Age of Aquarius - One Mind (11) [Archive]

View Full Version : Age of Aquarius - One Mind (11)

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 07:42 AM

Yes, the Age of Aquarius dawns ... where the left side (10) becomes a witness to the right (01) and vice versa ... and together we have a verifiable reality by means of one mind (11).

Oh, and happy birthday (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html) to me. :)

slingblade

4th March 2006, 08:00 AM

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 08:07 AM

I have no idea what you're babbling about, but if it's your birthday, I hope you have a happy one.

:)Yes, all the world is Babylon (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=1&chapter=11&version=9) ... or was. :)

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 08:18 AM

So, from Genesis 11 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=1&chapter=11&version=9) ...

1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.

2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.

4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

5 And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.

6 And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.

7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.

8 So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.

We go to Revelation 11 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=73&chapter=11&version=9) ...

1 And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.

2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.

4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth. And together we have the 66 books (6 x 11) of the Old and New Testament. Very interesting. Hmm ... the two candlesticks? Could this be in reference to the number 11 as well?

Cosmo

4th March 2006, 09:00 AM

:notm

But happy birthday regardless :)

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 09:14 AM

:notm

But happy birthday regardless :)No? But the number 11 (http://www.dionysus.org/x0801.html) is the key to me ... and you and, everyone else. :)

Cosmo

4th March 2006, 09:43 AM

No? But the number 11 (http://www.dionysus.org/x0801.html) is the key to me ... and you and, everyone else. :)

So is the number 10. It's difficult to count to 11 without 10! And don't get me started on 12...

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 09:50 AM

So is the number 10. It's difficult to count to 11 without 10! And don't get me started on 12...Yes, but the number 10 in Hebrew, would read as "01." Could it be because it's all a part of Jer-USA-lem?

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 09:57 AM

Speaking of which, you have Great Britain, which represents the 5th Church (of Man), and the United States which represents the 6th Church ... and together you get 5/6 ... or, 6/5 currently ... which is 56 + 65 = 121 ... or, 11 x 11. While it's funny how I should write about it on this URL ...

http://www.dionysus.org/x1001.html

Hmm ... I wonder if this has anything to do with my current post count? (9449). Maybe this has something to do with the day I took Walnut St. (a sign of the relationship (http://www.dionysus.org/x0101.html#22) between Great Britain and the United States) to 121st, and wound up on Highway 99? ... which, is where I now currently live. Which is funny, because on the day I took this trip (in 1999 by the way), I wound up following a black Camaro (the number 9 (http://www.dionysus.org/x0602.html) corresponding to black) right after I had gotten off Highway 99. And I picked him up over this windy mountain pass right in front of this place called Viking Walnuts (a drying outlet). Isn't that strange? And it was the first time I had ever driven on this road! While I proceeded to follow this guy deliberately (just to see where it would lead) for another 10 miles until he reached his destination, and I kind of waved goodbye in my mind as I proceeded on out to the coast.

Now if this wasn't strange enough, it was a couple of years after I had moved off of Highway 99 (in 2001), that I had business across town and opted to take the Walnut St./121st St. route again, for the first time. While I was thinking about this specifically, and lo and behold, there was this same black car again! That was just too much, and I proceeded to follow this guy until he turned off some backstreet (we were both going the same direction this time) and I kept on my way. Of course you might say, "Well, the guy obviously lives in the area." But, this was not the same place I had picked him up before which, was several miles away ... albeit it was on Walnut St. (instead of at Viking Walnuts). Talk about Deja Vu! Who says we aren't living in The Matrix?

Oh, I should probably mention where I was going. I was going to the unemployment office. And while there I was filling out some papers, and this Russian girl came up to me who, reminded me of this other Russian girl I used to know (that I was infatuated with) and she asked if I could help her with a couple of questions. And she just bowled me over with her accent (it reminded me so much of this other girl, and I thought maybe she could have been her younger sister) and I was in ecstasy for the rest of the afternoon. Which of course brings up the relationship between Russia, Great Britain and the United States, and the marriage (http://www.dionysus.org/x0101.html#28), which extends beyond the description of the walnut tree above.

TragicMonkey

4th March 2006, 10:30 AM

I thought this thread was going to be about The Fifth Dimension.

Mercutio

4th March 2006, 10:40 AM

I thought this thread was going to be about The Fifth Dimension.
Maybe it is, TM. Maybe it is.

Iacchus, thank you for reminding me how inane your numerology is. You had not posted any in a while.

Please return to not posting any.

TragicMonkey

4th March 2006, 10:48 AM

Maybe it is, TM. Maybe it is.

I meant the cool one, with Marilyn McCoo.

Mercutio

4th March 2006, 10:50 AM

I meant the cool one, with Marilyn McCoo.
Have some of whatever Iacchus is having...and maybe it is, man...maybe it is...

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 11:52 AM

I thought this thread was going to be about The Fifth Dimension.One can only follow the road where the road goes. Oh, and in reference to the Fifth Dimension? (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html#8) ...

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 12:02 PM

Maybe it is, TM. Maybe it is.

Iacchus, thank you for reminding me how inane your numerology is. You had not posted any in a while.

Please return to not posting any.Then I can only assume you understood what significance it had the first time. It's kind of sad, really.

slingblade

4th March 2006, 12:41 PM

No? But the number 11 (http://www.dionysus.org/x0801.html) is the key to me ... and you and, everyone else. :)

Well...it is my lucky number.

(can I utter the blasphemy of "lucky numbers" on a skeptics' forum?)

Donks

4th March 2006, 12:43 PM

Then I can only assume you understood what significance it had the first time. It's kind of sad, really.
IMO it is likely you are the only one who doesn't understand the significance of your numerology.

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 12:55 PM

IMO it is likely you are the only one who doesn't understand the significance of your numerology.Well, I might understand the nature of your complaint if, the things that I speak of did not actually happen. Or, could it be you don't see any significance to it either way?

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 12:57 PM

Well...it is my lucky number.

(can I utter the blasphemy of "lucky numbers" on a skeptics' forum?)Well, it is a number that reflects symmetry and is indicative to wholeness.

Donks

4th March 2006, 01:00 PM

Well, I might understand the nature of your complaint if, the things that I speak of did not actually happen. Or, could it be you don't see any significance to it either way?
I'd settle for you showing how they are significant. With no non sequitors or questions.

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 01:05 PM

I'd settle for you showing how they are significant. With no non sequitors or questions.Really? It would probably require that I write a book (http://www.dionysus.org). :)

Donks

4th March 2006, 01:08 PM

Really? It would probably require that I write a book (http://www.dionysus.org). :)
If you can think of no better way to show the significance, so be it. Just don't expect other people to give it the significance you give it based on your book.

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 01:11 PM

If you can think of no better way to show the significance, so be it. Just don't expect other people to give it the significance you give it based on your book.By the way, I did die and give birth to myself, and today is my birthday (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html) in that respect. :) Yes, and there was something about the Age of Aquarius (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html#8) in there as well.

Donks

4th March 2006, 01:17 PM

By the way, I did die and give birth to myself, and today is my birthday (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html) in that respect. :) Yes, and there was something about the Age of Aquarius (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html#8) in there as well.
So this is not your actual birthday, but the anniversary of the day you lost your mind?

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 01:25 PM

So this is not your actual birthday, but the anniversary of the day you lost your mind?A bit of a loaded question don't you think? I for one don't believe in coincidence. Do you?

Donks

4th March 2006, 01:26 PM

A bit of a loaded question don't you think? I for one don't believe in coincidence. Do you?
Yes, yes I do.

Iacchus

4th March 2006, 01:40 PM

Yes, yes I do.So, should I assume that your reasons for posting on this board is just a coincidence then? Perhaps I should. ;)

Donks

4th March 2006, 01:49 PM

So, should I assume that your reasons for posting on this board is just a coincidence then? Perhaps I should. ;)
Please, go ahead and assume that. Did that somehow change anything?

Arkan_Wolfshade

4th March 2006, 02:10 PM

Just because it is your birthday, does not mean you can skip your meds.

Nex

4th March 2006, 08:22 PM

Marquis de Carabas

4th March 2006, 08:29 PM

Funny, you're not listed on today's birthdays. You didn't provide incorrect information or anything nefarious like that, did you?

cyborg

5th March 2006, 09:53 AM

Well, it is a number that reflects symmetry and is indicative to wholeness.

In hexadecimal it's B.

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 10:00 AM

In hexadecimal it's B.So, is the Bible written in hexadecimal? Is hexadecimal something which is taught to everyone when they first enter school? There's no point in referring to something people don't understand is there? Otherwise there would be no way to communicate.

cgordon

5th March 2006, 10:02 AM

No, no, no. This isn't supposed to happen until The Year 2525 ...

cyborg

5th March 2006, 10:05 AM

So, is the Bible written in hexadecimal? Is hexadecimal something which is taught to everyone when they first enter school? There's no point in referring to something people don't understand is there? Otherwise there would be no way to communicate.

In binary it's 1011.

Donks

5th March 2006, 10:07 AM

slingblade

5th March 2006, 10:09 AM

Well, it is a number that reflects symmetry and is indicative to wholeness. (in reference to 11 being my lucky number)

I left Christianity by degrees, first telling myself that I no longer believed in the Xtian God, but that there must be something "out there," and if it has any sense, it will be female.

(I was just coming out of an abusive marriage, and didn't like men a whole lot at the moment. Forgive me.)

So I went the Pagan/Goddess route for a brief time, and delved into things like numerology.
Through it, I discovered I was a 1, and I chose that as my lucky number. As good as any, I reckoned. I also decided that 1 two times was 11, so 11 also became a lucky number.

I have never won anything or gained any advantage by picking the numbers 1 or 11 in any contest of any kind. But I like the consistency of having a specific number to choose when that sort of thing comes up.

Other lucky numbers for me are 17 (as in: I wish I was), 29 (ditto), 31 (age when I met my sweet husband), 35 (I looked HOT that year), and 42 (The Answer....you know, THE ANSWER). When I play lotto, I choose those.

This one time I had been playing one ticket a week for many weeks, and the one week I didn't play, the first five of my numbers came up. I've been a little honked at me ever since. I'll forgive me when I think I'm really sorry for it, and have learned my lesson.

Was it really your birthday, or did I give you good wishes for no farking reason? Just asking.

ETA: and I forgot: I was born on the 11th, and my sign is Aquarius. You, however, would have Pices.

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 10:13 AM

No, no, no. This isn't supposed to happen until The Year 2525 ...Actually, what I'm speaking of, happens once a year at about this time. ;) In fact, the ancient Greeks held a festival at this time; it was called The Anthesteria (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html#12) or, festival of flowers.

cyborg

5th March 2006, 10:21 AM

So, is the Bible written in hexadecimal?

Is it written in decimal?

Is hexadecimal something which is taught to everyone when they first enter school?

Is decimal?

There's no point in referring to something people don't understand is there? Otherwise there would be no way to communicate.

I see. Your numerology is dependent on the mode of communication.

How predictable. You lack the mathmatical nous to produce presentation-neutral numerology.

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 11:08 AM

I left Christianity by degrees, first telling myself that I no longer believed in the Xtian God, but that there must be something "out there," and if it has any sense, it will be female.I do an interesting thing with numbers, and it's based upon women's names (http://www.dionysus.org/x0401.html).

(I was just coming out of an abusive marriage, and didn't like men a whole lot at the moment. Forgive me.)

So I went the Pagan/Goddess route for a brief time, and delved into things like numerology.
Through it, I discovered I was a 1, and I chose that as my lucky number. As good as any, I reckoned. I also decided that 1 two times was 11, so 11 also became a lucky number.Whereas in my number system, the number 1 refers to Daphne (http://www.dionysus.org/x0402.html) and the number 11 refers to Penelope (http://www.dionysus.org/x0404.html).

I have never won anything or gained any advantage by picking the numbers 1 or 11 in any contest of any kind. But I like the consistency of having a specific number to choose when that sort of thing comes up.It does signify the realization of opposites as well (hence symmetry) which, is what Revelation 11 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=73&chapter=11&version=9) seems to imply by, the "two candlesticks." Hence by the joining of the masculine (10) with the feminine (01), we achieve what can appropriately be deemed as true testimony, hence wholeness (11).

Other lucky numbers for me are 17 (as in: I wish I was), 29 (ditto), 31 (age when I met my sweet husband), 35 (I looked HOT that year), and 42 (The Answer....you know, THE ANSWER). When I play lotto, I choose those.

This one time I had been playing one ticket a week for many weeks, and the one week I didn't play, the first five of my numbers came up. I've been a little honked at me ever since. I'll forgive me when I think I'm really sorry for it, and have learned my lesson.Wow! :jaw-dropp

Was it really your birthday, or did I give you good wishes for no farking reason? Just asking.Depends on whether you wish to believe the rest of the cr*p I've been spouting off? :confused:

ETA: and I forgot: I was born on the 11th, and my sign is Aquarius. You, however, would have Pices.Yes, but what's the point in having an aquarium -- comparable to a woman's womb perhaps? -- without any little fishies? Oh, and then there's Revelation 12 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=73&chapter=12&version=9), which alludes to something similar ...

1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:

2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.

3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.

4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. ~ Revelation 12:1-5 (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=73&chapter=12&version=9) Don't we pretty much begin as little tadpoles (or fishies) in mommy's belly? ;) I bring up this particular passage throughout my book, and it seems to apply most to my description of Daphne (http://www.dionysus.org/x0402.html), the water nymph and daughter of the river god Peneus.

Mercutio

5th March 2006, 11:38 AM

I do an interesting thing with numbers...
[snip]
Where "interesting" is defined differently than any other human being defines it.

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 11:43 AM

Where "interesting" is defined differently than any other human being defines it.Oh, did you know that words are just metaphors for a mind which, doesn't really exist? Are you suggesting that your version of "interesting" has any more or less significance than mine?

Mercutio

5th March 2006, 11:48 AM

Oh, did you know that words are just metaphors for a mind which, doesn't really exist? Are you suggesting that your version of "interesting" has any more or less significance than mine?
Did you have trouble parsing my meaning?

What I meant (I'll use small words) is that your numerology is not interesting. It is not meaningful. It is a waste of time for anyone to read it. It was a waste of your time to come up with it in the first place. If you describe it as "interesting", either you are using "interesting" differently, or you are a liar. Perhaps both.

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 11:52 AM

Did you have trouble parsing my meaning?Yes, and what is "meaning," outside of what you think it means? Sorry, you can't have it both ways.

Mercutio

5th March 2006, 11:57 AM

Yes, and what is "meaning," outside of what you think it means? Sorry, you can't have it both ways.
You are really funny today, Iacchus. Meaning is decided by the language community--when someone, as you often do, uses a word in a manner not shared by others, that is when the word ceases to have any meaning. Feel free to look through your posting history for many examples.

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 12:04 PM

You are really funny today, Iacchus. Meaning is decided by the language community--when someone, as you often do, uses a word in a manner not shared by others, that is when the word ceases to have any meaning. Feel free to look through your posting history for many examples.Oh, do you mean like in the case of a "collective hallucination?" Are you familiar with the term "iconoclast?" Perhaps you can explain to all the kind folks around here what that means? Or, would you have us believe that it means something other than the "dispelling of illusions?"

Mercutio

5th March 2006, 01:18 PM

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 03:05 PM

Please, Iacchus.

The most parsimonious explanation for the fact that you see things differently than the rest of the word, is that you are delusional. There is quite a lot of evidence consistent with that explanation; I invite you to present any disconfirming evidence.

(Hint: your book supports the "delusion hypothesis". Feel free to try something else, though.)Than the rest of the "word?" Or, do you mean "world?" And what would happen if the world came to believe in "my delusions" more than they do yours? For surely it is just a matter of the "prevailing view" if what you say is correct. ;)

Mercutio

5th March 2006, 03:38 PM

Than the rest of the "word?" Or, do you mean "world?" And what would happen if the world came to believe in "my delusions" more than they do yours? For surely it is just a matter of the "prevailing view" if what you say is correct. ;)
Yes, I did mean "world". Did it feel good to finally correct me on something?

If the rest of the world came to believe in your delusions...then I would be wrong. Now, all you have to do is convince them. Get to it. Start by rewriting your book. Go ahead, take a break from here for a year or two. Take all the good advice you got here, and gut the circularity from your book, read some basic biology and physics, and do it right this time.

How can we miss you if you won't go away?

Iacchus

5th March 2006, 03:54 PM

Take all the good advice you got here, and gut the circularity from your book, read some basic biology and physics, and do it right this time.Yes, but if my delusions are correct, in what way would they be circular?

Mercutio

5th March 2006, 04:14 PM

Yes, but if my delusions are correct, in what way would they be circular?
You assume your conclusions. That makes it circular whether it is correct or incorrect. The fact that it is circular means simply that the evidence you present is not (at all) evidence for your conclusions. Indeed, there are any number of other conclusions that are each perfectly consistent with your "evidence".

If your delusions are correct, then there will be other evidence that is not the circular evidence you present. If the evidence you present is all you have, then whether you are correct or not, you logically cannot know you are correct.

Bottom line is, you have had this explained to you a dozen times. You should be past asking the question.

slingblade

6th March 2006, 06:17 AM

"Depends on whether you wish to believe the rest of the cr*p I've been spouting off? "

No.....it depends on whether that was the day of your birth or not. Pretty simple question, really, and....oh wait.

Never mind.

Iacchus

6th March 2006, 11:17 AM

slingblade

7th March 2006, 06:56 PM

Okay, I take it you didn't follow the link.

You take it wrongly then, I'm afraid, because I did follow it and, not surprisingly, didn't find anything relevant to your birthday, or indeed to anything.

Or I was just tired and didn't want to read about the advent of Dionysus.

:)

Iacchus

7th March 2006, 08:25 PM

You take it wrongly then, I'm afraid, because I did follow it and, not surprisingly, didn't find anything relevant to your birthday, or indeed to anything.

Or I was just tired and didn't want to read about the advent of Dionysus.

:)Of course you wouldn't think it was relevant if you didn't believe a person could be born twice. It was the most important day in my life, however ... at least the second time around. ;)

Mercutio

7th March 2006, 09:06 PM

Of course you wouldn't think it was relevant if you didn't believe a person could be born twice.
If it was truly relevant, it would not matter what we believed; the evidence would be there. It isn't.

Donks was right.

Iacchus

18th March 2006, 02:15 PM

If it was truly relevant, it would not matter what we believed; the evidence would be there. It isn't.

Donks was right.Actually, albeit I think the Greeks understood it quite well, is that it's all about copulation ... more so the inherent "chemistry" between men and women. Whereas in that sense Dionysus who, was born a second time from Zeus' thigh (http://www.dionysus.org/x0501.html#16) (signifying the conjugal love of the Father), was the only begotten son of Zeus. No other god had come into the world in this sense.