View Full Version : UNreal
Giz
18th August 2006, 08:45 AM
(Todays award for understatement going to Dan Gillerman, Israeli UN envoy, describing the proposed UN "peace keeping" force:
"It would be very difficult if not inconceivable for Israel to accept troops from countries who do not recognise Israel, who have no diplomatic relations with Israel," he told the BBC. He said they would be "very happy" to accept troops from Muslim countries they have friendly relations with.
"But to expect countries who don't even recognise Israel to guard Israel's safety I think would be a bit naive," he said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5262490.stm
How can any "non-aligned" UN members have thought that this could be acceptable? Guarded by people who don't recognise your right to exist?
Just thinking
18th August 2006, 09:37 AM
"I may not believe in your sovereignty, but I will defend to the death your right not to exist!"
pipelineaudio
18th August 2006, 09:45 AM
ugh, this is going to end badly, its also going to look badly on israel, when israel WILL have to attack back thru UN do nothingness, hit some UN troops and then all the woo woo nazis will REALLY be screaming for israel's head
Dr Adequate
18th August 2006, 02:25 PM
Wow ... you've become even less coherent.
But how?
NoZed Avenger
18th August 2006, 02:40 PM
(Almost) no French troops now:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/17/AR2006081700813.html
I thought they had pledged 5,000 when the talks first started. (I may be remembering it wrong, of course).
If the UN can't even scare up the initial force to patrol the area, what then?!
Azure
18th August 2006, 05:19 PM
Wow, the cease fire agreement is doing wonders.
a_unique_person
18th August 2006, 05:31 PM
"It would be very difficult if not inconceivable for Israel to accept troops from countries who do not recognise Israel, who have no diplomatic relations with Israel," he told the BBC. He said they would be "very happy" to accept troops from Muslim countries they have friendly relations with.
I thought Israel was surrounded by rabid anti-zionists who only want it's destruction, or at least that's what I'm told here. Apparently that isn't so.
Azure
18th August 2006, 05:31 PM
I thought Israel was surrounded by rabid anti-zionists who only want it's destruction, or at least that's what I'm told here. Apparently that isn't so.
Where'd you hear that from?
You need to get out more. :D
Giz
18th August 2006, 07:43 PM
I thought Israel was surrounded by rabid anti-zionists who only want it's destruction, or at least that's what I'm told here. Apparently that isn't so.
Do you see Israel's objection as reasonable? Yes/no answer please.
(For bonus points you could confirm that while some Muslim states - say Turkey - are relatively friendly, and others - say Egypt - have peace treaties, still others - say Syria - could be accurately described as anti-zionist/Israel/semetic. But of course you know this and are just playing word games.)
webfusion
18th August 2006, 07:54 PM
Israeli jets are apparently flying bombing sorties again -- taking out specific Hezbollah targets in the Bekaa Valley, along the Syrian border.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/israeli-rockets-strike-lebanon-report/2006/08/19/1155408054913.html
The IDF spokeperson said it was 'checking the report' ---
pipelineaudio
18th August 2006, 07:58 PM
Wow ... you've become even less coherent.
But how?
What part do you need help with?
Dr Adequate
19th August 2006, 02:56 AM
The post written by you.
The other posters are perfectly lucid.
Perhaps one of them could explain to you about punctuation.
pipelineaudio
19th August 2006, 03:29 AM
Interesting ( ... )
zenith-nadir
19th August 2006, 06:19 AM
(Almost) no French troops now:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/17/AR2006081700813.html
I thought they had pledged 5,000 when the talks first started. (I may be remembering it wrong, of course).
If the UN can't even scare up the initial force to patrol the area, what then?!
The French were front and center for Israel to stop its military operations...and they were front and center to draft up a U.N. Security Council resolution to stop Israel's military operations....but when it came time for someone else to deal with Hezbollah militarily France "stepped up to the plate" :rolleyes: with 200 soldiers. YEAH! Israel is saved!
p.s. Even Bangladesh has pledged more troops than "Old Europe" ;) AKA Mighty France.
a_unique_person
19th August 2006, 06:59 AM
Bangladesh, unfortunately, has to do this as a source of revenue as much as anything else.
BPSCG
19th August 2006, 07:00 AM
Wow ... you've become even less coherent.
But how?Dr Adequate is a TLA winner?
C'mon, the guy is such a [rule8].
Oh, well, let's click on the icon and see...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I take my hat off. Superb.
But you're still a [rule8]. No offense. :D
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.