View Full Version : Did I just made "9/11 Deniers" term a bit more mainstream?
MarkyX
8th September 2006, 09:30 AM
Or maybe not...
But HotAir.com did a really great video today on, in her words, "9/11 Deniers"
Did my 9/11 Deniers Speak video made the term acceptable now? I know she did watch the video, as well as Screw Loose Change. :eek:
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/08/creeping-democrat-dementia/#comments
Arkan_Wolfshade
8th September 2006, 09:32 AM
W00t! Getting "Truth" out of their name will go a long way.
Pardalis
8th September 2006, 10:48 AM
Who knows? But it certainly proves that the term is damn right accurate. :)
juryjone
8th September 2006, 01:11 PM
Or maybe not...
But HotAir.com did a really great video today on, in her words, "9/11 Deniers"
Actually, she ripped into Democrats, painting them all as Deniers. She also ignored the fact that many of the Deniers are ultra right-wing, anti-semite fascists.
9/11 stupidity knows no political boundaries. To place them firmly in one party is disingenuous at best. However, I think Michelle knew what she was doing - using Deniers to fling mud at the entire Democratic Party.
chipmunk stew
8th September 2006, 01:19 PM
Actually, she ripped into Democrats, painting them all as Deniers. She also ignored the fact that many of the Deniers are ultra right-wing, anti-semite fascists.
9/11 stupidity knows no political boundaries. To place them firmly in one party is disingenuous at best. However, I think Michelle knew what she was doing - using Deniers to fling mud at the entire Democratic Party.
Yeah, if the Democrats were in power right now, there would be one or two Republican Deniers making a good showing, and this same bucket-o-mud would be in the Democrats' arsenal.
Remember all those people the Clintons murdered?
edit: but I hope the term does catch on...
Sword_Of_Truth
8th September 2006, 01:36 PM
As a Canadian who prefers republicans to be running our powerful neighbor, I've honestly said to various left of center CTers that they are Karl Roves wet dream.
Any savvy campaign manager would grab himself a bucket of tar along with the widest brush he can find and just swing away. These guys are going to push the hotly sought after swing voters into republican hands.
Democrats (and the Liberal Party and NDP up here) should be pushing these nuts to the side at the very least for thier own good.
MarkyX
8th September 2006, 01:44 PM
Actually, she ripped into Democrats, painting them all as Deniers. She also ignored the fact that many of the Deniers are ultra right-wing, anti-semite fascists.
9/11 stupidity knows no political boundaries. To place them firmly in one party is disingenuous at best. However, I think Michelle knew what she was doing - using Deniers to fling mud at the entire Democratic Party.
Well you can't diminish the fact that it's mostly democrats who get into huge conspriacies..
- Election Fraud
- The CIA leak
- Anything related to Karl Rove
- 9/11
But even though I think the majority of the members are democrats, they are being funded or supplied by extreme right wingers. You just need to look at Alex Jones and American Free Press.
Heck, if any democrat got into a debate with Alex Jones, Jones would call them "NWO shills" when it came to firearms.
EDIT: I almost forgot on how many times I am reminded by the 9/11 Deniers on how I should be busy giving head to George Bush instead of doing videos.
juryjone
8th September 2006, 01:51 PM
Democrats (and the Liberal Party and NDP up here) should be pushing these nuts to the side at the very least for thier own good.
They would be if they had a clue, just as Republicans should be pushing away the fundamentalist nutters. But no party seems to be willing to push away a single vote...
Heck, if any democrat got into a debate with Alex Jones, Jones would call them "NWO shills" when it came to firearms.
That's all I'm sayin'.
EDIT: I almost forgot on how many times I am reminded by the 9/11 Deniers on how I should be busy giving head to George Bush instead of doing videos.
Would that be from Democrats, or Republicans who find GWB too left-wing?;)
carlvs
8th September 2006, 02:36 PM
Actually, she ripped into Democrats, painting them all as Deniers. She also ignored the fact that many of the Deniers are ultra right-wing, anti-semite fascists.
9/11 stupidity knows no political boundaries. To place them firmly in one party is disingenuous at best. However, I think Michelle knew what she was doing - using Deniers to fling mud at the entire Democratic Party.
And that is the exact reason I have such contempt for the 9/11 "truth" movement... the only people who are being helped by their rantings and attacks on those who don't agree to their "facts" are those on the right:mad:
edit: embolden text
Brainster
8th September 2006, 03:14 PM
And that is the exact reason I have such contempt for the 9/11 "truth" movement... the only people who are being helped by their rantings and attacks on those who don't agree to their "facts" are those on the right:mad:
edit: embolden text
Hence the effort by the lefty gatekeepers (Corn, Kos, Chomsky and Goodman, all of whom get rare kudos from me) to prevent these theories from gaining a toehold.
chipmunk stew
8th September 2006, 03:33 PM
Well you can't diminish the fact that it's mostly democrats who get into huge conspriacies..
- Election Fraud
- The CIA leak
- Anything related to Karl Rove
- 9/11
I don't know, man. All the best ones come from the far right:
- The Gay Agenda
- The Jewish Media
- The Liberal Press
- The Clinton Murders
- The Zionist Illuminati
- The Darwinist Satanists
to name a few. ;)
ktesibios
8th September 2006, 03:45 PM
And that is the exact reason I have such contempt for the 9/11 "truth" movement... the only people who are being helped by their rantings and attacks on those who don't agree to their "facts" are those on the right:mad:
edit: embolden text
Well, I personally find it extremely offensive to see people who would undoubtedly self-identify as "progressive" happily perpetuating the paranoid conspiracist cultural tradition of the John Birch Society. That's a very unhealthy development.
Although there's probably a dissertation in it for some enterprising grad student in social psychology.
ryanebelhar
8th September 2006, 04:34 PM
Screw Loose Change was mentioned in US News and World Report this week.
defaultdotxbe
8th September 2006, 07:57 PM
- The Darwinist Satanists
darn those satanic athiests! lol
LashL
8th September 2006, 08:11 PM
The term "9/11 Deniers" is fitting and accurate. I don't care which side of the political spectrum endorses it first... I just hope that all sides of the political spectrum embrace it and repeat it over and over and over and over and over and over.... you get the idea :)
Way to go, Mark!
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.