DialecticMaterialist
9th May 2003, 07:19 PM
The latest commentary seemed to ignore one of the most important tenets of skepticism.
That one tenet being that in skepticism there are to be no Sacred Cows.
But I notice skeptical theists wish to take reason out of religion, say the "truth" of their claim is not succeptible to evidence.
However isn't that just establishing a Sacred Cow? Why should we be willing to examine ESP, UFOs etc, but God is out of the question?
Now here's what I'm not saying:
-I'm not saying theists cannot be skeptics.
Technically Raelians, scientologists, and even people that believe in ghosts can be skeptics.
-I'm not saying theists cannot be rational.
I believe a) you can be wrong and rational.(So even as an atheist I can think the theist is wrong but still rational) b) You can be rational in some ways and not others.
What I am saying is that by saying skepticism cannot comment on religion, you are making a "Sacred Cow". And that I believe goes against the purpose of skepticism, to explore all claims in a no holds bar kind of way.
To say paranormalists must submit their claims to evidence but not the religious seems a bit hypocritical imo.
That one tenet being that in skepticism there are to be no Sacred Cows.
But I notice skeptical theists wish to take reason out of religion, say the "truth" of their claim is not succeptible to evidence.
However isn't that just establishing a Sacred Cow? Why should we be willing to examine ESP, UFOs etc, but God is out of the question?
Now here's what I'm not saying:
-I'm not saying theists cannot be skeptics.
Technically Raelians, scientologists, and even people that believe in ghosts can be skeptics.
-I'm not saying theists cannot be rational.
I believe a) you can be wrong and rational.(So even as an atheist I can think the theist is wrong but still rational) b) You can be rational in some ways and not others.
What I am saying is that by saying skepticism cannot comment on religion, you are making a "Sacred Cow". And that I believe goes against the purpose of skepticism, to explore all claims in a no holds bar kind of way.
To say paranormalists must submit their claims to evidence but not the religious seems a bit hypocritical imo.