PDA

View Full Version : Spooked911 Asks Questions and Demands Answers

Sword_Of_Truth
29th September 2006, 09:47 PM
Though the answers should be kinda obvious. (http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/09/flight-simulator-modeling-critique.html) :p
LashL
29th September 2006, 09:50 PM
Yeah, and he thinks that a rabbit cage and a cup of kerosene is sufficient to prove that the WTC twin towers must have been brought down by controlled demolitions.


Enough said.
WildCat
29th September 2006, 10:08 PM
Yeah, and he thinks that a rabbit cage and a cup of kerosene is sufficient to prove that the WTC twin towers must have been brought down by controlled demolitions.


Enough said.
I'd love to do a parody of that, set off a pack of firecrackers inside the cage to prove it couldn't have been taken down w/ explosives.
Anti-sophist
29th September 2006, 10:43 PM
If we assume 9/11 was a massive psy-ops campaign, then we can assume that nothing about 9/11 is really as it seems.Oh god that hurts my brain. Did he steal that out of a logical fallacy textbook?
DarkMagician
30th September 2006, 02:06 AM
My favorite reply:
Anonymous said...

Calling it a video game isn't substantive? In that case, I played this game Rampage... and I had to punch out holes in at least 2/3 of a building before it would fall. This is clear evidence of a coverup, too, since the WTC had at most 1% of it's outsides punched in.
Bell
30th September 2006, 02:19 AM
The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!

9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!

:hb:
Beerina
30th September 2006, 06:21 AM
Though the answers should be kinda obvious. (http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/09/flight-simulator-modeling-critique.html) :p

No wonder you guys have a tough time picking your jaw up off the floor with these guys. (http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/09/indisputable-evidence-official-911.html)

Let's just paste in an arbitrarily-sized plane and say "see, it's way different in size" (and even that claim is wrong.)

When he clearly lists the tower width vs. width of the planes, scales them accordingly, then pastes a crystal clear plane on a crystal clear tower, then simultaneously blurs both, not just the plane, until the tower looks like the blurred tower, then I'll listen.

But they violate Occam's razor yet again. Why go through all that work for "the second plane", but do it a different way for the first? Couldn't the government just buy a 767 instead of a 737? Was some conspirator saying, "****! We took over a 767 but are using a 737 to hit the tower! I hope nobody notices! :rolleyes:
Loss Leader
30th September 2006, 08:56 AM
I'd love to do a parody of that, set off a pack of firecrackers inside the cage to prove it couldn't have been taken down w/ explosives.

Actually, I'd like to rig up a little model rocket. Then we could set off the firecrackers, then shoot the rocket at the cage, then light the kerosene. Then let's throw a frog at it. I'm not sure what it would prove, but I'm pretty sure it'd be cool.
jhunter1163
30th September 2006, 09:02 AM
I'm sure he only titled the thread the way he did because "Spooked911 JAQs Off" might be taken as a breach of Rule 8.
Anti-sophist
30th September 2006, 10:48 AM
My favorite reply:
Quote:
Anonymous said...

Calling it a video game isn't substantive? In that case, I played this game Rampage... and I had to punch out holes in at least 2/3 of a building before it would fall. This is clear evidence of a coverup, too, since the WTC had at most 1% of it's outsides punched in.

I was in a pretty sarcastic mood :(
Bell
30th September 2006, 10:52 AM
I was in a pretty sarcastic mood :(

I think we got that ;)

It was a good post, btw.
Anti-sophist
30th September 2006, 11:01 AM
It won't let me post my link until I have 15 posts :(

Realisitic computer simulation disproves 9/11 tower collapse possible given damage:
doc-ock-rampage.freeonlinegames.com/images/2887.jpg
T.A.M.
30th September 2006, 11:12 AM
I normally stay off the CT blogs, but you baited me...yu ragscallion. Now I've gone and made fun.

TAM:D
Arkan_Wolfshade
30th September 2006, 02:58 PM
It won't let me post my link until I have 15 posts :(

Realisitic computer simulation disproves 9/11 tower collapse possible given damage:
doc-ock-rampage.freeonlinegames.com/images/2887.jpg

Nice. Relinked for convenience here (http://doc-ock-rampage.freeonlinegames.com/images/2887.jpg)
defaultdotxbe
30th September 2006, 03:38 PM
The Official 9/11 Story IS a Conspiracy Theory!

9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
:hb:
this is why i suggest changing "conspiracy theory" to "massive coverup theory" since it isnt the conspiracy that implausible, its the coverup