PDA

View Full Version : Most Puzzling 9/11 Logic Questions and Answers


T.A.M.
25th August 2006, 08:18 PM
I have created this thread for two purposes:

1. A place for Debunkers to place their most puzzling, logic defying questions wrt to CTs of 9/11.

2. To give CTers a chance to explain, so I can better understand, their answers to these questions.


I will start off with a couple...

1. If the Hijackers were part of the cover up story, a story that involved the murder of 3000 people, then why would the US govt, responsible for this atrocity, allow some of the hijackers to live after 9/11, as CTers claim?

2. If the role of the Planes in the 9/11 attacks, were to instill fear in the public, then why didn't the govt also crash planes on the west coast, into some big buildings there? And why the crash in Shanksville (or if you prefer, why shoot down or crash one of the planes that you had put up there yourself to run into a building in the first place)?

I am sure the people here can come up with lots more, and I would really like some honest though out answers from the CT community?

Loss Leader
25th August 2006, 08:31 PM
I predict that this will go nowhere. The CT's don't have a consistent world-view. They have no big picture into which the pieces all fit. All they have are little, out-of-context scraps - a commend Rumsfeld made at a press conference, a remark the owner of WTC7 made, some screenshots from flight simulator, Sylvia Browne's insistance that a 9/11 firefighter drowned inside the World Trade Center. They can't answer your questions.

defaultdotxbe
25th August 2006, 08:32 PM
my basic question is why so many coverups

why shoot a missile at the pentagon and pretend it was a plane (why not just use a plane, or say it was a missile)

why use CGI planes instead of real ones?

why blow up a bomb in shanksville and say that was a plane?

T.A.M.
25th August 2006, 08:42 PM
LL:

I think you MIGHT be right. I am optimistic that some of the braver CTers may come here and give it a shot.

If nothing more, it might give us a thread to list our favorite complaints with their lack of logic...

We will see.

TAM

T.A.M.
26th August 2006, 07:33 AM
:bump4

gotta do it just once, to see if anyone wants to post...

kevin
26th August 2006, 07:47 AM
2. If the role of the Planes in the 9/11 attacks, were to instill fear in the public, then why didn't the govt also crash planes on the west coast, into some big buildings there? And why the crash in Shanksville (or if you prefer, why shoot down or crash one of the planes that you had put up there yourself to run into a building in the first place)?


[ct_mode=on]
If 9/11 hadn't gotten them what they wanted there was a plan to set off the san andreas fault.

Shanksville was to create heroes to worship.
[ct_mode=off]

chacal
26th August 2006, 08:10 AM
my basic question is why so many coverups

why shoot a missile at the pentagon and pretend it was a plane (why not just use a plane, or say it was a missile)

why use CGI planes instead of real ones?

why blow up a bomb in shanksville and say that was a plane?


I asked a similar question from a CT on another forum some time ago.
The answer is... <drums> ... Outsourcing! You see, different parts of the operation were outsourced to different clandestine intelligence agencies that didn't know of each other. Other teams used fake planes others didn't. It all makes sence now.

gumboot
26th August 2006, 08:12 AM
[ct_mode=on]
If 9/11 hadn't gotten them what they wanted there was a plan to set off the san andreas fault.[ct_mode=off]


Ugh... have you seen "Ground Zero" too? One of the worst movies of all time...

-Andrew

Loss Leader
26th August 2006, 12:10 PM
Told you this wouldn't go anywhere. (Just for a minute, let's all do the bump.)

Axiom_Blade
26th August 2006, 01:19 PM
If the intent was to provide a rationale for invading Iraq, why not frame Hussein instead of bin Laden?

T.A.M.
26th August 2006, 04:27 PM
Ah well...It was worth a try...I guess no CTers will bite...so I will let it go, and throw each logical corruption out one at a time, as they appear...

ktesibios
26th August 2006, 06:35 PM
I asked a similar question from a CT on another forum some time ago.
The answer is... <drums> ... Outsourcing! You see, different parts of the operation were outsourced to different clandestine intelligence agencies that didn't know of each other. Other teams used fake planes others didn't. It all makes sence now.

Continuing along the same lines...

So the hijackers were H1Bs?