BeholdTheTruth
22nd July 2006, 07:53 PM
It was pointed out to me by several folks in the Science section that, "loosely" speaking, Haeckel's "Ontogeny Recaputulates Phylogeny" idea holds some scientific water, while "tightly" speaking it is all wet. If that difference of perspective about an idea is applied to other ideas, are ideas "loosely" spoken of more likely to fall into the province of philosophy or the province of science?