PDA

View Full Version : Flying Spaghetti Monster or Invisible Pink Unicorn?


Whyatica
20th October 2005, 06:03 PM
This poll came from a debate in the chat room (http://www.skepticsrock.com/chatnow/) about who is better: The FSM or the IPU?

Vote here and decide this once and for all!

The Sopwith Turtle
20th October 2005, 06:07 PM
(A long-haired fanatic steps out of the shadows where he has been lurking...)

The IPU was first! It is the greatest!

The Sopwith Turtle
20th October 2005, 06:08 PM
Double post. Am embarrased and will go back to lurking now.

Lisa Simpson
20th October 2005, 06:13 PM
Don't be embarrassed. Happens all the time.

FSM RULZ!!!!

geni
20th October 2005, 06:23 PM
IPU. The followers of the FSM can't read fecking instructions.

rustypouch
20th October 2005, 08:03 PM
FSM, because his Heaven has a stripper factory and a beer volcano.

Dragonrock
20th October 2005, 08:19 PM
GTITS cuz it tastes better.

Kiless
20th October 2005, 08:23 PM
IPU - my husband said he was the inventor of that saying. I should do a search to see if indeed he is the first to use it...

Mojo
21st October 2005, 12:45 AM
FSM.

What has the IPU ever done for us?

H3LL
21st October 2005, 02:10 AM
FSM.

What has the IPU ever done for us?

I don't know about you, but the IPU gave me super-powers.

It's got to be IPU...All others are pale imitations.

http://www.invisiblepinkunicorn.com/download/ipulogoblack_small.gif


.

Odin
21st October 2005, 02:49 AM
The Great Invisible Flying Pink Spaghetti Taco Unicorn Monster In The Sky defeats everything.

KingMerv00
21st October 2005, 05:14 AM
Ok this is a silly discussion.

Everyone knows that DR. Hovind has shown (with math) that complex structures like a unicorn cannot simply spring into existance. A collection of noodles, on the other hand, is not irreducibily complex.

He who cannot be slurped watches over you.

Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
21st October 2005, 05:28 AM
These are both pale distortions of the Invisible Pink Hamster Orbiting Neptune. Begone, poseurs!

~~ Paul

Lord Emsworth
21st October 2005, 05:55 AM
FSM and IPU are members of the same duanity.

Upchurch
21st October 2005, 06:19 AM
This poll came from a debate in the chat room (http://www.skepticsrock.com/chatnow/) about who is better: The FSM or the IPU?Better in terms of what?

The IPU is a wonderful comparison to the Unseen Sky Daddy, but the FSM created a mountain, a tree, and a midget. On the other hand, FSM is an alternative to both Evolution and Intelligent Design Th... Theo... T... (I just can't string those three words together).

Never mind. I've decided the FSM is better because not only did it create the universe, a mountain, a tree, and a midget, but it also works against fundy nonsense and pirates. FSM gets my vote.

Ladewig
21st October 2005, 06:31 AM
When I am in Heaven and you are in Hell being trampled by the IPU's cloven hooves, I'll laugh at you for rejecting the IPU's love. Haw Haw.

Doubt
21st October 2005, 08:31 AM
Cthulhu!

FSM is just a meal with an attitude.

IPU does not even claim god status and has no worshipers other than pre-pubescent girls with lots of stuffed animals.

uruk
21st October 2005, 01:09 PM
Homer is god!!!! mmmmmmmmm...sacralicious.








Kiless, Is Cowboy Beebop awsome or what.
Yoko Kanno rules!!!!!!

Dancing David
21st October 2005, 04:29 PM
Neither it is the Giant Burrito !

Nex
21st October 2005, 06:12 PM
The Elder Gods will eat you all for your insolence. http://x79.xanga.com/d4406343016b214024953/t10059342.gif

arias
21st October 2005, 10:37 PM
I'm going to postulate that somewhere down the line, someone is going to find out that they're one and the same.. :D

DevilsAdvocate
22nd October 2005, 12:34 AM
I'm going to postulate that somewhere down the line, someone is going to find out that they're one and the same.. :DBoth the Invisible Pink Unicorn and Flying Spaghetti Monster prescribe dominant nouns that assert non-existence. In both cases, the representative entity is a hypothetical creature corresponding to an imagined, but empirically improvable, living being.

A Monster is defined as “an animal…of abnormal form or structure” or “an animal of strange…shape”. 1 (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=monster&x=11&y=13) A Unicorn is defined as “a…animal…with the body and head of a horse, the hind legs of a stag, the tail of a lion, and a single horn in the middle of the forehead”. 2 (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=unicorn&x=0&y=0) The abnormal form and structure and strange shape of the unicorn is consequently eiusdem generis as the prescribed definition of that of a monster.

Such as the comparative equality of the fundamental structures has been established, consideration of the primary adjective properties of these equivalents can be derived by investigation of the elementary purpose of such properties within the context of the intended employment of the questioned terminology. We find that just as the Monster possesses the improbable property of presenting a uniform exterior resemblance to spaghetti, the Unicorn exhibits a parallel peripheral quality of the color pink. As such, the underlying purposes are in totidem verbis identical properties ascribed mutually with similar connotations which therefore imply sine prole explicit correlation.

Despite the establishment of overwhelming evidence of similarities, exploration of the primary subjunctive prefaces is required to institute incontrovertible consistency. Both creatures in question exhibit descriptions of abilities fundamentally contrary to their established definitions. A unicorn described as invisible cannot, within defined philosophical terms, be said to posses a property of pink. A thing that is invisible, cannot be pink. Similarly, a monster described as spaghetti cannot fly sui iuris. Whether portrayed as invisible or flying, the indistinguishable descriptive element connotates indentical meaning.

In conclusion, a unicorn is identical to a monster, the exhibited property of pink or spaghetti as an exterior perception within the perspective of relating to such identical creatures is identical, and the premise of contrary abilities of invisibility or flying in such circumstances are identical. Therefore, the Invisible Pink Unicorn is idem quod the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Batman Jr.
22nd October 2005, 12:43 AM
On Planet X, all things are believed in, yet they aren't.

Dr Adequate
22nd October 2005, 03:06 AM
Monsterism has saucy female pirates!

http://www.venganza.org/sighting/images/4.jpg

Do y'all buhLEEVE now?

H3LL
22nd October 2005, 03:27 AM
Monsterism has saucy female pirates!

Do y'all buhLEEVE now?

Ahhhh BUH-LEEVE. Ooo-arrrr I dooo.

Nex
22nd October 2005, 07:15 AM
Monsterism has saucy female pirates!

Do y'all buhLEEVE now? Hey! Where'd you get that picture of me? :mad:




:D

Kiless
22nd October 2005, 07:33 AM
Kiless, Is Cowboy Beebop awsome or what.
Yoko Kanno rules!!!!!!

:D

Dragonrock
22nd October 2005, 08:51 AM
Both the Invisible Pink Unicorn and Flying Spaghetti Monster prescribe dominant nouns that assert non-existence.

<snip>

In conclusion, a unicorn is identical to a monster, the exhibited property of pink or spaghetti as an exterior perception within the perspective of relating to such identical creatures is identical, and the premise of contrary abilities of invisibility or flying in such circumstances are identical. Therefore, the Invisible Pink Unicorn is idem quod the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Tell me, where does the Great Taco In The Sky fit into this?

c4ts
22nd October 2005, 12:09 PM
Since I can't seem to find that horrible old taco play I wrote on the forums, I'll host it here:

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/24324589/

This proves the Taco is superior!

Dragonrock
22nd October 2005, 12:16 PM
I once posted an exerpt from the Ancient Taco Recipe and recieved a language award nomination for it. If that isn't proof of the Taco's superiority then A-tacoists are just too stupid to live.

c4ts
22nd October 2005, 01:48 PM
Yes. Language Award nominations make things true!