Criminal Felons Conduct Home Invasion Of Scott Petersen's House

[Jedi Knight]

Dangerous home invaders, people that ordinarily would be shot through the chest with shotguns by homeowners or with assault rifles by SWAT Teams, invaded Scott Petersen's home, stealing by strong-armed robbery items belonging to Scott.

Meanwhile, the leftist media stood outside videotaping it while the police did nothing to stop the dangerous felony invasion of Scott's house.

This is just yet another attempt by leftist matriarchal totalitarian terrorists to get Scott Petersen's name back in the media to subvert his chances at a fair trial and rig the trial in the minds of the public and the potential jury selection.

But up to a dozen dangerous criminal felony home-invader strong-armed robbers and dangerous burglars are now on the streets of Modesto, all while the leftist Modesto police department gives them the nod. It is like something out of "Training Day".

This is matriarchal terrorism and all men across the country should be alarmed.

JK

[Gem]

Got link?

Actually if I situation like that happened I think people would have more sympathy for him. Sounds VERY unusual that the American police would just stand by.

But I don't blame the "leftist media." JK, would you go agaisnt armed robbers with a camera in your hands or film them? The second options sounds like it will help catch them more than if he confronted them.

Gem

[Sanamas]

That's just silly, Jedi.




Now if you'll excuse me, I need to return to my essay for this women writers class.



It's a very interesting class, it has really changed my perspective on things.



Mmmm, women......



Us men, we've really been so unfair to them.......



They've been repressed for far too long....


They should be in power now.....


Us men are scum.....


All scum.....


Obey...


Must obey.....

[Skeptical Greg]

We are anxiously awaiting your next thread, titled:


" The b**ch and her brat, got what they deserved.. "






I thought I would check out one of your threads for a change...


Ho, Hum.... Just what I thought... Mayby again sometime...

[Psiload]

Originally posted by Jedi Knight
Dangerous home invaders, people that ordinarily would be shot through the chest with shotguns by homeowners or with assault rifles by SWAT Teams, invaded Scott Petersen's home, stealing by strong-armed robbery items belonging to Scott.

Meanwhile, the leftist media stood outside videotaping it while the police did nothing to stop the dangerous felony invasion of Scott's house.

This is just yet another attempt by leftist matriarchal totalitarian terrorists to get Scott Petersen's name back in the media to subvert his chances at a fair trial and rig the trial in the minds of the public and the potential jury selection.

But up to a dozen dangerous criminal felony home-invader strong-armed robbers and dangerous burglars are now on the streets of Modesto, all while the leftist Modesto police department gives them the nod. It is like something out of "Training Day".

This is matriarchal terrorism and all men across the country should be alarmed.

JK http://h4h.com/louis/spock3.jpg Fascinating.

[Checkmite]

Hi, Jedi.

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Joshua Korosi
Hi, Jedi.

Hi Joshua!

JK

[renata]

Originally posted by Diogenes
We are anxiously awaiting your next thread, titled:


" The b**ch and her brat, got what they deserved.. "






I thought I would check out one of your threads for a change...


Ho, Hum.... Just what I thought... Mayby again sometime...

http://host.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=18657

[Dancing David]

So did these felons happen to have a warrant in thier possesion? Do they happen to be investigators charged by the court's to secure evidence?

Or were they really women in dykish clothing chanting "death to men' and then just trashing his place.

I think you are just covering the fact that it looks like Scott's lawyers went and released the coroner's report today.

So Jedi, do you have a problem with our judicial system?

Sorry dude, whatever you are doing , you are loosing your magic touch, your post just looks stupid and lacks the usualy charm and wit.

But then I am sure you support the presecution bringing up a women's past in a rape trial too.

Can't wait to read what you write when I get back Monday.

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Dancing David
So did these felons happen to have a warrant in thier possesion? Do they happen to be investigators charged by the court's to secure evidence?

Or were they really women in dykish clothing chanting "death to men' and then just trashing his place.

I think you are just covering the fact that it looks like Scott's lawyers went and released the coroner's report today.

So Jedi, do you have a problem with our judicial system?

Sorry dude, whatever you are doing , you are loosing your magic touch, your post just looks stupid and lacks the usualy charm and wit.

But then I am sure you support the presecution bringing up a women's past in a rape trial too.

Can't wait to read what you write when I get back Monday.

There is no "charm and wit" needed when describing the terrorism men face today in the United States at the hands of matriarchal totalitarianism.

The criminal home-invading felons are now saying they got permission from the Modesto DA to do the home invasion. The problem is a DA doesn't have the authority to issue such instructions without written permission from a sitting judge.

Scott Peterson is being lynched and if you and others think that is "cool and fashionable" then wait until the day you wind up in court and have to stand alone against the terror like Scott is. It may never happen, but when men let these home-invasions occur to lynch men that have not been tried of any crime, we are finished as a lawful nation.

JK

[Crossbow]

Do you have any documentation regarding this "invasion" you speak of?

I did some checking and found a recent reference to the release of an autopsy report, but nothing about an invasion.

Thanks in advance for the clarificiation.

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Crossbow
Do you have any documentation regarding this "invasion" you speak of?

I did some checking and found a recent reference to the release of an autopsy report, but nothing about an invasion.

Thanks in advance for the clarificiation.

I don't think there is anything printed on yet. It was breaking news on leftist CNN.

JK

[renata]

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/30/peterson.case/index.html


Meanwhile, on Friday, self-described friends of Laci Peterson's family drove to the Peterson home in Modesto Friday and removed what appeared to be personal items belonging to the murdered Modesto woman.

Modesto police arrived on the scene and spoke briefly to the people who were removing items, who left shortly afterward. They took with them chairs, clothes, art work and other items that had presumably belonged to Laci Peterson.

An attorney for Laci's family, the Rochas, said the family had resolved a dispute with the Peterson family over some items they wanted to remove from the house and were expected to do so next week.

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Diogenes
We are anxiously awaiting your next thread, titled:


" The b**ch and her brat, got what they deserved.. "

You need to get your thinking straightened out. What is happening is the leftist feminazis in this country are using the media and police to "give Scott what he deserves".

You don't know if Scott killed his wife. Neither do I. The guy is about to go on trial for her death in front of a jury of his peers, the way the US system is designed.

You aren't alarmed that today a group of 10 - 15 people robbed Scott's house while the Modesto police sat in the driveway and the leftist media filmed it live?

That is not America. If Scott is convicted for killing Laci based upon unrefutable evidence, I will be the first to say he deserves the death penalty.

The guy is innocent until proven guilty. He hasn't even had his trial yet. The way Scott's case is being handled is pure terrorism against him, a man guaranteed rights under the US Constitution to a fair trial.

What is happening to Scott before his trial is 4th world communist terror and all men should be shamed by it.

Laci is dead. No one calling themselves "friends of Laci" have the lawful right to enter Scott's house and steal his property. That is felony home-invasion and felony burglary. If I were the defense for Scott in this case I would call for a mistrial and the immediate release of Scott over these 4th-world tactics.

JK

[Dancing David]

If it was done under a legal agreemnt it isn't home invasion. the fact that he is a suspect in a crime does not deprive him of his rights to have his property protected.

It's the rightist media JK but thats okay.

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Dancing David
If it was done under a legal agreemnt it isn't home invasion. the fact that he is a suspect in a crime does not deprive him of his rights to have his property protected.

It's the rightist media JK but thats okay.

You don't understand US law. Scott Peterson or a sitting judge are the only two people that can grant permission to go into the house. Lawyers do not have the authority to grant such permission and can be disbarred and criminally charged for such activity.

Anyone who went in there without one of those two permission venues is a criminal felony burglar.

The defense was going to use the evidence in the house to help Scott at his trial. That evidence is now in the back of pick-up trucks, stolen by criminal felons.

It is felony burglary, home-invasion, pre-trial interference, etc etc etc etc.

The people that entered the house are criminals and I bet the defense presses felony charges against them.

Is anyone but me alarmed that a man's trial is being subverted using 4th world feminazi tactics?

JK

[Crossbow]

Originally posted by Jedi Knight
Dangerous home invaders, ...

JK

It sounds to me like the family of the deceased spouse (Laci) was given permission by the surviving spouse (Scott) to take possesion of some items that belonged to her.

In this case:
- The items in question belonged to Laci Petersen,
- The action was was done in broad daylight with news media witnessing the event,
- There was prior agreement between both parties (Scott and Laci),
- There was a police presence that apparently agreed that all was in order (otherwise they would not have allowed the items to be taken and/or arrests would have been made).

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Crossbow


It sounds to me like the family of the deceased spouse (Laci) was given permission by the surviving spouse (Scott) to take possesion of some items that belonged to her.

In this case:
- The items in question belonged to Laci Petersen,
- The action was was done in broad daylight with news media witnessing the event,
- There was prior agreement between both parties (Scott and Laci),
- There was a police presence that apparently agreed that all was in order (otherwise they would not have allowed the items to be taken and/or arrests would have been made).

Not true. Scott did not give anyone but his defense attorneys permission to enter the house. The defense, I just learned, was going to videotape the house to defend Scott.

What happened today was a serious, serious crime. Grand theft, home invasion, capital murder pre-trial tampering of the defense's case and God knows how many other charges.

The people that entered that house had better have written permission by a sitting judge or this is going to be an explosive event, in my opinion.

Keep in mind that the only thing I am interested in this case is trial procedure. Scott Petersen, as you, me, or any other man, deserves a fair trial. When men in this country have their trials subverted and are lynched as Scott is, we are finished as a lawful nation.

I would say the same for anyone regardless of race or circumstance.

Seeing things like this on TV Crossbow makes me want to go out and get a Law degree and become a defense attorney.

JK

[Dancing David]

ditto,
i thought the material evidence had already been removed, gosh if I was a judge and the friends of Laci brought forward evidence that left the house I would quash it.

Doesn't Scott have the right to have his attorney make arrangements for him, has he said this isn't the case?

[Jedi Knight]

Originally posted by Dancing David
ditto,
i thought the material evidence had already been removed, gosh if I was a judge and the friends of Laci brought forward evidence that left the house I would quash it.

Doesn't Scott have the right to have his attorney make arrangements for him, has he said this isn't the case?

The defense, unbelievably, watched the home-invasion on TV and then rushed over there. Scott's lawyers didn't even know about it. They certainly didn't approve it. They were going to go into the house and videotape it tomorrow or in a couple days as part of Scott's defense.

Remember, even though Scott's lawyers are defending him, they are conducting their own criminal investigation of the case.

If, and I say if, Scott didn't kill his wife, this Un-American activity is working to send an innocent man to jail by subverting his trial.

American feminazis are desperate to send Scott Peterson to jail for the death of Laci and they are only interested in seating guilt, not giving him a fair trial to prove his innocence if he is innocent.

That is dangerous fascism and a threat to every American.

JK

[schplurg]

From Thursday:

Story From The Modesto Bee, family Hires Attorneys To Retrieve Items (http://www.modbee.com/reports/laci/story/6867298p-7804094c.html)

Niether the link above, nor Renatas link (thanks for finding that BTW) details whether or not the family had permission to retrieve any items. The defense claims they had a deal with the DA to keep people out of the home until their investigation was completed. Seems to me that only two people can legally allow anyone to come into their their home to remove personal items from the house that are not considered evidence, and one of them is dead. If Scott did not give permission himself, then I see a problem with this. After all, it is his house.

To me, there is insufficient information at this time to know whether this was illegal. It sounds like it could be. If nothing else, who's to say that some of the items taken weren't owned by Scott?

From the CNN link:
They took with them chairs, clothes, art work and other items that had presumably belonged to Laci Peterson. Chairs? As I said there is not enough information yet. I suppose the prosecution could argue that they may have been able to find blood or who knows what on some of these items, although it appears that the defense is the one complaining about this action. It is true that the house has been sitting for months, but that doesn't mean that useable evidence could not have been obtained, for either side. However, if the house was not considered a crime scene and sealed as such, then...well I dunno. That may have been a big mistake. It is known that family members have been in and out of the house repeatedly, though they claim nothing was disturbed.

I would think that since the house was owned by Laci and Scott that only Mr. Peterson could give permission for items to be taken from the home. If Scott's permission was not granted then I could see this being technically considered burglary. I would not assume that my mother-in-law (if I had one) could simply walk into my house and take things without consent. Who's to say what was his and what was hers anyways?

Again, it is not stated whether or not Scott, or anyone else, gave permission.

Crossbow (in bold):
- The items in question belonged to Laci Petersen (we don't know this)
- The action was was done in broad daylight with news media witnessing the event (true, doesn't mean it was legal or right)
- There was prior agreement between both parties (Scott and Laci) (I've seen no mention of this...might be true. That would change everything)
- There was a police presence that apparently agreed that all was in order (otherwise they would not have allowed the items to be taken and/or arrests would have been made). The people left shortly after the police arrived. The police may have been unaware of the circumstances)
Once again...we need more info. I personally think he's guilty, but I'm trying to be objective...not easy for me I'll admit.