PDA

View Full Version : Consumer advocate Tom Martino interviews 911 conspiracist James Fetzer

Ladewig
3rd August 2006, 06:33 PM
I'm not sure why Martino spent over 25 minutes interviewing Scholar for 9/11 Truth member James Fetzer, but he did.

Fetzer is full-on CONSPIRACY. When asked about the whether the government would do such a thing, he pointed to JFK's assassination, the US warship Maine being destroyed, and FDR's knowledge of Pearl Harbor.

I will be sending an e-mail to Martino asking him to poke around the JREF site. He should find it interesting both for debunking 9/11 falsehoods as well as exposing useless products like homeopathic water.
T.A.M.
3rd August 2006, 06:50 PM
is there a link to his interview, so we may pop some popcorn, pull up a chair, and have a listen?
Ladewig
3rd August 2006, 06:57 PM
is there a link to his interview, so we may pop some popcorn, pull up a chair, and have a listen?

It is on the radio right now if you have Martino's show in your area. The episodes sometimes repeat so check tomorrow's programs as well. http://troubleshooter.com/
Regnad Kcin
3rd August 2006, 07:21 PM
...Fetzer is full-on CONSPIRACY. When asked about the whether the government would do such a thing, he pointed to JFK's assassination, the US warship Maine being destroyed, and FDR's knowledge of Pearl Harbor."You say the moon is made out of white-cheddar popcorn?"

"Well, Saturn is composed of Tang powdered drink mix."

"Ah, I see."
American
3rd August 2006, 07:54 PM
Martino's OK, but he gets trigger-happy talking about things he knows nothing about. For one, he advocates for fertility doctors blindly and summarily dismisses health and ethical questions, just because he sees "beautiful, bouncing babies" come out.

One will not know for decades whether they are fit or wrought with genetic issues, not to mention the greater effect it could have on the population.

Well that's one example. One is one, and that's all I need to pass judgement. :drool:
juryjone
4th August 2006, 09:36 AM
Martino's OK, but he gets trigger-happy talking about things he knows nothing about. For one, he advocates for fertility doctors blindly and summarily dismisses health and ethical questions, just because he sees "beautiful, bouncing babies" come out.

One will not know for decades whether they are fit or wrought with genetic issues, not to mention the greater effect it could have on the population.

Well that's one example. One is one, and that's all I need to pass judgement. :drool:

Hey, American, could you do me a favor and tell me where to find your thread on the health and ethical questions brought on by in-vitro fertilization and other fertility techniques? I'm sure that it would make interesting reading, and I might have a comment or two to make.
American
4th August 2006, 11:44 AM
Hey, American, could you do me a favor and tell me where to find your thread on the health and ethical questions brought on by in-vitro fertilization and other fertility techniques? I'm sure that it would make interesting reading, and I might have a comment or two to make.

Not my job. You do it.
juryjone
4th August 2006, 12:14 PM
Not my job. You do it.

No thanks. Everybody's entitled to have opinions, even ones they're not willing to back up.
American
4th August 2006, 12:34 PM
No thanks. Everybody's entitled to have opinions, even ones they're not willing to back up.

You may believe that one is so entitled, but it has no bearing either way on anything I've said. Your proposal that I start a thread on some odd topic that interests you means that you read far too much into my statement in a desire to engage in debate about who the f- knows what... you haven't even said.