Chavez hilarity on the UK 911 CT forum

[GlennB]

Poor old moderate CT'ist DeFecToR is trying to knock the rabble into some kind of order over there.
Latest state of play is here (http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=26782#26782) (start at the top of the page)

[TK0001]

Oh, so he is there today. I'm still waiting for him to admit his screw-up in the "Jay Ref is an Admitted Liar" thread. Weird how he keeps missing it every time I bump it...

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

So DeFecToR doesn't like the taste of his own medicine eh?

[TK0001]

I must say it's tough to keep from chiming in, saying something akin to "It's pretty tough to make these people see the light, huh 'fector?"

Maybe we should pop in there and start saying Chavez is legit too, just to really gum up the works...

[Mancman]

What a bunch of twits.

[GlennB]

I must say it's tough to keep from chiming in, saying something akin to "It's pretty tough to make these people see the light, huh 'fector?"

Maybe we should pop in there and start saying Chavez is legit too, just to really gum up the works...

That would be very naughty.

[stateofgrace]

Is this thread a new episode of Fawlty Towers?

:dl:

Now that was naughty

[jhunter1163]

Basil, there's a kipper sticking out of your jacket...

[NickUK]

It pains me to say it as a Brit, but the UK crew are by far the most potent ejaculators of stupid in the bukkakefest that is the 9/11 truth movement.

I can manage 5 minutes over there tops. I dunno how Rik manages to keep his cool over there.

[chipmunk stew]

It pains me to say it as a Brit, but the UK crew are by far the most potent ejaculators of stupid in the bukkakefest that is the 9/11 truth movement.

I can manage 5 minutes over there tops. I dunno how Rik manages to keep his cool over there.
At least they're populated with a sprinkling of moderate LIHOP'ers (John White, for instance). In every prominent US Truthiness site I can think of, LIHOP'ers and other moderates get run out of town on a rail.

[negativ]

At least they're populated with a sprinkling of moderate LIHOP'ers (John White, for instance). In every prominent US Truthiness site I can think of, LIHOP'ers and other moderates get run out of town on a rail.

"Moderate" Truthers... :boggled:

My world grows more surreal by the day.

[chipmunk stew]

"Moderate" Truthers... :boggled:

My world grows more surreal by the day.
I've gotten a little too deep into this, haven't I?

It's like being able to recognize the differences between turquoise, aqua, and seafoam. :scared:

[GlennB]

I've gotten a little too deep into this, haven't I?

It's like being able to recognize the differences between turquoise, aqua, and seafoam. :scared:

Yes, go out and get drunk. I know I have !!

[stateofgrace]

At least they're populated with a sprinkling of moderate LIHOP'ers (John White, for instance). In every prominent US Truthiness site I can think of, LIHOP'ers and other moderates get run out of town on a rail.

Chipmunk you need to take a break from that place, it's starting to effect your ability to think straight ( only joking)

Actually what you say is correct I was very surprised at a reply I got from one of them in the critics corner after pasting TAMS post.


thats a fair point.
my only problem here is the assertion that the film '9/11 press for truth' is our self-proclaimed ultimate representation is somewhat assumptive. and whats more I can't help but feel that the underlying motivation in making this comment, is fuelled by the view that 9/11 is best left alone and not investigated further.
There are many crazy theories put forward by people in 'the movement', personally I strongly disagree with many of them. If your frustration at the existance of the 'truth movement' is simply that excessive speculation is abundant and is also discrediting the victims of 9/11 then I fully understand. From my point of view I wish the movement would seriously cut down on over confident conclusions formed on inconclusive evidence.. yes.
In many ways it's unfortunate that the first alternative 9/11 documentary of high quality production and wide public assessibility (Loose Change) has become a trademark of the 9/11 truth movement. It's unfortunate because it does contain heavy speculation and draws its conclusions very confidently, when much of the evidence it sites is inconclusive. Sadly this is part of the reason it has been so successful. People want answers, and loose change provides them in an exciting manner. However, in the process it brings to the viewers attention, many pieces of compelling evidence which are contradictory to the official story and were most likely not known to the viewer previously. On watching Loose Change you have a choice, you can take note of the evidence for yourself, do your own reaserch and form your own opinion, or you can let yourself become angry at the parts which draw conclusion over-confidently, accept the official story and decide to dismiss any investigation into the truth. While you're at it you can agressively ridicule anyone casting doubt on the official story.
In some ways though... I can't help but sympathize with even the more gung-ho theorists. American mainstream politicial culture has been promoting this attitude for years! Look at 9/11.. what have we got? the biggest terrorist attack on America in history. What did the whitehouse say? 'lets not investigate it, that would take valueable resources away from punishing the purpertrators'. Then they/we went and attacked Iraq with 9/11 as the pretext. Can you really blame people for having slightly over active imaginations when the whitehouse and our mainstream media are so trigger-happy?
Yes. theories about holograms, missiles hitting the pentagon, calls being faked, towers being demolished shouldn't go uncontended. But is it right people voicing these theories should be met with such aggressive ridicule?
What this film has done for me, is made me realize that the loons of the "truth" movement have distracted many of us from realizing that a part of their "movement" are legitimate people, with legitimate questions for their government. Now if the vast majority of their questions have been answered through the Commission report and all the other information out there, than fine, but if the victim families of the 9/11 attacks feel that the vast majority of their questions have gone unanswered, to their satisfaction, than I say they have a right to the answers.

obsolutely, fair enough. the only divide I can see between myself and the poster of this quote is that they probably have more faith in establishment and government than I do.