View Full Version : JREF Conspiracy?
Anti_Hypeman
30th September 2005, 08:06 PM
I posted irrefutable proof of Intelligent Design and 3 minutes later the forum goes down. When it "gets updated" my post dissapears.
Very strange indeed.
Nex
30th September 2005, 08:08 PM
Maybe god just wants to keep his secret. ;)
c4ts
30th September 2005, 09:03 PM
Yes there is a conspiracy. It's huge, complicated, impossible to figure out. I thought I'd already posted a link, but here it is again:
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/23511911/
thaiboxerken
30th September 2005, 09:31 PM
Irrefutable proof of ID!! That's a good one!!
c4ts
30th September 2005, 09:39 PM
Irrefutable proof of ID!! That's a good one!!
Well, technically you can't refute what isn't proven in the first place...
Diamond
30th September 2005, 10:08 PM
I posted irrefutable proof of Intelligent Design and 3 minutes later the forum goes down. When it "gets updated" my post dissapears.
Very strange indeed.
I post irrefutable proof of unintelligent spelling.;)
clarsct
1st October 2005, 01:00 AM
So re-post it.
Mid
1st October 2005, 07:09 AM
So re-post it.
Don't tell him to do that I don't think I could cope with any more forum withdrawl
Anti_Hypeman
1st October 2005, 07:22 AM
So re-post it.
http://www.livingwaters.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=231
http://www.livingwaters.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=245
c4ts
1st October 2005, 07:31 AM
http://www.livingwaters.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=231
http://www.livingwaters.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=245
Wow. Talk about the inability to tell nature from artifice...
Soapy Sam
1st October 2005, 09:24 AM
Complexity is always reduceable.
Simpletons are not.
ungoliant
2nd October 2005, 08:11 PM
Complexity is always reduceable.
Simpletons are not.
genius.
catbasket
3rd October 2005, 04:46 PM
Read the OP and thought it was a funny. Read A_Hs livingwaters links and thought A_H was a woo. Search/find all threads started by A_H ... aha, normality resumed.
My memory is appalling, I only missed two weeks of JREF lurking and I'd forgotten who was woo ... and who is not. Apologies A_H!
Psi Baba
6th October 2005, 10:03 AM
http://www.livingwaters.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=231
The banana -- the Christian prude's nightmare.
Note that the banana:
1. Is shaped for human vagina
2. Has a smooth surface
3. Has outward indicators of inward content:
Green-nice and firm, like a cucumber
Yellow-still somewhat firm, like a squash
Black-self-lubricating
4. Has a tab for hitting "the spot"
5. Has pleasure ribs on wrapper
6. Ergonomic wrapper
7. Is shaped for human hand
8. Has a point at top for ease of entry
9. Is pleasing to the nerve endings
10. Is curved to make self-gratification process easy
'kay I'll leave now.
Metullus
6th October 2005, 10:06 AM
Complexity is always reduceable.
Simpletons are not.
Unless explosives are employed.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.