PDA

View Full Version : What is the message of McLuhan's medium?


coberst
28th October 2006, 04:00 AM
What is the message of McLuhan’s medium?

“The Medium is The Message” is the phrase that made Marshall McLuhan famous. It is a phrase most of us, young and old, have heard. Until a few months ago it was a phrase that confounded me.

Let’s get very fundamental here and go back to the invention of the alphabet to understand what McLuhan is talking about and why it is important.

“The Greek myth about the alphabet was that Cadmus, reputedly the king who introduced the phonetic letters into Greece, sowed dragoon’s teeth, and they sprang up armed men. Like any other myth, this one capsulates a prolonged process into a flashing insight. The alphabet meant power and authority and control of military structures at a distance. When combined with papyrus, the alphabet spelled the end of the stationary temple bureaucracies and the priestly monopolies of knowledge and power.”

“The phonetic alphabet is a unique technology…This stark division and parallelism between a visual and an auditory world was both crude and ruthless, culturally speaking. The phonetically written sacrifices worlds of meaning and perception that were secured by forms like the hieroglyphs and the Chinese ideogram. These culturally richer forms of writing, however, offered men no means of sudden transfer from the magically discontinuous and traditional world of the tribal word into the cool and uniform visual medium.”

“All of these forms [pictographic and hieroglyphic] give pictorial expression to oral meanings. As such, they approximate the animated cartoon and are extremely unwieldy, requiring many signs for the infinity of data operations of social action. In contrast, the phonetic alphabet, by a few letters only, was able to encompass all languages.”

Consider the invention of the printing press and the introduction of books to the society. A book communicates a message. Many books communicate many messages. ‘The book’ communicates the same message to everyone who comes into contact with the book. The book transmits the same message to everyone while many books transmit many different messages to many different people.

Evolution moves very slowly. We adapt to our environment very slowly. We survive because we do adapt. When we change more quickly than we can adapt we face problems that we have not had the time to make the kind of adjustments necessary.

The habits we acquire determine our state of mind. Our changing habits are part of this process of adaptation to our environment. Do not think of environment as being just the quality of our air or water but it is a broad term signifying the world we live in.

So we have changed very dramatically our habits that were part of us when we knew little and understood much. I am speaking relatively here. What happens to us as a result of this dramatic change? I do not know but I only point to the fact as worth consideration.

Examine how we sit and watch TV for several hours everyday. When we watch TV we are constantly being transported perceptively from one scene to another. Think for a minute if instead of sitting and watching TV we were physically escorted done a hallway with many doors. Then we open a door and are physically placed into this world we see on TV. Our reaction would be very different. In other words we are creatures prepared for a certain world that no longer exists. This is the definition of a forthcoming extinction if we think about the meaning of evolution.

stillthinkin
28th October 2006, 01:56 PM
What is the message of McLuhan’s medium?

I am a great fan of McLuhan, but no expert. If you ask what the message of any medium is, the answer is that it depends on the medium. McLuhan's point is that new technologies affect how people think, and new communications technologies affect people most profoundly of all. This is the case in spite of the content communicated... it is precisely the new medium that brings about the change.

coberst
29th October 2006, 01:09 AM
I am a great fan of McLuhan, but no expert. If you ask what the message of any medium is, the answer is that it depends on the medium. McLuhan's point is that new technologies affect how people think, and new communications technologies affect people most profoundly of all. This is the case in spite of the content communicated... it is precisely the new medium that brings about the change.


In other words we are creatures prepared for a certain world that no longer exists. This is the definition of a forthcoming extinction if we think about the meaning of evolution.

Darwin informs us that species survive by adaptation to the changing world in which they must live. Extinction of a species occurs when that species is no longer capable of adapting adequately to a changing environment. Biological evolution is a slow process of adaptation over hundreds and thousands and millions of years.

In an age of rapid change biological evolution becomes overwhelmed and dysfunctional. Reason is the only means humans have to replace this dysfunctional process of biological evolution. Reason must develop an adaptation process that can keep pace with a world driven into overdrive by technology.

“So an attitude is caused when we think about something the same way over and over until it becomes automatic. The resulting actions in response to the thought also become automatic. Change the habit of thought and you change the attitude. Change the attitude and you change the resulting action.”

Consider the invention of the printing press and the introduction of books to the society. A book communicates a message. Many books communicate many messages. ‘The book’ communicates the same message to everyone who comes into contact with the book. The book transmits the same message to everyone while many books transmit many different messages to many different people.

Evolution moves very slowly. We adapt to our environment very slowly. We survive because we do adapt. When we change more quickly than we can adapt we face problems that we have not had the time to make the kind of adjustments necessary.

The habits we acquire determine our state of mind. Our changing habits are part of this process of adaptation to our environment. Do not think of environment as being just the quality of our air or water but it is a broad term signifying the world we live in.

So we have changed very dramatically our habits that were part of us when we knew little and understood much. I am speaking relatively here. What happens to us as a result of this dramatic change? I do not know but I only point to the fact as worth consideration.

Ladewig
29th October 2006, 06:19 AM
Reason must develop an adaptation process that can keep pace with a world driven into overdrive by technology.

“So an attitude is caused when we think about something the same way over and over until it becomes automatic.

Isn't what you describe in the second quoted sentence the exact opposite of reason?



The habits we acquire determine our state of mind. Our changing habits are part of this process of adaptation to our environment. Do not think of environment as being just the quality of our air or water but it is a broad term signifying the world we live in.

Is there an echo in here?

Ladewig
29th October 2006, 06:28 AM
Consider the invention of the printing press and the introduction of books to the society. A book communicates a message. Many books communicate many messages. ‘The book’ communicates the same message to everyone who comes into contact with the book.

No, it doesn't - as is easily proved with a glance at the Bible. There is hardly agreement on what message is being communicated with that book.

There was a recent thread on banned books. If some folks want to burn copies of "Huckleberry Finn" and others want to make it required reading for teenagers, the the idea that this book is communicating the same message to everyone becomes absurd.


Examine how we sit and watch TV for several hours everyday. When we watch TV we are constantly being transported perceptively from one scene to another. Think for a minute if instead of sitting and watching TV we were physically escorted done a hallway with many doors. Then we open a door and are physically placed into this world we see on TV. Our reaction would be very different. In other words we are creatures prepared for a certain world that no longer exists.


I suppose that if a viewer watched nothing but Pokemon for years on end, then an argument could be made that the viewer was ill prepared for the real world. However, most people watch a wide variety of programs and thus are "transported perceptively" to a wide vareity of "worlds." Viewing the events in these many worlds actually help us in real life - we can see what happens when people do things on TV that we do not have the time, ability or inclination to do. I can watch nature programs and learn to identify and avoid poisonous snakes. I can watch The Office and learn about office politics. I can watch Law and Order and learn that asking for a lawyer is a good idea. I can watch Frontline and learn about topical news events quickly and accurately. I can watch Jackass and learn that stopping a runaway shopping cart with my crotch is a bad idea.

Furthermore, while many people do sit idly while watching TV, many other people excercise, or do light housework, or prepare a meal, or do a wide vareity of other tasks while watching TV. There are very few things I can learn from books that I cannot learn from TV and there are a lots of tasks I can do while watching TV that I cannot do while reading a book.