Mojo
28th July 2005, 09:59 AM
I spotted this case (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/1624.html) yesterday. That's this (http://www.harmoniser.com/) guy (http://www.harmoniser.com/ck/index.htm) against these guys (http://www.implosionresearch.com/), by the way.
I'm concerned here with the judge's statements: From paragraph 2
Imploded water is water that has been treated by a process that involves centrifuging.
Evidently it imparts certain beneficial properties to the water. This water can then be used to treat tap water, for instance, to give it beneficial properties including improved taste. And: from footnote about kinesiology
A form of muscle testing, originally developed in the 1950s in the USA designed to test muscle strength and mobility, but which has more recently been developed as a means to diagnose and treat illness and disease.
The judge seems to have taken these assertions to be established facts: no sign of the word "allegedly," for example.
Fortunately he was only dealing with the question of who owned the design of their devices, not whether they actually work.
Anyway, they've been tested by Roger Coghill. ;)
I'm concerned here with the judge's statements: From paragraph 2
Imploded water is water that has been treated by a process that involves centrifuging.
Evidently it imparts certain beneficial properties to the water. This water can then be used to treat tap water, for instance, to give it beneficial properties including improved taste. And: from footnote about kinesiology
A form of muscle testing, originally developed in the 1950s in the USA designed to test muscle strength and mobility, but which has more recently been developed as a means to diagnose and treat illness and disease.
The judge seems to have taken these assertions to be established facts: no sign of the word "allegedly," for example.
Fortunately he was only dealing with the question of who owned the design of their devices, not whether they actually work.
Anyway, they've been tested by Roger Coghill. ;)