PDA

View Full Version : A Resolution to the Riddle of Mental Illness


values
20th August 2005, 10:32 PM
The communicational factors underlying mental illness have finally been
resolved in the ground-breaking new book - Communication Breakdown: Decoding
the Riddle of Mental Illness, Edited by John E. LaMuth M.S. Each of the
major categories of mental illness is incorporated into a unified
communicational dynamic: where dysfunctional behavior patterns can
accurately be determined, leading to effective resolution.
This communicational approach is intended as an adjunct to currently
available treatment regimens, adding a further crucial tool to the
repertoire of the mental health practitioner, wherein enhancing the
potential for timely intervention. This new system helps increase awareness
of dysfunctional patterns of communication, further highlighting
trigger-factors that can precipitate behavioral outbreaks. Here, the 56
different classifications of mental illness breaks down into the eight forms
of the personality disorders, eight forms of the neuroses, and twenty forms
each for the mood disorders and schizophrenia: as partially depicted below:

Narcissistic Personality >>> Obsession Neurosis
Confabulatory Euphoria >>> Confab. Paraphrenia
Enthusiastic Euphoria >>> Proskinetic Catatonia
Non-Participatory Euphoria >>> Silly Hebephrenia

Borderline Personality >>> Phobia Neurosis
Suspicious Depression >>> Fantastic Paraphrenia
Self-Torturing Depression >>> Negativistic Catatonia
Non-Participatory Depression >>> Insipid Hebephrenia

Dependent Personality >>> Compulsion Neurosis
Pure Mania >>> Expansive Paraphrenia
Unproductive Euphoria >>> Parakinetic Catatonia
Hypochondriacal Euphoria >>> Eccentric Hebephrenia

Avoidant Personality >>> Anxiety Neurosis
Pure Melancholy >>> Incoherent Paraphrenia
Harried Depression >>> Affected Catatonia
Hypochondriacal Depression >>> Autistic Hebephrenia

The extensive terminology (for the psychoses) in large part is due to a
pre-existing system of nomenclature pioneered by German clinician, Karl
Leonhard. The nomenclature for the personality disorders and the neuroses is
alternately contained within the specifications of the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (IV). Indeed, this advanced degree of
detail should prove quite a revelation for those more at home with the
American model of the psychoses, where manic-depressive disease and
schizophrenia are generally treated as unitary entities. This enhanced range
of detail, however, ultimately allows the current communicational approach
to formally be proposed. In light of the chances of being impacted by
mental illness at some time during one's life (whether as a caregiver or a
patient), this communicational approach to the mental disorders proves an
extremely timely issue, and one holding considerable promise to those thusly
afflicted.

Communication Breakdown:
Decoding the Riddle of Mental Illness
__________________________
Editor-in-Chief - John E. LaMuth M.S.
Fairhaven Book Publishers, Lucerne Valley, CA, USA

www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/cbd.html
www.charactervalues.org

Trade softcover (7.44 x 9.69 inches) - 276 pages

AmateurScientist
20th August 2005, 10:48 PM
Ummm....no. Someone with an MS degree is contradicting decades of medical research and practice by MDs by claiming to have solved the "riddle of mental illness" with psychobabble doubletalk?

No thanks. I'll stick with the DSM-IV, psychiatry, and the remarkably successful results from pharmocological treatments alone, or in conjunction with cognitive behavior therapy. You might as well be selling Tom Cruise's vitamins.

Oh, another thing. Your post violates Rule 3 of the Membership Agreement which states:

You will not post any commercial advertisements.

Your post is nothing more than an ad for the book which sells for $28.95 on your link.

I'm breaking my own self-imposed rule against reporting posts and I'm actually going to report this post, as it really ticks me off.

AS

Kiless
20th August 2005, 10:53 PM
Originally posted by AmateurScientist
I'm breaking my own self-imposed rule against reporting posts and I'm actually going to report this post, as it really ticks me off.


Thanks - and they should be removed from nominating themselves for a @*&#^@# language prize too....

AmateurScientist
20th August 2005, 10:58 PM
Originally posted by Kiless
Thanks - and they should be removed from nominating themselves for a @*&#^@# language prize too....

Oh man, thanks for pointing that out. What a (*#&*(#&! (Please pardon the incivility, mods and Darat)!

AS

Eos of the Eons
21st August 2005, 01:31 AM
I don't see anything in the original post that adds anything to the diagnosis of mental illness. this communicational approach to the mental disorders proves an extremely timely issue, and one holding considerable promise to those thusly afflicted

Communicational approach? How does it hold any promise to the afflicted? What have labels ever done to help those afflicted? Or are you simply proposing adding to the diagnostic criteria? How does that help?

You present your writing without explanation. Why?

Robaato
21st August 2005, 02:49 AM
User values has been suspended for one week for violating forum rule 3 (You will not post any commercial advertisements). Further action may follow pending discussion with the moderation team.

Mouthfire
21st August 2005, 02:55 AM
Originally posted by Raja
User values has been suspended for one week for violating forum rule 3 (You will not post any commercial advertisements). Further action may follow pending discussion with the moderation team.

Yay... the good guys come out on top....

skepHick
21st August 2005, 03:31 AM
Originally posted by Raja
User values has been suspended for one week for violating forum rule 3 (You will not post any commercial advertisements). Further action may follow pending discussion with the moderation team.

I may have to use Diamond's protest form (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=1871029663#post1871029663). Without values' multiple threads, how else does the mod team suggest I obtain free valuesable information on diagnostically classifying the emotions of my unethical robot in order to resolve the riddle of its mental illness? Hmmm?

AmateurScientist
21st August 2005, 07:12 AM
Thanks, Raja.

AS

values
31st August 2005, 03:43 AM
I was surprised to be suspended w/o any type of warning.
Is that how you treat newly fledged members?

I imagined that my new viewpoints would
be welcome, being as they impart an instinctual
scientific foundation to ground (within reality) much
of the confusion out there.

This could prove to be a big boon for the skeptic
movement. Please be tolerant

JLM

m0nngis
31st August 2005, 05:22 AM
Serious publishers host their sites at Angelfire.

:hit:

Dredred
31st August 2005, 05:25 AM
Originally posted by values
I imagined that my new viewpoints would
be welcomeJLM
Your viewpoints are welcome, your advertising isn't. That's why you got suspended, remember?

Soapy Sam
1st September 2005, 09:24 AM
Values-

Ignorance of the law is not an acceptable reason for breaking it, here as in the real world.

The rules are here. (http://randi.org/forum/rules.html)

Ashles
1st September 2005, 09:50 AM
Originally posted by values
I was surprised to be suspended w/o any type of warning.
Is that how you treat newly fledged members?
No, only the ones who spam, thus breaking forum rules.

I imagined that my new viewpoints would
be welcome, being as they impart an instinctual
scientific foundation to ground (within reality) much
of the confusion out there.
Actually they are psychobbable nonsense.
That is my instinctual response thus valid according to your system.

Go away, get some peer review then get back to us.

A handy rule of thumb is - groundbreaking research in any scientific field is rarely announced on an internet forum.

This could prove to be a big boon for the skeptic
movement.
How exactly? (But don't answer too quickly - I need time to stop laughing)

Please be tolerant

JLM
Please talk sense.

Jeff Corey
1st September 2005, 02:37 PM
Originally posted by values
I was surprised to be suspended w/o any type of warning.
Is that how you treat newly fledged members?

I imagined that my new viewpoints would
be welcome, being as they impart an instinctual
scientific foundation to ground (within reality) much
of the confusion out there.

This could prove to be a big boon for the skeptic
movement. Please be tolerant

JLM

"Instinctual scientific foundation"? Laddie, you wouldn't know scientific if one bit you on the tuchis.
And how could you post? I thought you and your Master's in Education were suspended.