Fake moonlanding proves 9/11 inside job.

[Bell]

So galls and guys, wassup? http://67.15.129.139/6014/152/emo/wavetowel2.gif

Like, I heard that the Space Shuttle or whatever landed on the moon was faked?
Something about that there were no stars on the American flag or something?
And the rocks in the picture said something like "property of Paramount picture"? http://67.15.129.139/6014/152/emo/Crylol.gif

Sorry if I don't get all the facts right, but I'm just too lazy to do a bit of researching myself. http://67.15.129.139/6014/152/emo/salute.gif

So, I figured, if the Nasa/US gov (=NWO evil Jews) went to all this trouble and faked these moonlandings,
then I have no doubt 9/11 was an inside job and it all was filmed inside a hangar at area 51. http://67.15.129.139/6014/152/emo/worthy.gif

The fake moonlanding proves 9/11 was an inside job. http://67.15.129.139/6014/152/emo/thumbsup.gif

http://67.15.129.139/6014/152/emo/cheers.gif

[TobiasTheViking]

It's True :)

[twinstead]

It all seems so clear now

[c4ts]

It all makes sense now!

3426

[Bell]

I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!

[Bell]

It all makes sense now!

3426

c4ts, velcro is missing in those schematics!

[Dazed]

Velcro could fit in nicely between homosexuals and satan.

[geni]

I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!

Nah these days those of who debunk the moon hoax idiots mothly throw things like:

http://www.clavius.org/

and

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/

Mind you the moan hoax belivers have this anoying habit of produceing massive lists that take time to go through and debunk.

[c4ts]

c4ts, velcro is missing in those schematics!

So's logic.

[StoneWT]

Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website:

Fake Moon Landing (http://assassinationscience.com/)

Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!

[Bell]

Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website:

Fake Moon Landing (http://assassinationscience.com/)

Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!

But I will stop reading after seeing so much text which I know will add up to nothing. I'm pretty sure the conclusion of that piece is that the moonlandings were faked. Thank you, Fetzer.

[uruk]

All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that.
the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press.

Look at what they did with Francis Powers.

[Bell]

All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that.
the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press.

Look at what they did with Francis Powers.

No no no no no!!

The Russians are in it too!! Yuri Gagarin knew, and wanted to break the story. That's why the NWO crashed his plane! Also, if the Russians would come out with this, the NWO said they wouldn't tear down the wall in 1989.

[geni]

All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that.
the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press.


Oh there is a whole list:

The russians lacked a deep space comunication ability (although zond 1 was launched in 1964)

For some reason they just did track the craft (well these guys did http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/trackind/Apollo17/APOLLO17.htm)

Fake signals from satilites (the horizen to horizen times would be all wrong)

Various commonts that russia was bought of with grain (lack of evidence and there problem that there would be no reason for russia to stay brought)

the usual CTs about a single secret goverment ruleing the world

The soviets being guilty of fakeing some of their stuff and agreeing to keep quite on the moon thing if the US kept quite about that (while there were russian fakes there was nothing of significance).

[uruk]

Not to mention that untill the apollo program The russians were kicking our ass in space. That's alot of incentive for them to be in on the fakeout

Also, why did the russians give up on thier lunar program? see: N1 and LK

[Bell]

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1879718095559427781) (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).

:D

[c4ts]

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1879718095559427781) (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).

:D

Needs "Eye of the Tiger."

[geni]

Not to mention that untill the apollo program The russians were kicking our ass in space. That's alot of incentive for them to be in on the fakeout

Not really remeber the US largly caught up with the gemini program.

[bonavada]

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers.
:D

nice one buzz, that is a lovely right hook you got fella..."You're a coward, a liar and a feeeuuughhhfff"

wots a "feeeuuughhhfff"?

BTW i'm not stalking you Bell. it's just destiny like :-}

BV
Swansea Wales UK

[StoneWT]

They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us.

Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?

[uruk]

They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us.

Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?

Yea, just like the russians kept quiet about Francis Powers.
I wonder what the hoaxsters say about that

[defaultdotxbe]

Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website:

Fake Moon Landing (http://assassinationscience.com/)

Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!
of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest


They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us.

Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?


the russians were the ones who REALLY went to the moon, and they didnt see us there

[geni]

of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest


It turns up from time to time. Problem with it is that most of the photos were taken in shot intense sections (photo take one step left photo or take photos while turning 360 degres).

[The Bad Astronomer]

Nah these days those of who debunk the moon hoax idiots mothly throw things like:

http://www.clavius.org/

and

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/



Sigh.

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe View Post
of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest

It turns up from time to time. Problem with it is that most of the photos were taken in shot intense sections (photo take one step left photo or take photos while turning 360 degres).

With a bit of Gooling(TM) I find that the Hasselblad cameras were modified to take film cartridges of 160 or 200 pictures and automaticly advance the film. All the Astronaut had to do was refocus which, given the brightness and the distance most things to photographed would be, was certainly not always necessary. The cameras were attached to the front of the space suits and thus took a picture in the direction the astronaut pointed. To take a picture all he had to do was press a button. This certainly could be overlapped with just about anything else he was doing -- so why assume a huge amount of time has to be dedicated to picture taking?

[Zep]

Sigh.Anyone would think that the logical person to debunk this would be an astronomer.

Do you happen to know of any, sir?

:rolleyes:

[Polaris]

I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!

Bay-be!!!

[I less than three logic]

The fake moonlanding proves 9/11 was an inside job.
Finally, one that makes sense!

[LashL]

Interesting timing, since it has recently been determined that Neil Armstrong didn't flub his famous line...

http://reports.discoverychannel.ca/servlet/an/discovery/1/20061002/1002_discovery_armstrong/20061002?hub=DiscoveryReport

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/strange/news-article.aspx?storyid=66068

http://www.mlive.com/news/kzgazette/index.ssf?/base/columns-2/1159975420236040.xml&coll=7

[bjb]

The astronauts could have had their cameras set to the hyperfocal distance:

http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html

Everything from 1/2 the hyperfocal distance to infinity will be in focus. The same idea is used in the fixed-focus cameras you get at the drugstore work. The hyperfocal distance becomes shorter as more light is available and the apature is closed down, which is how the cameras would be set for use on the moon.

[c4ts]

Sigh.

Yes, your site has a whole section on the moon landing hoax. It's a great resource. Insert shameless plug to join forum.

[Bell]

nice one buzz, that is a lovely right hook you got fella..."You're a coward, a liar and a feeeuuughhhfff"

wots a "feeeuuughhhfff"?

BTW i'm not stalking you Bell. it's just destiny like :-}

BV
Swansea Wales UK

No, I'm stalking you. I knew you would post that, so I posted first.

[Zygar]

So, I figured, if the Nasa/US gov (=NWO evil Jews) went to all this trouble and faked these moonlandings,
then I have no doubt 9/11 was an inside job and it all was filmed inside a hangar at area 51.

Obviously... I mean, if there was a conspiracy a few decades ago, then it proves that everything that has ever happened since is also a conspiracy.

Infact, the internet is faked. It's all a big conspiracy. None of this is real...

NWO forever!

[G-K-4]

Of course it's all a hoax. They're actually way ahead of what they claim. Thirty years ago, a British investigative journalist reported the FACTS of the joint Soviet-American landing on Mars. It's all part of the plan for dealing with overpopulation.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9098938544636366793

[Hellbound]

Obviously... I mean, if there was a conspiracy a few decades ago, then it proves that everything that has ever happened since is also a conspiracy.

Infact, the internet is faked. It's all a big conspiracy. None of this is real...

NWO forever!

You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them.

I'm onto you!!!!!

And I'll be watching...

:wide-eyed

[Bell]

You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them.

I'm onto you!!!!!

And I'll be watching...

:wide-eyed

We'll be watching back :a2:

Zygar
damn, I mean
c4ts
shoot!!
Killtown
F*CK! I keep messing up.

Bell

There, done.

[c4ts]

You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them.

I'm onto you!!!!!

And I'll be watching...

:wide-eyed

Lifegazer? Is that you?

[Hellbound]

Lifegazer? Is that you?

Hey now!

I was just joking around, no need to get mean...

;)

[boloboffin]

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1879718095559427781) (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).

:DI knew that guy. Not Aldrin - the luney. He's all wrapped up in a cult, the ICC - that's why he goes around trying to make astronauts swear on a Bible that they've been to the Moon.

But before Jesus, he did a lot of 'shrooms. A lot of 'shrooms. I'm using the word "lot" here with 'shrooms. LOT.