PDA

View Full Version : Rational intersubjective ideals

Frank Newgent
7th May 2003, 09:39 AM
Please respond to this poll only if you find the considerations, discussions and examinations of different arguments in the mind and the formal presentations of and opposition to stated propositions by Victor Danilchenko and shanek to be worthwhile, even riveting, correspondences.
Victor Danilchenko
7th May 2003, 09:44 AM
Ah, everybody's a critic. :)
subgenius
7th May 2003, 09:56 AM
Originally posted by Frank Newgent
Please respond to this poll only if you find the considerations, discussions and examinations of different arguments in the mind and the formal presentations of and opposition to stated propositions by Victor Danilchenko and shanek to be worthwhile, even riveting, correspondences.
I had just been pondering your sig in a different thread, and I noticed the poll.
Re: your sig, "It is heavy. It achieves true heaviosity."

I didn't respond to the poll because I know riveting when I see it, even though I'm a welder by trade.
Frank Newgent
7th May 2003, 12:14 PM
Originally posted by subgenius

I had just been pondering your sig in a different thread, and I noticed the poll.
Re: your sig, "It is heavy. It achieves true heaviosity."

I intended the line as absurdity.

If you want to read more about Habermas, there are lecture notes at http://www.phil.mq.edu.au/ug/2003/241/lecture1&2.html Great stuff but challenging. Maybe I should have studied it more in college. Oh, that's right. I didn't go.
subgenius
7th May 2003, 12:25 PM
Originally posted by Frank Newgent


I intended the line as absurdity.

If you want to read more about Habermas, there are lecture notes at http://www.phil.mq.edu.au/ug/2003/241/lecture1&2.html Great stuff but challenging. Maybe I should have studied it more in college. Oh, that's right. I didn't go.
Thanks for the link, I had already done some research. Whew, its beyond my limited powers of reasoning.
Frank Newgent
7th May 2003, 05:29 PM
Another tie-in (http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/Forum/meta/background/hab_rawl.html) to the brouhaha over on Why are you a libertarian?
a_unique_person
7th May 2003, 05:50 PM
Originally posted by Frank Newgent


I intended the line as absurdity.

If you want to read more about Habermas, there are lecture notes at http://www.phil.mq.edu.au/ug/2003/241/lecture1&2.html Great stuff but challenging. Maybe I should have studied it more in college. Oh, that's right. I didn't go.

And I thought C++ was bad. I think I'll stick to computers. I'll be waiting for the next libertarian stoush eagerly.