View Full Version : Edgar Cayce, Reincarnated
Meri
10th August 2006, 12:08 PM
I found this (http://speedoflove.iwarp.com/caycesback2/Page_1x.htm) through a google ad, and thought it was interesting enough to post here. Apparently, Edgar Cayce has been reincarnated as a guy named David Wilcock. And it must be true. After all, they've convinced Uri Geller.
coalesce
10th August 2006, 12:13 PM
And it's on the Internet, which makes even more truer!
Michael
Arkan_Wolfshade
10th August 2006, 12:23 PM
And it's on the Internet, which makes even more truer!
Michael
Oh goody. Someone tell Rodney.
Apathia
10th August 2006, 01:09 PM
I'm the reincarnation of Gregory Rasputin, and I tell it's a lie!
Wolverine
10th August 2006, 01:51 PM
I thought he'd already posited two lifetimes' worth of errant claims and failed predictions...
Meri
10th August 2006, 01:52 PM
I'm the reincarnation of Gregory Rasputin, and I tell it's a lie!
Yes, but do you have a badly done web page? Because without one, none of us can believe you.
Rodney
10th August 2006, 05:32 PM
I found this (http://speedoflove.iwarp.com/caycesback2/Page_1x.htm) through a google ad, and thought it was interesting enough to post here. Apparently, Edgar Cayce has been reincarnated as a guy named David Wilcock. And it must be true. After all, they've convinced Uri Geller.
But they haven't convinced Cayce's organization, the Association for Research and Enlightenment: "At the present time, A.R.E. does not believe that Edgar Cayce has returned." See http://www.edgarcayce.org/question_answers.asp#ecrencarn
thaiboxerken
10th August 2006, 05:42 PM
A.R.E probably isn't getting any share of the profits, thus they aren't going to endorse this guy.
Rodney
10th August 2006, 06:20 PM
A.R.E probably isn't getting any share of the profits, thus they aren't going to endorse this guy.
You should team with Dylan Avery to develop the Grand Unified Theory of Conspiracy.
thaiboxerken
10th August 2006, 06:22 PM
There is no conspiracy involved. The A.R.E. makes money by perpetuating mythology. They don't condone this other guy's claims because they aren't getting paid to.
Rodney
10th August 2006, 06:37 PM
There is no conspiracy involved. The A.R.E. makes money by perpetuating mythology. They don't condone this other guy's claims because they aren't getting paid to.
Where is your evidence? Avery can't document his claims about 9-11 and you can't document yours about the ARE and Cayce.
thaiboxerken
10th August 2006, 06:45 PM
Where is your evidence?
The evidence is that they aren't perpetuating fact. They make money by telling people that Eddie had superpowers.
Euromutt
11th August 2006, 04:03 AM
A.R.E probably isn't getting any share of the profits, thus they aren't going to endorse this guy.An analysis with which I am much inclined to agree. Problem is, TBK, that you've just indicated why a lack of endorsement by the A.R.E. does not constitute evidence that Wilcock isn't Cayce reincarnate.
thaiboxerken
11th August 2006, 09:51 AM
That kind of critical thought is above Rodney's ability to understand. Perhaps you can explain it to him, Euromutt.
Psiload
11th August 2006, 09:55 AM
I found this (http://speedoflove.iwarp.com/caycesback2/Page_1x.htm) through a google ad, and thought it was interesting enough to post here. Apparently, Edgar Cayce has been reincarnated as a guy named David Wilcock. And it must be true. After all, they've convinced Uri Geller.
What's his opinion on almonds?
Rodney
11th August 2006, 11:23 AM
The evidence is that they aren't perpetuating fact.I can always count on you to overwhelm me with evidence. ;)
thaiboxerken
11th August 2006, 11:32 AM
Evidence of my speculation?! Are you dense?
Psiload
11th August 2006, 11:38 AM
I can always count on you to overwhelm me with evidence. ;)
As linked directly from the A.R.E. homepage:
http://arebookstore.com/category.asp?c=162&sid=intec
Astrology charts.
Solid evidence that the A.R.E. perpetuates mythology, pseudoscience, nonsense, etc...
Rodney
11th August 2006, 11:42 AM
Evidence of my speculation?! Are you dense? So you're conceding that your assertion that "[t]hey (the ARE) don't condone this other guy's claims because they aren't getting paid to" is merely speculation?
thaiboxerken
11th August 2006, 11:52 AM
Yes, Rodney, it's speculation based on the FACT that they make money by perpetuation myths.
Tricky
11th August 2006, 12:23 PM
What's his opinion on almonds?Right. And is he working out of Atlantis?
Meri
11th August 2006, 01:23 PM
Right. And is he working out of Atlantis?
I don't think so, but he does make his predictions while asleep, so that's somthing.
Arkan_Wolfshade
11th August 2006, 01:32 PM
I don't think so, but he does make his predictions while asleep, so that's somthing.
Perhaps it's not Atlantis; perhaps it's R'lyeh.
Psiload
11th August 2006, 01:46 PM
Just wondering... now that Eddie is back, is he owning up to all of his spectacularly inaccurate prognostications?
Poor David... he's got a lot of 'splaining to do.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.