View Full Version : The 9/11 Debunker Guide Journal
chippy
29th November 2006, 09:04 AM
Hey folks - I started up a new journal on Livejournal called the "9/11 Debunker Guide". By this point I have only finished an analysis of the Pentagon, and I haven't touched on any other parts of the conspiracy theory yet, which is likely to take a lot of time. Give it a read and let me know what you think:
http://911debunker.livejournal.com
chipmunk stew
29th November 2006, 09:23 AM
Hey folks - I started up a new journal on Livejournal called the "9/11 Debunker Guide". By this point I have only finished an analysis of the Pentagon, and I haven't touched on any other parts of the conspiracy theory yet, which is likely to take a lot of time. Give it a read and let me know what you think:
http://911debunker.livejournal.com
Whoa...
:bigclap
Gravy
29th November 2006, 09:33 AM
Chippy's my new favorite chappy. Great job!
apathoid
29th November 2006, 09:47 AM
Great job chippy, I especially liked the light pole section. Its amazing that Lyte and S4S can look at this picture:
http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m80/911debunker/car2.jpg
..and come to the conclusion that the front passenger seat was unaffected by the pole. I guess when you're delusional, you tend to see things a little differently..
mortimer
29th November 2006, 09:49 AM
Excellent! Added you as a friend!
Quad4_72
29th November 2006, 10:09 AM
Very well done man. Good job.
Brainster
29th November 2006, 11:18 AM
Terrific job; I have linked again at SLC.
PerryLogan
29th November 2006, 12:25 PM
Watch out, Chippy. These are very sneaky people. They will debunk the pants off of you.
T.A.M.
29th November 2006, 01:07 PM
Excellent site and posting.
linked it at "9/11 - You judge" - My blog
TAM
Unfit4Command
29th November 2006, 01:54 PM
Great job, I've been reading that journal for a few weeks.
What subject are you moving onto next?
beachnut
29th November 2006, 03:15 PM
good job
Crazycowbob
29th November 2006, 03:21 PM
I guess when you're delusional, you tend to see things a little differently..
Lol, isn't that more or less the deffinition of delusional?
hellaeon
29th November 2006, 03:22 PM
Wicked. This rules.
hahaha Im doing a blog too, far from anything at this stage, we should all do them!
Alt+F4
29th November 2006, 03:36 PM
I also agree, great job....just one suggestion. Maybe it's just me, but I find it difficult reading white text on a black background.
Unfit4Command
29th November 2006, 04:03 PM
Wicked. This rules.
hahaha Im doing a blog too, far from anything at this stage, we should all do them!
What is your blog called? I have one too, but I just started it a few weeks ago so it's not much yet.
http://911questions.blogspot.com/
hellaeon
29th November 2006, 04:05 PM
I'll publish the url when I have more time to work on it, in the 3 weeks holiday starting next week
Its more satire rather then being a 'fact sheet'. More so just pointing out something dumb they say, showing the facts then asking the reader to refrain from punching the screen.
jhunter1163
29th November 2006, 04:49 PM
Excellent work. Every little bit of sanity helps when dealing with CTers.
Kent1
29th November 2006, 05:52 PM
Hey folks - I started up a new journal on Livejournal called the "9/11 Debunker Guide". By this point I have only finished an analysis of the Pentagon, and I haven't touched on any other parts of the conspiracy theory yet, which is likely to take a lot of time. Give it a read and let me know what you think:
http://911debunker.livejournal.com
Great stuff on the Pentagon.
Here's another photo of the inside of the taxi cab which shows damage to the dashboard.
From Russell's site.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/411.jpg
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/018.html
(Edit whoops..... I see you have a link to this page on your site)
And for those who missed it, the video is here.
http://www.nbc4.com/news/8988021/detail.html#
Retrograde
29th November 2006, 06:34 PM
re the pictures of the cab: on another forum I read a post by an ardent (or is that rabid?) believer in the missle-hit-the-pentagon believer who claimed that the picture validated that theory because "the hood didn't look too damaged". I dunno: maybe in the DC area cabs drive around with their windshields staved in: I don't think that would reassure customers.
Good analysis on your LJ page!
LashL
29th November 2006, 09:09 PM
Nice work, chippy, and welcome to JREF :)
You've done a great job on the Pentagon issue, and I'll look forward to seeing your further additions on other issues.
Edit to add: I agree with Alt+F4 that the only downside is the white text on a black background, which is difficult to read and hard on the eyes.
LashL
29th November 2006, 09:15 PM
hahaha Im doing a blog too, far from anything at this stage, we should all do them!
Me, too. But, man, it's hard to find the time to actually pull it all together. Work, friends, and family keep interfering and so far, my blog exists in name only with a few links to some great debunking sites.... but one of these days...
Thus, I truly appreciate good debunking sites and good debunking blogs, because I know how much time and effort goes into them.
Keep up the great work, folks!
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.