View Full Version : The movie that caused riots
kittynh
6th February 2006, 06:46 AM
http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=33045
It's happened before. And all they showed was the stupid camel stick! They never showed the Prophet, his wife, daughters or sons in law!
kittynh
6th February 2006, 06:47 AM
I was living in DC when the terrorits staged the take over. It wasn't funny, but people seem to have forgotten all about it. Over a dumb movie that WAS careful in the depictions.
richardm
6th February 2006, 07:22 AM
Finally, when the film was scheduled to premier in the U.S., another Muslim extremist group staged a siege against the Washington D.C. chapter of the B'nai B'rith under the mistaken belief that Anthony Quinn (http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/filmography.html?p_id=107297) played Mohammed in the film, threatening to blow up the building and its inhabitants unless the film's opening was cancelled
Wow. Interesting that the trouble was fanned by false information, and here we are 30 years later with exactly the same thing happening (the muslim cleric who helped kick off the current trouble appears to have augment the original cartoons with some extra-special ones of his own).
Although mind you if they were making such a fuss over a straightforward depiction of Mohammed in a film then I suspect the extra cartoons weren't needed.
Kitty, do you recall if there were similar riots around the world over this, or was the fuss rhetorical outside of DC?
Belz...
6th February 2006, 09:51 AM
Wow. Interesting that the trouble was fanned by false information, and here we are 30 years later with exactly the same thing happening (the muslim cleric who helped kick off the current trouble appears to have augment the original cartoons with some extra-special ones of his own).
Although mind you if they were making such a fuss over a straightforward depiction of Mohammed in a film then I suspect the extra cartoons weren't needed.
Kitty, do you recall if there were similar riots around the world over this, or was the fuss rhetorical outside of DC?
As I said, Rich. The cartoons were just an excuse, methinks.
JamesM
6th February 2006, 10:15 AM
the muslim cleric who helped kick off the current trouble appears to have augment the original cartoons with some extra-special ones of his own I suppose we should keep in mind that we have no idea how successful Islamisk Trossamfund were in their tour. John Simpson (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4685886.stm) suggests that Egyptian FM Ahmed Aboul Gheit was most likely responsible for the publicity:
As early as November, he was protesting about the cartoons, and calling them an insult.
[...]
He raised the issue at various international meetings. Slowly the news filtered out to the streets.
Mephisto
6th February 2006, 10:38 AM
I thought this was a thread about "Showgirls" or "Gigli." Sorry. ;)
Moon-Spinner
6th February 2006, 11:00 AM
I thought this was a thread about "Showgirls" or "Gigli." Sorry. ;)
Let's not forget the riots caused by "The Warriors" either ;)
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.