Am I the only one who find SCOTUS to

[Ed]

be a word that, if not vulgar, should be? Nothing political, just the word itself. Like a plural version of a male body part.

Just thinking...

[SezMe]

Just thinking...
... way too hard. :) :)

[Manny]

I'd WAG that about half the people mean it exactly that way about half the time.

[AmateurScientist]

No, you're not. I wrote about the same things a few years ago, but I think it was lost in the prunings.

It's just "Supreme Court." Nothing else is required or implied. "SCOTUS" is ugly, unnecessary, and ... hell, it's ugly.

AS

[brodski]

be a word that, if not vulgar, should be? Nothing political, just the word itself. Like a plural version of a male body part.

Just thinking...

Whereas POTUS puts me in mind of a small mammel, I'm not sure why.

[Tricky]

be a word that, if not vulgar, should be? Nothing political, just the word itself. Like a plural version of a male body part.

Just thinking...
You must be thinking of SCROTUS, the Short, Curlycovered Reproductive Organ Under-Sack.

[Luke T.]

No, you're not. I wrote about the same things a few years ago, but I think it was lost in the prunings.

AS

I remember that, and it is why I have not used SCOTUS ever since.

[Mark]

Maybe we should call the judges sitting on the court the SCOTUS Ring?


Maybe not.

[Ed]

Since there are an odd number of them, they are never hung.

[Mark]

Since there are an odd number of them, they are never hung.

Perhaps. But they may have conflicts with the Penal Authorities.