PDA

View Full Version : Troofers about to go ape-@#$% again


Sword_Of_Truth
7th August 2006, 05:24 PM
The cheif editor of POPULAR MECHANICS (OMG!) is on Bill O'Reilly right now debunking conspiracist bilge.

They're gonna go nuts over this.

defaultdotxbe
7th August 2006, 05:26 PM
sweet, need to look for a video later (at work now, no tv:( )

Sword_Of_Truth
7th August 2006, 05:26 PM
Bleh... it was even shorter than Brainsters spot on canadian radio the other day. =/

Donks
7th August 2006, 05:27 PM
They're gonna go nuts over this.
That ship has sailed. They may rant and rave a bit more than usual, but going nuts is mission accomplished.

MarkyX
7th August 2006, 05:46 PM
Man..

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I really want to watch Bill right now. I would to save this video and slap it on YouTube and on the Screw Loose Change website.

Cylinder
7th August 2006, 05:58 PM
Notice the the PM editor was also pimping what looked to be a nice-sized volume, Debunking 9/11 Myths. Very nice.

WildCat
7th August 2006, 06:09 PM
Notice the the PM editor was also pimping what looked to be a nice-sized volume, Debunking 9/11 Myths. Very nice.
By now the troofers have a whole slew of new nonsense not included in the book no doubt.

defaultdotxbe
7th August 2006, 06:18 PM
By now the troofers have a whole slew of new nonsense not included in the book no doubt.
you see the petition they have circulating now? they want the "scholars" to do a paper on how all the footage of the planes hitting the towers were faked live on tv with cgi

edit: Linky (http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html)

gumboot
7th August 2006, 06:19 PM
By now the troofers have a whole slew of new nonsense not included in the book no doubt.


Don't forget any debunked theory they can't worm their way around they'll simply claim was released as misinformation.

I just don't get the truthers.

I'd they'd show the link from MI6 and the CIA to Nazi-Arabs in the Muslim Brotherhood, then shown how they were employed in various roles, including Afghanistan, before establishing Al Qaeda, I'd be willing to accept that the US government paid them to carry out the attack for oil or gold or whatever they think the motive is.

Such a storyline is vaguely plausible, has roots in actual history, and directly matches all the physical evidence.

Why the nonsense? Why?

-Andrew

WildCat
7th August 2006, 06:24 PM
Why the nonsense? Why?
My guess is that they're stupid. Occam's razor and all...

Cylinder
7th August 2006, 06:29 PM
Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/103-8361777-5080652?redirect=true)

The original article in POPULAR MECHANICS caused a huge groundswell of interest, setting off online debates that continue to this day. Debunking 9/11 Myths expands that investigation to include the 20 most prominent and persistent claims underlying the conspiracy theories, focusing on concrete, physical facts rather than political hypothesizing. Among the issues examined: claims that air traffic control violated standard operating procedures by not immediately intercepting the stricken jets; that the fire caused by the crashes wasn’t actually hot enough to melt steel and cause structural damage in the World Trade Center; that the holes in the Pentagon were too small to have been made by a Boeing 757; and that Flight 93 was actually shot down by an Air Force plane.

The fascinating and in-depth findings come from leading experts in all the relevant fields, including aviation, air defense, air traffic control, civil engineering, firefighting, metallurgy, and geology.

$13 for a 200-page paperback. It is yet to be released and has a foreword written by Sen. McCain.