What We Saw - Bob & Bri (Not what we heard)

[Russell Pickering]

Can you clarify what you mean here? I genuinely don't understand.

I am saying for me as somebody that believes there is a conspiracy, it is valid to discuss who I think may be behind it in context with the evidence.

Like fingerprinting at a crime scene.

They are always looking for the "who" as well as the how.

The why seems clear to me.

[Gravy]

I am saying for me as somebody that believes there is a conspiracy, it is valid to discuss who I think may be behind it in context with the evidence.

Like fingerprinting at a crime scene.

They are always looking for the "who" as well as the how.

The why seems clear to me.Thanks for your answer. It seems clear to me that your belief is not in context with the evidence, because you misinterpret the evidence. But I don't know if we're ever going to agree on that. :)

Out of curiosity, was there a specific "turning point" for you in your beliefs?

[Russell Pickering]

Thanks for your answer. It seems clear to me that your belief is not in context with the evidence, because you misinterpret the evidence. But I don't know if we're ever going to agree on that. :)

Out of curiosity, was there a specific "turning point" for you in your beliefs?

Good question.

We may or may not ever agree.

There was not a single item that I would consider pivotal.

It was long and drawn out as well as confusing and painful.

[Usual Suspect]

AH they're tryin to spread you thin Russ. Excellent disinfo tactic. All this could be discussed in one thread.

[Pardalis]

AH they're tryin to spread you thin Russ. Excellent disinfo tactic. All this could be discussed in one thread.

These are all threads started by Russell.

[Russell Pickering]

I'll start a new thread just for this idea.

[Pardalis]

See?

[Usual Suspect]

This thread doesn't have it yet so

Will Gravy even try to debunk Craig?? Will he even try to debunk Steele?? Or will he just keep ignoring it because he knows he can't debunk Steele??

[Usual Suspect]

These are all threads started by Russell.

But this talk started in one. Good try at knockin Russ off his game though.

[Russell Pickering]

But this talk started in one. Good try at knockin Russ off his game though.



Here is a thread devoted to any topic.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=67359

[Pardalis]

But this talk started in one. Good try at knockin Russ off his game though.

I wasn't, I was mearly pointing to you that we weren't trying to "spread Russell thin", as you suggested. Russell is the one who started all these threads.

[Oliver]

Does anybody know the release date or where the full movie will be available?

[rwguinn]

What potential crime evidence is investigated without a who?

The evidence of that day is contingent on a suspect.

I am only responding to questions and accusations that my motives are political.

P.S. MOST of what is discussed here is either a direct belief or the result of a belief on both sides.
yeah, I guess you're right
I believe that F=M*a+V*b+K*x every time.
I believe that the stresses in a material are the direct result of the area and applied force
I believe that g=9.8 m/sec^2 (+-local variations) on Earth, always
I believe that energy is conserved in every case of real-world collisions
I believe that my 35 years of structural analysis experiece trumps your half-baked, paranoid idiocy.
(The above simplified for the tiny minds--don't go pedantic on me, JREFers)