View Full Version : Matthew Horton Woodson - your next congressman from Oklahoma
T.A.M.
9th October 2006, 09:59 AM
You guys are so lucky. Look at who is running for Congress this year:
(hat tip to SLC Blog for this)
http://www.sendmeabuck.com/
Yes it is the man who spends his time teaching people how to Kayak, works as a TV Technician, and now wants to represent OK in the congress.
So why am I posting this stuff...
well just go to the link above, and you will see...he is a "truth" follower.
but a few years ago, he just wanted to get rich from his website...
http://web.archive.org/web/20000101-20030101re_/http://www.sendmeabuck.com
If you want to hear what he has to say, his speeches are up on Youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_YZcIirGgA&mode=related&search=
Make sure you cast your vote wisely.
TAM
T.A.M.
9th October 2006, 10:17 AM
Here is where he stands on "The Issues"
My position on the following issues:
* Immigration - treat immigrants humanely, don’t deploy military forces on the border, acknowledge that “illegal immigrants” pay billions in taxes and provide us labor.
Well treat them humanely, yes, but let them enter properly, and fix that system so they can become true americans quicker, not sneak in while other people are forced to wait.
* The 2007 Farm Bill - cut corporate welfare, only subsidize crops which will promote healthy diets for Americans, encourage small organic farms
cut corporate welfare...yes cut it for single young men who are able bodied but lazy. Promote healthy diets...no argument there. Encourage organic farms...sure, as long as you don't subsidize them, while I pay $15 for a head of lettuce.
* Energy policy - release all information from Cheney’s Energy Task Force, promote reduced demand of energy, increase supply of clean renewable energies
Yes I agree on this issue.
* War in Iraq - change our strategy, ask international community to help achieve peace
Where have you been. The UN does not want to get involved with Iraq now. It is in Americas court, and they must fiz it...and they are trying.
* "Homeland" Security - scrutinize this departments budget realizing that 9/11 was caused by domestic criminals
okie dokie. SO you are telling the people you want to scrutinize the budget (political correct code for "slash" the budget) because the USG (of which you will be a part of) caused 9/11, not terrorists...yes good luck with that one.
* Taxes - end automatic withdraw from paychecks, taxpayers write quarterly checks to the Government
You've got the votes of Aaron Russo, Brad Rajter, and that engineer dweeb we had in here a while ago. The above is CT code for "You don't have to pay, so when they ask for their quarterly cheque, tell them to go jump in the river."
* Election reform - make voting day Federal holiday or over a weekend, give tax credit to those who vote, and penalty to those who don't
Penalize someone for not utilizing their right to vote. So what about their freedom to choose NOT to vote. You are suggesting penalizing someone for exercising their right NOT to vote. I agree everyone should vote, but you don't punish them if they choose not to idiot.
* Abortion - I'm a pro-lifer who believe that abortions should be discouraged in a variety of ways, but remain legal
Kind of vague. Too chicken to say more I fear.
* Gay marriage - This is a States issue, there should be no Constitutional amendment banning it
Agreed.
* Health care - Encourage prevention by teaching healthy lifestyle choices, Congress should provide oversight in marketing and sales of “junk foods”
Agreed, but we could be doing much more than this.
* Flag burning - The only Constitutional amendment regarding the flag should ban the manufacturing of our flag in China
Not american, so I will not comment on such a close to heart issue here.
TAM
CptColumbo
9th October 2006, 10:23 AM
At some televised debate, if he is invited, just ask him his take on the OKC bombing. Then see his popularity soar.
I doubt he'll be invited.
T.A.M.
9th October 2006, 10:24 AM
excellent point. If he says it was the gubmint, then he'll be crucified, if he says it was Mcvay, than he will alienate himself from the troofers...
TAM
Pardalis
9th October 2006, 10:33 AM
He seems to be a well seasonned man in the video. Like most people, he's an ordinary guy who is angry at his government, which made him an easy prey to the CT lies. Let's hope he will eventually get his facts straight.
StoneWT
9th October 2006, 10:43 AM
"Send Me A Buck" (Democracy should be cheap: I only want $1)
Umm, does he not know that paypal fees will devour most of the $1 sent to him?
At some televised debate, if he is invited, just ask him his take on the OKC bombing. Then see his popularity soar.
I doubt he'll be invited.
He could say that McVeigh worked with other people, but he doesn't seem smart enough for that. He probably believes there was no Ryder Truck in front of the building.
T.A.M.
9th October 2006, 12:58 PM
does anyone have a running tally on how many of these CT believers are running for congress. There is Bowman, Woodson, who else?
TAM
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.