PDA

View Full Version : Third footage of AA11 crash ? the heck ?

Bell
15th September 2006, 06:10 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8KBiym4Yd8

:eek:

Anyone seen this before?
realitybites
15th September 2006, 06:14 AM
The fireball looks much worse from that angle than from the Naudet film....
TK0001
15th September 2006, 06:24 AM
Can someone please host it elsewhere so I can see it?
rikzilla
15th September 2006, 07:25 AM
Wow.

That camera appears to have the same kind of per-frame-rate that the Pentagon camera had...but had a much wider view.

It's far enough away that the plane almost looks "missile-like". I can imagine that if this was the only footage of that strike we'd be hearing the same crap out of the CTers about WTC1 as we do about the Pentagon. Apparently if it's not filmed it didn't happen....

So does that mean if it was filmed it did happen? Damn! Captain Kirk is real!!! Beam me up Scotty!! :hit:

-z

(and BTW...what about that UFO that de-cloaks in the last frame!!??) :eek:
Bell
15th September 2006, 07:31 AM
(and BTW...what about that UFO that de-cloaks in the last frame!!??) :eek:

I think it's the same as this one?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-93485617365460579&q=wtc+ufo
ElWampa
15th September 2006, 08:07 AM
Here's a better quality one. It's from the Sci-Fi Channel, I think. Gotta love what computers can do these day, eh? That and poor compression. ;-)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4521482851149317053&q
dissonance
15th September 2006, 08:19 AM
The fireball looks much worse from that angle than from the Naudet film....


Wow, yeah. And you really see how the damage goes right through the building. It's not like the planes strike and are swallowed up. The damage must have been from one side of the building all the way through to the other. Actually, when you watch all the different footage of the 2nd plane, you really get a feel for how different it looks from different angles, so I'm not sure why I'm so surprised by how different that footage looks from the Naudet's.

The 'the planes weren't enough to cause collapse' theories just don't make any sense. When I watch the video of the planes hitting, I'm frankly amazed the buildings (especially the tower that was hit lower down) didn't collapse sooner. The structural damage inside must have been massive.
Bell
15th September 2006, 01:59 PM
Anywho, since this new Pentagon video came up, and that other thread with those Pentapictures, I thought I'd *bump* this one thread.
Kent1
15th September 2006, 02:12 PM
Wow, yeah. And you really see how the damage goes right through the building. It's not like the planes strike and are swallowed up. The damage must have been from one side of the building all the way through to the other. Actually, when you watch all the different footage of the 2nd plane, you really get a feel for how different it looks from different angles, so I'm not sure why I'm so surprised by how different that footage looks from the Naudet's.

The 'the planes weren't enough to cause collapse' theories just don't make any sense. When I watch the video of the planes hitting, I'm frankly amazed the buildings (especially the tower that was hit lower down) didn't collapse sooner. The structural damage inside must have been massive.
If you want to see a wild shot of how the plane blasts through the building, check this out.
http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0110/main04.htm
defaultdotxbe
15th September 2006, 02:25 PM
Wow, yeah. And you really see how the damage goes right through the building. It's not like the planes strike and are swallowed up. The damage must have been from one side of the building all the way through to the other. Actually, when you watch all the different footage of the 2nd plane, you really get a feel for how different it looks from different angles, so I'm not sure why I'm so surprised by how different that footage looks from the Naudet's.

The 'the planes weren't enough to cause collapse' theories just don't make any sense. When I watch the video of the planes hitting, I'm frankly amazed the buildings (especially the tower that was hit lower down) didn't collapse sooner. The structural damage inside must have been massive.

yeah,. didnt a wheel from flight 11 punch all the way through the tower and fly out the other side and was founf liek 700ft down the road? that would mean it was still moving over 100mph when it exited the building

just a feel for how devastating the impacts really were