View Full Version : Killtown: why is the "truth" so complicated?
defaultdotxbe
17th August 2006, 02:30 PM
why blow up feild in PA and say a 757 crashed there? why not just crash a remote-controlled 757?
why bother with this at all? wasnt the WTC and pentagon attacks enough?
why fire a missile at the pentagon and say it was a 757? why not just say it was a smaller plane, or just a missile?
or why not crash a 757 into the pentagon if you need the airliner there?
why use CGI aircraft at the WTC? why not use real planes there too?
if the govt can insert a CGI plane into the live CNN feed why couldnt they put a plane into the pentagon gate camera footage?
there are many more questions, but i will leave it at these for now
TK0001
17th August 2006, 02:32 PM
Follow the link, follow the link.
Sword_Of_Truth
17th August 2006, 02:38 PM
It's teh j000000sss!!!!
defaultdotxbe
17th August 2006, 02:41 PM
apparently those jews have never heard of KISS (keep it simple, schlomo)
Darth Rotor
17th August 2006, 03:00 PM
apparently those jews have never heard of KISS (keep it simple, schlomo)
That would be KISS: Kosher, Icelandic Salmon, Sandwich
(A lower cholesterol option vis a vis Bagel and Lox)
Let's get our acronyms in order here, shall we? :cool:
DR
LashL
17th August 2006, 09:12 PM
Is it just me or does anyone else get the impression that killtown's only purpose here is to drive traffic to his awful blog?
It just seems like his only "answer" to anything is "see my blog" - and having seen it before, I am not willing to boost his stats by visiting it repeatedly just because he floats unsubstantiated and unsustainable theories as "100% proof" and "smoking guns" and all of that. That site is vile, full of horrible accusations against innocent people, and next to zero actual facts or evidence.
Regnad Kcin
17th August 2006, 09:41 PM
That would be KISS: Kosher, Icelandic Salmon, Sandwich...I thought it was Knights In Satan's Service. I just can't keep up with you kids and your boom-de-boom.
Matthew Best
18th August 2006, 01:34 AM
Does Killtown make money from ads on his blog?
I'm just asking a question.
Hawkeye
18th August 2006, 03:43 AM
why use CGI aircraft at the WTC? why not use real planes there too?
Hold the presses! Are CTers seriously now claiming that the video of planes hitting the towers is fake now? :eek:
Oh dear...
Forget about the "motives" of using CGI, how do they explain the thousands of people who witnessed what actually happened first hand? Did the government secretly transmit mind control waves to fool their brains into thinking they were seeing real planes?
So much for Occam’s razor...
:bwall
Gravy
18th August 2006, 04:16 AM
Hold the presses! Are CTers seriously now claiming that the video of planes hitting the towers is fake now? :eek:
Oh dear...
Forget about the "motives" of using CGI, how do they explain the thousands of people who witnessed what actually happened first hand? Did the government secretly transmit mind control waves to fool their brains into thinking they were seeing real planes?
So much for Occam’s razor...
:bwall
Ah, yes, welcome to the world of the "no-planers." The claim that no planes hit the towers has been around for years, although only the wackiest of the CTs subscribe to it. The most prominent is Morgan Reynolds (http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html), former Chief Economist in George W. Bush's first-term Department of Labor. :eek:
Unfortunately, the idea that no 757s crashed in Pennsylvania or at the Pentagon are still "mainstream" in CT land.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.