PDA

View Full Version : 7-11 to Sell Canned Oxygen in Japan


SteveGrenard
15th May 2006, 12:24 PM
How do you say rip-off in Japanese?



http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7003580082 (http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7003580082)


Canned Oxygen To Be Sold In 7-11 Stores In Japan

May 15, 2006 2:01 p.m. EST
Julie Farby - All Headline News Staff Writer

Japan (AHN)— Japanese convenience store operator Seven-Eleven Japan announces it will make an entry into the rapidly expanding oxygen market, and begin selling cans of oxygen on May 24.

According to the RapidNewsWire.com report, oxygen has emerged as a popular new product and sparked the creation of city "oxygen bars" that provide oxygen for customers to breathe in.

As the first retailer among Japanese convenience stores and supermarkets to enter the so-called oxygen market, Seven-Eleven will sell small portable cans.

The idea behind the product is to allow buyers to replenish their oxygen levels anytime they feel a lack of it due to stress, fatigue, or other factors.

According to the report, a drop in the amount of oxygen in the body can make people start to yawn and sigh. Normal air contains only about 21 percent oxygen, but the oxygen concentration in the cans is 95 percent, and breathing it in can reportedly bring on a feeling of invigoration.

bob_kark
15th May 2006, 12:25 PM
How do you say rip-off in Japanese?



http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7003580082 (http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7003580082)

[B][/COLOR]

Yeah, I know! They totally did that in Spaceballs!

SteveGrenard
15th May 2006, 12:36 PM
http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/national/news/20060513p2a00m0na027000c.html (http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/national/news/20060513p2a00m0na027000c.html)

This Guy
15th May 2006, 12:55 PM
So, other than the potential for raging fires being fed by nearly pure oxygen, and the potential for oxygen overdosing, are there any negatives to this? ;)

Hellbound
15th May 2006, 02:15 PM
I dunno, I could see a use for this.

Open up a can and top-off on oxygen right before my 2-mile run test for the Army...

:)

Ririon
15th May 2006, 02:32 PM
I dunno, I could see a use for this.

Open up a can and top-off on oxygen right before my 2-mile run test for the Army...

:)
Or even DURING the run test. Most people could use som "invigoration" then. The better you do at that test, the higher the chance that you will be sent somewhere horrible where people are shooting at you, right? ;)

Athletes sometimes train in a low oxygen environment at (simulated) altitude to improve lung performance. What if you really wanted to work out your muscles and heart hard for a long time? Longer and harder than is normally possible because you will run out of oxygen?

If you used a treadmill and an oxygen tank, could you run 5000 m at 800 m-pace? Surely, it would not be good for you, but sport at the elite level never is. My question is: Would it increase some part of your performance in an air-breathing run?

I saw a Finnish cross-country skier using what looked like an oxygen bottle while skiing once. I don't remember if it was during warm-up or restitution.

Don't try this at home.
Ririon

SteveGrenard
15th May 2006, 03:46 PM
Supplemental oxygen is not stored by the body in any meaningful way. A can holding 35 X 2-second whiffs (70 seconds) will, 10 seconds after you stop using it, buy psychological benefit only. I have no idea what 70 seconds worth of pure oxygen $ costs in this market (they are charging 600 yen) .......but its got to be at a considerable mark-up over any commercially available small cylinder of medical grade oxygen which could last an hour or more.

Maybe someone familiar with xchange rates could do the math. A pony of O2 that lasts an hour or nearly 60 times longer than this can costs roughly $20.00 in the U.S.

Dark Jaguar
15th May 2006, 03:51 PM
Convenience stores being run the way they are, there will be a moment where they decide to store the tanks right next to some matches or lighters, and some patron will be compelled to "test" the little fire starting gizmos shortly afterwards...

BlackCat
15th May 2006, 05:38 PM
600 en is about 6 dollars. (Yes, I wrote en instead of yen.)

BlackCat

SteveGrenard
15th May 2006, 06:03 PM
600 en is about 6 dollars. (Yes, I wrote en instead of yen.)

BlackCat

So that comes to about $360.00 an hour for oxygen whereas a small
conventional tank of O2 that lasts an hour and you can carry costs $20 in the U.S.
Plus its worthless anyway since it has no permanent/beneficial
therapeutic effect when breathed for 2 seconds or even the whole can for 70 seconds.

Dark Jaguar
15th May 2006, 06:15 PM
But does it have a TEMPORARY beneficial effect?

SteveGrenard
15th May 2006, 06:23 PM
According to the press release the recommended dose is 2 seconds of use...if one were breathing 20 times a minute, in and out, that's 3 seconds for a single breath to put this into perspective. Any temporary beneficial effect with these numbers is nil. The volume you could inhale in two seconds would hardly even clear your anatomical deadspace. If you suck up the whole can there would be a beneficial effect of about 1 minute and then you'd be breathing that polluted air anyway. They actually had vending machines for oxygen in Japan where people would step up, fill them with money and take some oxygen. Even with these you still
couldn't get very far since whatever you inhale rapidly becomes used up and hence depleted.

Ducky
15th May 2006, 09:59 PM
Hey you know what's a good idea? Selling highly flammable gasses in pressurized bottles to anyone that wants it!

If McDonald's has to warn about coffee, 7/11 will have to put this warning on the oxygen bottles:

"Warning: Acting like a twat can cause this bottle to explode and remove yourself from the gene pool. Cheers, asshat!"

Ririon
16th May 2006, 03:29 AM
Hey you know what's a good idea? Selling highly flammable gasses in pressurized bottles to anyone that wants it!

If McDonald's has to warn about coffee, 7/11 will have to put this warning on the oxygen bottles:

"Warning: Acting like a twat can cause this bottle to explode and remove yourself from the gene pool. Cheers, asshat!"
There probably is a warning text. It's not much worse than selling lighter gas to people. At least oxygen is supposed to be inhaled...

If anybody wants to try some oxygen, why not sign up for the next TAM? Las Vegas has plenty of oxygen bars. I didn't try them unfortunately, so no anecdote from me. When I felt like doing something silly, I had no need for "invigoration". And when I had that need, I didn't feel like doing something silly. A light breakfast, on the other hand... ;)

Meffy
16th May 2006, 08:03 AM
I dunno, I could see a use for this.
*glances at the tag under Huntsman's nick*

Don't get caught! :-}

Blue Bubble
16th May 2006, 08:20 AM
But where are they getting the oxygen from ? They're probably using some impoverished third-world African country, which is now in serious trouble with excess nitrogen in their air.

I can see the headlines. Someone should inform Bob Geldof.









P.s. I'll get me coat

CACTUSJACKmankin
17th May 2006, 04:12 AM
honestly, is it any sillier than selling bottled water? I've also seen one of those flavored oxygen bars, those r just as silly. When I see those I always think "you know, I've always wanted to look like a cancer patient!"

geni
17th May 2006, 05:31 AM
Hey you know what's a good idea? Selling highly flammable gasses in pressurized bottles to anyone that wants it!

People have been selling gas for stoves for years.


If McDonald's has to warn about coffee, 7/11 will have to put this warning on the oxygen bottles:

"Warning: Acting like a twat can cause this bottle to explode and remove yourself from the gene pool. Cheers, asshat!"

Umm how? I suppose you could heat it and get the pressure to cause it to explode by you could do that with a bottle of water.

Camillus
17th May 2006, 07:49 AM
Hey you know what's a good idea? Selling highly flammable gasses in pressurized bottles to anyone that wants it!

If McDonald's has to warn about coffee, 7/11 will have to put this warning on the oxygen bottles:

"Warning: Acting like a twat can cause this bottle to explode and remove yourself from the gene pool. Cheers, asshat!"

Oxygen is not flammable - it certainly supports combustion but you cannot ignite O2 with a spark.

Admiral
17th May 2006, 07:59 AM
Also, the word is inflammable- not flammable. (Yeah, I know, only losers care about the difference. But on another thread, people are arguing about whether the word jacuzzi has to be written with a ®.)

Hellbound
17th May 2006, 08:06 AM
Also, the word is inflammable- not flammable. (Yeah, I know, only losers care about the difference. But on another thread, people are arguing about whether the word jacuzzi has to be written with a ®.)

Um....

From dictionary.com:Usage Note: Historically, flammable and inflammable mean the same thing. However, the presence of the prefix in- has misled many people into assuming that inflammable means “not flammable” or “noncombustible.” The prefix -in in inflammable is not, however, the Latin negative prefix -in, which is related to the English -un and appears in such words as indecent and inglorious. Rather, this -in is an intensive prefix derived from the Latin preposition in. This prefix also appears in the word enflame. But many people are not aware of this derivation, and for clarity's sake it is advisable to use only flammable to give warnings.

See flammable (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=flammable) and inflammable (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=inflammable).

Oxygen is neither. It's an oxidizer, oddly enough ;)

Admiral
17th May 2006, 08:22 AM
Um....

From dictionary.com:

See flammable (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=flammable) and inflammable (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=inflammable).

Oxygen is neither. It's an oxidizer, oddly enough ;)

I quote from my handy copy of Strunk and White's The Elements of Style:

Flammable.An oddity, chiefly useful in saving lives. The common word meaning "combustible" is inflammable. But some people are thrown off by the in- and think inflammable means "not combustible." For this reason, trucks carrying gasoline or explosives are now marked FLAMMABLE. Unless you are operating such a truck and are concerned with the safety of children and illiterates, use inflammable.

Now, having quoted Strunk and White and unintentionally implied Huntsman was either a child or illiterate, I think I will escape this thread before I make myself look even more like a loser.

Hellbound
17th May 2006, 08:50 AM
I quote from my handy copy of Strunk and White's The Elements of Style:



Now, having quoted Strunk and White and unintentionally implied Huntsman was either a child or illiterate, I think I will escape this thread before I make myself look even more like a loser.

LOL

Nah, we're just getting our pendanticness off our chests :P

I think current usage is leaning towards flammable, because of the possible confusions, at least for warning labels. For "official" papers, where confusion is not likely to be immediately harmful, I could see using inflammable.

So it seems both our sources actually agree; the words are used to mean the same thing, but flammable is preferred for warning labels.

So we both get to be right :D

Admiral
17th May 2006, 11:46 AM
Who saw the Simpsons episode when Dr. Nick says, as his clinic is burning to the ground, "Inflammable means flammable? What a country..."

CaveDave
17th May 2006, 03:48 PM
Oxygen is not flammable - it certainly supports combustion but you cannot ignite O2 with a spark.
I once saw a demonstration where a jet of oxygen was shown to combust quite readily.







Did I neglect to mention that it occured in a fluorine environment?:D

Cheers,
Dave

Meffy
17th May 2006, 07:52 PM
Heh, I don't doubt it. :-D

ISTR a Scientific American article, mid-1970s most likely, showing backwards flames -- jets of oxygen or air (I forget which) burning in vessels filled with various combustible* gases. The flames didn't look or behave identically to those made by burning the gases in air or oxygen. I don't recall whether they explained why. Several possible reasons come to mind: differing densities, viscosities, thermal characteristics...

blutoski
17th May 2006, 09:52 PM
Yeah, I know! They totally did that in Spaceballs!


Mel Brooks. Comedian. Prophet.

http://www.1115.org/archives/perriair.jpg

This Guy
18th May 2006, 06:56 AM
The flame hazard is caused by the fact that Oxygen greatly enhances any fire. It takes three things to have a normal fire (leaving out such things as metals that burn by suppling their own oxygen, though they technically still play by the same rules). Those things are Heat, Fuel, and Oxygen. Remove any of those, and there is no fire. Increase any of them and guess what? :)

Oxygen can turn a normal lit cigarette into a torch (well, it will make it burn a WHOLE LOT FASTER anyway).

Ever notice all the warning signs around homes and hospital rooms where there are patients on Oxygen? Ever wonder why?

I've heard the term "Explosive combustion" used to describe flames fed with pure Oxygen. I'm not sure that is technically correct, but I think it fairly accurately describes the effect. Oxygen will make anything burn MUCH faster.

I think selling cans of 95% pure Oxygen at the local corner store may not be the wisest thing to do. There will likely be deaths from burns, caused by some kid, or older idiot playing around with his/her can of Oxygen.

DarkMagician
18th May 2006, 07:58 AM
How do you say rip-off in Japanese?ぼったくり, or bottakuri.

Meffy
18th May 2006, 08:03 AM
ぼったくり, or bottakuri.
Cool. *thumbs up* Service above and beyond the call of rhetoric!

geni
18th May 2006, 09:45 AM
Did I neglect to mention that it occured in a fluorine environment?:D


Almost anything will combust under those conditions.