View Full Version : John D'Oh Boy (JDX) makes a "film"
LashL
2nd January 2007, 05:44 PM
Looks like the D'oh Boy has uploaded a trailer for his widdle "film"...
Don't shoot the messenger, but yeah, it's pretty bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Oh, and comments have to be "approved" by D'oh Boy. Ahh, yes, yet another exhibition of the D'oh Boy trying to control the message and the medium, and his fear of criticism and fair comment.
(Sorry, I don't know how to use the embedded youtube function - I will try to figure it out - but in the meantime, I just posted the direct link)
Edit to add: With thanks to Lisa, here is the proper link:
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Lisa Simpson
2nd January 2007, 05:49 PM
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Lisa Simpson
2nd January 2007, 05:50 PM
Could the music be any more annoying?
Architect
2nd January 2007, 05:50 PM
And we'd have got away with it too, if it wasn't for you pesky kids....
LashL
2nd January 2007, 05:52 PM
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Thanks!
I just went to the help forum to figure it out but you are QUICK, QUICK, QUICK, Lisa!
:)
LashL
2nd January 2007, 05:54 PM
Could the music be any more annoying?
Nope.
Pretty rank amateurish, if you ask me.
T.A.M.
2nd January 2007, 05:57 PM
Was Chapter one so insignificant that it didnt even warrant a post over here at JREF, cause I do not remember anyone commenting on it?
TAM
Dog Town
2nd January 2007, 06:00 PM
And we'd have got away with it too, if it wasn't for you pesky kids....
Don't forget SCOOBY!
Bell
2nd January 2007, 06:05 PM
Looks like the D'oh Boy has uploaded a trailer for his widdle "film"...
Don't shoot the messenger, but yeah, it's pretty bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Oh, and comments have to be "approved" by D'oh Boy. Ahh, yes, yet another exhibition of the D'oh Boy trying to control the message and the medium, and his fear of criticism and fair comment.
(Sorry, I don't know how to use the embedded youtube function - I will try to figure it out - but in the meantime, I just posted the direct link)
Edit to add: With thanks to Lisa, here is the proper link:
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
That does it for me!! 9/11 was an inside job.
Bye all!!
stupid sheeple
hellaeon
2nd January 2007, 06:08 PM
why is it these guys remind me of watching the big foot idiots on Penn and Teller trying to be serious but coming across like oafs.
LashL
2nd January 2007, 06:13 PM
That does it for me!! 9/11 was an inside job.
Bye all!!
stupid sheeple
:dl:
Dog Town
2nd January 2007, 06:18 PM
:dl:
Ditto!
Calcas
2nd January 2007, 07:04 PM
How does one justify "I can control/edit the comments" and think it's 'truth'...
That's lunacy.
Bell
2nd January 2007, 07:11 PM
How does one justify "I can control/edit the comments" and think it's 'truth'...
That's lunacy.
He is 'weedwacking' out the gubmint propaganda.
Crungy
2nd January 2007, 07:16 PM
yawn.
I was expecting to be offended and I was, but only because it was such a half assed production that revealed the sheer laziness and uncreative mind behind this junior high media class production. Further proof that he ain't a pilot, but a little kid.
babazaroni
2nd January 2007, 07:19 PM
Looks like he's going talk technical about flying by mentioning barometric pressure, etc. and try to overwhelm a non-technical audience.
Of course, the pilots here will provide quick correction. Can't wait.
No doubt he will also talk about the impossibility of a flight crew giving up control to the hijackers.
JimBenArm
2nd January 2007, 07:20 PM
I watched this. All I can think is, there's five minutes of my life totally wasted.
What is this supposed to be? An ad for Flight Simulator?
Dog Town
2nd January 2007, 07:23 PM
What is this supposed to be? An ad for Flight Simulator?
That is the only,somewhat, redeeming quality!
Calcas
2nd January 2007, 07:50 PM
JDX personally invited me over to his board when he found out I was an ex-ATC.
In less than a week, he banned me since I didn't seem to agree with his little fairy tale. I did NOT even come close to violating any TOS.
Since then, he has given great credence to another ex-ATC 's story that is in line with his same illusion.
He told me he reads this board religiously. He's obsessed with it.
So, JD, get your new sock puppet in order and explain why I was banned and why anyone here should even give you the time of day.
BTW, I just checked. There is ONE member on-line there right now.
It's Merc.
LOL.
LashL
2nd January 2007, 08:14 PM
JDX personally invited me over to his board when he found out I was an ex-ATC.
In less than a week, he banned me since I didn't seem to agree with his little fairy tale. I did NOT even come close to violating any TOS.
Since then, he has given great credence to another ex-ATC 's story that is in line with his same illusion.
He told me he reads this board religiously. He's obsessed with it.
So, JD, get your new sock puppet in order and explain why I was banned and why anyone here should even give you the time of day.
BTW, I just checked. There is ONE member on-line there right now.
It's Merc.
LOL.
No surprises there, Calcas. He's a strange guy, all right. He simply cannot stand it when people who actually know what they are talking about disagree with him (and everyone who knows what they are talking about disagrees with him).
Thus, it is also not surprising to see that he has to control the content of comments on his crappy video. He can't stand the thought of legitimate criticism being posted about it any more than he has ever been able to stand legitimate disagreement with his cockamamie theories, legitimate facts and actual evidence. He hasn't got much to do at his pathetic little forum, so he has to exercise whatever lame forms of control and censorship that he can, in this case, with regard to his little video.
uruk
2nd January 2007, 08:20 PM
I wonder if he got permisson from AC/DC's publishing company to use thier song?
Dog Town
2nd January 2007, 08:22 PM
He hasn't got much to do at his pathetic little forum, so he has to exercise whatever lame forms of control and censorship that he can, in this case, with regard to his little video.
Ironic, how those that scream "police state", are the biggest fascists! Go figgure...
4863
beachnut
2nd January 2007, 08:24 PM
JDX runs his web sites like a true NAZI. You are banned before you can question his junk.
JDX will banned you even if he can debunk you; since he is telling lies he can not have any other ideas, right or wrong.
JDX will ban you if you have competence; you must be competent if you have been banned by JDX.
JDX is lucky if his flying is independent of his lies. Short on facts fast on banning competence. JDX is the anti first amendment guy! Pure BS is king, JDX.
I expect most pilots find his video's real dumb; I do.
Bell
2nd January 2007, 08:38 PM
JDX will ban you if you have competence; you must be competent if you have been banned by JDX.
Well, thank you :)
I just signed up there, using the name RussellCasse, as a nod to
forums.randi.org/imagehosting/36174504033371510.jpg
(can't link yet)
Since aledged pilot JohnD'oh is monitoring this forum, I wonder if I get banned even before I post anything? :boxedin:
This was the picture:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/36174504033371510.jpg
Well... okay... THAT was fast. My postcount? Zero...
Sorry, you are not permitted to use this board
ETA: Got an email, notiving (sp) me that my username has been changed:
RussellCasse,
An administrator has changed your member name on Pilots For Truth.
Your new name is: BellJREFTroll
Please remember this as you will need to use this new name when you log in next time.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=62553&page=6
beachnut
2nd January 2007, 08:46 PM
JDX does not get it; Several pilots I know go over there and post like they are CT guys.
The can not believe he is a pilot; but the name he used does have FAA stuff; you can look it up at the FAA web site; if you have his name.
I would think you may not want to fly with someone who is kind of loony like JDX is.
So who was JDX here before he got banned? I expect a someone like JDX can not help but get banned since he is unable to take criticisms.
Bell
2nd January 2007, 09:00 PM
JDX does not get it; Several pilots I know go over there and post like they are CT guys.
The can not believe he is a pilot; but the name he used does have FAA stuff; you can look it up at the FAA web site; if you have his name.
I would think you may not want to fly with someone who is kind of loony like JDX is.
So who was JDX here before he got banned? I expect a someone like JDX can not help but get banned since he is unable to take criticisms.
Some believe Weedwacker was a JDX sock.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=66225
LashL
2nd January 2007, 09:00 PM
I wonder if he got permisson from AC/DC's publishing company to use thier song?
Somehow, I doubt it. My guess is he's taking a page from the loosewiththetruth playbook, the page that says, "why buy it when you can steal it?"
Crungy
2nd January 2007, 09:15 PM
I wonder if he got permisson from AC/DC's publishing company to use thier song?
Maybe he'll use Whole Lotta Rosie for his next video.
Orphia Nay
2nd January 2007, 09:21 PM
I watched this. All I can think is, there's five minutes of my life totally wasted.
What is this supposed to be? An ad for Flight Simulator?
:newlol
Agreed.
Orphia Nay
2nd January 2007, 09:27 PM
Dying to know what wondrous explanation he has for his simulation going from this:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/4884459b2f7e30985.jpg
to this:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/4884459b2f7e631e8.jpg
Can’t wait for the movie, if it’s as absurd as the preview. :rolleyes:
LashL
2nd January 2007, 09:39 PM
Maybe he'll use Whole Lotta Rosie for his next video.
Or perhaps "Shot Down in Flames"
MG1962
3rd January 2007, 06:32 AM
So Highway to Hell huh? What's his latest theory? A truck hit the building?
I can think of so many great 'ariplane' songs, I wonder why he bothered
chran
3rd January 2007, 07:05 AM
Dying to know what wondrous explanation he has for his simulation going from this:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/4884459b2f7e30985.jpg
to this:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/4884459b2f7e631e8.jpg It's the barometric pressure, dude! Like, it was way too high or something! LOLZ!
It's a conspiracy! http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/5316459bb7fb1cb60.gif (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3463)http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/5316459bb7fb1cb60.gif (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3463)
Horatius
3rd January 2007, 01:16 PM
What I liked are the quick cuts of some flight sims showing different attempts to hit the Pentagon. I assume it's to show how "hard" it would be to hit exactly that spot.
Of course, it completely ignores the fact that hitting it anywhere would have done the job for the terrorists, but there you go. Somehow he thinks they really were aiming for that one spot.
I'd argue that hitting that one spot shows how bad a pilot he was, as he damn near missed the building entirely. Half a smidge lower, and he would have plowed into the lawn.
Anti-sophist
3rd January 2007, 01:23 PM
Of course, it completely ignores the fact that hitting it anywhere would have done the job for the terrorists, but there you go. Somehow he thinks they really were aiming for that one spot.
It's basically claiming it's impossible for me to have just thrown that dart into the dartboard because I am unable to throw another dart into the same hole.
It's among the silliest conspiracy theorist arguments.
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 01:28 PM
JDX does not have the capability to research 9/11. He is a delusional paranoid fellow. His video tries to make you think there was no flight 77. He fails to research his material.
JDX is delusional because he does not let any posts on his videos or at his web site that go against his ideas.
JDX proves he is a nut case by not letting others see what other people say about his video.
JDX will not let you post a comment if it has a story different than his lies.
Looks like he making up some new false ideas for his DVD; bet he is trying to be the LC of the pilot nut cases.
Calcas
3rd January 2007, 01:43 PM
JDX does not have the capability to research 9/11. He is a delusional paranoid fellow. His video tries to make you think there was no flight 77. He fails to research his material.
JDX is delusional because he does not let any posts on his videos or at his web site that go against his ideas.
JDX proves he is a nut case by not letting others see what other people say about his video.
JDX will not let you post a comment if it has a story different than his lies.
Looks like he making up some new false ideas for his DVD; bet he is trying to be the LC of the pilot nut cases.
Agree on all points.
Wasn't he one of the LC bigwigs at their old forum and he got kicked out? Or am I confusing him with one of the other nutcases?
DavidJames
3rd January 2007, 01:49 PM
Wasn't he one of the LC bigwigs at their old forum and he got kicked out? Or am I confusing him with one of the other nutcases?JDX started out at LC as a mealy mouthed CTists whose primary rhetorical device was the emoticon (around May last year). He then started posting over 100 times a day and became a mod. Having the maturity of a 12 year old, the increased responsibility went to his head and he started banning people left and right. To the credit of someone at LC, he was stripped of his powers and plastic light saber, sulked off and began his own forum.
uruk
3rd January 2007, 01:51 PM
Or perhaps "Shot Down in Flames"
Or "I'm an a**hole" by Dennis Leary.
****WARNING ADULT LANGUAGE CONTENT****
**DON'T VIEW IF YOUR OFFENDED BY WORDS**
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY67cYJDc9s
babazaroni
3rd January 2007, 02:04 PM
JDX started out at LC as a mealy mouthed CTists whose primary rhetorical device was the emoticon (around May last year). He then started posting over 100 times a day and became a mod. Having the maturity of a 12 year old, the increased responsibility went to his head and he started banning people left and right. To the credit of someone at LC, he was stripped of his powers and plastic light saber, sulked off and began his own forum.
He also likes to monitor the referral logs on his site, then join in the discussion as evidenced by this thread. (http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.html?topic_id=278574&msg=279577#msg279577)
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 02:08 PM
Looks like the D'oh Boy has uploaded a trailer for his widdle "film"...
Don't shoot the messenger, but yeah, it's pretty bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Oh, and comments have to be "approved" by D'oh Boy. Ahh, yes, yet another exhibition of the D'oh Boy trying to control the message and the medium, and his fear of criticism and fair comment.
(Sorry, I don't know how to use the embedded youtube function - I will try to figure it out - but in the meantime, I just posted the direct link)
Edit to add: With thanks to Lisa, here is the proper link:
yojJhxoL1ag&eurl=
Go ahead make a comment on the video at youtube; see if you can make it to being posted; keep JDX the NAZI like censor busy! If you have to watch the JDX junk you should be able to post!
JDX you are more of a fraud than your videos; that takes extra work!
Keep the NAZI like censorship one man fraud busy! post a reply today.
JDX censorship master of fraud! Good job JDX!
Calcas
3rd January 2007, 02:29 PM
I posted a reply but it has to go to Robbie boy for approval first. Fat chance.
What kind of friggin system does youtube and the others run that they allow the posters to censor any and all comments? If you put something on the net, anything (from a feedback standpoint) should be allowed.
Horatius
3rd January 2007, 02:32 PM
He also likes to monitor the referral logs on his site, then join in the discussion as evidenced by this thread. (http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.html?topic_id=278574&msg=279577#msg279577)
I like seeing threads like that. Nice to see others blowing holes in the CTist arguments. Gives one hope.
Firestone
3rd January 2007, 03:30 PM
I posted a reply but it has to go to Robbie boy for approval first. Fat chance.
What kind of friggin system does youtube and the others run that they allow the posters to censor any and all comments? If you put something on the net, anything (from a feedback standpoint) should be allowed.Yep.
But, one can apparently post comments about a user (http://www.youtube.com/profile_comment_post?user=johndoeXLC), so I posted a comment about johndoeXLC. It doesn't look as if he can censor that. :)
(Although I don't really know how the Youtube site works.)
Horatius
3rd January 2007, 03:33 PM
I posted a reply but it has to go to Robbie boy for approval first. Fat chance.
What kind of friggin system does youtube and the others run that they allow the posters to censor any and all comments? If you put something on the net, anything (from a feedback standpoint) should be allowed.
Could we have a prize for the most subtle debunking that gets through the censorship process? That'd be fun!
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 03:59 PM
Could we have a prize for the most subtle debunking that gets through the censorship process? That'd be fun!
He has banned some for life! I am banned for life from posting to JDX; like a gag order! youtube facilitates NAZI like censorship! (is that against some law?)
JimBenArm
3rd January 2007, 04:00 PM
He has banned some for life! I am banned for life from posting to JDX; like a gag order! youtube facilitates NAZI like censorship! (is that against some law?)
No, since it's a private site, not associated with any government agency. They can ban anyone they like, for any (or no) reason.
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 04:02 PM
Yep.
But, one can apparently post comments about a user (http://www.youtube.com/profile_comment_post?user=johndoeXLC), so I posted a comment about johndoeXLC. It doesn't look as if he can censor that. :)
(Although I don't really know how the Youtube site works.)
He will block you soon. I can see your comment but I cannot comment; bet his list of blocked people is growing.
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 04:21 PM
No, since it's a private site, not associated with any government agency. They can ban anyone they like, for any (or no) reason.
Yes; I am joking; I like it when things become self critiquing.
By massive censorship JDX has become exactly like, and doing a better job, the people he hates who not only do not push an official story are just moving on. JDX has taken 5 years to find out he is nuts and does not even know it.
One thing I have learned from CT dolts is I need to "'shoot down" all liars no matter what my political biases are; and I have learned that from the whole spectrum of biased idiots bashing Reagan - Carter - Nixon - Johnson - Bush - Clinton - Kerry - John Birch - Jane Fonda - Jack Sh@# etc.
It is cool to debate politics, but would be cool to keep the facts straight up.
JDX never asked questions; he just pushes his agenda; So far pilots for truth are a few nut cases (25; some real nuts, others just dumb on 9/11)
I think they should be free to censor - what was that story about those who became more equal than others - in his own mind he has power to ban others ideas - his "open mind" must of facilitated his brain's escape to freedom.
Gravy
3rd January 2007, 04:25 PM
I can't watch it. I don't want to see myself die when the patriots take over.
Oliver
3rd January 2007, 04:42 PM
I love AC/DC - can´t believe that JDX is trying to ruin my love for Rock´n´Roll... http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/angry002.gif
Architect
3rd January 2007, 05:10 PM
I can't watch it. I don't want to see myself die when the patriots take over.
Aha, but if it's successful who do you want to play you in the Hollywood version? ;)
Orphia Nay
3rd January 2007, 05:13 PM
At least we can rate it poorly. I signed up at youtube just to do so. My vote yesterday for "poor" made its rating go from 3 stars down to 1 star, but I see it's back up to 3 again.
JAStewart
3rd January 2007, 05:37 PM
Way to use an amazing song for that POS.
Calcas
3rd January 2007, 07:12 PM
Oh, Robbie let one post of mine stand on his little home movie.
Then he put up a "snappy comeback"...LOL.
Then he blocked me from any more comments.
*Sigh* He and Killtown are cut from the same cloth.
LashL
3rd January 2007, 07:18 PM
Or "I'm an a**hole" by Dennis Leary.
****WARNING ADULT LANGUAGE CONTENT****
**DON'T VIEW IF YOUR OFFENDED BY WORDS**
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY67cYJDc9s
That would be most fitting, indeed.
:D
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 07:19 PM
johndoeXLC (http://www.youtube.com/user/johndoeXLC) (3 hours ago)
It will all come together nicely when the film is released. I promise. With many more surprises. ;-)
OMG; he is a number 1 standard CT super nut job;
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 07:22 PM
JDX you should explain why the FDR stopped recording and is missing 3 to 6 seconds of data! hi (or why it is not missing data; hello)
I can not post much to JDX, he is a censor of all thought other than his own CT logic.
Dog Town
3rd January 2007, 07:29 PM
I hope for JDX's sake, he got clearance for the music. Think I'll give some friends, at Sony a call.
Federal law provides severe civil and criminal penalties for the unauthorized reproduction, distribution, rental or digital transmission of copyrighted sound recordings. (Title 17, United States Code, Sections 501 and 506). The FBI investigates allegations of criminal copyright infringement and violators will be prosecuted..
He is selling it right?
babazaroni
3rd January 2007, 07:32 PM
I hope for JDX's sake, he got clearance for the music. Think I'll give some friends, at Sony a call.
He is selling it right?
Don't even have to sell it for it to be a violation.
I don't care if thousands of others are doing it.
Can we report him to YouTube?
Calcas
3rd January 2007, 07:33 PM
I hope for JDX's sake, he got clearance for the music. Think I'll give some friends, at Sony a call.
He is selling it right?
I guarantee you he didn't get clearance for the music. He's not bright enough or rich enough.
Make the call.
And then watch him pull it with some lame ass excuse...LOL.
Dog Town
3rd January 2007, 07:40 PM
Make the call.
Calls made. Be outa pocket next day or so, will get to bottom of this, by then.
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 07:45 PM
Yes, since RIAA is suing the kids for mp3s; they will sue JDX the 5k plus for selling copy right stuff. That is just one offense; if and when he does sell that is multiple copy right infractions.
Does LC have real music? They have made a lot of money. Or did they pull off all copy right stuff?
Arkan_Wolfshade
3rd January 2007, 07:47 PM
Flag it as inappropriate and choose "Other ToU Violation" option. It violates their Terms of Use section 5 subsection c
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 07:56 PM
JDX seems to of missed hitting the Petagon as the terrorist did; he can not hit the same spot; a simple task most pilots can do with no hands just their knee on the stick!
If JDX states on one can hit the same spot over and over; it only proves he is not a good pilot.
I was watching his attempt, I guess it is him, to hit the Pentagon on MS Flight Sim.
Can you use video of MS Flight Sim for commercial purposes? Or spreading biased political BS. Who is the legal expert here; OK I have to read the darn agreement.
Good job posting on JDX video; but you will be banned by the truth NAZI.
beachnut
3rd January 2007, 08:26 PM
Calcas (http://www.youtube.com/user/Calcas) (5 hours ago)
B.S. Anyone who thinks flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon is a nutjob. And what's scary is that this JDX guys says he's a pilot.
(Reply (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yojJhxoL1ag&mode=related&search=#))
johndoeXLC (http://www.youtube.com/user/johndoeXLC) (4 hours ago)
Looks like someone doesnt know how to use the FAA database. Not surprising coming from someone who spends his every waking hour in front of a computer with people he thinks are 'nutjobs'. Get a life Calcas.
Yes JDX, johndoe, is a pilot; But funny thing is the pilots (terrorists) he said were not good enough to fly a Cessna; were also pilots! (anyone want to fly with an idiot who thinks a 40 pitch down into a target is a good idea; even for terrorist?) (frightening!!! one could hope he is lying and his father/brother/friend does not know he has stolen his identity)
Looks like JDX is just as good as, if not worse, than the terrorist pilots. He talks a really dumb game, bet he is frightful to fly with.
Like I said go to his pilots place, he is the first member; he is FAAed just like the terrorist! Maybe he was the fifth pilot and he chickened out; and now he is doing his propaganda as penitence for his yellow streak. (this is a nut case CT idea applied to the life and times of JDX, the pilot who is missing a few things here and there. If JDX is the fifth pilot this was just an accidental secret reviled and I was just using CT logic to prove it)
babazaroni
3rd January 2007, 08:29 PM
In the new trailer comment section, JDX says he has new recorded calls.
I found this from a few months ago
YPF4Lo4wkJ4
I suspect he has made more recorded calls to various folks in an attempt to ambush then claim they are hiding the twoof.
In the call above, someone from PF911T tries to get answers about true altitude vs pressure altitude and says the plane was too high to hit the lightpoles.
I could not listen to it all, its just so irritating.
bonavada
3rd January 2007, 09:48 PM
Looks like the D'oh Boy has uploaded a trailer for his widdle "film"...
Oh, and comments have to be "approved" by D'oh Boy. Ahh, yes, yet another exhibition of the D'oh Boy trying to control the message and the medium, and his fear of criticism and fair comment.
fixed feel free to comment here :-} (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mYzs86ZHQ4)
wonder if doughboy will have any complaints about copyright violations......
BV
LashL
3rd January 2007, 11:52 PM
fixed feel free to comment here :-} (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mYzs86ZHQ4)
wonder if doughboy will have any complaints about copyright violations......
BV
He presents like a freakish child who thinks that negative attention is a good thing. Perhaps he was neglected as a youngster (last year) and feels that posting nonsense from his Mom's basement (this year) empowers him or something.
He's not getting any attention at his pathetic little forum and he got booted out of the loosewiththetruth forum where he mistakenly thought he had gained the attention he craves, so this is his next try - a do over, if you will :)
I don't know what his problem is precisely, as I am not a psychiatrist, but I do know, without a doubt, that he has serious problems. Poor widdle boy.
beachnut
4th January 2007, 12:19 AM
fixed feel free to comment here :-} (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mYzs86ZHQ4)
wonder if doughboy will have any complaints about copyright violations......
BV
are a genius
babazaroni
4th January 2007, 12:47 AM
JDX lists Lyte Trip as one of his Eyewitness Experts.
He even lists private pilots and sailplane pilots and still comes up with such few members.
Dog Town
5th January 2007, 10:08 PM
Make the call.
The well runs deeper. My friends at Sony said, talk to Warner-Chappell ( as in owns licen rights)! Done! Recent girlfriend works, for the Catalogue! Game on! I see big lawsuits, on the horizon, I see trouble on the way! Anyone know that he "really" has it on the DVD? First question to be answered. They'll buy one copy to see, I am sure. He has not bought the rights , of that I am assured! This should be interesting!
babazaroni
5th January 2007, 10:13 PM
The well runs deeper. My friends at Sony said, talk to Warner-Chappell ( as in owns licen rights)! Done! Recent girlfriend works, for the Catalogue! Game on! I see big lawsuits, on the horizon, I see trouble on the way! Anyone know that he "really" has it on the DVD? First question to be answered. They'll buy one copy to see, I am sure. He has not bought the rights , of that I am assured! This should be interesting!
Well, if he's smart, he'll take it out before the release.
If he does, that will be a win for JREF.
Any bets?
LashL
5th January 2007, 10:14 PM
JDX lists Lyte Trip as one of his Eyewitness Experts.
:dl:
LashL
5th January 2007, 10:15 PM
The well runs deeper. My friends at Sony said, talk to Warner-Chappell ( as in owns licen rights)! Done! Recent girlfriend works, for the Catalogue! Game on! I see big lawsuits, on the horizon, I see trouble on the way! Anyone know that he "really" has it on the DVD? First question to be answered. They'll buy one copy to see, I am sure. He has not bought the rights , of that I am assured! This should be interesting!
Very interesting indeed. Great work, Dog Town :)
Arkan_Wolfshade
5th January 2007, 10:33 PM
This may well turn in to a fun slap back in to reality for him. Or rather, fun to watch.
Dog Town
5th January 2007, 11:59 PM
Well, if he's smart, he'll take it out before the release.
If he does, that will be a win for JREF.
Any bets?
From what I gather, at the least, a contract for $, will be handed to him! If he is indeed, not smart enough, he will be in deep doo doo!
Not too sure about the JREF part, but it will be victory for musicians, and quite prob "da jooos"! Fcuk'em if they can't...
DT
Gonna be gone, for the next five days, check ya!
jhunter1163
6th January 2007, 03:38 AM
Now I've got "Bad Moon Rising" stuck in my head...
I see... no completed contracts
I see... lawyers on the way..
Looks like, he's in for nasty weather
Looks like, he's gonna have to pay
Don't try to plagiarize
'Cause it's bound to see the light
Under JREF's watchful eyes
With apologies to John Fogerty. I know it's pretty lame but it's five in the morning here, best I could do.
Big Les
6th January 2007, 12:50 PM
Nice to see some love for Angus and the gang on here. I too find his co-opting of the band irritating. Besides, wouldn't "Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap" have been a more appropriate choice?
LashL
6th January 2007, 01:47 PM
Nice to see some love for Angus and the gang on here. I too find his co-opting of the band irritating. Besides, wouldn't "Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap" have been a more appropriate choice?
Indeed.
And great sig line you have there, Big Les :D
EvilBiker
6th January 2007, 01:51 PM
Nice to see some love for Angus and the gang on here. I too find his co-opting of the band irritating. Besides, wouldn't "Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap" have been a more appropriate choice?
Bwahahahahaa! Perfect choice!
...I would put forward "Big Balls" as an underlying theme tune for Gravy....
chipmunk stew
6th January 2007, 02:07 PM
Flag it as inappropriate and choose "Other ToU Violation" option. It violates their Terms of Use section 5 subsection c
Worth repeating:
C. In connection with User Submissions, you further agree that you will not: (i) submit material that is copyrighted, protected by trade secret or otherwise subject to third party proprietary rights, including privacy and publicity rights, unless you are the owner of such rights or have permission from their rightful owner to post the material and to grant YouTube all of the license rights granted herein; (ii) publish falsehoods or misrepresentations that could damage YouTube or any third party; (iii) submit material that is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, threatening, pornographic, harassing, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive, or encourages conduct that would be considered a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, violate any law, or is otherwise inappropriate; (iv) post advertisements or solicitations of business: (v) impersonate another person. YouTube does not endorse any User Submission or any opinion, recommendation, or advice expressed therein, and YouTube expressly disclaims any and all liability in connection with User Submissions. YouTube does not permit copyright infringing activities and infringement of intellectual property rights on its Website, and YouTube will remove all Content and User Submissions if properly notified that such Content or User Submission infringes on another's intellectual property rights. YouTube reserves the right to remove Content and User Submissions without prior notice. YouTube will also terminate a User's access to its Website, if they are determined to be a repeat infringer. A repeat infringer is a User who has been notified of infringing activity more than twice and/or has had a User Submission removed from the Website more than twice. YouTube also reserves the right to decide whether Content or a User Submission is appropriate and complies with these Terms of Service for violations other than copyright infringement and violations of intellectual property law, such as, but not limited to, pornography, obscene or defamatory material, or excessive length. YouTube may remove such User Submissions and/or terminate a User's access for uploading such material in violation of these Terms of Service at any time, without prior notice and at its sole discretion.
LashL
6th January 2007, 03:04 PM
Worth repeating:
Yes, indeed. Thanks for highlighting that.
jhunter1163
6th January 2007, 06:15 PM
Maybe "Shot Down In Flames"...
Brainache
6th January 2007, 06:30 PM
Maybe the sequel will include "Jail Break".
I think he chose an Aussie band as a tribute to Billzilla.
LashL
6th January 2007, 07:45 PM
Maybe the sequel will include "Jail Break".
I think he chose an Aussie band as a tribute to Billzilla.
:dl:
beachnut
7th January 2007, 01:46 AM
Who would buy this junk? Not the sane.
Big Les
7th January 2007, 10:23 AM
Indeed.
And great sig line you have there, Big Les :D
Thanks; It may not be word-for-word accurate, since I heard on a rerun of the show the other day and thought of "them" right away. Does Futurama have a conspiracy-themed episode I wonder? I haven't seen all of them.
Arkan_Wolfshade
7th January 2007, 10:43 AM
Thanks; It may not be word-for-word accurate, since I heard on a rerun of the show the other day and thought of "them" right away. Does Futurama have a conspiracy-themed episode I wonder? I haven't seen all of them.
Fry and the Slurm Factory
Roswell That Ends Well
Big Les
7th January 2007, 12:06 PM
D'oh! I saw the Slurm factory one only recently; my memory is failing me. I'll have to check out the Roswell ep though. New series soon too!
Oliver
7th January 2007, 05:16 PM
I love JDX´s response... :D
not bad for a trailer.. although i have seen that my 'fan club' over at JREF has made new accounts on youtube just to get the ratings down. http://209.85.48.10/8872/98/emo/laughing1.gif
Man those people really need to get a life...
LashL
7th January 2007, 05:20 PM
I love JDX´s response... :D
He flatters himself. I've had an account there for ages and I'm sure others have, too. He just hates to admit that his video is crap and thus it has attracted crap ratings.
beachnut
7th January 2007, 05:22 PM
I love JDX´s response... :D
He says this as he posts to the silly posts and then when some is proved to tell the truth he runs away.
Bye JDX, your web forum has one or two idiots; are the top guns too lazy to play.
Hi JDX! You web weeny!
I love it when he said we need a life. Sorry we can not censor comments as you do with your world.
What was it they called JDX. Like the soup NAZI, JDX is the "censor NAZI", "no commment for you!".
apathoid
7th January 2007, 08:25 PM
What was it they called JDX. Like the soup NAZI, JDX is the "censor NAZI", "no commment for you!".
LMAO beachnut!
Dog Town
11th January 2007, 09:24 PM
Contacted by legal, at Warner-Chappell today, forwarded the AC/DC abuse.
They sound pissed. Will let you know when I hear more.
DT
R.Mackey
11th January 2007, 09:27 PM
Man, I knew I should have ripped off Accept instead...
It may seem cruel, but these kids have got to grow up somehow.
LashL
11th January 2007, 09:41 PM
Contacted by legal, at Warner-Chappell today, forwarded the AC/DC abuse.
They sound pissed. Will let you know when I hear more.
DT
Thanks for the update, Dog Town. This could get very interesting, indeed!
Orphia Nay
11th January 2007, 10:02 PM
Good Work, Dog Town. Hehehe. JDX himself will probably be singing, "I'm on the Highway to Hell" before long. :D
(Although the thought crossed my mind earlier that that is a Twoofer's soundtrack to their life - what with the fear and paranoia and all.)
Now I've got "Bad Moon Rising" stuck in my head...
I see... no completed contracts
I see... lawyers on the way..
Looks like, he's in for nasty weather
Looks like, he's gonna have to pay
Don't try to plagiarize
'Cause it's bound to see the light
Under JREF's watchful eyes
With apologies to John Fogerty. I know it's pretty lame but it's five in the morning here, best I could do.
That's pretty good, actually! :newlol
I love JDX´s response... :D
I did actually say I had to sign up at youtube to vote his clip down. I'd actually say that that means I have a life, not having come across that sort of crap before, and not spending all day everyday at youtube like Twoofers seem to.
Crungy
11th January 2007, 10:03 PM
Contacted by legal, at Warner-Chappell today, forwarded the AC/DC abuse.
They sound pissed. Will let you know when I hear more.
DT
Bon Scott is rollin' in his grave.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.