss it.
Frankly I think this forum is more gentle.
As a neuroscience student he should be aware of the limitations of nerve tranmission speed which renders quite a lot of chi's claims impossible instantly.
Ashles
19th July 2005, 04:45 PM
Originally posted by Deadlytoque
He believes that all things, whether living or non-living are surrounded by an as-yet-unmeasured energy field, which a trained practicioner (or talented amateur) can manipulate for various purposes, including healing, promotion of growth, and better health.
It might be worth asking him if it is unmeasured how anyone can detect it.
And if he says people can 'sense' it then he needs a basic course in perception.
This is really poor from a potential neuroscientist. Is he like 2 weeks into the first term?
Ashles
19th July 2005, 04:48 PM
Originally posted by Deadlytoque
He believes that all things, whether living or non-living are surrounded by an as-yet-unmeasured energy field, which a trained practicioner (or talented amateur) can manipulate for various purposes, including healing, promotion of growth, and better health.
Sorry to bombard with responses, but it might also be worth mentioning to him that if he, or anyone he knows can demonstrate these abilities then they can win a million dollars as part of the JREF Challenge (http://www.randi.org/research/index.html).
They don't even need to explain how it works, merely demonstrate the ability.
Kilik
19th July 2005, 05:02 PM
Qi can be sensed. Many people do.
There is nothing else in the world as good as proper ancient/prehistoric qigong school pracitce, or internal martial arts. If what he practices is one of those, he can feel chi, the "runner's high" is laughable, and his health and rejuvenation will be incredible. Not likely going to convince someone with words not to believe that.
What you will feel at first is basically, exactly like an electrical machine like a scenar or maybe TENS. Electrical energy. Also heat, vaporous, thickness or just a strong magnetic force. At first in the hands and then whole body. I don't think hypnotism or placeobo can do that. Only qigong, or a machine I'd think.
apoger
19th July 2005, 05:09 PM
Qi can be sensed. Many people do.
People say things like this all the time.
First person to demonstrate it gets a cool million, and ushers in a new era of understanding.
Go for it!
Ashles
19th July 2005, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
Qi can be sensed. Many people do.
There is nothing else in the world as good as proper ancient/prehistoric qigong school pracitce, or internal martial arts. If what he practices is one of those, he can feel chi, the "runner's high" is laughable, and his health and rejuvenation will be incredible. Not likely going to convince someone with words not to believe that.
Let's firstly ignore the double negative there that appears to make the opposite point you were trying to make.
'Health' and 'rejuvenation' are to a certain extent objective measures. Could you please provide the evidence which backs up your claim?
No?
Oh dear.
Floating Egg
19th July 2005, 06:02 PM
If you're going to try and convince him to change his beliefs, you should first recognize that this is probably not a casual thing for him. If he's spent any time at all exploring Qigong he must have come across some very real physical effects that he either can't explain or is unwilling to explain.
Words can seem very impotent when compared to tingling sensations, feelings of heat, and the beneficial effects associated with meditation. Coupling these sensory experiences with peer pressure and respect for a teacher can be very intoxicating indeed.
Deadlytoque
19th July 2005, 10:03 PM
I'm not entirely sure I want him to change his beliefs. It's hardly my place. I just want him to realize he's got a blind spot in his otherwise solid critical thinking, so that he can change his own beliefs, if and when he makes the realization.
I'll direct him towards the website, and try talking to him, but I was hoping for a print resource, something he can read between classes, or on the bus, since I only see him two or three times a year. It doesn't have to be totally devoted to qigong or martial arts, but a chapter or two on qi or even feng shui would be helpful.
Thanks for all the feedback, everyone. Now if only I could make some headway on the creationist ex-girlfriend... ah, lost causes.
Phrost
19th July 2005, 10:18 PM
Originally posted by Ashles
Well first of all you want to check out the forums here - there are many discussions on the subject.
Then you really have to have a look at Bullshido.com (http://www.bullshido.net/) a frankly superb resource that discusses all the nonsense that gets tied up with martial arts.
Phrost is the website administrator of Bullshido.com and if you have any specific questions then you couls ask him or thaiboxerken, both of whom are regular posters and pretty darned knowledgeable about the whols area.
Or, the simplest solution: ask your friend what he claims qigong is capable of and type it up here.
Bottom line is - I bet he has recently started a martial arts course and is all excited about what he has heard is possible with qigong or chi or qi etc.
It isn't.
Here is a recent example of someone who was confused about what is possible with martial arts (and they weren't even going into the wackier mystical aspects).
The Ultimate Unstoppable Chi Warrior (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=58683)
Bottom line is, he probably won't appreciate what you tell him (as you can see from that thread), so maybe you could invite him to join this forum or bullshido.com to discuss it.
Frankly I think this forum is more gentle.
As a neuroscience student he should be aware of the limitations of nerve tranmission speed which renders quite a lot of chi's claims impossible instantly.
Thanks for the plug, and yeah, this forum's a bit more tame. Ours is the forum equivalent of a no-holds-barred cage fight, which serves our purpose in getting through to the typically less than erudite crowd that makes up the bulk of the Martial Arts community. (Though surprisingly, we've got a good number of scientists and other scholarly types, which really baffles me at times).
Is the guy in question Asian? I ask only because I've run into a lot of cases of deep-rooted cultural superstitions and beliefs that they just can't let go of despite having a good education in scientific principles.
For a lot of Chinese people I've met, saying Qigong is BS is as offensive as bringing up how Jet Li can't really fight (Wushu is not a fighting art, it's a performance art).
So it can be very difficult to overcome these beliefs. Heck, there are a lot of self-described "skeptics" who cling to religious beliefs they know deep down are irrational.
I'd also like to add my vote for Thaiboxerken. He's one of the best skeptical forum posters I've run into and does a great job of dismantling pro-woo arguments.
Kell
19th July 2005, 11:06 PM
In the hope of turning up some written material to share with your friend, I found the CSICOP site has some material on Qigong.
The first article I came across recounts the experiences of Sima Nan, a chinese journalist who was involved in the qigong movment in China for a long time, became disillusioned with its practices and finally acted to expose the fraud. He suffered for it.
Interestingly, he has also now set up an eqivelant of the JREF Million Dollar Prize in China.
The CSICOP article is here:
http://www.csicop.org/sb/9903/sima-nan.html
From the link at the bottom of that article, there is a list of other CSICOP material dealing with qigong.
The top of the list is a link to their review of this book on Amazon:
Qigong: Chinese Medicine or Pseudoscinece? - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573922323/csicop/102-2805750-1233722
It doesn't act to completely refute qigong, but the authors ( chinese scientists ) refute the various 'psychic' claims associated with qigong. Unfortunately, the book seems to suffer from translation problems too. But it is apparently the first of its kind to be printed in english.
If the book is difficult to get hold of or suffers too much from ambiguous translation, you can at least print off some of the CSICOP material for your friend to read.
HTH
Jyera
19th July 2005, 11:53 PM
Deadlytoque,
If you are a real friend, buy him a Light Saber.
Pros:
1. Your friend have a new toy.
2. Divert his focus from QiGong.
3. You get to be sarcastic about his overtly imaginative pursue.
4. Since he is unlikely to learn Qigong successfully, at least he can wield his saber and pretend to use Qi to suffocate you. Like Dart Vader.
5. Like QiGong, the Lightsaber represent something cool.
But the road to tangible QiGong is as real as making a real lightsaber.
If you do buy him a light saber, may I register to be your friend too. :) .
Kilik
20th July 2005, 12:55 AM
interesting thread here on mind body interaction and DNA-
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=72887
Interesting article on the history of energy researches
http://twm.co.nz/energ.html
From a site called PubMed, National Library of medicine
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1353653&dopt=Abstract
Articles about energy development and technology
http://spectrum.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/14/3/149
http://www.diamondhead.net/sbtm.htm
Heat and electricity seem part of the spectrum of qi. It is why hot will go to cold and vice versa, and not something else. Energy expresses itself according to qi balance.
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2002/04.18/09-tummo.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8070042
Qi and sound
http://www.chiexplorer.com/infrasonic.html
article
http://www.somatics.de/Oshman.htm
Here's a interesting article. It really seems to be on the right track for future development. The future is in energy and fields of energy-
http://www.yorkkarate.com/Articles/Q%20i&%20Bioelectromagetic%20Energy.pdf
Qi theory fits in well with scientific discoveries
http://www.wwwolf.co.uk/drmunchie/articles/drmunchie-QBC-1and2.pdf
I doubt there's enough money in external qigong for a company to control external qi though.
http://www.qigonginstitute.org/html/papers/qigonglyphoma.pdf
http://www.qigonginstitute.org/html/papers.php
Meridians being discovered by machines?
http://www.cihs.edu/whatsnew/research.asp
http://www.cihs.edu/whatsnew/news_sum99.asp
http://www.spiritual.com.au/articles/healing/energeticmedicine_share.htm
I found those articles to be fairly interesting
http://www.qimaster.com/research_ext-qi1.php
http://nrizzoroberts.home.att.net/nancy.htm
http://gdvusa.org/research.html
ABHORRENT IDEAS IN SCIENCE. Lol
http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/abhor.html
Energy generating machines-
http://scenarworld.com/questions.php/
http://scenarworld.com/research/article5.php
"Direct action on the affected areas results in rhythmical contraction of a large number of the myofibrils of the skeletal muscles and smooth muscles of the blood vessel walls. "
It can make you involuntarily flap around. It measures skin resistance and then changes it's current and the person can't adapt
Immunity and the mind -
http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/psufalundafa/homepage/meditation%20&%20medical%20research.htm
http://www.pureinsight.org/pi/articles/2002/5/20/195.html
http://clearwisdom.net/emh/articles/2002/12/14/29727.html
Tai Chi boosts immunity?
http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2003/A/20036202.html
another article
http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/islis/en/journalE/abst212E.htm
So what's the big deal anyways? Ancient people knew that there were such things as fields of energy a long time ago.
From the writings of Hermes Trismesgus-
http://www.crystalinks.com/emerald14bw.html
"Preserve them and guard them,
hide them in symbols,
so the profane will laugh and renounce.
In every land, form ye the mysteries.
Make the way hard for the seeker to tread.
Thus will the weak and the wavering be rejected.
Thus will the secrets be hidden and guarded,
held till the time when the wheel shall be turned."
Zep
20th July 2005, 03:40 AM
So doing even an average amount of exercise doesn't make anyone's hands and feet warm, and feel hot?
It does?!
Oh dear - silly notion in trouble here...
EdipisReks
20th July 2005, 04:18 AM
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9003/miscpetardedi22iv.png
Deadlytoque
20th July 2005, 08:42 AM
My friend's not Asian, is neither is the guy who (I suspect) got him into this nonsense. He has started taking martial arts lessons, from a bona fide woo-woo (Creation "Science", including Diluvian nonsense, humans and dinosaurs side by side, and the rest; not to mention the fact that he once tried to convince myself and other partygoers that he was a "vampire slayer"... yes, he used the word "slayer" a la Buffy). I've done my best to simply remove the bad influence, but there's only so far I can go. Similarly, printing out a bunch of references and just plopping them on my friend's lap is a bit overt. I find education works better if the student comes to the understanding himself.
Anyway, again thanks for all your help.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 09:22 AM
With regards to the dinosaur nonsense then if you can somehow get him to visit the excellent Talk Origins (http://www.talkorigins.org/) then he will find all the answers he could ever want on the subject.
Influences like this person your friend is taking lessons from are really bad news. As you have demonstrated they often don't have just one weird belief, but a whole range that they interweave in a stupid way.
The irony is that if your friend was really interested in seeing the truth he would be able to in about 5 seconds flat, but at the moment it sounds like he wants to believe.
It's a shame you can't ask your friend to ask this guy to actually demonstrate his amazing Chi abilities. Aren't they suposed to be able to jump about 10 foot in the air and stuff?
Please let us know of any progresss or developments.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 10:45 AM
I said-
"What you will feel at first is basically, exactly like an electrical machine like a scenar or maybe TENS. Electrical energy. Also heat, vaporous feelings, and thickness or just a strong magnetic force, in a strong current. At first in the hands and then whole body. I don't think hypnotism or placeobo can do that. Only qigong, or a machine I'd think."
Moderate amounts of exercise, running, claisthenics, weights etc. Don't do this. Even if you do alot.
Measuring qi might be difficult becaue in it's most basic sense, it is simply influence or relationship. It might be like measuring an orbit, it's only seen or felt because of what it effects.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:02 AM
About the Asian thing. I've met several asians, and my brother knows one guy from China, who thinks it all nonsense.
I think they might be insecure in there position in their new country. Trying to be more western, or else they actually believe all this school stuff too extremely and absolutely. I don't know.
Skepticism probably has nothing to do with race, but more with upbringing.
Ripley Twenty-Nine
20th July 2005, 11:06 AM
Originally posted by Kilik
I said-
"What you will feel at first is basically, exactly like an electrical machine like a scenar or maybe TENS. Electrical energy. Also heat, vaporous feelings, and thickness or just a strong magnetic force. At first in the hands and then whole body. I don't think hypnotism or placeobo can do that. Only qigong, or a machine I'd think."
Moderate amounts of exercise, running, claisthenics, weights etc. Don't do this. Even if you do alot.
Measuring qi might be difficult becaue in it's most basic sense, it is simply influence or relationship. It might be like measuring an orbit, it's only seen or felt because of what it effects.
Hoo boy. Here we go again.
Kilik, please do me a favour. List one thing in the world that you don't believe in. Just one. Then I'm going to post 20 links from disreputable sites that only try and further their own delisions.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: On this forum, there are quite a few martial artists. Probably in total, we have hundreds of years of experience between us. Noone here has seen any evidence of 'qi'. What does this tell you?
If 'The Force' existed, everyone would train to be Jedis. If 'Qi' exists, why can't everyone light candles with their fingers and jump 10 feet in the air?
Honestly, why do you think that is?
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:10 AM
I wouldn't come here to get info on MAs. I practice several myself.
Not everyone has access to tradtional practices, not everyone can find a teacher. However, it is still pretty damn popular for something that was not as openly shown for so many years through history.
Some martial arts don't have a concept of qi, and don't develop it in practice. Some do.
For things I am not convinced of, I think others on here have said all there is to say, so there is not a whole lot of point in me talking about those topics. Oh, I don't believe in hypnotism shows.
Phrost
20th July 2005, 11:13 AM
Originally posted by Deadlytoque
My friend's not Asian, is neither is the guy who (I suspect) got him into this nonsense. He has started taking martial arts lessons, from a bona fide woo-woo (Creation "Science", including Diluvian nonsense, humans and dinosaurs side by side, and the rest; not to mention the fact that he once tried to convince myself and other partygoers that he was a "vampire slayer"... yes, he used the word "slayer" a la Buffy). I've done my best to simply remove the bad influence, but there's only so far I can go. Similarly, printing out a bunch of references and just plopping them on my friend's lap is a bit overt. I find education works better if the student comes to the understanding himself.
Anyway, again thanks for all your help.
What martial art does/did he study? Perhaps it's a minimal contact one like Taekwondo or McDojo Karate.
I imagine he could stand to get some sense knocked into him. People who train realistically (full contact, full resistance) tend to have a more realistic understanding of their limitations. Just as people who are properly educated (advanced degrees in a science) tend to have a more scientific understanding of the world.
Your friend, I'm sorry to say, is just gullible. He probably has this poster on his wall:
http://users.aol.com/hytritium/newpost.jpg
Ashles
20th July 2005, 11:18 AM
Originally posted by Kilik
"What you will feel at first is basically, exactly like an electrical machine like a scenar or maybe TENS. Electrical energy. Also heat, vaporous feelings, and thickness or just a strong magnetic force, in a strong current. At first in the hands and then whole body. I don't think hypnotism or placeobo can do that. Only qigong, or a machine I'd think."
Jeez...
Okay electrical energy, heat and magnetic force are measurable.
So either these forces are really generated and we can measure them - yet this has never happened.
Or they aren't actually being generated and your perceptions are playing tricks on you.
Either way, it doesn't look too good for the existence of Chi.
But never mind - you 'know' it exists.
Fine, I'll continue to 'know' that it doesn't.
And that reality currently seems to match my beliefs on the subject.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:21 AM
That's an arbitrary use of the term "reality"
Qi is really a new thing in the west. It isn't totally understood or studied. Yet.
Bronze Dog
20th July 2005, 11:22 AM
If all these qi/chi/whatever believers could do half the things they say they can, I'd have signed up already. I mean, who doesn't fantasize about that sort of thing?
McDojo Karate
I love that expression. If I ever sign up for martial arts lessons, I'll want the real thing. For the money, I figure it's better to gain an emergency can of whoop[keister] (any maybe lose a little bit of my belly), than some mushy self-esteem thing.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:26 AM
If you saw the docemntary on A&E called "The Martial Arts" I think, there was a Hard Qigong demonstration where the guy was really getting hit hard in the body in defferent areas, liver, ribs, abdomen. I really don't think there was anything fake about it.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 11:30 AM
Originally posted by Kilik
If you saw the docemntary on A&E called "The Martial Arts" I think, there was a Hard Qigong demonstration where the guy was really getting hit hard in the body in defferent areas, liver, ribs, abdomen. I really don't think there was anything fake about it.
Wow. Another documentary huh?
That's certainly usually the best way to learn about hard science.
Nothing on TV is ever done for sensationalism or ratings. Certainly not in documentaries.
By the way, how do you hit someone in the liver? As opposed to the abdomen or ribs?
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:35 AM
Abdomen and liver overlap to some degree obviously. A good body blow under the ribs you should feel in the liver I think. A good body blow is sometimes called a liver shot.
You'd have to see the documentary to see how hard the guy was getting hit and exactly where. THe main point is that, I think some people often view demonstrations of taking blows to be set up, and the hit is only done in the exact right spots where it can be taken. The one on A&E was real though, real hard power on real targets.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 11:44 AM
I cannot think of an area of the body that, if hit, I would describe as getting punched in the liver. The liver is behind the ribs.
You cannot get punched in the liver.
Look where the liver is (http://www.talktransplant.com/transcaretemplates/ttemplate2.aspx?navigation=47)
You would have to either punch through someone's ribs, or up through part of the surrounding digestive system.
If that had happened to him, he would have been intantly hospitalised.
So it's a nice visceral sounding description you provided Kilik, but obviously incorrect.
And can you explain what any of this has got to do with Qigong or Chi or anything?
So the guy is prepared to get hit hard on TV. What does that demonstrate?
Bronze Dog
20th July 2005, 11:51 AM
Originally posted by Ashles
So the guy is prepared to get hit hard on TV. What does that demonstrate?
Wasn't that one of the things Houdini did? As far as I can tell, it's just toughness mixed with intelligent methods of handling force, momentum, and all that stuff to minimize the damage done.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:51 AM
It's not really a qigong term. It's more a boxing term or kickboxing term. It's a correct term becaues it's used. Can't blame me if it's "technically" not correct, I didn't invent it. But if you take a good body shot, you may start thinking of it as a liver hit.
However, regardless of style, a powerful punch to a good target, is a good punch to a good target. So IMAist also do liver hits, but don't necessarily call it that.
As for houdini, I'd have to see the hits he took to see if they could compare.
Donks
20th July 2005, 11:53 AM
Originally posted by Kilik
If you saw the docemntary on A&E called "The Martial Arts" I think, there was a Hard Qigong demonstration where the guy was really getting hit hard in the body in defferent areas, liver, ribs, abdomen. I really don't think there was anything fake about it.
What is the documentary supposed to show? Was the guy hitting using Qigong or the guy getting hit? Was either of them responding differently than someone not using Qigong?
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:55 AM
Both were using qigong. A hit like that could drop me, and probably most people I think. Even a fighter or MAist.
Phrost
20th July 2005, 11:55 AM
Originally posted by BronzeDog
I love that expression. If I ever sign up for martial arts lessons, I'll want the real thing. For the money, I figure it's better to gain an emergency can of whoop[keister] (any maybe lose a little bit of my belly), than some mushy self-esteem thing.
Yeah, you have to specify that because there are some really good Karate schools out there (usually Kyokushin).
This video explains the difference between real, and BS training better than I could here:
www.bullshido.com/videos/sbg2.wmv
Kilik, would you volunteer to have me kick you in the liver?
Please?
Kilik
20th July 2005, 11:58 AM
I think I'll pass. Though maybe we could have some sort of kicking contest? A two way thing? I would suggest the nerve on the side of the leg as the target rather than the liver, more my level. No just kidding, I don't need unnecessary hits. Hard qigong is not something I really do that much. Just very basic stuff.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 12:06 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
It's not really a qigong term. It's more a boxing term or kickboxing term. It's a correct term becaues it's used. Can't blame me if it's "technically" not correct, I didn't invent it.
But you didn't actually use any kickboxing 'term'. You simply wrote:
there was a Hard Qigong demonstration where the guy was really getting hit hard in the body in defferent areas, liver, ribs, abdomen
So your post wasn't "technically" incorrect, it was just incorrect.
It was only in a subsequent post you started referring to a "liver shot". But that isn't relevent either as it is only an expression, rather than a literal description.
But if you take a good body shot, you may start thinking of it as a liver hit.
Maybe, but that wouldn't be what it was.
An actually bruised liver is very serious and you would be hospitalised.
However, regardless of style, a powerful punch to a good target, is a good punch to a good target. So IMAist also do liver hits, but don't necessarily call it that.
No they don't. This is incorrect.
Nobody punches anyone else with any intention of doing damge to their liver in any form of martial art practice or exhibition whatsoever.
Some information on a bruised liver (http://www.umm.edu/outdoor/injured_liver.htm)
If a fall or blow to the abdomen, right flank, or right lower chest is followed by abdominal pain that is worsened by pressing on the right upper quadrant, a torn or bruised liver should be considered. The victim is at risk for severe internal bleeding and should be observed for signs of shock. Evacuate him as soon as possible.
I am being very precise about the language used here because this is an excellent example of how expressions, and inaccurate descriptions can create false impressions about Martial Arts. And how a little information about Martial Arts can be very misleading.
You have inadvertantly made a very good point here Kilik.
Also, you claim to practise several martial arts yourself, but your posts certainly do not give that impression.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 12:11 PM
It's liver shot. You might call it a shot to the ribs, or body, but the common term I've heard is liver shot.
Read my posts more, many schools are going to say liver shot, and I wouldn't really say they're "wrong".
Ashles
20th July 2005, 12:17 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
It's liver shot. You might call it a shot to the ribs, or body, but the common term I've heard is liver shot.
Read my posts more, many schools are going to say liver shot, and I wouldn't really say they're "wrong".
They could call it an alien spaceship if they like.
But it doesn't change the fact that it isn't an actual blow to the liver any more than a 'helicopter' move in breakdancing would allow you to hover.
It is a 'term' or 'expression' that does not accurately represent what it describes.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 12:21 PM
Fair enough. Think of it as a body blow.
But good fighters use the term and it is accepted if not technically correct.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 12:24 PM
I never disputed that it was an actually used term.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 12:26 PM
I simply useed it as a term meaning a body blow to the rib or body
Phrost
20th July 2005, 12:32 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
I think I'll pass. Though maybe we could have some sort of kicking contest? A two way thing? I would suggest the nerve on the side of the leg as the target rather than the liver, more my level. No just kidding, I don't need unnecessary hits. Hard qigong is not something I really do that much. Just very basic stuff.
Oh well. I'll settle for a groin shot then, just to make sure you don't reproduce.
How about it?
Ashles
20th July 2005, 12:33 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
I simply useed it as a term meaning a body blow to the rib or body
Kilik, this is getting ridiculous. your first post on the subject is available for anyone to see:
If you saw the docemntary on A&E called "The Martial Arts" I think, there was a Hard Qigong demonstration where the guy was really getting hit hard in the body in defferent areas, liver, ribs, abdomen. I really don't think there was anything fake about it.
You specifically said liver, not as part of the term "liver shot" but simply as a description of where someone was being hit. You mention ribs and abdomen as other areras he was getting hit in so you were making a distinction between the areas.
You can't really say you were refering to a "liver shot" in that post as you don't mention the term at all.
I am only continuing to reply on the subject as it appears you are now trying to imply you meant "liver shot" all along when you clearly didn't.
Kilik
20th July 2005, 12:40 PM
I meant, a liver shot as it is called. But on the show I was talking about, the taget wasn't the exact same spot every time. The guy took repeated body blows, some I would say appeared the same as what is called a "liver blow". That's what I meant.
coalesce
20th July 2005, 12:43 PM
Originally posted by Phrost
Oh well. I'll settle for a groin shot then, just to make sure you don't reproduce.
How about it?
So you want to Rochambeau him?
Michael
Ashles
20th July 2005, 12:43 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
I meant, a liver shot as it is called. But on the show I was talking about, the taget wasn't the exact same spot every time. The guy took repeated body blows, some I would say appeared the same as what is called a "liver blow". That's what I meant.
Okay, so you agree that his actual liver was not being hit?
Kilik
20th July 2005, 12:46 PM
Okay, maybe. I am not an expert on internal organ damage or impact.
It would sure feel like the liver though.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 12:52 PM
Originally posted by Kilik
Okay, maybe. I am not an expert on internal organ damage or impact.
It would sure feel like the liver though.
I'm betting it wouldn't.
You must go for a bruised liver treatment if you have the following symptoms, fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, weight loss, weakness, jaundice. Additional symptoms that may be associated with a bruised liver are sweating and excessive abdominal pain.
That's why you really wouldn't want yours hit.
Quote from here (http://www.chronic-hepatitis-treatment.com/bruised-liver-treatment.htm)
Bronze Dog
20th July 2005, 12:55 PM
Let's try to get back on topic:
I don't see much paranormal about being able to take a hit. As I posted earlier:
As far as I can tell, it's just toughness mixed with intelligent methods of handling force, momentum, and all that stuff to minimize the damage done.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 01:03 PM
Yes, sorry that liver derail did go on a bit. :)
Is that one of the claims of qigong? Increased toughness and resilience to being hit?
It does sound like The Force" in that it appears to be capable of almost any ability.
crimresearch
20th July 2005, 01:12 PM
Resistance to strikes is often linked to qigong under the heading of 'Iron Shirt' or 'Gold Bell Cover'.
And in the circus atmosphere of martial arts, there is a good deal of 'demonstration' of purported abilities along those lines...lying on nails/glass/swords, having sticks broken across various body surfaces, accepting kicks and punches, etc.
Some practitioners suggest 2 basic schools of such development, internal and external.
And along the lines of theories that qigong is nothing more than visualization, breath and muscle control, and perhaps some fascial 'toughening', there might be something to some of it.
But most of it seems too over the top to be believed.
Ossai
20th July 2005, 01:30 PM
Kilik
Moderate amounts of exercise, running, claisthenics, weights etc. Don't do this. Even if you do alot. I take it you’ve never exercised before.
Measuring qi might be difficult becaue in it's most basic sense, it is simply influence or relationship. It might be like measuring an orbit, it's only seen or felt because of what it effects. If it affects something physically, it can be measured, there may have to be highly specialized sensors used, but the effect at least could be measured.
Ossai
Phrost
20th July 2005, 01:44 PM
Iron Shirt worked great in the Boxer Rebellion.
Oh wait...
crimresearch
20th July 2005, 02:21 PM
Obviously the Qigong of Martini-Henry, and Enfield and Mauser was a stronger type.
:p
Deadlytoque
20th July 2005, 02:40 PM
To blatantly direct attention back to me and my question for a moment ;) , I don't know specifically what Martial Arts my friend is studying, but I do know that the moron who's teaching him rambles incessently about several styles, including Aikido, Taekwondo, and Jeet Kun Do. What his skill level in the relevant arts is, I don't know either.
As for taking hits, I know they do that as well, including full-contact sparring (helmets, gloves, footpads, and mouthguards) and shin-hardening (by cracking their shins together, or against firm surfaces).
So, I don't think it's a lack of real pain that continues his belief. Possibly he's just mistaking concentration (focusing on ignoring/blocking out pain) with actual healing?
Also I may not have been clear before when I described the trainer (NOT my friend) as someone who believed in Creation "Science" etc. My friend has a solid grounding in evolutionary theory, perception and cognition, and the scientific method. He certainly does not have a UFO poster on his wall. He just can't seem to realize that what he's "experiencing" as qigong is all in is head. Really, as far as I know this is the only place he's let his critical gaze falter. His trainer, on the other hand, will believe anything you show him on TV.
As for Kilik's continued interruptions and digressions, I can only say this: I don't believe in qigong, or else I wouldn't be trying to convince my friend to stop believing in it; no matter how many bad websites you direct me to, I'm not going to change my mind. In my original question I asked for sources to help set his head right, not for a debate. If you want to debate the merits of qi and related flimflammery, you probably shouldn't do it on a skeptics forum, not unless you've got some real evidence to back it up. How about tracking down some of these "true masters" or whatever you called them, and asking them to try out for the JREF prize? Then they could use the million to set up a school where they could teach their arts to a wider audience, blessing that many more people with their ancient wisdom.
So, for a final time, I thank everyone who has suggested sources or options. If a debate ensues, I hope you enjoy it, but I'm disabling email notification, and I probably won't be checking this thread again.
Ashles
20th July 2005, 04:46 PM
Originally posted by Deadlytoque
To blatantly direct attention back to me and my question for a moment ;) ,
Oh my goodness. Captain selfish or what? :)
I don't know specifically what Martial Arts my friend is studying, but I do know that the moron who's teaching him rambles incessently about several styles, including Aikido, Taekwondo, and Jeet Kun Do. What his skill level in the relevant arts is, I don't know either.
Even my very basic knowledge of martial arts tells me that those are three very disparate disciplines.
I have studied Aikido and Taekwondo at a fairly basic level and neither involved even the slightest degree of degree of "Chi" in my experience.
Taekwondo in particular is a very modern martial art develpoed in Korea with very little BS attached. It might not be the most efficient martial art (a lot of spinning and leg work) but it is great for exercise and suppleness.
Jeet Kun Do is Bruce Lee's very BS free martial art. As far as I am aware Bruce Lee was fairly against a lot of the nonsense perpetuated by older more mystical martial arts and very much rebelled against them.
Again I am only going by my own experience and I know there are far more knowledgeable posters here so if I am incorrect on any of this please let me know.
But it sounds like this guy has picked some strangely non-mystical Martial Arts to hang his Qigong nonsense from.
As for taking hits, I know they do that as well, including full-contact sparring (helmets, gloves, footpads, and mouthguards) and shin-hardening (by cracking their shins together, or against firm surfaces).
So, I don't think it's a lack of real pain that continues his belief. Possibly he's just mistaking concentration (focusing on ignoring/blocking out pain) with actual healing?
Sounds likely.
Also I may not have been clear before when I described the trainer (NOT my friend) as someone who believed in Creation "Science" etc. My friend has a solid grounding in evolutionary theory, perception and cognition, and the scientific method. He certainly does not have a UFO poster on his wall. He just can't seem to realize that what he's "experiencing" as qigong is all in is head. Really, as far as I know this is the only place he's let his critical gaze falter. His trainer, on the other hand, will believe anything you show him on TV.
That is what is so worrying. If your friend is prepared to believe in one aspect of his trainer's nonsense then it might go one of two ways.
1) He realises how silly one belief is and as a result his trainer loses credibility.
2) He wants to believe so much in one of the beliefs, he starts accepting some of the others.
As for Kilik's continued interruptions and digressions, I can only say this: I don't believe in qigong, or else I wouldn't be trying to convince my friend to stop believing in it; no matter how many bad websites you direct me to, I'm not going to change my mind. In my original question I asked for sources to help set his head right, not for a debate. If you want to debate the merits of qi and related flimflammery, you probably shouldn't do it on a skeptics forum, not unless you've got some real evidence to back it up. How about tracking down some of these "true masters" or whatever you called them, and asking them to try out for the JREF prize? Then they could use the million to set up a school where they could teach their arts to a wider audience, blessing that many more people with their ancient wisdom.
Kilik does tend to debate by the tactic of link overload. But if you actually visit the sites (and it takes a while) they tend not to contain any actual evidence.
Of sourse if they did then we would all know about it already due to the groundbreaking nature of the claims.
So, for a final time, I thank everyone who has suggested sources or options. If a debate ensues, I hope you enjoy it, but I'm disabling email notification, and I probably won't be checking this thread again.
Really? Why?
Phrost
20th July 2005, 05:08 PM
Personally, I think you should find another friend.
And in other news, we've managed to get a hold of a video of one of the internet's biggest chi woos, "Chrono" of the "Ki Sanctuary" (http://kisanctuary.chaosmagic.com) "powering up".
Some crafty fellow has added the infamous "numa numa" song to it, which makes it all the more entertaining.
For those of you not aware of this guy, he (and I'm not joking) believes he learned a "deadly meteor storm" chi technique from his grandfather, can see auras, and can transform into a werewolf.
He's also somewhat infamous for getting into a lengthy argument on another forum over him "astrally raping" a Sonic the Hedgehog fan fiction character in what has to be one of the lowest points in human history on the Internet.
http://www.bullshido.net/modules.php?name=Links&file=viewlinkinfo&id=161
This is the company which you keep, DeadlyT.
Bronze Dog
20th July 2005, 06:30 PM
Originally posted by Ashles
Jeet Kun Do is Bruce Lee's very BS free martial art. As far as I am aware Bruce Lee was fairly against a lot of the nonsense perpetuated by older more mystical martial arts and very much rebelled against them.
Note to self: Watch more Bruce Lee movies.
sf108
20th July 2005, 07:16 PM
Originally posted by Ashles
Jeet Kun Do is Bruce Lee's very BS free martial art. As far as I am aware Bruce Lee was fairly against a lot of the nonsense perpetuated by older more mystical martial arts and very much rebelled against them.
JKD was created by Bruce Lee as a way to counter the fact that Western people were much bigger and taller than Asians. JKD was an improvement on his WingChun background. Yeh, and Bruce did go around challenging those mystic masters stroking their long white beards...
That picture with Kilik on the IQ score card is GOLD!
He has some strange behaviour. He talks some sense in some posts, then turns back to his link spamming spree. Very unusual character.
crimresearch
20th July 2005, 11:32 PM
Ashles, it is in the nature of the martial arts to trend toward woo-woo, not away from it.
The Ki in Aikido is the same word as Qi in qigong...mystical energy.
Many Aikido schools buy into the nonsense on a variety of levels, much like Tai Chi.
And TKD isn't even a martial art, it is a sport created out of misunderstood bad karate.
Ashles
21st July 2005, 05:06 AM
Originally posted by crimresearch
Ashles, it is in the nature of the martial arts to trend toward woo-woo, not away from it.
The Ki in Aikido is the same word as Qi in qigong...mystical energy.
Oh yeah I just looked it up.
It apparently means (approximately) "the way of harmony through energy" or "the way of spiritual harmony".
So much for it being BS free then. I guess my teacher just didn't have much truck with that side of it.
Ripley Twenty-Nine
21st July 2005, 08:02 AM
Originally posted by Ashles
That is what is so worrying. If your friend is prepared to believe in one aspect of his trainer's nonsense then it might go one of two ways.
1) He realises how silly one belief is and as a result his trainer loses credibility.
2) He wants to believe so much in one of the beliefs, he starts accepting some of the others.
Unfortunately, my experience with martial arts has shown that there are many clubs that have a 'cult-like' atmosphere. The Sensei is the all-knowing master that must never be questioned... It's a very faith-based art in a lot of cases.
I've even been in a club where the Sensei recommended his students to come to him for advise for personal or financial problems, as if his martial arts skill made him somehow qualified for such things.
If a teacher believes in Chi or other paranormal things, his/her students will be expected to believe in it as well... And most do, without question.
jmercer
21st July 2005, 08:50 AM
Originally posted by Phrost
Iron Shirt worked great in the Boxer Rebellion.
Oh wait...
ROFL!!! This was worth reading the thread - although the thread otherwise made me utterly disgusted. :D
Kilik, there is no such thing as qi the way you view it. :)
Deadlytoque
21st July 2005, 12:06 PM
So, for a final time, I thank everyone who has suggested sources or options. If a debate ensues, I hope you enjoy it, but I'm disabling email notification, and I probably won't be checking this thread again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Why?
No offense meant. I got what I set out to get from the discussion (a few good anti-qigong resources) and so I saw no further reason to be involved.
crimresearch
21st July 2005, 12:40 PM
Too late!!
Your thread are belong to us!
Kilik
21st July 2005, 03:09 PM
A book written by a skeptical western doctor, who went to China and actually studied the practices some, is " Encounters with Qi."
I don't think he ended up accepting the chinese philosophy over his western ideas, but I think he thought there was some value in the ancient practices , the idea of mind/body connection, and that the eastern and western philosophies should eventually merge. I guess you have to read for yourself,
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/sim-explorer/explore-items/-/0393312135/0/101/1/none/purchase/ref%3Dpd%5Fsxp%5Fr0/104-1353642-8722349
Bronze Dog
21st July 2005, 04:41 PM
[Slight derail] Oh, yeah. Finally watched that video (http://www.bullshido.com/videos/sbg2.wmv) you linked me to, Phrost. Covers a pretty simple concept well. Bit of relevant personal experience: Went to an Armored Core tournament a couple years ago. Don't know any local players, so I only had the computer to practice against. Got thrown off when my human opponents started using the terrain to their advantage. At least I was expecting them to pull tricks like that. [/Slight derail]
crimresearch
21st July 2005, 05:09 PM
Straight Blast seems to be addressing self defense reality the way that people from Gene LaBell and Charles Nelson, to the Dog Brothers and a few LE instructors, have been doing for decades.
No Qi energy, no commando outfits, no glorified rank structures, no teacher worship, no macho posturing and bullying, no special jargon for the initiates, no steroids, no rhetoric to demonize other styles and discourage questions, no secret magical stuff, no demands for unquestioning loyalty...just rational analysis and utilitarian practice.
And the way that a few people on this list have been pretending not to notice, while bragging about the superiority of their 'death touch', or 'official Navy Seal', or sport oriented system is nothing new either.
The bulk of the martial arts appeals to charlatans, it draws in True Believers, and it thrives on mumbo jumbo and obfuscation.
Phrost
21st July 2005, 05:15 PM
Originally posted by crimresearch
And the way that a few people on this list have been pretending not to notice, while bragging about the superiority of their 'death touch', or 'official Navy Seal', or sport oriented system is nothing new either.
The bulk of the martial arts appeals to charlatans, it draws in True Believers, and it thrives on mumbo jumbo and obfuscation.
Which is exactly why Bullshido, the site, is so important. We joke a lot, but the reality is that there are people out there who do have a need to defend themselves in bad situations. If they spend thousands of dollars at a McDojo instead of learning simple situational awareness combined with some realistic training, they'll not only be poor, they could very well be injured by overestimating their skills.
© 2001-2008, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.