UnrepentantSinner
22nd March 2006, 06:41 AM
http://dallasmorningviews.beloblog.com/?nl
Conservative Catholic Dallas Morning News editor Rod Dreher posted a blog entry (the link above might require subscription) where he mentions a possible manifestation of a "Eucharistic miracle." I haven't had time to dig around the 'Net for other references, but are any of you familiar with this supposed miracle and have investigated it?
Here's Rod's entry for those of you who don't want to register:
Do you know what a "Eucharistic miracle" is? It's a Catholic phenomenon in which consecrated communion wafers, which Catholics believe are mystically transformed into the body and blood of Jesus, are said actually to bleed, and in the rarest cases even turn to human flesh. The most famous such "miracle" occurred in Lanciano, Italy (http://www.therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/lanciano.html) -- and is said to have been scientifically tested in the 1970s. The blood is reportedly real human blood, and the flesh that from a human heart.
Well, the buzz is that we've got something like this now in Dallas, at St. James Catholic church in Oak Cliff{link snipped - Google for website). Got this e-mail this morning from a reader:
In Dallas at St. James church on March 19, 2006, another Eucharistic miracle was reported. About 1 month ago a boy who had received communion spit out the host on the floor of the bathroom. The priest followed him and picked it up off the floor. The priest placed it in a glass of water and left it there. He went to check on it and saw that it needed more water to help it dissolve because it had not dissolved after 30 days. When he put more water in the glass the host moved from the side of the glass to the middle and turned into the flesh and blood before his very eyes. I saw this myself this afternoon. The blood on the host was staying right in the middle and not blending into the water.
This news has been picked up and is all over the Internet now (you can see a different account, and a photo of the alleged miracle,here (http://spiritdaily.com/eucharistmiracledallas.htm)). The reader reported that at 11 a.m. today, representatives from the Catholic Diocese took possession of the alleged miracle. I've been trying to call the church to confirm it, but the phone is constantly busy. I'll wait to read about it in the paper.
I've often said that Catholicism presents perported evidence for the validity of Christian belief more than Pentecostalism with it's "miracle healings" (which disproportionatly involve deafness or one leg being shorter than the other) or evangelicalism which offers YEC and anecdotes. At least Catholicism offers things that can be tested to the point of saying - you know, supernatural intervention can be the only answer. Verifiable Marian Apparations/Miracles or things like the Oak Cliff Eucharist miracle are exactly the sort of thing I've been asking for.
AS an aside, I've been wondering for years why, given that we've known about vomiting for well, forever, and we've been able to pump stomachs for at least a century, why hasn't the consecrated Host, after being taken during Communion, been removed from a Communicant's gullet and tested to see if the contents are actually flesh and blood thereby validating the doctrine of Transubstantiation?
Conservative Catholic Dallas Morning News editor Rod Dreher posted a blog entry (the link above might require subscription) where he mentions a possible manifestation of a "Eucharistic miracle." I haven't had time to dig around the 'Net for other references, but are any of you familiar with this supposed miracle and have investigated it?
Here's Rod's entry for those of you who don't want to register:
Do you know what a "Eucharistic miracle" is? It's a Catholic phenomenon in which consecrated communion wafers, which Catholics believe are mystically transformed into the body and blood of Jesus, are said actually to bleed, and in the rarest cases even turn to human flesh. The most famous such "miracle" occurred in Lanciano, Italy (http://www.therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/lanciano.html) -- and is said to have been scientifically tested in the 1970s. The blood is reportedly real human blood, and the flesh that from a human heart.
Well, the buzz is that we've got something like this now in Dallas, at St. James Catholic church in Oak Cliff{link snipped - Google for website). Got this e-mail this morning from a reader:
In Dallas at St. James church on March 19, 2006, another Eucharistic miracle was reported. About 1 month ago a boy who had received communion spit out the host on the floor of the bathroom. The priest followed him and picked it up off the floor. The priest placed it in a glass of water and left it there. He went to check on it and saw that it needed more water to help it dissolve because it had not dissolved after 30 days. When he put more water in the glass the host moved from the side of the glass to the middle and turned into the flesh and blood before his very eyes. I saw this myself this afternoon. The blood on the host was staying right in the middle and not blending into the water.
This news has been picked up and is all over the Internet now (you can see a different account, and a photo of the alleged miracle,here (http://spiritdaily.com/eucharistmiracledallas.htm)). The reader reported that at 11 a.m. today, representatives from the Catholic Diocese took possession of the alleged miracle. I've been trying to call the church to confirm it, but the phone is constantly busy. I'll wait to read about it in the paper.
I've often said that Catholicism presents perported evidence for the validity of Christian belief more than Pentecostalism with it's "miracle healings" (which disproportionatly involve deafness or one leg being shorter than the other) or evangelicalism which offers YEC and anecdotes. At least Catholicism offers things that can be tested to the point of saying - you know, supernatural intervention can be the only answer. Verifiable Marian Apparations/Miracles or things like the Oak Cliff Eucharist miracle are exactly the sort of thing I've been asking for.
AS an aside, I've been wondering for years why, given that we've known about vomiting for well, forever, and we've been able to pump stomachs for at least a century, why hasn't the consecrated Host, after being taken during Communion, been removed from a Communicant's gullet and tested to see if the contents are actually flesh and blood thereby validating the doctrine of Transubstantiation?