Bentspoon
23rd April 2003, 11:20 AM
I heard about this over the weekend:
[URL=http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/news/special_packages/iraq/5669603.htm[/URL]
The article explains that he just cpuldn't take it anymore and up and drove to the airport - just like that. E-mailed his superior later. He did this the day before Easter services. Presumably this kind of service is something the Marines need or they wouldn't have them there ..... would they? Personnally I think the Marines that are the losers in this (those without the Easter service should see this as an education; "Men of the cloth are worth more in this society than you" and reject the purveyors of myth.
It is desertion. But it won't be treated as such. Where is the outrage - I thought desertion brought on some serious consequences (so does pedophilia but men of the cloth are apparently immune). Will he be punished Absolutely not!
I think it is disgusting.
What is your opinion?
Bentspoon
I heard about this on a very consertive right wing talk show that is local to Wash. state. These people would not give a consciencious objector an objective thought but then this is a man of the cloth.
some of the reasoning of these fine God fearing folk
* well, he will suffer much more in the eyes of his god because of his shame than the military could ever do - I think that is punishment enough
* Hey he volunteered so he shouldn't be held to the same standards
* He is in a non combatant role and therefore the rules of desertion shouldn't really apply
* Gee well you know it is not like it is a necessary function or anything
Even the host kept saying, "Gee, I don't know - this is a tough one". It isn't a tough one if you are not blinded by your own irrational myths. It is desertion plain and simple.
None of the callers or the host could bring themselves to what is clear in my mind - he had a job to do, it was a necessary support function and he deserted it without so much of a howdy do to his superiors. Some would say that somethig should come of it but not one caller could say that it was desertion.
[URL=http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/news/special_packages/iraq/5669603.htm[/URL]
The article explains that he just cpuldn't take it anymore and up and drove to the airport - just like that. E-mailed his superior later. He did this the day before Easter services. Presumably this kind of service is something the Marines need or they wouldn't have them there ..... would they? Personnally I think the Marines that are the losers in this (those without the Easter service should see this as an education; "Men of the cloth are worth more in this society than you" and reject the purveyors of myth.
It is desertion. But it won't be treated as such. Where is the outrage - I thought desertion brought on some serious consequences (so does pedophilia but men of the cloth are apparently immune). Will he be punished Absolutely not!
I think it is disgusting.
What is your opinion?
Bentspoon
I heard about this on a very consertive right wing talk show that is local to Wash. state. These people would not give a consciencious objector an objective thought but then this is a man of the cloth.
some of the reasoning of these fine God fearing folk
* well, he will suffer much more in the eyes of his god because of his shame than the military could ever do - I think that is punishment enough
* Hey he volunteered so he shouldn't be held to the same standards
* He is in a non combatant role and therefore the rules of desertion shouldn't really apply
* Gee well you know it is not like it is a necessary function or anything
Even the host kept saying, "Gee, I don't know - this is a tough one". It isn't a tough one if you are not blinded by your own irrational myths. It is desertion plain and simple.
None of the callers or the host could bring themselves to what is clear in my mind - he had a job to do, it was a necessary support function and he deserted it without so much of a howdy do to his superiors. Some would say that somethig should come of it but not one caller could say that it was desertion.