Doubletree Video Delayed

[Moving On]

Here is the history of the Doubletree video release cancellation.

ORIGINAL STORY:


"The FBI has agreed to release to Judicial Watch a videotape obtained from the Doubletree Hotel near the Pentagon by November 9, 2006."

http://www.judicialwatch.org/5965.shtml


NOW:

-----Original Message-----

From: Russell Pickering [mailto:russellpickering@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:57 AM
To: Chris Farrell
Subject: Doubletree Video

Chris,

Is this video being held back now?

Any idea why?

Any idea when it will be released?

Was the release court ordered?

Russell Pickering

__________________________________________________ ______

----- Original Message -----

From: Chris Farrell
To: 'Russell Pickering'
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:53 AM
Subject: RE: Doubletree Video

I understand that the govt. needed more time for privacy-related technical reasons. I believe the release has now been pushed back to sometime in December. As soon as we get it, we’ll release it.
__________________________________________________ ______

-----Original Message-----

From: Russell Pickering [mailto:russellpickering@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:10 AM
To: Chris Farrell
Subject: Re: Doubletree Video

Chris,

Thank you for your response.

I apologize for my frustration.

5 years was not enough time?

Can you elaborate on what privacy issues when you have time please?

Thank you,
Russell

__________________________________________________ ______________

----- Original Message -----

From: Chris Farrell
To: 'Russell Pickering'
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: Doubletree Video


I believe (although I do not possess metaphysical certitude on the point) that the govt. is busy blurring the faces of persons who wander into/through the video, in order to protect those persons’ privacy interests/rights. They did the same thing in the Citgo video.

__________________________________________________ ____________________

Just the honest truth and the full story. The USG should be appreciated and defended in their handling of 9/11. They have done a great job all the way from ignoring the memos to the White House about Osama months before right up to disposing of conspiracy theories in a timely fashion!

[Pardalis]

So?

Who is Chris Farrell anyways?

[Kent1]

Well at least we can agree there was no "October surprize":D

[The_Fire]

"Privacy-related" can also mean that the owner of the film is resisting the publication of the material. In that case the Feds can't publish it.

[Pardalis]

-----Original Message-----

From: petsauce
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:57 AM
To: pardalis
Subject: 9/11

Hey, did you see the movie Loose Change?

Wow, man, the US like totally did it!

----------

From: pardalis
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:02 PM
To: petsauce
Subject: 9/11

I've seen it and it's filled with errors and lies.

As far as all the evidence shows, al Qaeda are the ones behind 9/11.

-----------

From: petsauce
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 02:03 PM
To: pardalis
Subject: 9/11

Really?

--------

From: pardalis
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 02:22 PM
To: petsauce
Subject: 9/11

Yep.
_______________________________

Some people are just dumb.

[Moving On]

So?

Who is Chris Farrell anyways?

He's in charge of Judicial watch.

[Moving On]

"Privacy-related" can also mean that the owner of the film is resisting the publication of the material. In that case the Feds can't publish it.

I have talked with the Doubletree. I don't believe that is the case.

[defaultdotxbe]

so whats wrong with the idea of them having to blur out faces?

[R.Mackey]

Here is the history of the Doubletree video release cancellation.

Just the honest truth and the full story. The USG should be appreciated and defended in their handling of 9/11. They have done a great job all the way from ignoring the memos to the White House about Osama months before right up to disposing of conspiracy theories in a timely fashion!

Well, shoot, I'm convinced. Obviously the Doubletree Hotel is responsible for Sept. 11th. That's a joke, for the sarcasm-impaired.

Look, you're already setting yourself up to discount the video, no matter what it shows, on the basis of "Government tampering." So why even bother?

[JamesB]

Here is the history of the Doubletree video release cancellation.

ORIGINAL STORY:



NOW:

-----Original Message-----

From: Russell Pickering [mailto:russellpickering@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:57 AM
To: Chris Farrell
Subject: Doubletree Video

Chris,

Is this video being held back now?

Any idea why?

Any idea when it will be released?

Was the release court ordered?

Russell Pickering

__________________________________________________ ______

----- Original Message -----

From: Chris Farrell
To: 'Russell Pickering'
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:53 AM
Subject: RE: Doubletree Video

I understand that the govt. needed more time for privacy-related technical reasons. I believe the release has now been pushed back to sometime in December. As soon as we get it, we’ll release it.
__________________________________________________ ______

-----Original Message-----

From: Russell Pickering [mailto:russellpickering@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:10 AM
To: Chris Farrell
Subject: Re: Doubletree Video

Chris,

Thank you for your response.

I apologize for my frustration.

5 years was not enough time?

Can you elaborate on what privacy issues when you have time please?

Thank you,
Russell

__________________________________________________ ______________

----- Original Message -----

From: Chris Farrell
To: 'Russell Pickering'
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: Doubletree Video


I believe (although I do not possess metaphysical certitude on the point) that the govt. is busy blurring the faces of persons who wander into/through the video, in order to protect those persons’ privacy interests/rights. They did the same thing in the Citgo video.

__________________________________________________ ____________________

Just the honest truth and the full story. The USG should be appreciated and defended in their handling of 9/11. They have done a great job all the way from ignoring the memos to the White House about Osama months before right up to disposing of conspiracy theories in a timely fashion!

This was supposed to be the October Surprise damnit! We probably lost the House because of this. How hard is it to fake some video camera footage Freakin' New World Order incompetents. Get me Queen Beatrix on the phone!

[defaultdotxbe]

hmm, didnt realize this at first, you contradicted yourself in the span of a single post (sadly though, this is hardly a record for the truth movement)

Here is the history of the Doubletree video release cancellation.


I understand that the govt. needed more time for privacy-related technical reasons. I believe the release has now been pushed back to sometime in December. As soon as we get it, we’ll release it.

not a "cancellation" at all, i believe the word you were looking for is "delay"

BTW, did the govt ever say they would release it at a specific time, or was that an estimate from judicial watch?


...i have a feeling this is halo 2 all over again

[Horatius]

...i have a feeling this is halo 2 all over again

Yeah, except Halo 2 was actually worth looking forward too. Now I'm just waiting for Halo 3.....

[Kent1]

Here comes the lame spin....

http://www.infowars.net/articles/november2006/071106Pentagon_tape.htm

[milesalpha]

On the bright side it will give the CTs another 1/10th second blur to study. How can anyone believe you will get anything significant from a hotel security cam?

[T.A.M.]

Well, shoot, I'm convinced. Obviously the Doubletree Hotel is responsible for Sept. 11th. That's a joke, for the sarcasm-impaired.

Look, you're already setting yourself up to discount the video, no matter what it shows, on the basis of "Government tampering." So why even bother?

I never doubted this for a moment. No matter when or how it is released, the CTers will find reasons to doubt it. Why? Because we know it will either show (1) a Boeing hitting the pentagon, or (2) nothing. Either way it does not help them, so they will discount it. I would expect no less from most of the wingnuts. I hope Russ proves to be an exception.

If they wanted to tamper with it, they would have done so by now. I don't think it is that hard that they had to delay it to tamper with it some more...lol.

TAM

[Bell]

This was supposed to be the October Surprise damnit! We probably lost the House because of this. How hard is it to fake some video camera footage Freakin' New World Order incompetents. Get me Queen Beatrix on the phone!

lol, what is the obsession with our queen on here these boards? :)

[Gravy]

lol, what is the obsession with our queen on here these boards? :)All drones need their queen Bea.

[JamesB]

lol, what is the obsession with our queen on here these boards? :)

Well duh, she is in charge!

Greeted at the airport by limousine drivers holding single-letter "B" signs, global luminaries such as Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands began quietly slipping into Ottawa yesterday for the annual gathering of the ultra-secretive Bilderberg Group.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/secretb.htm

[StoneWT]

First off Bell, I have to traveled to your wonderful country. The beauty of your women is only exceeded by the quality of the food. In the US, a 50-year-old building that Elvis Presley used the toilet in is considered historic. In Holland, a 500-year-old building barely raises a snort. :)

Prince Bernhard was involved with founding the Bildeberg group. I'm guessing that people assume all Dutch royalty is in on the NWO.

[Bell]

Well duh, she is in charge!

Now it all makes sense! I am employed by the NWO (their 'police' branch) and there is a portret of her hanging in our entrance hall. Ignorant me, thinking it was there because she was just our queen...

[Bell]

First off Bell, I have to traveled to your wonderful country. The beauty of your women is only exceeded by the quality of the food.

Thanks StoneWT. But most of our food is foreign (but well prepared). We do excell at poffertjes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poffertjes) :)

In the US, a 50-year-old building that Elvis Presley used the toilet in is considered historic. In Holland, a 500-year-old building barely raises a snort. :)

Steve Martin: "Some of these buildings are 20 years old!" :D

Prince Bernhard was invloved with founding the Bildeberg group. I'm guessing that people assume all Dutch royalty is in on the NWO.

Even queen Beatrix' family is not safe from the NWO:

In the year 2003 a series of incidents had become known as the Margarita-affair. In the media, Margarita and her husband accused the Royal House and the Dutch Secret Service of obstructing the affairs of Fincentives, the company of De Roy van Zuydewijn. They also said their telephone-conversations were tapped. Although there seemed to be truth in these accusations, they ridiculed themselves by adding more preposperous claims and telling tales of private family affairs of the Dutch Royals. After it was revealed that the Queen's personal cabinet had indeed ordered an investigation, the right to do so was legally removed from the Queen.

Source (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Margarita%2C_Countess_of_Colorno)

They thought that screws that were in the ceiling were actually microphones... :tinfoil

And Edwin de Roy van Zuydewijn is a troofer, nuff said.

[Scientologist]

Just the honest truth and the full story. The USG should be appreciated and defended in their handling of 9/11. They have done a great job all the way from ignoring the memos to the White House about Osama months before right up to disposing of conspiracy theories in a timely fashion!



The US government is not under any obligation to disprove wackjob conspiracy theories. Sorry, Russ, you live in a CT dream world.

[CptColumbo]

Mitch Hedberg on Doubletree

2MCuEb_Oib8

"The girl at the front desk must have really liked me, she gave me her number. It was '0.' I tried to call her from here, but some other lady answered."

[Kent1]

http://www.flight77.info/
It seems Dec 21st is the day.

I continue to read more and more information stating that it WILL show a glimpse of the plane.

[Class]

http://www.flight77.info/
It seems Dec 21st is the day.

I continue to read more and more information stating that it WILL show a glimpse of the plane.

Nice, a birthday present from the government.:)

[Bell]

http://www.flight77.info/
It seems Dec 21st is the day.

I continue to read more and more information stating that it WILL show a glimpse of the plane.

As stated in the last page of the Maguire Statement, whatever is on this video, it will not be the impact. It will likely be a glimpse of the flight.

And that is based on what exactly?

Neither the FOIA request, nor the FBI response, talk about AA77's flight captured on video, only about the impact. I think this video will show as much AA77 as the Citgo video... nothing.

[hellaeon]

Well, shoot, I'm convinced. Obviously the Doubletree Hotel is responsible for Sept. 11th. That's a joke, for the sarcasm-impaired.

Look, you're already setting yourself up to discount the video, no matter what it shows, on the basis of "Government tampering." So why even bother?

my thoughts exactly.

your predictable russell.

cheers

[Arus808]

And that is based on what exactly?

Neither the FOIA request, nor the FBI response, talk about AA77's flight captured on video, only about the impact. I think this video will show as much AA77 as the Citgo video... nothing.


and the cter's are going to claim "cover up"! and dance in the streets.

[Kent1]

And that is based on what exactly?

Neither the FOIA request, nor the FBI response, talk about AA77's flight captured on video, only about the impact. I think this video will show as much AA77 as the Citgo video... nothing.

So far it has been based on rumor. I've heard a few reports now that state it will show a plane. A news reporter (I believe from CNN) was the first to make the claim.

[Bell]

So far it has been based on rumor. I've heard a few reports now that state it will show a plane. A news reporter (I believe from CNN) was the first to make the claim.

Anyhow, who cares if it shows a plane? (yeah, we do) But the nutters will claim ILM has obvious faked the video :)

[Kent1]

Anyhow, who cares if it shows a plane? (yeah, we do) But the nutters will claim ILM has obvious faked the video :)

Just like any other damning evidence, I suspect if it DOES show a plane with decent quality they will HAVE to claim its a fake.
Some people have too much money, time, ego invested to say otherwise.