lloth
1st July 2003, 12:23 AM
Wasn't sure to put this under the skepticism or the science part, but here goes.
Recently on another forum I was involved in a discussion about the "160,000 year old man", and someone gave me some links to look at- I guess to show how our scientists are either wrong or haven't told us the whole truth. My interest in man's past is more in the biology aspect, and I really know little about archeology and ancient artifacts. Here are the links:
http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar.htm
http://www.nasca.org.uk/Strange_relics_/strange_relics_.html
http://www.nasca.org.uk/Strange_relics_/strange_relics_.html
I would appreciate any input, as I really have no facts to bolster my feeling that these sites are merely misleading and likely to contain much info that is either misconstrued or possibly outright lies. Those are just my thoughts based on the rest of the two sites' content.
Thanks ahead of time, even if you can just point me to a site that deals with these types of claims that would help too.
Recently on another forum I was involved in a discussion about the "160,000 year old man", and someone gave me some links to look at- I guess to show how our scientists are either wrong or haven't told us the whole truth. My interest in man's past is more in the biology aspect, and I really know little about archeology and ancient artifacts. Here are the links:
http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar.htm
http://www.nasca.org.uk/Strange_relics_/strange_relics_.html
http://www.nasca.org.uk/Strange_relics_/strange_relics_.html
I would appreciate any input, as I really have no facts to bolster my feeling that these sites are merely misleading and likely to contain much info that is either misconstrued or possibly outright lies. Those are just my thoughts based on the rest of the two sites' content.
Thanks ahead of time, even if you can just point me to a site that deals with these types of claims that would help too.