PDA

View Full Version : 9/11 Security: failure or deliberate?


Pages : 1 [2]

DavidJames
17th July 2006, 02:28 PM
Of all the hardcore CTers out there, why do we get the dumbest?
How can you tell? :)

Ginarley
17th July 2006, 02:59 PM
Of all the hardcore CTers out there, why do we get the dumbest?

It's clearly a conspiracy.

senorpogo
17th July 2006, 03:30 PM
It's not déjà vu, Senor. We're actually in a very nasty time-loop.

AND our di-lithium crystals are burnt out! So, tough luck!

You know, I think you're right. That explains so many things. Repition of arguments followed by the same evidence we'be heard ten times before to debunk it.

If only we could get that Halkan council to agree to provide us with some dilithium.

Class
17th July 2006, 08:05 PM
Of all the hardcore CTers out there, why do we get the dumbest?
Government infiltrators of the truth movement ordered to spread disinfo and make the 9/11 truthers look bad.

EDIT: quoted wrong thing

Belz...
18th July 2006, 05:58 AM
You know, I think you're right. That explains so many things. Repition of arguments followed by the same evidence we'be heard ten times before to debunk it.

If only we could get that Halkan council to agree to provide us with some dilithium.

Uh oh. Doesn't that mean we're going to the mirror universe ?

senorpogo
18th July 2006, 09:35 AM
Uh oh. Doesn't that mean we're going to the mirror universe ?

Yes. Geggy will be a good guy and Gravy will be a CT nut with a gotti.

Belz...
18th July 2006, 10:22 AM
Yes. Geggy will be a good guy and Gravy will be a CT nut with a gotti.

I think we should use a shuttle instead...

geggy
19th July 2006, 04:56 AM
Wrong again, geggy. The number was 40.9% with a MOE of +/- 3.5%, the question didn't mention George W. Bush (It said "some leaders"), and the poll of New York City adults was written and financed by 911truth.org and held...ta-da! On the eve of the Republican National Convention in...ta-da! New York City.

Oh, and I've explained this Zogby nonsense to geggy before.

http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=9196

???

Belz...
19th July 2006, 05:27 AM
http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=9196

???

Translation: "But I REALLY want it to be true!!"

Also:

This is the first scientific poll of it kind in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy. Zogby International will release full details at 2pm Eastern time today.

Don't you just hate those typos ?

Shrinker
19th July 2006, 05:27 AM
http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=9196

???

LOL, geggy you are amazing. How can anyone be so constently wrong without a deliberate effort?

geggy
19th July 2006, 06:48 AM
More like "I don't want it to be true!" am i right

Stellafane
19th July 2006, 06:49 AM
http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=9196

???

Keep running into those cattle prods, geggy, I'm sure you'll drain their batteries eventually.

aggle-rithm
19th July 2006, 06:56 AM
More like "I don't want it to be true!" am i right

So many conspiracy theorists, so few brains....

Regnad Kcin
19th July 2006, 07:20 AM
geggy, did you actually read the content of your link? All the way through?

Belz...
19th July 2006, 08:16 AM
More like "I don't want it to be true!" am i right

That's the part you don't understand. I really don't care about which truth I get.

Pardalis
19th July 2006, 12:06 PM
More like "I don't want it to be true!" am i right

Prove it.

Arkan_Wolfshade
19th July 2006, 12:11 PM
More like "I don't want it to be true!" am i right

No. QED

Belz...
19th July 2006, 01:12 PM
No. QED

What does that mean, anyway ?

DAMN I hate acronyms.

Arkan_Wolfshade
19th July 2006, 01:21 PM
What does that mean, anyway ?

DAMN I hate acronyms.

Originally
Q.E.D.
- "quod erat demonstrandum" (Latin) This stems from medieval translators' habitual tendency of translating the Greek for "this was to be demonstrated" to the Latin phrase above. This appeared originally at the end of many of Euclid's propositions, signifying that he had proved what he set out to prove. http://library.thinkquest.org/2647/geometry/glossary.htm#q

Has morphed into In English speaking countries the letters have been humorously interpreted as "Quite Easily Done" or, occasionally, "Quite Eloquently Done", or "Quite Enough Done". Other humorous expansions in the context of mathematical proofs are "Question Every Detail" or "Question Every Deduction", suggesting that the reader should check that the proof is indeed correct as claimed, or "Qualitatively Extracted Deduction." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qed

Or, as a more slang usage that I have seen, and was my intended use It is self evident. If you don't get it, go reread what I wrote.

Belz...
20th July 2006, 08:23 AM
Originally http://library.thinkquest.org/2647/geometry/glossary.htm#q

Has morphed into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qed

Or, as a more slang usage that I have seen, and was my intended use

Thanks.

What about "QFD", or something ?

Arkan_Wolfshade
20th July 2006, 08:57 AM
Thanks.

What about "QFD", or something ?
QFD?

Belz...
20th July 2006, 10:23 AM
QFD?

Sorry, that's QFT:

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=1765710&postcount=162

Class
20th July 2006, 01:25 PM
QFT means "Quoted for truth".

Money-Lover
20th July 2006, 03:24 PM
Geggy, I'm really sick of your conspiricy Blithering. 19 hijackers attacked us on 9/11 That's it. 19. Their names were found in a suitcase. Was anybody else's name found in that suitcaes? No! You seem to think that they had help from inside our government. Was Dick Cheney's name in that suitcase? No. Donald Rumsfeld? No.

GGG

(that's "Get a grip Geggy")