PDA

View Full Version : A White Nationalist Primer (Stormfront)


Luke T.
21st May 2003, 03:29 PM
This is a guide for anyone who would like to join me on stormfront.org.

First of all, I don't recommend you directly go to stormfront.org from here. They use vBulletin, just like JREF, and the admins are able to tell the last web site that you came from. If you have posted a lot of personal information about yourself on here, you might not want them to know you came from here, if you follow my drift.

I usually jump there from a neutral site like Google.

This may be paranoia on my part, as I have found the White Nationalists not to be a bunch of loons, as some might think, but you never know about the lone loon or two who might be lurking about.

Also, I don’t know how the rest of JREF would handle the sudden appearance of White Nationalists on the JREF forum. I wouldn’t want to be responsible for that. :D

Okay. Some pointers.

First of all, if you are anti-White Nationalism, you will be known to them as an "anti," and must restrict your posts to the "Opposing Views" section of the forum. You may surf the entire site, but do not post to a topic outside of the Opposing Views section. If you see something in a topic outside of that area that you want to discuss, you can start your own topic about it in Opposing Views.

Second, it is best if you throw out any preconceived notions you may have about White Nationalism. Nazis, Hitler, gas ovens, skinheads, etc. No two WNs are the same. Some are exactly as one would imagine, some are not.

Ask questions. Learn.

Never, ever, laugh at White Nationalism or WNs. I came within a hair's breadth of being banned just for making a joke that anyone who wouldn't do Halle Barry had to be one sick person. :D

That went over very badly. And for a while after that, I wasn’t allowed any sense of humor at all. I made a sarcastic comment about something one day after the Halle Barry joke and was told that was two strikes against me.

Once you have earned a little respect from them, you may exchange humorous comments as long as it is not at the expense of them or their philosophy.

Do not allow yourself to get emotional. That will also get you banned.

It is very easy to get banned. WNs are real big on free speech, except when it comes to antis.

Your skeptical skills will be tested like they never have been before. You must be logical, concise, and able to back up your claims. And they have heard it all before, so be ready for it.

The smartest of the WNs tend to congregate in the Opposing Views section. I cannot stress enough that you will be debating some of their brightest people. The occasional yahoo drops in, but they rarely stick around. And the occasional idiot drops in who is against Nazis and says something stupid like “You guys suck,” or “I’m ashamed to be white because of you guys,” but they don’t hang around long either.

The really do appreciate a well thought out argument. You will earn their respect if you give them a good fight. Just make sure you stay rational and calm at all times, even though some WNs get very ugly and toss ad homs at will. Don't be baited into replying in kind as the moderators will swoop down and eject you immediately. The moderators read every anti post.

At first, all new posters are put on a time delay. This can be extremely frustrating. The moderators say this is to prevent emotional or stupid tirades from the occasional trolls. Once you have established yourself as a stable individual, you may petition the moderators via PM to remove the time delay. This usually takes an anti up to 50 posts on their forum before they feel you are trustworthy. Even after they remove the time delay, they watch you like hawks.

Okay. So what is the philosophy of White Nationalism all about?

Keep in mind that I said no two WNs think the same way. I will outline very broadly what their philosophy is, and try to include the variations of each idea within the philosophy. If there is one thing a WN hates, it is for an anti to make an assumption of what they believe. This can seem pretty ironic considering how often they will guess not only what you think, but your ethnicity, based on little or no clues from you whatsoever.

Avoid the use of phrases that attempt to lump a single WN in with all WNs. They hate that. If you are talking to a WN and say "all you guys think is...." then he will slam you for it. He will demand you show him where he said that.

Very basically, WNs believe that the races would all be happier if they lived apart. Some believe it is inevitable that this will happen. Just about every WN denies that this should occur by force, or that if WNs ever take over a nation, that they will commence some kind of genocide. Although there are some who have boldly proclaimed to me that genocide would be an option, most WNs vehemently deny this.

Should a White Nation come to pass, WNs feel that many non-whites would feel compelled to leave such a place on their own and would move to a country where they could find their own kind. Those non-whites who did not move of their own volition would be forced to emigrate. Some WNs say that these people would be financially compensated for the trouble. And there are some WNs who feel that those non-whites who remained would be sterilized.

I have found that most of the WNs I talk with strongly deny that they are racists. And they especially deny that they hate anyone. If you accuse a WN of hating non-whites, you better be prepared to show exactly where he used hateful language. I have had a lot of conversations just trying to figure out what the WN definition of "hate" and "racism" are. It's a topsy-turvy world.

WNs like to talk about the lower IQs of blacks. And the high crime rate amongst blacks. And the high proportion of blacks in our prisons. And so on and so on. But you will be hard pressed to get a WN to say they think blacks are "inferior," because that would imply the WN is a "supremacist," and they don't like that label. Although one or two have come right out and admitted to being supremacists.

Some WNs think that once all the races live separately, that the black nations will most likely self-destruct. I have more than once been asked to provide the name of any nation that is not white or asian that is successful.

WNs don't begrudge the existence of the state of Israel, which was initially very surprising to me, considering how much they slander Jews on Stormfront. But to WNs, Israel is proof that we will all end up separate. What they do begrudge Israel is its influence on the U.S.'s policies.

Even though an anti may be a political conservative, WNs have another catch-all for them. "Cultural Marxism." I was given a primer from a female WN on cultural Marxism. If you want one yourself, go to
http://www.geocities.com/roundtable_research_editions/frankfurt_resed.html

Or just look up the "Frankfurt School" on google. Basically, the Jews control our political process, and are behind the "politically correct" movement, and are seeking to diminish white influence around the world.

This same female WN told me she believed only white male property owners should have the right to vote in America! :eek:

There is a camp in the WN community that has a huge resentment about the Reconstruction period following the Civil War. They believe that is when the Constitution was irrevocably damaged, and the “multiculturalists” began their takeover of our country. America was on the path away from its glorious past as a White Nation. I am being extremely general about this.

WNs also believe our immigration policy is seriously whacked. They believe we should have stuck to the Naturalization Act of our forefathers, which was written in the 18th century. It is their belief that our immigration program has allowed so many non-whites in, that it is now impossible to stem the flow. No politician would dare anger the large portion of the immigrant population by suggesting we curb immigration now. And so the disappearance of whites in America is virtually assured. And this was once a proud white nation. And these large numbers of immigrants are a net negative on our economy. Especially in the border states. So we are doomed.

Antis are called all kinds of other names. Multicults. Cultural Marxists. Neo-cons. And that is just the nice stuff.

There are a lot of symbolic numbers and phrases you may see. Most are self explanatory, or you will pick them up as you go along. Other symbology is included in usernames or signature lines. For example, “88.” This comes from the fact that the letter H is the eighth letter of the alphabet and represents “HH,” or “Heil Hitler.” You see 88 a lot on Stormfront. You may also see the expression “14 Words.” This comes from David Lane, a member of The Order, and means, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children,” which is 14 words long.

You will see a few swastikas and other nazi symbols around Stormfront. Be careful not to assume all WNs idolize Hitler. Opinions on Hitler come in all flavors. Some do idolize him. Some don’t like him at all. Many think he was given a bad shake in the history books. Discussions on the Holocaust are common, and WNs either believe it didn’t happen at all (very rare to find a WN who believes this, though), or believe it was overplayed/exaggerated by the Jews. Some believe the concentration camps were no different than the U.S. concentration camps of Japanese, and that the Jews were well treated, and rightly imprisoned as threats to Germany’s goals. Saboteurs, whatever. And the only reason they were malnourished is because by the end of the war, all of Germany was malnourished and why give what little food was available to enemies of the state?

As for the death camps (DO NOT confuse the two), “where is the evidence?” Have fun with that. I highly recommend you read any past topics on Stormfront about the Holocaust before stepping into that mess.

By and large, though, everything keeps coming back to race. There is one camp in the WN community that believe a “racial holy war” is inevitable. Good luck finding out what that means. Not all of them believe it actually means armed conflict. There is one camp that believes that the assumption of power by “multiculturalists,” or non-whites, should actually be encouraged so that whites will see how much they make a mess of things and come to their senses and return the U.S. to its proper place. Yeah.

I haven’t found any great fans of the Constitution. Many are well-versed in U.S. history, though. But their interpretations vary widely.

Expect to make some of the longest posts of your life. It has taken me over an hour to answer some of their posts. I feel they deserve the best I can give them. Since I am in a very tiny minority over there, I have to fight the good fight. And any dodge to their questions or claims is hailed as a victory on their part.
I have found that when I treat them with respect, the best of the best tend to flock to the topics I am engaged in. And there is mutual respect and some fascinating conversation. It is well worth the trip and the effort.

Hope I see some of you over there. Frankly, I am exhausted from dealing with these guys by myself. Not that there aren’t any other antis over there, it is just that there are so few that we tend to be divided and conquered. Each of us is wrapped up in our own separate topics. It gets tiring. And I don’t necessarily agree with the political viewpoints of some of the other antis there. Some of them are Marxists, and I disagree with them probably more than I disagree with WNs. :D

Tony
21st May 2003, 03:39 PM
This (http://www.stormfront.org/forum/threadid64862.php) thread is disturbing.

Ian Osborne
21st May 2003, 04:07 PM
Luke, what nick do you use there? I'd like to see some of your battles...

Luke T.
21st May 2003, 04:16 PM
Originally posted by Ian Osborne
Luke, what nick do you use there? I'd like to see some of your battles...

T. Ekul :D

I started a topic called "Ask T. Ekul" that is a good place to start. I also started a topic called "What I Understand and What I Don't Understand" that asked WNs to explain their beliefs to me.

"Ask T. Ekul" is about to be bumped back to the top of the Opposing Views section since I am still working on responses to posts people made to me. It has been very hard for me to keep up with answering everyone. But that should give you a good idea of what kind of fight I've been in.

schplurg
21st May 2003, 04:25 PM
I don't disagree that the mixture of cultures in America is one of our strongest, yet sometimes weakest and most experimental aspects of our nation. It does seem to be natural for people of a like mind and kind to live amongst themselves.

I have enough walls to pound my head against without joining that site, but thanks for the info. It is good to know what "the enemy" are thinking sometimes, but in this case I personally don't care. The mixing of races is a challenge that benefits people in many ways. It is difficult and it may not work in the end, but accepting the status quo (in their minds) that races can't live together is a cop out.


From their forum: Discussion of a guy angry at his girlfriend for giving her phone number to an "African Immigrant".
I would never, NEVER give my # to ANY nonwhite!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I can't even stand looking at them so why would I write down my number and give it to him..... If that happened to me I would tell him where to go.
..........
She won't show me where he lives, or do anything else to 'get him in trouble'
Gee maybe she's trying to get rid of you because you're a racist? After reading a few more threads...ya they may say they aren't racists. Don't most bigots claim that as they talk about "those people"?

They're politically correct racists :D

Luke T.
21st May 2003, 05:50 PM
I forgot to mention that discussion of religion is strictly verboten on Stormfront. Although that probably scores points with some of you. :D

You can talk about Jews all the live long day. I think they are viewed more as a "race" than a "religion" on Stormfront.

schplurg, I hope you find the time to post on Stormfront someday. I know what you mean about being stretched pretty thin already. Stormfront completely dominates my online time now, at the sacrifice of my time here at JREF and some of my other favorite web sites. But it is a refreshing change of pace from debunking UFOs and psychics.

WildCat
21st May 2003, 05:55 PM
I refuse to post on a site that has no Planet X content. :D
Seriously, I just don't have the time to get involved w/ those inbred creeps. I think they'll die off on their own accord eventually anyway.
Keep fighting the good fight Luke!

Luke T.
21st May 2003, 06:10 PM
Originally posted by WildCat
I refuse to post on a site that has no Planet X content. :D
Seriously, I just don't have the time to get involved w/ those inbred creeps. I think they'll die off on their own accord eventually anyway.
Keep fighting the good fight Luke!

I made a reference to Planet X, and one of the senior moderators immediately retorted with a sarcastic Nibiru reference!

Like I said, they ain't dummies.

a_unique_person
21st May 2003, 09:13 PM
So, they have plenty of money by the sound of it.

Khalid01
21st May 2003, 09:14 PM
Luke, I appreciate your work over there on stormfront, it's very courageous of you and I hope you can continue to maintain your sanity for as long as you have now. I visited there, following your instructions of course and took a look at your "Ask T. Ekul" thread. I admit that I was a bit frightened, they're so sure of themselves, it seems impossible to wrench them from their beliefs. However, you have mentioned that you're mainly fighting for the fence-sitters, and I hope and am sure you've brought them around.

I wish I could help you, but I'm afraid I would not have any credentials from their criteria, namely, that I'm a leftist, and I am very young. One can imagine how quickly they'd brush me off like parasite, but you have my well wishes at the least.

I know that you're an intelligent fellow, and that you've debated with these people frequently so that you may have come across everything regarding these people. However, I have some questions which you could answer, or not if you prefer.

Firstly, where in the Constitution do they draw their justification for a "white nation"? I actually know that it's highly probable they've already answered similar questions, but what do they draw from? Is it the "three-fifths compromise"? Do they focus on the forefathers such as Thomas Jefferson whom owned slaves? How can they be conservative, which in the early years of our nation I believe would be labeled "constructionist", and yet go beyond the words of the Constitution to justify these sentiments?

If and when America becomes a "white nation", do they believe crime will nose-dive? Do they think every white will suddenly transform into a upstanding citizen and follow their ideology. To put it in their context "who is going to drive all the taxis when the non-whites are gone?" (I thought of this while playing GTA Vice City:D) How can they even expect every white to compromise with them? I myself would blame the crime that is so commonly cited by them is due to urbanization which is a process that overwhelms infrastructure, in addition to long-lived discrimination, which has been focused on even white ethnic groups like the Irish, back in the 1800's. Although the circumstances have undoubtedly changed, with less mass immigrations. What is their opinion of the whites in Appalachia or anywhere else in America that are poor or not working? Are they all resultant of Affirmative Action? Whatever happened to that fantastic intellect the IQ tests report showing favour to whites.

Why do they support war for any cause other than protection? I know this would be hard for you to answer being a conservative and all, but play along.;) Shouldn't we leave all other nations alone, except perhaps white ones, in order to preserve our civilization? I can recognize the sentiment of preemptive strikes, but shouldn't we, in their context, just let the rest of the non-white world fall over and die? In spite of their downplaying the "neo-cons" they still seem to follow them, I would expect them to keep their distance, but then again you did admonish generalizations about them.

That's all I have to ask, excuse my long-winded post. I hope that you can aggregate more followers over time, and I just may attempt debating over there, but considering how infrequently I do so here, it'll hard be to muster the courage.

corplinx
22nd May 2003, 12:38 AM
Luke, you spent all this time there and all you could gleen was that they are sissies who dance around racial superiority and hatred like lawyers.

I said it once and I shall say it again, big waste of time.

MRC_Hans
22nd May 2003, 01:48 AM
Mmm, obviously a whole site full of essentially trolls, or at least troll behaviour. Should appeal to an old troll-basher like meself. Would more or less leave me without time for JREF, but you can surely survive that, heheh. I won't have time during hte next several weeks, though. Will also need to prepare a special e-mail address for registering.

--- and think of a new handle ;) ... Mmm, I could send Trinity for starters, that place should really turn her on :p

Hans

Luke T.
22nd May 2003, 07:26 AM
Originally posted by Khalid01
Luke, I appreciate your work over there on stormfront, it's very courageous of you and I hope you can continue to maintain your sanity for as long as you have now. I visited there, following your instructions of course and took a look at your "Ask T. Ekul" thread. I admit that I was a bit frightened, they're so sure of themselves, it seems impossible to wrench them from their beliefs. However, you have mentioned that you're mainly fighting for the fence-sitters, and I hope and am sure you've brought them around.

I have received some interesting PMs over there.

I wish I could help you, but I'm afraid I would not have any credentials from their criteria, namely, that I'm a leftist, and I am very young. One can imagine how quickly they'd brush me off like parasite, but you have my well wishes at the least.

You wouldn't be the only leftist, and there are certainly a large number of young people there. They may even make up the majority.


I know that you're an intelligent fellow, and that you've debated with these people frequently so that you may have come across everything regarding these people. However, I have some questions which you could answer, or not if you prefer.

I can certainly answer any questions you have.

Firstly, where in the Constitution do they draw their justification for a "white nation"? I actually know that it's highly probable they've already answered similar questions, but what do they draw from? Is it the "three-fifths compromise"? Do they focus on the forefathers such as Thomas Jefferson whom owned slaves? How can they be conservative, which in the early years of our nation I believe would be labeled "constructionist", and yet go beyond the words of the Constitution to justify these sentiments?

Again, there is no all-encompassing WN philosophy, but the basic idea is that America was mostly comprised of white people at the beginning. Some WNs feel slavery was a mistake, but only in that it introduced non-whites into our country. And was a black mark on our human rights scorecard.

I am only vaguely beginning to understand where they feel things went wrong after that. It seems to be tied to the Reconstruction period after the Civil War, when the Constitution was amended at gunpoint. This opened the door for "multiculturalism," in their opinion. Free blacks, equal opportunity, Affirmative Action, and so on. They feel the Constitution was no longer a constitution after Reconstruction, and that the central government then assumed a role it was not supposed to assume. States rights were forever gone.

If and when America becomes a "white nation", do they believe crime will nose-dive?

Yes, they do. Unequivocably. But not every WN feels that America will ever be a White Nation again.

Do they think every white will suddenly transform into a upstanding citizen and follow their ideology. To put it in their context "who is going to drive all the taxis when the non-whites are gone?" (I thought of this while playing GTA Vice City:D) How can they even expect every white to compromise with them?

They don't expect every white to fall in line with their thinking. But they think most whites will come around to their point of view when things get bad enough. That is why one camp of WNs feels that as many non-whites should be handed the reins of power in America as possible, so that whites will begin to see what a mess they make of things and create an upswell of white backlash.

Those whites who do not fall into the WN way of thinking will be invited to leave the White Nation and live amongst the "muds." Or they will be forcibly emigrated along with the non-whites.

Some WNs are confident that within most white men, there is a White Nationalist dying to break out.

Apparently some non-whites believe the same thing. :D

I myself would blame the crime that is so commonly cited by them is due to urbanization which is a process that overwhelms infrastructure, in addition to long-lived discrimination, which has been focused on even white ethnic groups like the Irish, back in the 1800's. Although the circumstances have undoubtedly changed, with less mass immigrations. What is their opinion of the whites in Appalachia or anywhere else in America that are poor or not working? Are they all resultant of Affirmative Action? Whatever happened to that fantastic intellect the IQ tests report showing favour to whites.

They have the official government statistics to back up their claim that poor white Appalachians have a lower crime rate than poor black populations. Take a look for yourself. West Virginia. Many a topic has discussed U.S. Census statistics which show the higher the black population in a state, the higher the crime rate. The ten states that have the highest black percentage have the highest crime rates. The ten states that have the lowest black percentage have the lowest crime rates.

Think about how you would argue against that. Not so easy, eh?

Why do they support war for any cause other than protection? I know this would be hard for you to answer being a conservative and all, but play along.;) Shouldn't we leave all other nations alone, except perhaps white ones, in order to preserve our civilization? I can recognize the sentiment of preemptive strikes, but shouldn't we, in their context, just let the rest of the non-white world fall over and die? In spite of their downplaying the "neo-cons" they still seem to follow them, I would expect them to keep their distance, but then again you did admonish generalizations about them.

Actually, there seems to be an isolationist attitude among the WNs. They were about as divided over the war in Iraq as we were on this forum. As for letting non-white nations fall over and die, that is pretty much their attitude. But they feel that we give too much aid to Israel to let natural selection take place. And they feel Israel has far too much influence in our politics.

That's all I have to ask, excuse my long-winded post. I hope that you can aggregate more followers over time, and I just may attempt debating over there, but considering how infrequently I do so here, it'll hard be to muster the courage.

I hope I do see you over there. Ponder some of the things I discussed in this topic and see what kind of thoughts you come up with. I think you would do well.

Skeptical Greg
22nd May 2003, 07:32 AM
Again, there is no all-encompassing WN philosophy, but the basic idea is that America was mostly comprised of white people at the beginning.

Do they consider Native Americans to be white?

DanishDynamite
22nd May 2003, 10:30 AM
Nice work, Luke. I went for a look and it is clear to me that you have garnered some respect but also that you are severly moderating yourself in order to kowtow to the local rules.

I'd join you, but:

a) If their main goal is the seperation of races into seperate countries, then that isn't really a goal which can be argued against scientifically. The reasons for wanting this goal and the methods for achieving it certainly can be questioned, but the goal itself seems like a political opinion.
2) I don't like to be seriously "straitjacketed" in regard to my posts.
3) They are already a fringe minority and don't have a hope in hell of achieving any of their goals.

Luke T.
22nd May 2003, 10:37 AM
Originally posted by DanishDynamite
Nice work, Luke. I went for a look and it is clear to me that you have garnered some respect but also that you are severly moderating yourself in order to kowtow to the local rules.

I'd join you, but:

a) If their main goal is the seperation of races into seperate countries, then that isn't really a goal which can be argued against scientifically. The reasons for wanting this goal and the methods for achieving it certainly can be questioned, but the goal itself seems like a political opinion.
2) I don't like to be seriously "straitjacketed" in regard to my posts.
3) They are already a fringe minority and don't have a hope in hell of achieving any of their goals.

I don't like being "straitjacketed" either, DD, but I am learning to adapt.

As for the rest, you make good points, but my big picture goal is to deflate some of their arguments which engender hatred and mistrust between human beings.

And I am also there just to learn about White Nationalism. It is a fascinating subject. And why not apply critical thinking to politics like we do the paranormal elsewhere on the net?

While a White Nation may not be achievable, the spread of prejudice certainly is. We can at least do a little something about that.

DanishDynamite
22nd May 2003, 02:20 PM
Originally posted by Luke T.


I don't like being "straitjacketed" either, DD, but I am learning to adapt.

As for the rest, you make good points, but my big picture goal is to deflate some of their arguments which engender hatred and mistrust between human beings.

And I am also there just to learn about White Nationalism. It is a fascinating subject. And why not apply critical thinking to politics like we do the paranormal elsewhere on the net?

While a White Nation may not be achievable, the spread of prejudice certainly is. We can at least do a little something about that. I understand your motives and I think they are admirable. Kudos, my friend. Perhaps, if things are slow here, I will slide into the straijacket and post there.

Anyway, the very best of luck.

Stig
22nd May 2003, 02:40 PM
Good luck over there Luke. I'm afraid I won't be joining you as I am a person who can get overtaken by my emotions too easily. I don't think I would last a day before getting banned.

Stig

SRW
22nd May 2003, 03:41 PM
Good luck to you Luke, I would highly recommend you keep your contact with these people at a distance. My run it with folks of this ilk left me with a .38 slug in the back. And I never want to have any contact with them again.

Luke T.
22nd May 2003, 03:56 PM
Originally posted by Stig
Good luck over there Luke. I'm afraid I won't be joining you as I am a person who can get overtaken by my emotions too easily. I don't think I would last a day before getting banned.

Stig

I know what you mean. It took me a while to get my feelings in check. But I have found that the longer I stay, and the more I learn, the easier it is. The more rational people tend to congregate together from the anti and WN camps.

Luke T.
22nd May 2003, 03:57 PM
Originally posted by SRW
Good luck to you Luke, I would highly recommend you keep your contact with these people at a distance. My run it with folks of this ilk left me with a .38 slug in the back. And I never want to have any contact with them again.

I sure would like to hear that story sometime, Steveo.

Luke T.
22nd May 2003, 04:00 PM
Stormfront is not entirely without some humorous entertainment value. A WN started a poll asking if homosexuals should be allowed to post anywhere they choose on their forum. I assume they mean homosexual White Nationalists, because the options are to allow them to post anywhere on the forum or to "treat them like antis" and restrict them to the Opposing Views section.

One White Nationalist responded with this comment:

I'd rather die for freakin Israel in Palestine before I'd ever fight to allow homosexuals in a White society. That is my one and only comment I will make on this thread.

:D :D :D

SRW
22nd May 2003, 04:25 PM
Originally posted by Luke T.


I sure would like to hear that story sometime, Steveo.


Well If you make it to TAM I show you the scar;

the best advice I can give you is to stay away from them.

If you don't take that advice do not play cards with them , if you play cards don't win.

And if you happen to win a woman, do not turn her down things can get ugly.

Baker
22nd May 2003, 05:50 PM
Looks like you have quite an active thread there Luke I have been trying to read as many messages as I can to get into the conversation but you are doing quite well.

max
23rd May 2003, 01:27 AM
LukeT
I had a look in the stormfront web, what terrible people they are. You do well with your replies to them but it seems like a lot of hardwork.
I was listening to the radio last night and the presenter read out some statistics on the global population.
57% of the people are Asians (including China) 8% are African
17% white. Interesting eh? I can't remember what the other percentages were.
The white light you mentioned was V interesting can you tell us on here about that?

Trinity
23rd May 2003, 04:01 AM
I took a look at that site. On Hans' recommedation. I am still hyperventilating :mad: . But I see the need for some opposition there. I dont expect to get many chances though, a 3/4 white female lol.

Trinity

Cleopatra
23rd May 2003, 04:16 AM
The way you describe the forum , Luke, seems to me that their ideas are very clear to those that they decide to jump-in, so if you allow me the question, what is the point of discussing with those people if there is no way for you to persuade them?

Since they believe in racial superiority they would find interesting to know the word in the mother of the languages, ancient Greek, which stands for "conversation".

The word is "synousia" and it means sexual intercourse and it says a lot on what the people, who practically invented dialogue, thought about discussions.

They wanted to describe a spiritual osmosis, something that is interesting and challenging indeed when you discuss with people who are willing to interact.

Would you care to come "so close" to such people?

Frightening thought...

Luke T.
23rd May 2003, 06:44 AM
Originally posted by Baker
Looks like you have quite an active thread there Luke I have been trying to read as many messages as I can to get into the conversation but you are doing quite well.

Thanks, Baker.

Yeah, my topic is on its ninth page and will soon be on its tenth. I got a bigger response than I anticipated, but I plan on holding to my promise in my opening post that I would answer each and every person who posted.

For a few days there, I was reading and posting 7 to 10 hours at a crack. Very tiring. I'm pacing myself now.

Luke T.
23rd May 2003, 06:48 AM
Originally posted by max
LukeT
I had a look in the stormfront web, what terrible people they are. You do well with your replies to them but it seems like a lot of hardwork.
I was listening to the radio last night and the presenter read out some statistics on the global population.
57% of the people are Asians (including China) 8% are African
17% white. Interesting eh? I can't remember what the other percentages were.
The white light you mentioned was V interesting can you tell us on here about that?

I have posted a few times on here about my white light experience, max. I was driving along the highway one day when it happened. A white light from nowhere, and I have no idea how long the moment was. When it was gone, I was still behind the wheel of my vehicle, moving down the highway, and I had gone from an atheist to a believer in that moment. My faith has been unshakeable since.

I heard no voice, or anything like that, like Paul in the bible did. Like I tell people, "I didn't get the Jesus package." :D

As for whites being a minority on the planet, the WNs are well aware of that fact. They take pride in that whites have dominated the world, and led the way in inventions and progress.
They are scared witless that whites are losing political power.

Luke T.
23rd May 2003, 06:50 AM
Originally posted by Trinity
I took a look at that site. On Hans' recommedation. I am still hyperventilating :mad: . But I see the need for some opposition there. I dont expect to get many chances though, a 3/4 white female lol.

Trinity

Hello, Trinity! I don't believe we have met before.

Don't get mad. Stay calm. Come on over to Stormfront and give them some what for. :D

If you can make a good argument without losing your cool, you will earn their respect. That is a guarantee.

Luke T.
23rd May 2003, 06:53 AM
Originally posted by Cleopatra
The way you describe the forum , Luke, seems to me that their ideas are very clear to those that they decide to jump-in, so if you allow me the question, what is the point of discussing with those people if there is no way for you to persuade them?

Since they believe in racial superiority they would find interesting to know the word in the mother of the languages, ancient Greek, which stands for "conversation".

The word is "synousia" and it means sexual intercourse and it says a lot on what the people, who practically invented dialogue, thought about discussions.

They wanted to describe a spiritual osmosis, something that is interesting and challenging indeed when you discuss with people who are willing to interact.

Would you care to come "so close" to such people?

Frightening thought...

Cleopatra, you didn't have to travel thousands of years into the past and halfway around the world to find a sexual meaning to discussion. Right here in our own language, we have "intercourse."

As for why do I do it, there have been many topics on JREF asking why people bother to go to paranormal forums to promote critical thinking. And my reasons are the same.

If it was an act of futility, why do people of differeing political views bother talking to each other right here on JREF?

There are many reasons, which I think I listed already. If it wasn't in this topic, it was in the topic someone started about the increase of neo-nazi web sites on the net a few days ago here in P&CE.

Frank Newgent
23rd May 2003, 06:55 AM
Originally posted by Luke T.
You see 88 a lot on Stormfront.

I saw an 88Transit bus yesterday on the Ohio Turnpike. It was a fairly new tour bus looking thing painted white with a green jagged line running the length of it. Out of Pennsylvania.

Cleopatra
23rd May 2003, 01:53 PM
Originally posted by Luke T.


Cleopatra, you didn't have to travel thousands of years into the past and halfway around the world to find a sexual meaning to discussion. Right here in our own language, we have "intercourse."

As for why do I do it, there have been many topics on JREF asking why people bother to go to paranormal forums to promote critical thinking. And my reasons are the same.

If it was an act of futility, why do people of differeing political views bother talking to each other right here on JREF?

There are many reasons, which I think I listed already. If it wasn't in this topic, it was in the topic someone started about the increase of neo-nazi web sites on the net a few days ago here in P&CE.

The fact that you were talking about people who believe in racial superiority made me want to talk to you about the origin of the English word " intercourse" Luke, which is a synonym -by structure -of the word synousia. Inter comes from the Greek- en -who is relative to syn, as you already know

Different political views have nothing to do with what you described. As you have mentioned several times you censor yourself in order to be able even to post...

People with different political views don't take for granted that they are superior to others.

Don't take me wrong. I wasn't criticizing you for doing so, I was just curious on how you can do it.

Luke T.
23rd May 2003, 02:23 PM
Originally posted by Cleopatra


The fact that you were talking about people who believe in racial superiority made me want to talk to you about the origin of the English word " intercourse" Luke, which is a synonym -by structure -of the word synousia. Inter comes from the Greek- en -who is relative to syn, as you already know

Different political views have nothing to do with what you described. As you have mentioned several times you censor yourself in order to be able even to post...

People with different political views don't take for granted that they are superior to others.

Don't take me wrong. I wasn't criticizing you for doing so, I was just curious on how you can do it.

Well, Cleopatra, many paranormal web sites are also known to be very hostile toward skeptics. And yet many of us visit them and follow their stringent, one-sided rules and attempt to present our views. There are some here who still remember the day 29 of us were booted off survivalscience's web site simultaneously. :D

I would say that Stormfront, despite it's heavy-booted approach toward antis, still treats the opposition better than many paranormal web sites.

So why do we do it?

To be honest, there is always that deep, secret hope of "converting" someone. But that is not very realisitic, although I have seen it happen. It does not happen enough to warrant the effort, though.

Sometimes we go to these places just so that the people there don't get the impression that "no opposition means I'm right." They need to have that delusion and that argument taken from them.

And finally, click on the forum jump box and take a look at "Who's Online." Notice how many "Guests" there are?

max
23rd May 2003, 02:27 PM
LukeT
i worry about you. Your twins need you soooo much more than white supremists

Cleopatra
23rd May 2003, 02:27 PM
Originally posted by Luke T.



To be honest, there is always that deep, secret hope of "converting" someone. But that is not very realisitic, although I have seen it happen. It does not happen enough to warrant the effort, though.


This was a very strong and very honest argument. I have been there, so I know the feeling :)

Luke T.
23rd May 2003, 05:34 PM
Originally posted by max
LukeT
i worry about you. Your twins need you soooo much more than white supremists

max, your sentimentality is why I like you so much. Don't worry. When I am at home, my family gets my full attention. I do 99.9% of my posting from work. I have a job that involves a lot of sitting around waiting for a machine to break so I can fix it.

I am sitting at work right now. :D

_Q_
23rd May 2003, 06:55 PM
Other symbology is included in usernames or signature lines. For example, “88.” This comes from the fact that the letter H is the eighth letter of the alphabet and represents “HH,” or “Heil Hitler.” You see 88 a lot on Stormfront.
Luke,

I think "88" is amateur radio shorthand for "love and kisses", or sentiments to that effect.

Something tells me that little tidbit wouldn't go over so big over on Stormfront, right?


Q

subgenius
23rd May 2003, 08:47 PM
Thanks for shedding some light.
Evil grows in the dark.
All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing/remain ignorant.

peptoabysmal
23rd May 2003, 11:59 PM
Originally posted by Luke T.

As for the rest, you make good points, but my big picture goal is to deflate some of their arguments which engender hatred and mistrust between human beings.


You can't fight irrational hatred with logic. You can only appeal to the possible shred of humanity left in them, and hope it takes root.

Fade
24th May 2003, 01:52 AM
This is one of the reasons I left the mental health field. These people are disturbed.

subgenius
24th May 2003, 02:45 AM
Originally posted by Fade
This is one of the reasons I left the mental health field. These people are disturbed.
That's like an othopedist saying they got out because there was too many broken bones.
But, I agree that at a point "beliefs" become delusional.
Stick around here, I think you'll make some diagnoses, as I'm sure you do everyday in daily life.
I can understand your frustration.
Mental illness is the hardest to treat because: its so pervasive, the patients are in denial about the need for treatment (when you have a broken arm you take care of it), its a newer field and the science is still developing, misunderstanding of it among the public, and lack of support for diagnosis/treatment in industry/government, and therefore there is a big "burn out" factor causing many in the profession to leave. You of course can be of no help unless you're healthy.
But, on the other hand, the brain is the vanguard of science.
(And my second favorite organ;) )

max
24th May 2003, 01:52 PM
LukeT
I have tried twice to register with stormfront to no avail. Is there a problem in registering? Did you experience this?

Luke T.
24th May 2003, 03:54 PM
Originally posted by max
LukeT
I have tried twice to register with stormfront to no avail. Is there a problem in registering? Did you experience this?

I had no trouble registering, max. But I registered a year ago.

I know a couple other people from here have registered in the last couple of days. I already see them over there.

Luke T.
24th May 2003, 03:56 PM
The guantlet has been thrown.

Posted by one of Stormfront's senior moderators to me yesterday:

But in actuality, I find that there's a paucity of truly White anti-racists who post here or wish to debate with White Nationalists. They are often the ones who consider it "beneath them." Some of the more prolific antis here are actually non-whites, including a fair number of jews.

What do you say, white people? Are any of you anti-racist?

Fade
24th May 2003, 06:57 PM
Originally posted by subgenius

That's like an othopedist saying they got out because there was too many broken bones.
But, I agree that at a point "beliefs" become delusional.
Stick around here, I think you'll make some diagnoses, as I'm sure you do everyday in daily life.
I can understand your frustration.
Mental illness is the hardest to treat because: its so pervasive, the patients are in denial about the need for treatment (when you have a broken arm you take care of it), its a newer field and the science is still developing, misunderstanding of it among the public, and lack of support for diagnosis/treatment in industry/government, and therefore there is a big "burn out" factor causing many in the profession to leave. You of course can be of no help unless you're healthy.
But, on the other hand, the brain is the vanguard of science.
(And my second favorite organ;) )

The problem doesn't come with those who are simply ill, it's those who make a culture out of their illness. You can not help soembody that doesn't want to be helped. What happens is they get frustrated, angry, and finally learn what you want to hear, learn to act legitimate, and when released immediately slip back into all the habits they had before.

It bothers me that hate speech exists. It bothers me right to my core. I am, in the end, too fragile a human being to truly help those who are in the most serious need of help, because I can't identify with them at all.

MRC_Hans
9th June 2003, 01:07 PM
Originally posted by Luke T.
*snip*
What do you say, white people? Are any of you anti-racist? [/B]I do not identify myself as a "white person", although to my knowledge, I am what might be referred to as such.

But I promised you to look around, and I will. Just havent got a lot of time at present.

Hans